Orienting the Map: Where K to 12 Teachers Stand in Relation to Text Complexity

References

• Adams, M. J. (2009). The challenge of advanced texts: The interdependence of reading and learning. In E. H. Hiebert (Ed.), Reading more, reading better: Are american students
   Google Scholar
• reading enough of the right stuff? (pp. 163–189). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Allington, R. L., McCuiston, K., & Billen, M. (2015). What research says about text complexity and learning to read. The Reading Teacher, 68(7),491–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Applebee, A. N. (1993). Literature in the secondary school: Studies of curriculum and instruction in the united states. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
   Google Scholar
• Armbruster, B. B., Lehr, F., Osborn, J., O’Rourke, R., Beck, I., Carnine, D., & Simmons, D. (2001). Put reading first. Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.
   Google Scholar
• Carver, R. P., & Leibert, R. E. (1995). The effect of reading library books at different levels of difficulty upon gain in reading ability. Reading Research Quarterly, 26–48.
   Google Scholar
• Clayton, J. K. (2011). Changing diversity in US schools: The impact on elementary student performance and achievement. Education and urban society, 43(6),671–695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2017). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher D. & Frey N. & Lapp, D. (2012). Text Complexity: Raising Rigor in Reading. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2014). Addressing CCSS anchor standard 10: Text complexity. Language Arts, 91(4), 236.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2015). Selecting texts and tasks for content area reading and learning. The Reading Teacher, 68(7),524–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, J., Elmore, J., Koons, H., Hiebert, E. H., Bowen, K., Sanford-Moore, E. E., & Stenner, A. J. (2015). Important text characteristics for early-grades text complexity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(1), 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, J., Hiebert, E. H., Bowen, K., Relyea-Kim, E. J., Kung, M., & Elmore, J. (2015). Text complexity: Primary teachers’ views. Literacy Research and Instruction, 54(1),19–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fountas, I. C., & Pinnell, G. S. (1996). Guided reading: Good first teaching for all children. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Friese, E., Alvermann, D., Parkes, A., & Rezak, A. (2008). Selecting texts for English Language Arts classrooms: When assessment is not enough. English Teaching, 7(3), 74.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, J.L. (2013). Revisiting key assumptions of the reading level framework. The Reading Teacher, 66, (1), 53–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiebert, E. H. (2011). Beyond Single Readability Measures: Using Multiple Sources of Information in Establishing Text Complexity. Journal of Education, 191(2).
   Google Scholar
• Hiebert, E. H. (2012). The Common Core’s staircase of text complexity: Getting the size of the first step right. Reading Today, 29(3),26–27.
   Google Scholar
• Hiebert, E. H., & Mesmer, H. A. E. (2013). Upping the ante of text complexity in the Common Core State Standards: Examining its potential impact on young readers. Educational Researcher, 42(1),44–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiebert, E. H. (2013). Supporting students’ movement up the staircase of text complexity. The Reading Teacher, 66(6),459–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiebert, E. H., & Pearson, P. D. (2014). Understanding text complexity: Introduction to the special issue. The Elementary School Journal, 115(2),153–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinchman, K. A., & Moore, D. W. (2013). Close reading: A cautionary interpretation. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 56(6),441–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch Jr, E. D., Kett, J. F., & Trefil, J. S. (1988). Cultural literacy: What every American needs to know. New York: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Jipson, J., & Paley, N. (1991). The Selective Tradition in Teachers’ Choice of Children’s Literature: Does It Exist in the Elementary Classroom?. English Education, 23(3),148–159.
   Google Scholar
• Kutner, M., Greenberg, E., Jin, Y., Boyle, B., Hsu, Y., & Dunleavy, E. (2007). Literacy in everyday life: Results from the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy (NCES 2007–480). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Lapp, D., Moss, B., & Grant, M. (2015). A close look at close reading: Teaching students to analyze complex texts (K–5). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• Leko, M. M., Mundy, C. A., Kang, H. J., & Datar, S. D. (2013). If the book fits: Selecting appropriate texts for adolescents with learning disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 48(5),267–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis-Beck, M. S., Bryman, A. & Liao, T. F. (Eds.) (2004). The SAGE encyclopedia of social science research methods (Vols. 1-3). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd. doi: 10.4135/9781412950589.
   Google Scholar
• National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core standards: English language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Washington, D.C.: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers.
   Google Scholar
• Piccolo, G. (2014). Why this text? why now? a case study involving four nsw stage 5 english teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• RAND Reading Study Group. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an r&d program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: RAND. Retrieved from http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1465.html.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblatt, L. M. (1994). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work. Carbondale, IL: SIU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Routman, R. (2003). Reading Essentials: The Specifics You Need To Teach Reading Well. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Rush, L., Ash, G. E., Saunders, J., Holschuh, J., & Ford, J. (2011). Meaningful and significant texts for adolescents: Tensions in text selection policies. Literacy Research Association 60th Yearbook. Oak Creek, WI: Literacy Research Association
   Google Scholar
• Rush, L. S., Scherff, L., & Martorana, C. M. (2013). Opening the conversation: Thinking deeper about text selection. English Education, 45(2),211–217.
   Google Scholar
• Shanahan, T. (2011) “Rejecting Instructional Level Theory. Shanahan on Literacy http://www.shanahanonliteracy.com/2011/08/rejecting-instructional-level-theory.html
   Google Scholar
• Shanahan, T. (2014). Should we teach students at their reading level? Literacy Leadership, 32(2),14–15.
   Google Scholar
• Shaughnessy, J.J., Zechmeister, E.B., & Zechmeister, J.S. (2014). Research methods in psychology (10th ed). New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. W., & Wilhelm, J. D. (2002). ”Reading Don’t Fix No Chevys”: Literacy in the Lives of Young Men. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Spiegel, D. L., & Wright, J. D. (1983). Biology teachers’ use of readability concepts when selecting texts for students. Journal of Reading, 27(1),28–34.
   Google Scholar
• Stallworth, B. J., Gibbons, L., & Fauber, L. (2006). It’s not on the list: An exploration of teachers’ perspectives on using multicultural literature. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 49(6),478–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valencia, S. W., Wixson, K. K., & Pearson, P. D. (2014). Putting text complexity in context: Refocusing on comprehension of complex text. The Elementary School Journal, 115(2),270–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins, N., & Ostenson, J. (2015). Navigating the text selection gauntlet: exploring factors that influence English teachers’ choices. English Education, 47(3), 245.
   Google Scholar
• Wirt, J., Choy, S., Rooney, P., Provasnik, S., Sen, A., & Tobin, R. (2004). The condition of education 2004 (NCES 2004-077). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2004/2004077.pdf
   Google Scholar