Becoming a literacy specialist: Developing identities

References

• Ashworth, B., Kreiner, G., & Fugate, M. (2001). All in a day’s work: Boundaries and micro transitions. Academy of Management Reviews, 25, 472–491. doi:10.5465/amr.2000.3363315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2002). Social cognitive theory in cultural context. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51(2), 269–290. doi:10.1111/apps.2002.51.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–559. Retrieved from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR13-4/baxter.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bean, R. M., Kern, D., Goatley, V., Ortlieb, E., Shettel, J., Calo, K., & L’Allier, S. (2015). Specialized literacy professionals as literacy leaders: Results of a national survey. Literacy Research and Instruction, 54, 83–114. doi:10.1080/19388071.2014.998355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bean, R. M., & Morewood, A. L. (2011). Best practices in professional development for improving literacy instruction in schools. In L. M. Morrow & L. Gambrell (Eds.), Best practices for literacy instruction (4th ed., pp. 455–478). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G., & Tedder. (2007). Agency and learning in the lifecourse: Towards an ecological perspective. Studies in the Education of Adults, 39, 132–149. doi:10.1080/02660830.2007.11661545
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, R. (2015). Teacher identity and agency in an era of accountability. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 21(6), 700–719. doi:10.1080/13540602.2015.1044329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calo, K. M., Sturtevant, E. G., & Kopfman, K. M. (2015). Literacy coaches’ perspectives of themselves as literacy leaders: Results from a national study of K-12 literacy coaching and leadership. Literacy Research and Instruction, 54, 1–18. doi:10.1080/19388071.2014.941050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvert, L. (2016). Moving from compliance to agency: What teachers need to make professional learning work. Oxford, OH: Learning Forward and NCTAF.
   Google Scholar
• Cantrell, S. C., & Hughes, H. K. (2008). Teacher efficacy and content literacy implementation: An exploration of the effects of extended professional development with coaching. Journal of Literacy Research, 40, 95–127. doi:10.1080/10862960802070442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E., & Woulfin, S. L. (2012). Reading coaches and the relationship between policy and practice. Reading Research Quarterly, 47, 5–30. doi:10.1002/RRQ.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, A. L., & Garmston, R. J. (2002). Cognitive coaching: A foundation for renaissance schools. Norwood, MA: Christopher Gordon Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Crafton, L., & Kaiser, E. (2011). The language of collaboration: Dialogue and identity in teacher professional development. Improving Schools, 14, 104–116. doi:10.1177/1365480211410437
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., Wei, R., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the United States and abroad. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Dillon, D. R., O’Brien, D. G., Sato, M., & Kelly, C. (2011). Professional development and teacher education for reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. D. Pearson, E. B. Moje, & P. P. Afflerbach (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. IV, pp. 629–660). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Elish-Piper, L., & L’Allier, S. K. (2011). Examining the relationship between literacy coaching and student reading gains in grades K-3. The Elementary School Journal, 112, 83–106. doi:10.1086/660685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galloway, E. P., & Lesaux, N. K. (2014). Leader, teacher, diagnostician, colleague, and change agent: A synthesis of the research on the role of the reading specialist in this era of RTI-based literacy reform. The Reading Teacher, 67, 517–526. doi:10.1002/trtr.1251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (1999). Introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. M. (2001). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. In W. G. Secada (Ed.), Review of research in education (pp. 99–125). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Handsfield, L. J. (2016). Literacy theory as practice: Connecting theory and instruction in K-12 classrooms. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hanks, W. F. (1991). Foreword. In J. Lave & E. Wenger (Eds.), Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation (pp. 13–24). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heinecke, S. F. (2013). Coaching discourse: Supporting teachers’ professional learning. The Elementary School Journal, 113, 409–433. doi:10.1086/668767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, C. S., & Handsfield, L. J. (2013). The emotional landscapes of literacy coaching: Issues of power, identity, and positioning. Journal of Literacy Research, 45, 47–86. doi:10.1177/1086296X12469969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Literacy Association. (2010). Standards for reading professionals- revised 2010. Newark, DE: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Jewett, P., & MacPhee, D. (2012). A dialogic conception of learning: Collaborative peer coaching. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 1, 12–23. doi:10.1108/20466851211231594
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, P. H. (2004). Choice words: How our language affects children’s learning. Portland, ME: Stenhouse.
   Google Scholar
• Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (1996). Staff development as a comprehensive service organization. Journal of Staff Development, 17, 2–6.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacPhee, D., & Jewett, P. (2017). Conflicting discourses: Navigating the tensions of becoming a literacy coach. The New Educator, 13, 408–431. doi:10.1080/1547688X.2016.1237690
   Google Scholar
• McKenna, M. C., & Walpole, S. (2008). The literacy coaching challenge: Models and methods for Grades K-8. New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Michener, H., & Delamater, J. (1999). Social psychology. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed., pp. 10–12). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Quatroche, D., & Wepner, S. B. (2008). Developing reading specialists/literacy coaches as leaders: New directions for program development. Literacy Research and Instruction, 47, 99–115. doi:10.1080/19388070701878816
   Google Scholar
• Rainville, K. N., & Jones, S. (2008). Situated identities: Power and positioning in the work of a literacy coach. The Reading Teacher, 61, 440–448. doi:10.1598/RT.61.6.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4–14. doi:10.3102/0013189X015002004
   Google Scholar
• Stover, K., Kissel, B., Haag, K., & Shoniker, R. (2011). Differentiated coaching: Fostering reflections with teachers. The Reading Teacher, 64, 498–509. doi:10.1598/RT.64.7.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Swan Dagen, A., & Bean, R. (2014). High quality research-based professional development: An essential for enhancing high-quality teaching. In L. E. Martin, S. Kragler, D. J. Quatroche, & K. L. Bauserman (Eds.), Handbook of professional development in education: Successful models and practices, PreK-12 (pp. 42–64). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Vogt, M. E., & Shearer, B. (2011). Reading specialists and literacy coaches in the real world (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.
   Google Scholar
• Walker-Dalhouse, D., Risko, V. J., Lathrop, K., & Porter, S. (2010). Helping diverse struggling readers through reflective teaching and coaching. The Reading Teacher, 64, 70–72. doi:10.1598/RT.64.1.11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walpole, S., & Blamey, K. L. (2008). Elementary literacy coaches: The reality of dual roles. The Reading Teacher, 62(3), 222–231. doi:10.1598/RT.62.3.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, E., & Deaney, R. (2010). Changing career and changing identity: How do teacher career changers exercise agency in identity construction? Social Psychology of Education, 13, 169–183. doi:10.1007/s11218-010-9119-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar