886
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Teacher Adaptations to a Core Reading Program: Increasing Access to Curriculum for Elementary Students in Urban Classrooms

References

  • Achinstein, B. A., & Ogawa, R. T. (2006). (In)fidelity: What the resistance of new teachers reveals about professional principles and prescriptive educational policies. Harvard Educational Review, 76(1), 30–63. doi:10.17763/haer.76.1.e14543458r811864
  • Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2003). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Bondy, E., Ross, D. D., Gallingame, C., & Hambacher, E. (2007). Creating environments of success and resilience: Culturally responsive classroom management and more. Urban Education, 42(4), 326–348. doi:10.1177/0042085907303406
  • Campbell, E. (2006). Curricular and professional authority in schools. Curriculum Inquiry, 36(2), 111–118. doi:10.1111/j.1467-873X.2006.00349.x
  • Coburn, C. E. (2004). Beyond decoupling: Rethinking the relationship between the institutional environment and the classroom. Sociology of Education, 77(3), 211–244. doi:10.1177/003804070407700302
  • Corno, L. (2008). On teaching adaptively. Educational Psychologist, 43(3), 161–173. doi:10.1080/00461520802178466
  • Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). The flat world and education: How America’s commitment to equity will determine our future. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Darling-Hammond, L. & Bransford, J. (Eds.). (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
  • Duffy, G. G. (2002). Visioning and the development of outstanding teachers. Reading Research and Instruction, 41(4), 331–343. doi:10.1080/19388070209558375
  • Duffy, G. G., & Hoffman, J. V. (1999). In pursuit of an illusion: The flawed search for a perfect method. The Reading Teacher, 53(1), 10–16.
  • Duffy, G. G., Miller, S. D., Kear, K., Parsons, S. A., Davis, S., & Williams, B. (2008). Teachers’ instructional adaptations during literacy instruction. In Y. Kim, V. Risko, D. L. Compton, D. K. Dickinson, M. K. Hundley, R. T. Jimenez, … D. W. Rowe (Eds.), 57th yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 160–171). Oak Creek, WI: NRC.
  • Duffy, G. G., Webb, S., Parsons, S., Kear, K., & Miller, S. (2006). Does thoughtfully adaptive teaching exist? In first steps in a longitudinal study of literacy teaching and literacy education. A paper presented at the National Reading Conference, Los Angeles, CA.
  • Duke, N. K., & Pearson, P. D. (2002). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In A. E. Farstrup & S. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (pp. 205–242). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
  • Dweck, C. W. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality and development. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
  • Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 119–161). New York, NY: MacMillan
  • Fairbanks, C. M., Duffy, G. G., Faircloth, B. S., Ye, H., Levin, B., Rohr, J., & Stein, C. (2010). Beyond knowledge: Exploring why some teachers are more thoughtfully adaptive than others. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 161–171. doi:10.1177/0022487109347874
  • Gambrell, L. B., Malloy, J. A., Marinak, B. A., & Mazzoni, S. A. (2015). Evidence-based best practices for comprehensive literacy instruction in the age of the Common Core Standards. In L. M. Morrow & L. B. Gambrell (Eds.), Best practices in literacy instruction (5th ed., pp. 3–36).New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
  • Gamse, B. C. (2008). Reading First impact study: Final report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
  • Gee, J. P. (2008). Learning in semiotic domains: A social and situated account. In M. Prinsloo & M. Baynham (Eds.), Literacies, global and local (pp. 137–151). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  • Hammond, Z. (2015). Culturally responsive teaching and the brain: Promoting authentic engagement and rigor among culturally and linguistically diverse students. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
  • Harvey, S., & Goudvis, A. (2007). Strategies that work: Teaching comprehension for understanding and engagement (2nd ed.). Portland, ME: Stenhouse.
  • Herrell, A. L., & Jordan, M. (2008). Fifty strategies for teaching English language learners. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
  • Hollie, S. (2012). Culturally and linguistically responsive teaching and learning. Huntington Beach, CA: Shell Education.
  • Kersten, J., & Pardo, L. (2007). Finessing and hybridizing: Innovative literacy practices in reading first classrooms. The Reading Teacher, 61(2), 146–154. doi:10.1598/RT.61.2.4
  • Ladson-Billings, G. (1994). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Mahiri, J., & Maniates, H. (2013). The tough part: Getting first graders engaged in reading. The Reading Teacher, 67(4), 255–263. doi:10.1002/trtr.2013.67.issue-4
  • Maniates, H., & Mahiri, J. (2011). Post-scripts: Teaching reading in the aftermath of prescriptive curriculum policies. Language Arts, 89(1), 10–21.
  • McGregor, T. (2007). Comprehension connections: Bridges to strategic reading. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Milner, H. R. (2014). Scripted and narrowed curriculum in school reform. Urban Education, 49(7), 743–749. doi:10.1177/0042085914549685
  • Moje, E. B., & Lewis, C. (2007). Examining opportunities to learn literacy: The role of critical sociocultural literacy research. In C. Lewis, P. Enciso, & E. B. Moje (Eds.), Reframing sociocultural research on literacy: Identity, agency, and power. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Onosko, J. (2011). Race to the top leaves children and future citizens behind: The devastating effects of centralization, standardization, and high stakes accountability. Democracy and Education, 19(2), 1–11.
  • Pease-Alvarez, L., & Samway, K. D. (2008). Negotiating a top-down reading program mandate: The experiences of one school. Language Arts, 86(1), 32–41.
  • Randi, J., & Corno, L. (2005). Teaching and learner variation. Pedagogy: Learning from Teaching. British Journal of Educational Psychology, Monograph Series II, (3), 47–69.
  • Sloan, K. (2006). Teacher identity and agency in school worlds: Beyond the all-good/all-bad discourse on accountability-explicit curriculum policies. Curriculum Inquiry, 36(2), 119–152. doi:10.1111/j.1467-873X.2006.00350.x
  • SRA/McGraw Hill. (2002). Open Court reading program. Columbus, OH: SRA/McGraw Hill.
  • Stake, R. E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 443–466). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
  • Tomlinson, C. (1999). Mapping a route toward differentiated instruction. Educational Leadership, 57(1), 12–16.
  • Vaughn, M., & Faircloth, B. S. (2011). Understanding teacher visioning and agency during literacy instruction. In P. J. Dunston, L. B. Gambrell, K. Headley, S. K. Fullerton, P. M. Stecker, V. R. Gillis, & C. C. Bates (Eds.), 60th yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 156–164). Oak Creek, WI: LRA.
  • Vaughn, M., & Parsons, S. A. (2013). Adaptive teachers as innovators: Instructional adaptations opening spaces for enhanced literacy learning. Language Arts, 91(2), 81–93.
  • Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.