Becoming a Literacy Leader in the 21st Century: Fieldwork that Facilitates the Process

References

• Agar, M. (1996). The professional stranger: An informal introduction to ethnography. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bean, R. M., Cassidy, J., Grumet, J. E., Sheldon, D., & Wallis, S. R. (2002). What do reading specialists do? Results from a national survey. The Reading Teacher, 55(8), 736–744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bean, R. M., Kern, D., Goatley, V., Ortlieb, E., Shettel, J., Calo, K., & Cassidy, J. (2015). Specialized literacy professionals as literacy leaders: Results of a national survey. Literacy Research and Instruction, 54(2), 83–114. doi:10.1080/19388071.2014.998355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bean, R. M., & Wilson, R. M. (1981). Effecting change in school reading programs: The resource role. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Beaver, J. M. (2006). Teacher guide: Developmental reading assessment, grades K–3. Parsippany, N.J, USA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Birt, L., Scott, S., Cavers, D., Campbell, C., & Walter, F. (2016). Member checking: A tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation? Qualitative Health Research, 26, 1802–1811. doi:10.1177/1049732316654870
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud, D. (2007). Reframing assessment as if learning were important. In D. Boud & N. Falchikov (Eds.), Rethinking assessment in higher education: Learning for the longer term (pp. 14–25). New York, NY, USA: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, G. A. (2008). Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: A research note. Qualitative Research, 8(1), 137–152. doi:10.1177/1468794107085301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. S., Goodnow, J. J., & Austin, G. A. (1986). A study of thinking. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Calo, K. M., Sturtevant, E. G., & Kopfman, K. M. (2014). Literacy coaches’ perspectives of themselves as literacy leaders: Results from a national study of K–12 literacy coaching and leadership. Literacy Research and Instruction, 54(1), 1–18. doi:10.1080/19388071.2014.941050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casey, T. (2014). Reflective practice in legal education: The stages of reflection. Clinical Law Review, 20(2), 317–354.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran‐Smith, M., Shakman, K., Jong, C., Terrell, D. G., Barnatt, J., & McQuillan, P. (2009). Good and just teaching: The case for social justice in teacher education. American Journal of Education, 115(3), 347–377. doi:10.1086/597493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, P. (2001). Anticipatory reflection while learning to teach: From a temporally truncated to a temporally distributed model of reflection in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(1), 89–106. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00040-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornett, J., & Knight, J. (2008). Research on coaching. In J. Knight (Ed.), Coaching approaches and perspectives (pp. 192–216). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (1997). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124–130. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danielson, C. (2007). The many faces of leadership. Educational Leadership, 65(1), 14–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (Eds.). (2007). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. San Francisco, CA, USA: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Dettmer, P., Knackendoffel, A., & Thurston, L. P. (2012). Collaboration, consultation, and teamwork for students with special needs. New York, NY, USA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Elish-Piper, L., & L’Allier, S. K. (2011). Examining the relationship between literacy coaching and student reading gains in grades K–3. The Elementary School Journal, 112(1), 83–106. doi:10.1086/660685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenwick, T. (2008). Workplace learning: Emerging trends and new perspectives. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2008(119), 17–26. doi:10.1002/ace.v2008:119
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY, USA: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, L. (2015). Beyond member-checking: A dialogic approach to the research interview. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 38(1), 23–38. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2014.914487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hathaway, J. I., Martin, C. S., & Mraz, M. (2016). Revisiting the roles of literacy coaches: Does reality match research? Reading Psychology, 37(2), 230–256. doi:10.1080/02702711.2015.1025165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Literacy Association. (2017). Standards for the preparation of literacy professionals. International Literacy Association.
   Google Scholar
• International Reading Association. (2000). Teaching all children to read: The roles of the reading specialist: A position statement of the international reading association. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 44(1), 99–104.
   Google Scholar
• International Reading Association. (2010). Standards for reading professionals—Revised 2010. Retrieved from https://www.literacyworldwide.org/get-resources/standards/standards-for-reading-professionals
   Google Scholar
• International Reading Association. (2017). Standards for the preparation of literacy professionals. Retrieved from https://literacyworldwide.org/docs/default-source/resource-documents/draft-ila-standards-2017.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Korthagen, F. A. (2004). In search of the essence of a good teacher: Towards a more holistic approach in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(1), 77–97. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2003.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, L., Walker, D., Zimmerman, D. P., Cooper, J. E., Lambert, M. D., Gardner, M. E., & Szabo, M. (2002). The constructivist leader (2nd ed.). New York, NY, USA: Teachers College Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2006). Transformational school leadership for large-scale reform: Effects on students, teachers, and their classroom practices. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(2), 201–227. doi:10.1080/09243450600565829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Loughran, J. J. (2002). Effective reflective practice in search of meaning in learning about teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(1), 33–43. doi:10.1177/0022487102053001004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath, K., & Erwin, R. (2015). University-based literacy center: Benefits for the college and the community. AILACTE Journal, 12(1), 93–117.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mraz, M., Algozzine, B., & Watson, P. (2008). Perceptions and expectations of roles and responsibilities of literacy coaching. Literacy Research and Instruction, 47(2), 99–115. doi:10.1080/19388070802059076
   Google Scholar
• Mraz, M., Salas, S., Mercado, L., Dikotla, M., & Thoghda, M. N. (2016). Teaching better together: Literacy coaching as collaborative professional development. U. S. Department of State: English Teaching Forum, 54(4), 24–31.
   Google Scholar
• No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, P.L. 107-110, 20 U.S.C. § 6319. (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Paris, S. G., & Paris, A. H. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 36(2), 89–101. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3602_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, P. D., & Gallagher, G. (1983). The gradual release of responsibility model of instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8(3), 112–123.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, D. C. (1995). The good, the bad, and the ugly: The many faces of constructivism. Educational Researchers, 24(7), 5–12. doi:10.3102/0013189X024007005
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1951). The child’s conception of the world (Vol. 213). Latham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Quatroche, D. J., Bean, R. M., & Hamilton, R. L. (2001). The role of the reading specialist: A review of research. The Reading Teacher, 55(3), 282–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quatroche, D. J., & Wepner, S. B. (2008). Developing reading specialists as leaders: New direction for programming development. Literacy Research and Instruction. doi:10.1080/19388070701878816
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY, USA: NY Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, M. L. (2007). Preparing reading specialists to be literacy coaches: Principles, practices, possibilities. Journal of Language and Literacy Education, 3(1), 6–17.
   Google Scholar
• Shuy, T. (2010). Self-regulated learning. Retrieved from https://lincs.ed.gov/sites/default/files/3_TEAL_Self%20Reg%20Learning.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, N. L. (2010). The high school literacy coach: Searching for an identity. Journal of Education, 191(3), 19–25. doi:10.1177/002205741119100304
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Toll, C. A. (2014). The literacy coach’s survival guide: Essential questions and practical answers. Newark, DE, USA: International Reading Assoc.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, G. (2000). Dialogic inquiry in education: Building on Vygotsky’s legacy. In C. D. Lee & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research (pp. 51–85). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar