Reconsidering Resistance and Challenges: Teacher Agency During Joint Instructional Inquiry with Literacy Coaches

References

• Achinstein, B., & Ogawa, R. T. (2006). (In)fidelity: What the resistance of new teachers reveals about professional principles and prescriptive educational policies. Harvard Educational Review, 76(1), 30–63. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.76.1.e14543458r811864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anders, P. L., Hoffman, J. V., & Duffy, G. G. (2000). Teaching teachers to teach reading: Paradigm shifts, persistent problems, and challenges. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 719–742). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bean, R. M., Draper, J. A., Hall, V., Vandermolen, J., & Zigmond, N. (2010). Coaches and coaching in Reading First schools: A reality check. The Elementary School Journal, 111(1), 87–114. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/653471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biancarosa, G., Bryk, A., & Dexter, E. (2010). Assessing the value-added effects of literacy collaborative professional development on student achievement. The Elementary School Journal, 111(1), 7–34. https://doi.org/10.1086/653468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boylan, M., Coldwell, M., Maxwell, B., & Jordan, J. (2018). Rethinking models of professional learning as tools: A conceptual analysis to inform research and practice. Professional Development in Education, 44(1), 120–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2017.1306789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridwell-Mitchell, E. N. (2015). Theorizing teacher agency and reform: How institutionalized instructional practices change and persist. Sociology of Education, 88(2), 140–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040715575559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brock, C. H., Robertson, D. A., Borti, A., Thrailkill, L., & Khasilova, D. (2021). Exploring the discursive positioning of members of a literacy professional learning community. Professional Development in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2021.2013930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodie, K. (2021). Teacher agency in professional learning communities. Professional Development in Education, 47(4), 560–573. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1689523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castle, K. (2006). Autonomy through pedagogical research. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(8), 1094–1103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crafton, L., & Kaiser, E. (2011). The language of collaboration: Dialogue and identity in teacher professional development. Improving Schools, 14(2), 104–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480211410437
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., Wei, R., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the United States and abroad. National Staff Development Council.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1995). Human autonomy: The basis of true self-esteem. In M. Kemmis (Ed.), Efficacy, agency, and self-esteem (pp. 31–49). Plenum. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1280-0_3
   Google Scholar
• Desimone, L. M., & Stuckey, D. (2014). Sustaining teacher professional development. In L. E. Martin, S. Kragler, D. J. Quatroche, & K. L. Bauserman (Eds.), Handbook of professional development in education: Successful models and practices, preK-12 (pp. 467–482). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dillon, D. R., O’Brien, D. G., Sato, M., & Kelly, C. M. (2011). Professional development and teacher education for reading instruction. In M. L. Kamil, P. D. Pearson, E. B. Moje, & P. P. Afflerbach (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 4, pp. 627–660). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203840412.ch26
   Google Scholar
• Elish-Piper, L., & L’Allier, S. K. (2011). Examining the Relationship between Literacy Coaching and Student Reading Gains in Grades K–3. The Elementary School Journal, 112(1), 83–106. http://www.jstor.org/stalbe/10.1086/660685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haneda, M., Sherman, B., Nebus Bose, F., & Teemant, A. (2019). Ways of interacting: What underlies instructional coaches’ discursive actions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 78, 165–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.11.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1986). Two courses of expertise. In H. Stevenson, H. Azama, & K. Hakuta (Eds.), Child development and education in Japan (pp. 262–272). Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Heineke, S. F. (2013). Coaching discourse: Supporting teachers’ professional learning. The Elementary School Journal, 113(3), 409–433. https://doi.org/10.1086/668767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, C. S. (2016). Getting to the heart of the matter: Discursive negotiations of emotions within literacy coaching interactions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 331–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, S., & Rainville, K. N. (2014). Flowing toward understanding: Suffering, humility, and compassion in literacy coaching. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 30(3), 270–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2014.909270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (1982). The coaching of teaching. Educational Leadership, 40(1), 4–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraft, M. A., Blazar, D., & Hogan, D. (2018). The effect of teacher coaching on instruction and achievement: A meta-analysis of the causal evidence. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318759268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, C., Li, Z., & Gong, Y. (2016). Teacher agency and professional learning in cross-cultural teaching contexts: Accounts of Chinese teachers from international schools in Hong Kong. Teaching and Teacher Education, 54, 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, L., & Ruppar, A. (2021). Conceptualizing teacher agency for inclusive education: A systematic and international review. Teacher Education and Special Education, 44(1), 42–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406420926976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacPhee, D., & Jewett, P. (2017). Conflicting discourses: Navigating the tensions of becoming a literacy coach. The New Educator, 13(4), 408–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/1547688X.2016.1237690
   Google Scholar
• Matsumura, L. C., Garnier, H. E., & Spybrook, J. (2013). Literacy coaching to improve student reading achievement: A multi-level mediation model. Language and Instruction, 25, 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McChesney, K., & Aldridge, J. M. (2021). What gets in the way? A new conceptual model for the trajectory from teacher professional development to impact. Professional Development in Education, 47(5), 834–852. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1667412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. M., Huberman, A. M., & Saldańa, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2022). NAEP report card: 2022 NAEP reading assessment. Institute of Education Sciences, U. S. Department of Education. https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/highlights/reading/2022/
   Google Scholar
• Neuman, S. B., & Wright, T. S. (2010). Promoting language and literacy development for early childhood educators: A mixed-methods study of coursework and coaching. The Elementary School Journal, 111(1), 63–86. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/653470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paris, C., & Lung, P. (2008). Agency and child-centered practices in novice teachers: Autonomy, efficacy, intentionality, and reflectivity. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 29(3), 253–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/10901020802275302
   Google Scholar
• Reeve, J., & Tseng, C. -M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 257–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, D. A., Ford-Connors, E., Frahm, T., Bock, K., & Paratore, J. R. (2020a). Unpacking productive coaching interactions: Identifying coaching approaches that supports instructional uptake. Professional Development in Education, 46(3), 405–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1634628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, D. A., Padesky, L., & Brock, C. H. (2019). Cultivating student agency through teacher professional development. Theory into Practice, 59(2), 192–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, D. A., Padesky, L., Ford-Connors, E., & Paratore, J. R. (2020b). What does it mean to say coaching is relational?. Journal of Literacy Research, 52(1), 55–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X19896632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sailors, M., Minton, S., & Villarreal, L. (2017). The role of literacy coaching in improving comprehension instruction. In S. E. Israel (Ed.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (2nd ed., pp. 601–625). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sailors, M., & Price, L. (2015). Support for the Improvement of Practices through Intensive Coaching (SPIC): A model of coaching for improving reading instruction and reading achievement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 45, 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smagorinsky, P. (2008). The methods section as conceptual epicenter in constructing social science research reports. Written Communication, 25(3), 389–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088308317815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teemant, A. (2014). A mixed-methods investigation of instructional coaching for teachers of diverse learners. Urban Education, 49(5), 574–604. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085913481362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walpole, S., McKenna, M. C., Uribe-Zarain, X., & Lamitina, D. (2010). The relationships between coaching and instruction in the primary grades: Evidence from high-poverty schools. The Elementary School Journal, 111(1), 115–140. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/653472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheatley, K. F. (2002). The potential benefits of teacher efficacy doubts for educational reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0742-051x(01)00047-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, K. S., Duncan, T., Lee, S. W. Y., Scarloss, B., & Shapley, K. L. (2007). Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Educational Evaluation and Regional Assistance.
   Google Scholar