References

• Alma, Ö.G. (2011). Comparison of robust regression methods in linear regression. International Journal of Contemporary Mathematical Sciences, 6(9), 409–421.
   Google Scholar
• Burton, S., & Soboleva, A. (2011). Interactive or reactive? Marketing with Twitter. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 28(7), 491–499.
   Google Scholar
• Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(5), 752–766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, P., & Yan, Y. (2012). The new media tourism micro-blog’s attraction for tourists: A case study on network text analysis of Elong Sina micro-blog. Tourism Forum, 5(3), 22–26.
   Google Scholar
• Chiu, H.C., Hsieh, Y.C., Kao, Y.H., & Lee, M. (2007). The determinants of email receivers’ disseminating behaviors on the internet. Journal of Advertising Research, 47(4), 524–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries, L., Gensler, S., & Leeflang, P.S H. (2012). Popularity of brand posts on brand fan pages: An investigation of the effects of social media marketing. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26, 83–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan, W., Gu, B., & Whinston, A.B. (2008). Do online reviews matter?—An empirical investigation of panel data. Decision Support Systems, 45, 1007–1016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong. S. (2013). Who benefits from Twitter? Social media and political competition in the U.S. House of Representatives. Government Information Quarterly, 30, 464–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen, B. J., Zhang, M., Sobel, K., & Chowdury, A. (2009). Twitter power: Tweets as electronic word of mouth. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(11), 2169–2188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Java, A., Song, X., Finin, T., & Tseng, B. (2007). Why we twitter: Understanding microblogging usage and communities. Paper presented at the ninth WekKDD and first SNA-KDD 2007 Workshop on Web Mining and Social Network Analysis. San Jose, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, A.M., & Haenlein. M. (2011). The early bird catches the news: Nine things you should know about micro-blogging. Business Horizons, 54, 105–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., & Moon, S. (2010, April). What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 591–600). : ACM. Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Z., Liu, L., & Li, H. (2012). Determinants of information retweeting in microblogging. Internet Research, 22(4), 443–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, X., & Zhang, J. (2013). How do consumer buzz and traffic in social media marketing predict the value of the firm? Journal of Management Information Systems, 30(2), 213–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malhotra, A., Malhotra, C.K., & See, A. (2012). How to get your messages retweeted. MIT Sloan Management Review, 53(2), 60–66.
   Google Scholar
• Maronna, R.A., & Yohai, V.J. (2000). Robust regression with both continuous and categorical predictors. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 89, 197–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renaud, O., & Victoria-Feser, M.P. (2010), A robust coefficient of determination for regression. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 140, 1852–1862.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rybalko, S., & Seltzer, T. (2010). Dialogic communication in 140 characters or less: How Fortune 500 companies engage stakeholders using Twitter. Public Relations Review, 36, 336–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, S. Y. (2010). The dissemination characteristics of Micro-blogging and promotion. Young Writers, 14, 246–249.
   Google Scholar
• Starbird, K., Palen, L., Hughes, A.L., & Vieweg, S. (2010, February). Chatter on the red: What hazards threat reveals about the social life of microblogged information. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 241–250). : ACM. New York, NY, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Suh, B., Hong, L., Pirolli, P., & Chi, E.H. (2010). Want to be retweeted? Large scale analytics on factors impacting retweet in twitter network. In Proceedings of the Social Computing (SocialCom), 2010 IEEE Second International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust (pp. 177–184). : IEEE. Minneapolis, MN.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, X.J., Wu, X.X, Huang, C.X., & Liu, R.S. (2013). Annual Report on Development of New Media in China 2013. Beijing, China: Social Sciences Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Torres-Salinas, D., Cabezas-Clavijo, A., Ruiz-Pérez, R., & López-Cózar, E.D. (2011). State of the library and information science blogosphere after social networks boom: A metric approach. Library & Information Science Research, 33, 168–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J., & Huang, J. (2012). Research on the Evaluation Indices of Micro-blog Marketing Effectiveness. Paper presented at the 10th Asia Pacific CHRIE (APacCHRIE) Pilipinas 2012 Conference. Manila, Philippines.
   Google Scholar
• Weinberg, B.D., & Pehlivan, E. (2011). Social spending: Managing the social media mix. Business Horizons, 54, 275–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xi, X. (2011). Two fulcrums of micro-blog marketing impact assessment. Advertiser Market Observer, 2, 41.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, J., & Counts, S. (2010). Predicting the speed, scale, and range of information diffusion in Twitter. Proceedings of the 4th International AAAI International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 355–358.
   Google Scholar
• Ye, S., & Wu, F. (2010). Measuring message propagation and social influence on Twitter.com. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6430(3), 216–231.
   Google Scholar
• Zarrella, D. (2009). The Science of Retweets. Retrieved from http://danzarrella.com/the-science-of-retweets-report.html
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, W., & Watts, S.A. (2008). Capitalizing on content: Information adoption in two online communities. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9(2), 73–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar