Preparing reading/literacy specialists to meet changes and challenges: International Literacy Association’s Standards 2017

References

• Afflerbach, P. (2011). Understanding and using reading assessment K–12 (2nd ed.). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Afflerbach, P. (2016). Reading assessment: Looking ahead. The Reading Teacher, 69(4), 413–419. doi:10.1002/trtr.2016.69.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvermann, D. E., Unrau, N. J., & Ruddell, R. B. (Eds.). (2013). Theoretical models and processes of reading (6th ed.). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Ankrum, J. (2017). Differentiated literacy instruction: Assessing, grouping, teaching. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• August, D., & Shanahan, T. (2006). Report of the National Literacy Panel on language minority children and youth. Philadelphia, PA: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Bean, R., Kern, D., Goatley, V., Ortlieb, E., Shettel, J., Calo, K., … Cassidy, J. (2015). Specialized Literacy Professionals as Literacy Leaders: Results of a National Survey, Literacy Research and Instruction, 54:2, 83–114, DOI:10.1080/19388071.2014.998355
   Google Scholar
• Bean, R. M. (2015). The reading specialist: Leadership and coaching for the classroom, school and community (3rd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bean, R. M., & Ippolito, J. (2016). Cultivating coaching mindsets: An action guide for literacy leaders. West Palm Beach, FL: Learning Sciences International.
   Google Scholar
• Bean, R. M., & Lillenstein, J. (2012). Response to intervention and the changing roles of schoolwide personnel. The Reading Teacher, 65(7), 491–501. doi:10.1002/TRTR.01073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botel, M., & Paparo, L. B. (2016). The plainer truths of teaching, learning, and literacy. Ephrata, PA: Owl Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Breidenstein, A., Fahey, K., Glickman, C., & Hensley, F. (2012). Leading for powerful learning: A guide for instructional leaders. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buly, M., & Valencia, S. (2002). Below the bar: Profiles of students who fail state reading assessments. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(3), 219–239. doi:10.3102/01623737024003219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castek, J. (2015). Instruction with multimodal, multiple texts. Newark, DE: International Literacy Association E-ssentials Series. Retrieved from http://reading.org/general/Publications/e-ssentials/e8064
   Google Scholar
• Christ, T., Arya, P., & Chiu, M. M. (2012). Collaborative peer video analysis: Insights about literacy assessment and instruction. Journal of Literacy Research, 44(2), 171–199. doi:10.1177/1086296X12440429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clay, M. (1966). Emergent reading behaviour ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Connor, C. M., Alberto, P. A., Compton, D. L., & O’Connor, R. E. (2014). Improving reading outcomes for students with or at risk for reading disabilities: A synthesis of the contributions from the Institute of Education Sciences Research Centers (NCSER 2014-3000). Washington, DC: National Center for Special Education Research, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. This report is available on the IES website at http://ies.ed.gov/
   Google Scholar
• Dobbs, C. L., Ippolito, J., & Charner-Laird, M. (2016). Layering intermediate and disciplinary literacy work: Lessons learned from a secondary social studies teacher team. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 60(2), 131–139. doi:10.1002/jaal.547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2013). Common core English language arts in a PLC at work grades 6–8. Bloomington, IN: Solution-tree Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foorman, B. R., & Torgeson, J. (2001). Critical elements of classroom and small-group instruction to promote reading success in all children. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 16(4), 203–212. doi:10.1111/0938-8982.00020
   Google Scholar
• Galloway, E. P., & Lesaux, N. K. (2014). Leader, teacher, diagnostician, colleague, and change agent. The Reading Teacher, 67(7), 517–526. doi:10.1002/trtr.2014.67.issue-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gambrell, L. (2011). Seven rules of engagement: What’s most important to know about motivation to read. The Reading Teacher, 65(3), 172–178. doi:10.1002/trtr.2011.65.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavelek, J. R., Raphael, T. E., Biondo, S. M., & Wang, D. (2000). Integrated literacy instruction. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. III, pp. 587–608). New York, NY: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (1990). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Hebert, M. A. (2010). Writing to read: Evidence for how writing can improve reading. In A Carnegie corporation time to act report. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T. (2008). Engaging adolescents in reading. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. III, pp. 403–422). New York, NY: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, K. D. (2008). Developing a sociocritical literacy in the third space. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(2), 148–164. doi:10.1598/RRQ.43.2.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, K. D., Baquedano-Lopez, P., & Tejeda, C. (1999). Rethinking diversity: Hybridity and hybrid language practices in the third space. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 6(4), 286–303. doi:10.1080/10749039909524733
   Google Scholar
• Hill, J. D., & Bjork, C. L. (2008). Classroom instruction that works with English language learners: Facilitator’s guide. Alexandria, VA: Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Holdaway, D. (1979). The foundations of literacy. Sydney, Australia: Ashton Scholastic.
   Google Scholar
• Hull, G. A., & Schultz, K. (2001). Literacy and learning out of school: A review of theory and research. Review of Educational Research, 71(4), 575–611. doi:10.3102/00346543071004575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Reading Association (IRA). (2010). Standards for reading professionals—Revised. Newark, DE: Author.
   Google Scholar
• International Literacy Association. (2015a). Multiple roles of specialized literacy professionals (Research brief). Newark, DE: Author. Retrieved from https://www.literacyworldwide.org/docs/default-source/where-we-stand/literacy-professionals-research-brief.pdf?sfvrsn=ff3aa28e_10
   Google Scholar
• International Literacy Association. (2015b). Multiple roles of specialized literacy professionals (Position statement). Newark, DE: Author. Retrieved from https://www.literacyworldwide.org/docs/default-source/where-we-stand/literacy-professionals-position-statement.pdf?sfvrsn=f33aa28e_4
   Google Scholar
• International Literacy Association. (2016). Dyslexia: Research advisory. Newark, DE: Author. Retrieved from https://www.literacyworldwide.org/docs/default-source/where-we-stand/ila-dyslexia-research-advisory.pdf?sfvrsn=6
   Google Scholar
• International Literacy Association. (2018). Standards for the preparation of literacy professionals 2017. Newark, DE: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Kamil, M. L., Pearson, P. D., Moje, E. B., & Afflerbach, P. P. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of reading research (Vol. IV). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kern, D. (2011). 62 years of the pendulum’s swing: The role of the reading specialist. New England Reading Association Journal, 46(2), 67–72.
   Google Scholar
• Kriete, R. (2014). The morning meeting book (3rd ed.). Greenfield, MA: Northeast Foundation for Children.
   Google Scholar
• Lacina, J., & Block, C. C. (2011). What matters most in distinguished literacy teacher education programs? Journal of Literacy Research, 43(4), 319–351. doi:10.1177/1086296X11422033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladson-Billings, G. (1994). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African-American children. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491. doi:10.3102/00028312032003465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, J., & Snow, C. (2011). Oral discourse and reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. D. Pearson, E. Moje, & P. Afflerbach (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. IV, pp. 320–338). New York, NY: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Leu, D. J., Kinzer, C., Coiro, J., Castek, J., & Henry, L. A. (2013). A dual level theory of the changing nature of literacy, instruction, and assessment. In N. Unrau & D. Alvermann (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (6th ed., pp. 1150–1181). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Lipson, M. Y., Chomsky-Higgins, P., & Kanfer, J. (2011). Diagnosis: The missing ingredient in RTI assessment. The Reading Teacher, 65(3), 204–208. doi:10.1002/trtr.2011.65.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacArthur, C. A., Graham, S., & Fitzgerald, J. (Eds.). (2016). Handbook of writing research (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGill-Franzen, A., & Allington, R. L. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of reading disability research. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moats, L. (2004). Teaching reading is rocket science: What expert teachers of reading should know and be able to do. Washington, DC: American Federation of Teachers. Retrieved from https://www.aft.org/sites/default/files/reading_rocketscience_2004.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Moje, E. B. (2008). Foregrounding the disciplines in secondary literacy teaching and learning: A call for change. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 52, 96–107. doi:10.1598/JAAL.52.2.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moll, L., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31(2), 132–141. doi:10.1080/00405849209543534
   Google Scholar
• Moll, L., & González, N. (1994). Lessons from research with language minority children. Journal of Reading Behavior, 26(4), 23–41. doi:10.1080/10862969409547862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Early Literacy Panel. (2008). Developing early literacy: Report of the national early literacy panel. Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.
   Google Scholar
• National Governors Association Center for Best Practices (NGA) & Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO). (2010). Common Core State Standards (English language arts). Washington, DC: Authors.
   Google Scholar
• National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Neuman, S., & Dickinson, D. (2001). Handbook for research in early literacy. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ortlieb, E., McVee, M. B., & Shanahan, L. E. (Eds.). (2015). Video reflection in literacy teacher education and development: Lessons from research and practice (Literacy research, practice and evaluation) (Vol. 5). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Paratore, J., Cassano, C., & Schickedanz, J. (2010). Supporting early and later literacy development at home and at school: The long view. In M. L. Kamil, P. D. Pearson, E. B. Moje, & P. P. Afflerback (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. IV, pp. 107–135). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Paris, D. (2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher, 41(3), 93–97. doi:10.3102/0013189X12441244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, P. D., & Hiebert, E. H. (2015). Research-based practices for teaching common core literacy. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pellegrini, A. D., & Galda, L. (1993). Ten years after: A reexamination of symbolic play and literacy research. Reading Research Quarterly, 28(2), 162–175. doi:10.2307/747887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A. (2011). Reading processes and reading problems: Progress toward a universal reading science. In P. McCardle, J. Ren, O. Tzeng, & B. Miller (Eds.), Dyslexia across languages: Orthography and the brain-gene-behavior link (pp. 18–32). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1969). The psychology of the child. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Quatroche, D. J., Bean, R. M., & Hamilton, R. L. (2001). The role of the reading specialist: A review of research. The Reading Teacher, 55(3), 282–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raphael, T. E., & Hiebert, E. H. (2013). Creating an integrated approach to literacy instruction (Reading Essentials Reprint Series). Santa Cruz, CA: TextProject.
   Google Scholar
• Risko, V. J., & Vogt, M. (2016). Professional learning in action: An inquiry approach for teachers of literacy. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rock, M., Gregg, M., Gable, R., & Zigmond, N. P. (2009). Virtual coaching for novice teachers: Technology enables university professors to observe and literally whisper in the ear of a teacher during instruction. Phi Delta Kappan, 91, 36–41. doi:10.1177/003172170909100209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roskos, K. A., & Neuman, S. B. (2001). Environment and its influences for early literacy teaching and learning. In S. B. Neuman & D. K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 281–294). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roskos, K. A., & Neuman, S. B. (2012). Formative assessment: Simply, no additives. The Reading Teacher, 65(8), 534–538. doi:10.1002/TRTR.01079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scanlon, D. M. (2010). Response to intervention as an assessment approach. In A. McGill-Franzen & R. L. Allington (Eds.), Handbook of reading disability research (pp. 139–148). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Scarborough, H. S. (2001). Connecting early language and literacy to later reading (dis)abilities: Evidence, theory, and practice. In S. Neuman & D. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook for research in early literacy (pp. 97–110). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. (2008). Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content-area literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 40–59. doi:10.17763/haer.78.1.v62444321p602101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. (2012). What is disciplinary literacy and why does it matter? Topics in Language Disorders, 32(1), 7–18. doi:10.1097/TLD.0b013e318244557a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, C., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, C., Griffin, P., & Burns, M. S. (2005). Knowledge to support the teaching of reading: Preparing teachers for a changing world. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Snowling, M. G., & Hulme, C. (2011). Evidence-based Interventions for reading and language difficulties: Creating a virtuous circle. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(Pt.1), 1–23. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.2010.02014.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, D. (1983). Family literacy. Exeter, NH: Heinemann Educational Books.
   Google Scholar
• Torgeson, J. K., & Miller, D. H. (2009). Assessments to guide adolescent literacy instruction. Portsmouth, NH: RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction.
   Google Scholar
• Tracey, D. H., & Morrow, L. M. (2017). Lenses on reading: An introduction to theories and models (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vogt, M. E., Echevarria, J., & Short, D. (2010). The SIOP Model for teaching English language arts to English learners. Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Wharton-McDonald, R. (2011). Expert classroom instruction for students with reading disabilities. In A. McGill-Franzen & R. L. Allington (Eds.), Handbook of reading disability research (pp. 265–272). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wixson, K. K., & Valencia, S. W. (2011). Assessment in RTI: What teachers and specialists need to know. The Reading Teacher, 64(6), 466–469. doi:10.1598/RT.64.6.13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfersberger, M., Reutzel, R., Sudweeks, R., & Fawson, P. (2004). Developing and validating the classroom literacy environmental profile (CLEP): A tool for examining the “print richness” of early childhood and elementary classrooms. Journal of Literacy Research, 36(1), 83–144. doi:10.1207/s15548430jlr3602_4
   Google Scholar
• Wood, C. (2007). Yardsticks: Children in classrooms ages 4–14 (3rd ed.). Turners Falls, MA: Center for Responsive Schools.
   Google Scholar