Using Insights from Teachers to Inform Online Professional Development in Early Literacy Instruction

References

• Amendum, S. J., & Liebfreund, M. D. (2019). Situated learning, professional development, and early reading intervention: A mixed methods study. The Journal of Educational Research, 112(3), 342–356. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2018.1523782
   Google Scholar
• Arrow, A. W., Braid, C., & Chapman, J. W. (2019). Explicit linguistic knowledge is necessary, but not sufficient, for the provision of explicit early literacy instruction. Annals of Dyslexia, 69(1), 99–113. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-018-00168-0
   Google Scholar
• Bippert, K., Davis, D., Hilburn, M. R., Hooper, J. D., Kharod, D., Rodriguez, C., & Stortz, R. (2016). (Re)learning about learning: Using cases from popular media to extend and complicate our understandings of what it means to learn and teach. Dialogue: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Popular Culture and Pedagogy. https://journaldialogue.org/issues/relearning-about-learning-using-cases-from-popular-media-to-extend-and-complicate-our-understandings-of-what-it-means-to-learn-and-teach/
   Google Scholar
• Bonafini, F. C. (2018). Characterizing super-posters in a MOOC for teachers’ professional development. Online Learning, 22(4), 89–108. doi:https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i4.1503
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi:https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Castleberry, A., & Nolen, A. (2018). Thematic analysis of qualitative research data: Is it as easy as it sounds? Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 10(6), 807–815. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2018.03.019
   Google Scholar
• Castles, A., Rastle, K., & Nation, K. (2018). Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19(1), 5–51. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100618772271
   Google Scholar
• Ciesielski, E. J. M., & Creaghead, N. A. (2020). The effectiveness of professional development on the phonological awareness outcomes of preschool children: A systematic review. Literacy Research and Instruction, 59(2), 121–147. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2019.1710785
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(8), 947–967. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00053-7
   Google Scholar
• Compton‐Lilly, C. F., Mitra, A., Guay, M., & Spence, L. K. (2020). A confluence of complexity: Intersections among reading theory, neuroscience, and observations of young readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(S1), S185–S195. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.348
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124–130. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, A. E., Etter, K., Platas, L., Wheeler, S., & Campbell, K. (2015). Professional development in emergent literacy: A design experiment of Teacher Study Groups. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 31, 62–77. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2014.12.002
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, A. E., Perry, K. E., Stanovich, K. E., & Stanovich, P. J. (2004). Disciplinary knowledge of K-3 teachers and their knowledge calibration in the domain of early literacy. Annals of Dyslexia, 54(1), 139–167. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-004-0007-y
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., Wei, R. C., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession. Washington, DC: National Staff Development Council.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, D. S., Jones, J. S., & Samuelson, C. (2020). Is it time for a hard conversation about cueing systems and word reading in teacher education? Reading and Writing Quarterly, 1–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2020.1792813
   Google Scholar
• Desimone, L. M., & Garet, M. S. (2015). Best practices in teachers’ professional development in the United States. Psychology, Society and Education, 7, 252–263. doi:https://doi.org/10.25115/psye.v7i3.515
   Google Scholar
• Fälth, L., Gustafson, S., & Svensson, I. (2017). Phonological awareness training with articulation promotes early reading development. Education, 137(3), 261–276.
   Google Scholar
• Folsom, J. S., Smith, K. G., Burk, K., & Oakley, N. (2017). Educator outcomes associated with implementation of Mississippi’s K-3 early literacy professional development initiative. REL 2017-270. Regional Educational Laboratory Southeast.
   Google Scholar
• Foorman, B., Beyler, N., Borradaile, K., Coyne, M., Denton, C. A., Dimino, J., … Wissel, S. (2016). Foundational skills to support reading for understanding in kindergarten through 3rd grade (NCEE 2016-4008). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (NCEE), Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/PracticeGuide/wwc_foundationalreading_040717.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Foorman, B. R., Francis, D. J., Fletcher, J. M., Schatschneider, C., & Mehta, P. (1998). The role of instruction in learning to read: Preventing reading failure in at-risk children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 37–55. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.1.37
   Google Scholar
• Foorman, B. R., Herrera, S., Petscher, Y., Mitchell, A., & Truckenmiller, A. (2015). The structure of oral language and reading and their relation to comprehension in kindergarten through grade 2. Reading and Writing, 28(5), 655–681. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9544-5
   Google Scholar
• Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038004915
   Google Scholar
• Geisler, C., & Swarts, J. (2019). Coding streams of language: Techniques for the systematic coding of text, talk, and other verbal data. Fort Collins, CO: University Press of Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Goldschmidt, P., & Phelps, G. (2010). Does teacher professional development affect content and pedagogical knowledge: How much and for how long? Economics of Education Review, 29(3), 432–439. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2009.10.002
   Google Scholar
• Hatch, T., & Grossman, P. (2009). Learning to look beyond the boundaries of representation: Using technology to examine teaching (Overview for a digital exhibition: Learning from the practice of teaching). Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 70–85. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108328533
   Google Scholar
• International Literacy Association (ILA). (2019). Children experiencing reading difficulties: What we know and what we can do [Literacy leadership brief]. Author.Newark, DE.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, R. L. P., & Bratsch-Hines, M. (2020). Associations of reading knowledge with kindergarten and first grade teachers’ reported instructional strategies . Literacy Research and Instruction, 59(4), 277–297.
   Google Scholar
• Kabilan, M. K. (2005). Online professional development: A literature analysis of teacher competency. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 21(2), 51–57.
   Google Scholar
• Kellogg, S., & Edelmann, A. (2015). Massively open online course for educators (MOOC–Ed) network dataset. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(5), 977–983. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12312
   Google Scholar
• Kleiman, G., Wolf, M. A., & Frye, D. (2015). Educating educators: Designing MOOCs for professional learning. In P. Kim (Ed.), Massive open online courses: The MOOC revolution (pp. 117–144). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H. S., Mojica, G. F., & Lovett, J. N. (2020). Examining how online professional development impacts teachers’ beliefs about teaching statistics. Online Learning, 24(1), 5–27. doi:https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i1.1992
   Google Scholar
• Loizzo, J., Ertmer, P. A., Watson, W. R., & Watson, S. L. (2017). Adults as self-directed and determined to set and achieve personal learning goals in MOOCs: Learners’ perceptions of MOOC motivation, success, and completion. Online Learning, 21(2). doi:https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i2.889
   Google Scholar
• Lonigan, C., Burgess, S., & Anthony, J. (2000). Development of emergent literacy and early reading skills in preschool children: Evidence from a latent-variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 36(5), 596–613. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.36.5.596
   Google Scholar
• Mackey, J., & Evans, T. (2011). Interconnecting networks of practice for professional learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(3), 1–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.873
   Google Scholar
• Markussen-Brown, J., Juhl, C. B., Piasta, S. B., Bleses, D., Højen, A., & Justice, L. M. (2017). The effects of language-and literacy-focused professional development on early educators and children: A best-evidence meta-analysis. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 38, 97–115. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2016.07.002
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, B., & Mitchell, N. (2014). The role of video in teacher professional development. Teacher Development, 18(3), 403–417. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2014.938106
   Google Scholar
• McCutchen, D., Abbott, R. D., Green, L. B., Beretvas, S. N., Cox, S., Potter, N. S., … Gray, A. L. (2002). Beginning literacy: Links among teacher knowledge, teacher practice, and student learning. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35(1), 69–86. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/002221940203500106
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Fundamentals of qualitative data analysis. In Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed., pp. 69–104).Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Moats, L. (1994). The missing foundation in teacher education: Knowledge of the structure of spoken and written language. Annals of Dyslexia, 44, 81–102. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02648156
   Google Scholar
• Moats, L. C., & Foorman, B. R. (2003). Measuring teachers’ content knowledge of language and reading. Annals of Dyslexia, 53(1), 23–45. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-003-0003-7
   Google Scholar
• National Early Literacy Panel. (2009). Developing early literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel, executive summary.Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.
   Google Scholar
• National Reading Panel (NRP). (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
   Google Scholar
• Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
   Google Scholar
• Ouellette, G., & Beers, A. (2010). A not-so-simple view of reading: How oral vocabulary and visual-word recognition complicate the story. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 23, 189–208. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9159-1
   Google Scholar
• Ouellette, G., Sénéchal, M., & Haley, A. (2013). Guiding children’s invented spellings: A gateway into literacy learning. The Journal of Experimental Education, 81(2), 261–279. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2012.699903
   Google Scholar
• Pacheco, M., & Gutierrez, K. (2009). Cultural-historical approaches to literacy teaching and learning. In C. Compton-Lilly (Ed.), Breaking the silence: Recognizing the social and cultural resources bring to the classroom (pp. 113–145). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, S. A., Hutchison, A. C., Hall, L. A., Parsons, A. W., Ives, S. T., & Leggett, A. B. (2019). U.S. teachers’ perceptions of online professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 82, 33–42. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.03.006
   Google Scholar
• Perna, L. W., Ruby, A., Boruch, R. F., Wang, N., Scull, J., Seher, A., & Evans, C. (2014). Moving through MOOCs: Understanding the progression of users in massive open online courses. Educational Reviewer, 43(9), 421–432.
   Google Scholar
• Petscher, Y., Cabell, S. Q., Catts, H. W., Compton, D. L., Foorman, B. R., Hart, S. A., … Wagner, R. K. (2020). How the science of reading informs 21st century education. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(S1), S267–S282. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.352
   Google Scholar
• Piasta, S. B., Connor, C. M., Fishman, B. J., & Morrison, F. J. (2009). Teachers’ knowledge of literacy concepts, classroom practices, and student reading growth. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13, 224–248. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10888430902851364
   Google Scholar
• Piasta, S. B., Justice, L. M., O’Connell, A. A., Mauck, S. A., Weber-Mayrer, M., Schachter, R. E., … Spear, C. F. (2017). Effectiveness of large-scale, state-sponsored language and literacy professional development on early childhood educator outcomes. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 10(2), 354–378. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2016.1270378
   Google Scholar
• Piasta, S. B., Ramirez, P. S., Farley, K. S., Justice, L. M., & Park, S. (2020). Exploring the nature of associations between educators’ knowledge and their emergent literacy classroom practices. In Reading and Writing , 33(6), 1399–1422.
   Google Scholar
• Podhajski, B., Mather, N., Nathan, J., & Sammons, J. (2009). Professional development in scientifically based reading instruction: Teacher knowledge and reading outcomes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(5), 403–417. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219409338737
   Google Scholar
• Powell, C. G., & Bodur, Y. (2019). Teachers’ perceptions of an online professional development experience: Implications for a design and implementation framework. Teaching and Teacher Education, 77, 19–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.09.004
   Google Scholar
• Prestridge, S. (2010). ICT professional development for teachers in online forums: Analysing the role of discussion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(2), 252–258. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.04.004
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., Foorman, B. R., Perfetti, C. A., Pesetsky, D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2001). How psychological science informs the teaching of reading. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2(2), 31–74. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1529-1006.00004
   Google Scholar
• Renninger, K. A., Cai, M., Lewis, M. C., Adams, M. M., & Ernst, K. L. (2011). Motivation and learning in an online, unmoderated, mathematics workshop for teachers. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(2), 229–247. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-011-9195-4
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Scanlon, D. M., Anderson, K. L., & Sweeney, J.M. (2017). Early intervention for reading difficulties; the interactive strategies approach (2nd ed.). New York: NY Guilford Press
   Google Scholar
• Seaton, D. T., Coleman, C., Daries, J., & Chuang, I. (2015). Enrollment in MITx MOOCs: Are we educating educators? EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2015/2/enrollment-in-mitx-moocs-are-we-educatingeducators
   Google Scholar
• Sénéchal, M., & LeFevre, J. A. (2002). Parental involvement in the development of children’s reading skill: A five–year longitudinal study. Child Development, 73(2), 445–460. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00417
   Google Scholar
• Shanahan, T., Callison, K., Carriere, C., Duke, N. K., Pearson, P. D., Schatschneider, C., & Torgesen, J. (2010). Improving reading comprehension in kindergarten through 3rd grade: A practice guide (NCEE 2010-4038). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from whatworks.ed.gov/publications/practiceguides
   Google Scholar
• Sharples, M., Taylor, J., & Vavoula, G. (2007). A theory of learning for the mobile age. In R. Andrews & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of e-learning research (pp. 221–247). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. A., & Sivo, S. A. (2011). Predicting continued use of online teacher professional development and the influence of social presence and sociability. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(6), 871–882. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01223.x
   Google Scholar
• Snell, E. K., Hindman, A. H., & Wasik, B. A. (2019). A review of research on technology-mediated language and literacy professional development models. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 40(3), 205–220. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10901027.2018.1539794
   Google Scholar
• Snow, C., Burns, M. W., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, C. E., Science and Technology Policy Institute (Rand Corporation), & United States. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R & D program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: Rand
   Google Scholar
• Spear-Swerling, L., & Zibulsky, J. (2014). Making time for literacy: Teacher knowledge and time allocation in instructional planning. Reading and Writing, 27(8), 1353–1378. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-013-9491-y
   Google Scholar
• Torgesen, J. K., Alexander, A. W., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Voeller, K. K. S., & Conway, T. (2001). Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: Immediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approaches. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34(33–58), 78. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/002221940103400104
   Google Scholar
• Vereb, A., Carlisle, J. F., & Mihocko-Bowling, E. (2015). Online case studies as a professional development opportunity for teachers of elementary reading. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 23(1), 107–131.
   Google Scholar
• Vrasidas, C., & Zembylas, M. (2004). Online professional development: Lessons from the field. Education & Training (London), 46(6/7), 326–334. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/00400910410555231
   Google Scholar
• Washburn, E. K., Joshi, R. M., & Binks-Cantrell, E. S. (2011). Teacher knowledge of basic language concepts and dyslexia. Dyslexia, 17(2), 165–183. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.42
   Google Scholar
• Yoon, K. S., Duncan, T., Lee, S. W. Y., Scarloss, B., & Shapley, K. L. (2007). Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement. (Issues & Answers Report, REL 2007-No. 033). Washington DC: US Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Southwest
   Google Scholar
• Yurkofsky, M. M., Blum-Smith, S., & Brennan, K. (2019). Expanding outcomes: Exploring varied conceptions of teacher learning in an online professional development experience. Teaching and Teacher Education, 82, 1–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.03.002
   Google Scholar