References
- Agar, M. H. (1996). The professional stranger: An informal introduction to ethnography (Vol. 2). San Diego, CA: Academic press.
- Allington, R. L. (2013). What really matters when working with struggling readers. The Reading Teacher, 66(7), 520–530. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/TRTR.1154
- Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT–TPCK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Computers & Education, 52(1), 154–168. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.006
- Archambault, L., Kennedy, K., Shelton, C., Dalal, M., McAllister, L., & Huyett, S. (2016). Incremental progress: Re-examining field experiences in K-12 online learning contexts in the United States. Journal of Online Learning Research, 2(3), 303–326.
- Bardsley, M. E., & McGrath, K. (2016). Let's Go to Camp: A Modelfor Clinical Practice. AILACTE Journal, 13(1), 95–112.
- Bear, D. R., Invernizzi, M., Templeton, S. R., & Johnston, F. (2020). Words their way. New York, NY: Pearson.
- Birt, L., Scott, S., Cavers, D., Campbell, C., & Walter, F. (2016). Member checking: A tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation? Qualitative Health Research, 26, 1802–1811. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316654870
- Boud, D. (2007). Reframing assessment as if learning were important. In Rethinking assessment in higher education (pp. 24–36). London: Routledge.
- Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. New York: Harvard university press.
- Bowen, G. A. (2008). Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: A research note. Qualitative Research, 8(1), 137–152. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794107085301
- Bruner, J. S., & Austin, G. A. (1986). A study of thinking. New York: Transaction publishers.
- Carpenter, J. P., Rosenberg, J. M., Dousay, T. A., Romero-Hall, E., Trust, T., Kessler, A., … Krutka, D. G. (2020). What should teacher educators know about technology? Perspectives and self-assessments. Teaching and Teacher Education, 95, 103124. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103124
- Chien, Y. T., Chang, C. Y., Yeh, T. K., & Chang, K. E. (2012). Engaging pre-service science candidates to act as active designers of technology integration: A MAGDAIRE framework. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(4), 578–588. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.12.005
- Coffey, G. (2012). Literacy and technology: Integrating technology with small group, peer-led discussions of literature. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4(2), 395–405.
- Conway, P. F. (2001). Anticipatory reflection while learning to teach: From a temporally truncated to a temporally distributed model of reflection in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(1), 89–106. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00040-8
- Day, D., & Kroon, S. (2010). “Online literature circles rock!” Organizing online literature circles in a middle school classroom. Middle School Journal, 42(2), 18–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00940771.2010.11461753
- Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
- DiPietro, M., Ferdig, R. E., Black, E. W., & Preston, M. (2008). Best practices in teaching K-12 online: Lessons learned from Michigan Virtual School candidates. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 7(1), 10–35.
- Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Random House.
- Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–284. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551
- Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Seabury.
- Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovering of grounded theory. Chicago, Illinois: EEUU.
- Glaser, R. (1984). Education and thinking: The role of knowledge. American Psychologist, 39(2), 93. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.39.2.93
- Glazier, J., & Bean, A. (2019). The promise of experiential education in teacher education: Transforming teacher beliefs and practices. Teaching Education, 30(3), 261–277. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2018.1462312
- Glazier, J., Bolick, C., & Stutts, C. (2017). Unstable ground: Unearthing the realities of experiential education in teacher education. Journal of Experiential Education, 40(3), 231–248. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1053825917712734
- Gudmundsdottir, G. B., & Hatlevik, O. E. (2018). Newly qualified candidates’ professional digital competence: Implications for teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 41(2), 214–231. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1416085
- Harvey, L. (2015). Beyond member-checking: A dialogic approach to the research interview. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 38(1), 23–38. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2014.914487
- Haydn, T. (2014). How do you get pre-service candidates to become ‘good at ICT’in their subject teaching? The views of expert practitioners. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 23(4), 455–469. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2014.892898
- Houge, T. T., & Geier, C. (2009). Delivering one‐to‐one tutoring in literacy via videoconferencing. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 53(2), 154–163. doi:https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.53.2.6
- International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). (2021). ISTE standards. Retrieved from https://www.iste.org/standards/for-educators
- Johnson, T. E., Maring, G. H., Doty, J. H., & Fickle, M. (2006). Cybermentoring: Evolving high-end video conferencing practices to support preservice teacher training. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 5(1), 59–74.
- Kennedy, K., & Archambault, L. (2012). Offering preservice candidates field experiences in K-12 online learning: A national survey of teacher education programs. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(3), 185–200. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487111433651
- Kent, A. M., & Simpson, J. L. (2010). Interactive videoconferencing: Connecting theory to practice for preservice candidates. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 27(1), 12–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2010.10784652
- Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Journal of Education, 193(3), 13–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741319300303
- Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experience as the source of learning and development. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
- Kolb, D. A., & Lewis, L. H. (1986). Facilitating experiential learning: Observations and reflections. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 30, 99–107. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.36719863012
- Kurz, T. L., Llama, G., & Savenye, W. (2005). Issues and challenges of creating video cases to be used with preservice candidates. TechTrends, 49(4), 67–73. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02824113
- Lai, K. W. (2008). ICT supporting the learning process: The premise, reality, and promise. In Voogt, Joke, Knezek, Gerald (Eds.) International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 215–230). Boston, MA: Springer.
- Law, N. (2008). Teacher learning beyond knowledge for pedagogical innovations with ICT. In Voogt, Joke, Knezek, Gerald (Eds.) International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 425–434). Boston, MA: Springer.
- Lee, J. F. (2019). Enhancing preservice candidates’ professional competence through experiential learning. Journal of Education for Teaching, 45(3), 353–357. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2019.1599507
- Leinhardt, G., & Greeno, J. G. (1986). The cognitive skill of teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(2), 75. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.78.2.75
- Lewis, L. H., & Williams, C. J. (1994). Experiential learning: Past and present. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 1994(62), 5–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.36719946203
- Loughran, J. J. (2002). Effective reflective practice: In search of meaning in learning about teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(1), 33–43. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487102053001004
- McAllister, L., & Graham, C. (2016). An analysis of the curriculum requirements for K-12 online teaching endorsements in the US. Journal of Online Learning Research, 2(3), 247–282.
- McGrath, K.,& Erwin, R. (2015). University-Based Literacy Center: Benefits forthe College and the Community. AILACTE Journal, 12
- McGrath, K., & Bardsley, M. E. (2018).Becoming a literacy leader in the 21st century: Fieldwork thatfacilitates the process. Literacy Research and Instruction, 57(4),351–368
- McLeod, S. (2017). Kolb’s learning styles and experiential learning cycle. Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/learning-kolb.html
- Mishra, P. (2019). Considering contextual knowledge: The TPACK diagram gets an upgrade. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 35(2), 76–78. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2019.1588611
- National Council on Teacher Quality. (2020). 2020 teacher prep review: Clinical practice and classroom management. Retrieved from https://www.nctq.org/publications/2020-Teacher-Prep-Review:-Clinical-Practice-and-Classroom-Management
- National Education Association (NEA). (2006). National Education Association: Guide to teaching online courses. Washington, DC: Author.
- New York State Education Department (NYSED). (n.d.). College supervised literacy practicum. Retrieved from http://www.highered.nysed.gov/tcert/certificate/literacypracticum.html
- Pape, L., & Wicks, M. (2009). National standards for quality online programs. International Association for K-12 Online Learning. Vienna, VA.
- Paris, S. G., & Paris, A. H. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 36(2), 89–101. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3602_4
- Peterson, K., DeCato, L., & Kolb, D. A. (2015). Moving and learning: Expanding style and increasing flexibility. Journal of Experiential Education, 38(3), 228–244. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1053825914540836
- Pinnell, G. S., & Fountas, I. (2017). When readers struggle: Teaching that works. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
- Pulham, E., & Graham, C. R. (2018). Comparing K-12 online and blended teaching competencies: A literature review. Distance Education, 39(3), 411–432. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1476840
- Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X029001004
- Rice, M. F.,& Deschaine, M. E. (2020). Orienting toward teacher educationfor online environments for all students. The educational forum,84(2),114–125
- Saracho, O. N. (2017). Literacy in the twenty-first century: Children, families and policy. Early Child Development and Care, 187(3–4), 630–643. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2016.1261513
- Sharpe, L., Hu, C., Crawford, L., Gopinathan, S., Moo, S. N., & Wong, A. F. (2000). Multipoint desktop videoconferencing as a collaborative learning tool for teacher preparation. Educational Technology, 40(5), 61–63.
- Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
- Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
- Shuy, T. (2010). Self-regulated learning. Retrieved from https://lincs.ed.gov/sites/default/files/3_TEAL_Self%20Reg%20Learning.pdf
- Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education (SITE). (2021). Teacher educator technology competencies. Retrieved from https://site.aace.org/tetc/#:~:text=Teacher%20Educator%20Technology%20Competencies%20%28TETCs%29%20The%20Teacher%20Educator,Teacher%20candidates%20who%20receive%20consistent%20and%20appropriate%20experiences
- Southern Regional Education Board (SREB). (2003). Essential principles of high-quality online teaching: Guidelines for evaluating K-12 online candidates. Southern Regional Education Board. Atlanta, GA.
- Starfall®. (2021). Retrieved from https://www.starfall.com/h/
- Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. New York, NY: Sage publications.
- The Department of Education Office of Educational Technology. (2020). National education technology plan. Retrieved from https://tech.ed.gov/netp/
- Thomas, L. G., & Knezek, D. G. (2008). Information, communications, and educational technology standards for students, candidates, and school leaders. In Voogt, Joke, Knezek, Gerald (Eds.) International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 333–348). Boston, MA: Springer.
- Tondeur, J., Van Braak, J., Sang, G., Voogt, J., Fisser, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2012). Preparing pre-service candidates to integrate technology in education: A synthesis of qualitative evidence. Computers & Education, 59(1), 134–144. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.009
- Vasquez, E., III, Forbush, D. E., Mason, L. L., Lockwood, A. R., & Gleed, L. (2011). Delivery and evaluation of synchronous online reading tutoring to students at-risk of reading failure. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 30(3), 16–26. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/875687051103000303
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Socio-cultural theory. Mind in Society, 6, 52–58.
- Wells, G. (2000). Dialogic inquiry in education. In C.D. Lee and P. Smagorinsky (Eds.) Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research.New York: Cambridge University Press, (pp. 51–85).
- Wetzel, K., Buss, R., Foulger, T. S., & Lindsey, L. (2014). Infusing educational technology in teaching methods courses: Successes and dilemmas. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 30(3), 89–103. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2014.891877
- Williams, L. M., Hall, K. W., Eastham, N., Hedrick, W. B., & Boller, D. (2015). Providing preservice and inservice candidates with virtual field experiences using interactive videoconferencing. The Reading Professor, 37(1), 7.