https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6268-6998
References
- Alvermann, D. E., & Wilson, A. A. (2011). Comprehension strategy instruction for multimodal texts in science. Theory into Practice, 50(2), 116–124. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2011.558436
- Arizpe, E., & Styles, M. (2016). Children reading picturebooks: Interpreting visual texts (2nd ed.). London, UK: Routledge.
- Avgerinou, M. (2009). Re-viewing visual literacy in the “Bain d’images” era. Tech Trends, 53(2),28–34.
- Avgerinou, M., & Pettersson, R. (2011). Toward a cohesive theory of visual literacy. Journal of Visual Literacy, 30(2), 1–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23796529.2011.11674687
- Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. (2008). Writing in multimodal texts: A social semiotic account of designs for learning. Written Communication, 25(2), 166–195. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088307313177
- Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. (2016). Multimodality, learning and communication: A social semiotic frame. London, UK: Routledge.
- Brugar, K. A., & Roberts, K. L. (2017). Seeing is believing. Promoting visual literacy in elementary social studies. Journal of Teacher Education, 68(3), 262–279. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117696280
- Chen, X. (2017). A comparative study of visual representations in conventional, digitized and interactive high school science textbooks. Journal of Visual Literacy, 36(2), 104–122. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1051144X.2017.1386388
- Coleman, J. (2010). Elementary teachers’ instructional practices involving graphical representations. Journal of Visual Literacy, 29(2), 198–222. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23796529.2010.11674681
- Coleman, J. M., & Dantzler, J. A. (2016). The frequency and type of graphical representations in science trade books for children. Journal of Visual Literacy, 35(1), 24–41. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1051144X.2016.1198543
- Coleman, J. M., & Donovan, C. (2018). Notice, identify, and interpret. Science and Children, 56(4), 48–57. doi:https://doi.org/10.2505/4/sc18_056_04_48
- Coleman, J. M., & McTigue, E. M. (2013). Unlocking the power of visual communication. Science and Children, 50(5), 73–77.
- Coleman, J. M., McTigue, E. M., & Smolkin, L. B. (2011). Elementary teachers’ use of graphical representations in science teaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(7), 613–643. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-010-9204-1
- Cook, M. (2008). Students’ comprehension of science concepts depicted in textbook illustrations. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 12(1), 1–14.
- Cummins, S. (2015). Unpacking complexity in informational texts: Principles and practices for grades 2-8. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
- Dipper, F. (2016). The marine world: A natural history of ocean life. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
- Eisner, E. (2002). The arts and the creation of mind. New Heaven, CT: Yale University Press.
- Fang, Z. (2014). Disciplinary literacy in science: Developing science literacy through trade books. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 57(4), 274–278. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.250
- Guo, D., Wright, K. L., & McTigue, E. M. (2018). A content analysis of visuals in elementary school textbooks. The Elementary School Journal, 119(2), 244–269. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/700266
- Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
- Jewitt, C. (Ed.). (2014). The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (2nd ed.). London, UK: Routledge.
- John-Steiner, V., & Mahn, H. (1996). Sociocultural approaches to learning and development: A Vygotskian framework. Educational Psychologist, 31(3/4), 191–206.
- Kędra, J. (2018). What does it mean to be visually literate? Examination of visual literacy definitions in a context of higher education. Journal of Visual Literacy, 37(2), 67–84. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1051144X.2018.1492234
- Kelley, M. J., & Clausen-Grace, N. (2010). Guiding students through expository text with text feature walks. The Reading Teacher, 64(3), 191–195. doi:https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.64.3.4
- Kelly, L. B. (2018). An analysis of award-winning science trade books for children: Who are the scientists, and what is science? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55, 1188–1210. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21447
- Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London, UK: Routledge.
- Kress, G. (2015). Semiotic work: Applied linguistics and a social semiotic account of multimodality. AIRA Review, 28(1), 49–71.
- Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd ed.). London, UK: Routledge.
- Lemke, J. L. (2001). Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 296–316. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200103)38:3<296::AID-TEA1007>3.0.CO;2-R
- Macken-Horarik, M. (2016). Building a metalanguage for interpreting multimodal literature:Insights from systemic functional semiotics in two case study classrooms. English in Australia, 51(2), 85–99.
- Martens, P., Martens, R., Doyle, M., Loomis, J., & Aghalarov, S. (2012/2013). Learning from picturebooks: Reading and writing multimodally in first grade. The Reading Teacher, 66(4), 285–294. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/TRTR.01099
- McTigue, E. M., & Flowers, A. C. (2011). Science visual literacy: Learner’s perceptions and knowledge of diagrams. The Reading Teacher, 64(8), 578–589. doi:https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.64.8.3
- Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Mills, K. A., & Doyle, K. (2019). Visual arts: A multimodal language for Indigenous education. Language and Education, 36(3), 521–543. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2019.1635618
- Mills, K. A., & Unsworth, L. (2017). Multimodal literacy. In Oxford research encyclopedia of education. https://oxfordre.com/education/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.001.0001/acrefore-9780190264093-e-232
- Müller, M. G. (2008). Visual competence: A new paradigm for studying visuals in the social sciences? Visual Studies, 23(2), 101–112. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860802276248
- O’Brien, D., & Rogers, T. (2015). Sociocultural perspectives on literacy and learning. In L. Corno & E. M. Anderman (Eds), Handbook of educational psychology (3rd. ed., pp. 311–322). New York, NY: Routledge.
- Pantaleo, S. (2012). Exploring grade 7 students’ responses to Shaun Tan’s The red tree. Children’s Literature in Education, 43(1), 51–71. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10583-011-9156-x
- Pantaleo, S. (2014). Exploring the artwork in picturebooks with middle years students. Journal of Children’s Literature, 40(1), 15–26.
- Pantaleo, S. (2016). Primary students’ understanding and appreciation of the artwork in picturebooks. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 16(2), 228–255. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798415569816
- Pantaleo, S. (2017). Critical thinking and young children’s exploration of picturebook artwork. Language and Education, 32(2), 152–168. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2016.1242599
- Pantaleo, S. (2018). Elementary students’ analytical responses about David Wiesner’s The Three Pigs. New Review of Children’s Literature and Librarianship, 24(2), 167–188. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13614541.2018.1533616
- Pantaleo, S. (2019). Studio habits of mind, picturebooks and student multimodal ensembles. Ubiquity: The Journal of Literature, Literacy, and the Arts, 6(2), 60–98.
- Pantaleo, S. (2020). Slow looking: “reading picturebooks takes time.” Literacy, 54(1), 40–48. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.v54.1
- Pearson, P. D., & Gallagher, M. C. (1983). The instruction of reading comprehension. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 317–344. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-476X(83)90019-X
- Pettersson, R. (2013). Views on visual literacy. Journal on Images and Culture, 1(1), 1–9. http://vjic.org/vjic2/?page_id=214
- Robbins, J. (2005). ‘Brown paper packages?’ A sociocultural perspective on young children’s ideas in science. Research in Science Education, 35(2), 151–172. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-005-0092-x
- Roberts, K. L., & Brugar, K. A. (2017). The view from here: Emergence of graphical literacy. Reading Psychology, 38(8), 733–777. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2017.1336661
- Roberts, K. L., Norman, R. R., Duke, N. K., Morsink, P., Martin, N. M., & Knight, J. A. (2013). Diagrams, timelines, and tables – Oh, my! The Reading Teacher, 67(1),12–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/TRTR.1174
- Sackes, M., Trundle, K. C., & Flevares, L. M. (2009). Using children’s literature to teach standard- based science concepts in early years. Early Childhood Education Journal, 36, 415–522. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-009-0304-5
- Serafini, F. (2012). Expanding the four resources model: Reading visual and multi-modal texts. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 7(2), 150–164. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2012.656347
- Serafini, F. (2014). Reading the visual: An introduction to teaching multimodal literacy. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
- Sipe, L. R. (2008). Storytime: Young children’s literary understanding in the classroom. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
- Stylianidou, F., Omerod, F., & Ogborn, J. (2002). Analysis of science textbook pictures about energy and pupils’ readings of them. International Journal of Science Education, 24(3), 257–283. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110078905
- Suhor, C. (1984). Towards a semiotics-based curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 16(3), 247–257. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027840160304
- Tang, K.-S., Delgado, C., & Moje, E. B. (2014). An integrative framework for the analysis of multiple and multimodal representations for meaning-making in science education. Science Education, 98(2), 305–326. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21099
- Tishman, S. (2018). Slow looking: The art and practice of learning through observation. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Yazan, B. (2015). Three approaches to case study methods in education: Yin, Merriam, and Stake. The Qualitative Report, 20(2), 134–152.
- Youngs, S. (2012). Understanding history through the visual images in historical fiction. Language Arts, 89(6), 379–391.
Children’s Literature References
- Browne, A. (1998). Voices in the park. London, UK: Picture Corgi Books.
- Marsden, J., & Tan, S. (2003). The rabbits. Vancouver, BC: Simply Read Books.
- Milner, C. (2019). The sea book. New York, NY: DK.
- Wenzel, B. (2016). They all saw a cat. San Francisco, CA: Chronicle Books.
- Wiesner, D. (2006). Flotsam. New York, NY: Clarion Books.
- Yolen, J., & Shannon, D. (1992). Encounter. New York, NY: Harcourt.