Experts and Novices Reading Literature: An Analysis of Disciplinary Literacy in English Language Arts

References

• Afflerbach, P., Pearson, P. D., & Paris, S. G. (2008). Clarifying differences between reading skills and reading strategies. The Reading Teacher, 61(5), 364–373. doi:10.1598/RT.61.5.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, R. C. (2013). Role of the reader’s schema in comprehension, learning, and memory. In D. Alvermann, N. Unrau, & R. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (6th ed., pp. 476–488). Newark, DE: International Reading Association. Authors. ( 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Baumann, J. F., & Kame’enui, E. J. (1991). Research on vocabulary instruction: Ode to Voltaire. In J. Flood, J. J. D. Lapp, & J. R. Squire (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts (pp. 604–632). New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bazerman, C. (1985). Physicists reading physics: Schema-laden purposes and purpose-laden schema. Written Communication, 2(1), 3–23. doi:10.1177/0741088385002001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., & Omanson, R. G. (1987). The effects and uses of diverse vocabulary instructional techniques. In M. G. McKeown & M. E. Curtis (Eds.), The nature of vocabulary acquisition (pp. 147–163). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2003). Qualitative research for education: An instroduction to theories and methods. New York, NY: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Bruffee, K. A. (1999). Collaborative learning: Higher education, interdependence, and the authority of knowledge (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buehl, D. (2011). Developing readers in the academic disciplines. Newark, NJ: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, K. (1966). Language as symbolic action: Essays on life, literature, and method. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cazden, C. B. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Collin, R. (2014). A Bernsteinian analysis of content area literacy. Journal of Literacy Research, 46, 306–329. doi:10.1177/1086296X14552178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culler, J. (1976). Structuralist poetics: Structuralism, linguistics and the study of literature. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duke, N. K., Pearson, P. D., Strachan, S. L., & Billman, A. K. (2011). Essential elements of fostering and teaching reading comprehension. In S. Samuels & A. Farstrup (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (4th ed., pp. 51–93). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Earthman, E. A. (1992). Creating the virtual work: Readers’ processes in understanding literary texts. Research in the Teaching of English, 26(4), 351–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, Z., & Schleppegrell, M. J. (2010). Disciplinary literacies across content areas: Supporting secondary reading through functional language analysis. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 53, 587–597. doi:10.1598/JAAL.53.7.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fish, S. (1980). Is there a text in this class? The authority of interpretive communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, L. (2005). Teachers and content area reading: Attitudes, beliefs and change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 403–414. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2005.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hynd, C., Holschuh, J. P., & Hubbard, B. P. (2004). Thinking like a historian: College students’ reading of multiple historical documents. Journal of Literacy Research, 36, 141–176. doi:10.1207/s15548430jlr3602_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iser, W. (1978). The act of reading. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kintgen, E. R. (1983). The perception of poetry. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C. D., & Spratley, A. (2010). Reading in the disciplines: The challenges of adolescent literacy. New York, NY: Carnegie Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Meyers, J., Lytle, S., Palladino, D., Devenpeck, G., & Green, M. (1990). Think-aloud protocol analysis: An investigation of reading comprehension strategies in fourth- and fifth-grade students. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 8, 112–127. doi:10.1177/073428299000800201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moje, E. B. (2007). Developing socially just subject-matter instruction: A review of the literature on disciplinary literacy teaching. Review of Research in Education, 31, 1–44. doi:10.3102/0091732X07300046001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moje, E. B. (2008). Foregrounding the disciplines in secondary literacy teaching and learning: A call for change. Journal of Adult and Adolescent Literacy, 52, 96–107. doi:10.1598/JAAL.52.2.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, W. T., Jr. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston
   Google Scholar
• Peskin, J. (1998). Constructing meaning when reading poetry: An expert-novice study. Cognition and Instruction, 16(3), 235–263. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1603_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Pressley, M., Brown, R., El-Dinary, P. B., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). The comprehension instruction that students need: Instruction fostering constructively responsive reading. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 10(4), 215–224.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, irony, and solidarity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblatt, L. M. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblatt, L. M. (2013). The transactional theory of reading and writing. In D. Alvermann, N. Unrau, & R. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (6th ed., pp. 923–956). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Rush, L. S., & Reynolds, T. (2014). Literacy support in English/language arts classrooms: Motivation, dialogue, and strategy instruction. In K. Hinchman & H. Sheridan-Thomas (Eds.), Best Practices in adolescent literacy instruction (2nd ed., pp. 249–265). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saldana, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Shanahan, C. (2012). How disciplinary experts read. In T. L. Jetton, & C. Shanahan (Eds.), Adolescent literacy in the academic disciplines: General principles and practical strategies (pp. 69–90). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. (2008). Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content-area literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 40–59. doi:10.17763/haer.78.1.v62444321p602101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. (2012). What is disciplinary literacy and why does it matter? Topics in Language Disorders, 32(1), 7–18. doi:10.1097/TLD.0b013e318244557a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanahan, C., Shanahan, T., & Misischia, C. (2011). Analysis of expert readers in three disciplines: History, mathematics, and chemistry. Journal of Literacy Research, 43(4), 393–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, J. E. (2011). “Generic” and “specific” expertise in English: An expert/expert study in poetry interpretation and academic argument. Cognition and Instruction, 29(4), 349–374. doi:10.1080/07370008.2011.607929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wineburg, S. S. (1991). On the reading of historical texts: Notes on the breach between school and academy. American Educational Research Journal, 28(3), 495–519. doi:10.3102/00028312028003495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeitz, C. M. (1994). Expert-novice differences in memory, abstraction, and reasoning in the domain of literature. Cognition and Instruction, 12(4), 277–312. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1204_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar