Using Relevance Prompts: An Exploratory Study to Promote Eighth Graders’ Comprehension and Retelling of Narrative Text

References

• Association for Middle Level Education (AMLE). (2010). This we believe: Keys to educating young adolescents. Westerville, OH: National Middle School Association.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, L., & Wigfield, A. (1999). Dimensions of children’s motivation for reading and their relations to reading activity and reading achievement. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 452–477. doi:10.1598/RRQ.34.4.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brozo, W. G., & Afflerbach, P. P. (2010). Adolescent literacy inventory: Grades 6–12. New York, NY: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Fogarty, M., Oslund, E., Simmons, D., Davis, J., Simmons, L., Anderson, L., & Roberts, G. (2014). Examining effectiveness of a multicomponent reading comprehension intervention in middle schools: A focus on treatment fidelity. Educational Psychology Review, 26, 425–449. doi:10.1007/s10648-014-9270-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T., & Davis, M. H. (2003). Motivating struggling readers in middle school through an engagement model of classroom practice. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19, 59–85. doi:10.1080/10573560308203
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., & Klauda, S. L. (2012). Adolescents’ engagement in academic literacy. Retrieved from http://cori.umd.edu/research-publications/2012_adolescents_engagement_ebook.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Henry, O. (1905). After twenty years. Retrieved from https://americanenglish.state.gov/files/ae/resource_files/after-twenty-years.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hoyle, R. H. (Ed.). (1999). Statistical strategies for small sample research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hulleman, C. S., Godes, O., Hendricks, B. L., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010). Enhancing interest and performance with a utility value intervention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 880–895. doi:10.1037/a0019506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulleman, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2009). Promoting interest and performance in high school science classes. Science, 326, 1410–1412. doi:10.1126/science.1177067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keene, E., & Zimmerman, S. (1997). Mosaic of thought. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Linderholm, T., & van den Broek, P. (2002). The effects of reading purpose and working memory capacity on the processing of expository text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 778–784. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.4.778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipstein, R. L., & Renninger, K. A. (2007). Putting things into words: The development of 12–15 year olds’ interest for writing. In P. Boscolo & S. Hidi (Eds.), Motivation and writing: Research and school practice (pp. 113–140). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacGinitie, W. H., MacGinitie, R. K., Maria, K., & Dreyer, L. G. (2010). Gates-MacGinitie reading tests (4th ed.). Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• McCrudden, M. T. (2011). Do specific relevance instructions promote transfer appropriate processing? Instructional Science, 39, 865–879. doi:10.1007/s11251-010-9158-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrudden, M. T., Magliano, J. P., & Schraw, G. (2010). Exploring how relevance instructions affect personal reading intentions, reading goals and text processing: A mixed methods study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35, 229–241. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrudden, M. T., Schraw, G., & Hartley, K. (2006). The effect of general relevance instructions on shallow and deeper learning and reading time. The Journal of Experimental Education, 74, 291–310. doi:10.3200/JEXE.74.4.291-310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2013). The nation’s report card: A first look: 2013 mathematics and reading (NCES 2014-451). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Science. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/subject/publications/main2013/pdf/2014451.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards for English language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Washington, DC: Authors. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/assets/Appendix_B.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs and mathematical problem solving of gifted students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 325–344. doi:10.1006/ceps.1996.0025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, D. K., & Vaughn, S. (2012). Retell as an indicator of reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16, 187–217. doi:10.1080/10888438.2010.538780
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renninger, K. A., Bachrach, J. E., & Posey, S. K. E. (2008). Learner interest and achievement motivation. In M. Maehr, S. Karabenick, & T. Urdan (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 15, pp. 461–491). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.
   Google Scholar
• Schiefele, U., Schaffner, E., Möller, J., & Wigfield, A. (2012). Dimensions of reading motivation and their relation to reading behavior and competence. Reading Research Quarterly, 47, 427–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, C. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Tovani, C. (2000). I read it, but I don’t get it: Comprehension strategies for adolescent readers. Portland, ME: Stenhouse.
   Google Scholar
• van den Broek, P., Lorch, R. F., Linderholm, T., & Gustafson, M. (2001). The effects of readers’ goals on inference generation and memory for texts. Memory & Cognition, 29, 1081–1087. doi:10.3758/BF03206376
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanzek, J., Vaughn, S., Scammacca, N., Metz, K., Murray, C. S., Roberts, G., & Danielson, L. (2013). Extensive reading interventions for students with reading difficulties after grade 3. Review of Educational Research, 83, 163–195. doi:10.3102/0034654313477212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (2002). Relevance theory. In L. R. Horn & G. Ward (Eds.), The handbook of pragmatics (pp. 607–632). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar