Coordinating and implementing multiple systems for forest management: implications of the regulatory framework for sustainable forestry in Sweden

References

• Appelstrand, M. (2007). Miljömålet i skogsbruket styrning och frivillighet. Lund studies in sociology of law, 26. (Thesis PhD). Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Bäckstrand, K., Khan, J., Kronsell, A. & Lövbrand, E. (Eds.). (2010). The promise of new modes of environmental governance. In Environmental politics and deliberative democracy: Examining the promise of new modes of governance (pp. 3–27). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, S., & Cashore, B. (2012). Complex global governance and domestic policies: four pathways of influence. International Affairs, 88(3), 585–604. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2012.01090.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cashore, B., Auld, G., & Newsom, D. (2004). Governing through markets forest certification and the emergence of non-state authority. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eckerberg, K. (1987). Environmental protection in Swedish forestry: A study of the implementation process. (Thesis PhD). Umeå University.
   Google Scholar
• Forsberg, M. (2012). Skogen som livsmiljö en rättsvetenskaplig studie om skyddet för biologisk mångfald. (Thesis PhD). Uppsala University.
   Google Scholar
• Gulbrandsen, L. (2014). Dynamic governance interactions: Evolutionary effects of state responses to non-state certification programs. Regulation and Governance, 8(1), 74–92. doi:10.1111/rego.12005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, L., Baker, S.C., Bauhus, J., Beese, W. J., Brodie, A., Kouki, J., … Franklin, J. F. (2012). Retention forestry to maintain multifunctional forests: A world perspective. BioScience, 62(7), 633–645. doi:10.1525/bio.2012.62.7.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, L., Kouki, J., & Sverdrup-Thygeson, A. (2010). Tree retention as a conservation measure in clear-cut forests of northern europe: A review of ecological consequences. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 25, 295–308. doi:10.1080/02827581.2010.497495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2001). Types of multi-level governance. European Integration online Papers, 5(11). Retrieved March 18, 2012, from http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2001-011.htm
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M. coordinating lead author. (2011). Overcoming the challenges to integration: Embracing complexity in forest policy design through multi-level governance. In J. Rayner, A. Buck, & P. Katila, (Eds.), Embracing complexity: Meeting the challenges of international forest governance. (pp. 93–110). Vienna: International Union of Forest Research Organizations.
   Google Scholar
• Humphreys, D., (2006). Logjam – deforestation and the crisis of global governance. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Hysing, E. (2009). Governing without government? The private governance of forest certification in sweden. Public Administration, 87(2), 312–326. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01750.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, J. (2013a). Constructing and contesting the legitimacy of private forest governance: The case of forest certification in Sweden. (Thesis PhD). Umeå University.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson, J. (2013b). Towards democratic and effective forest governance? The discursive legitimation of forest certification in northern sweden. Local Environment, doi:10.1080/13549839.2013.792050
   Google Scholar
• Keskitalo, E. C. H., & Liljenfeldt, J. (in press). Implementation of forest certification in sweden: An issue of organisation and communication?. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research.
   Google Scholar
• Keskitalo, E. C. H., & Pettersson, M. (2012). Implementing multi-level governance? The legal basis and implementation of the EU water framework directive for forestry in sweden. Environmental Policy and Governance, 22(2), 90–103. doi:10.1002/eet.1574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keskitalo, E. C. H., Sandström, C., Tysiachniouk, M., & Johansson, J. (2009). Local consequences of applying international norms: Differences in the application of forest certification in northern sweden, northern finland and northwest russia. Ecology and Society, 14(2), 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindkvist, A., Mineur, E., Nordlund, A., Nordlund, C., Olsson, O., Sandström, C., … Keskitalo, E. C. H.  (2012). Attitudes on intensive forestry. An investigation into perceptions of increased production requirements in swedish forestry. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 27, 438–448. doi:10.1080/02827581.2011.645867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lister, J. (2011). Corporate social responsibility and the state – international approaches to forest co-regulation. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, G., & Hooghe, L. (2004). Contrasting visions of multi-level governance. In I. Bache & M. Flinders, (Eds.), Multi-level governance (pp. 15–30). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marsden, G., & Rye, T. (2010). The governance of transport and climate change. Journal of Transport Geography, 18, 669–678. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2009.09.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott, C. L., Cashore, B., & Kanowski, P. (2010). Global environmental forest policies: An international comparison. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Miljömålsberedningen. (2012). Plan för framtagandet av en strategi för långsiktigt hållbar markanvändning. Delbetänkande från Miljömålsberedningen. SOU 2012:15. Stockholm: Fritze.
   Google Scholar
• Miljömålsberedningen. (2013). Långsiktig hållbar markanvändning del 1. Delbetänkande av Miljömålsberedningen. SOU 2013:43. Stockholm: Fritze.
   Google Scholar
• Miljömålsberedningens expertgrupp. (2012). Rapport från expertgruppen om miljöhänsyn i skogsbruket (working material in Swedish). Retrieved March 1, 2012, from http://www.sou.gov.se/mmb/pdf/Rapport%20fr%C3%A5n%20expertgruppen%20om%20milj%C3%B6h%C3%A4nsyn%20i%20skogsbruket.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Agriculture. (2008). A forest policy in line with the times. Fact Sheet, July 2008. Stockholm: Government Offices of Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Moen, J., & Keskitalo, E. C. H. (2010). Interlocking panarchies in multi-use boreal forests in sweden. Ecology and Society, 15(3), 17.
   Google Scholar
• Overdevest, C. (2010). Comparing forest certification schemes: The case of ratcheting standards in the forest sector. Socio-Economic Review, 8, 47–76. doi:10.1093/ser/mwp028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PEFC Sweden. (2012). Svensk PEFC Skogsstandard. PEFC SWE 002:3. 2012–2017. Uppsala: PEFC Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G. (2011). Governance as political theory. Critical Policy Studies, 5(1), 63–72. doi:10.1080/19460171.2011.555683
   Google Scholar
• Pierre, J., & Peters, B. G. (2005). Governing complex societies: Trajectories and scenarios. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlin, M. (2011). Under the cover of the swedish forestry model. Stockholm: Swedish Society for Nature Conservation.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlin, M. (2013). Credibility at stake: How FSC sweden fails to safeguard forest biodiversity. Stockholm: Swedish Society for Nature Conservation.
   Google Scholar
• Sarkki, S., & Heikkinen, H. I. (2010). Social movements’ pressure strategies during forest disputes in finland. Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research, 2(3), 281–296. doi:10.1080/19390459.2010.487991
   Google Scholar
• Sundström, G. (2005). Målstyrningen drar åt skogen: Om government och governance i svensk skogspolitik. SCORE Rapportserie 2005:6. Stockholm: SCORE.
   Google Scholar
• Sveaskog. (2012). Sveaskogs naturvårdsarbete En satsning för mångfald i framtidens skogslandskap. Retrieved May 20, 2013, from http://www.sveaskog.se/sv/skogsbruk-och-miljo/naturvard/
   Google Scholar
• Sweden, G. (2008). Regeringens skogsproposition hotar den biologiska mångfalden [online press release, 18 March 2008]. Retrieved March 18, 2012, from http://www.greenpeace.org/sweden/se/press/pressmeddelanden/regeringens-skogsproposition-h/
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Environmental Protection Agency. (2012a). Steg på vägen. Fördjupad utvärdering av miljömålen 2012. Rapport 6500. Stockholm: SEPA.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Environmental Protection Agency. (2012b). Styrmedel för att nå miljökvalitetsmålen. En övergripande kartläggning av styrmedel som styr mot Sveriges miljökvalitetsmål. Rapport 6415. Stockholm: SEPA.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Forest Agency and Swedish Environmental Protection Agency. (2011). Skogs- och miljöpolitiska mål - brister, orsaker och förslag på åtgärder. Jönköping: Swedish Forest Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Forest Agency. (2005). Quantitative targets of swedish forest policy. Jönköping: Swedish Forest Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Forest Agency. (2008a). Generell hänsyn – en fallstudie. Jönköping: Skogsstyrelsen.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Forest Agency. (2008b). Natur- och kulturmiljöhänsyn vid föryngringsavverkning – resultat från skogsstyrelsens rikspolytaxinventering (R1), 1999–2006. Jönköping: Swedish Forest Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Forest Agency. (2009). Ny metod och nya definitioner i uppföljningen av frivilliga avsättningar. Jönköping: Swedish Forest Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Forest Agency. (2012a). Skogsbrukets frivilliga avsättningar. Jönköping: Swedish Forest Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Forest Agency. (2012b). Swedish statistical yearbook of forestry. Jönköping: Swedish Forest Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Forest Agency. (2012c). Hänsynsuppföljning - grunder. Jönköping: Swedish Forest Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Forest Agency. (2012d). Kunskapssammanställning och bedömningsgrunder för hyggesfritt skogsbruk. Jönköping: Swedish Forest Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Forest Agency. (2012e). Skogsvårdslagstiftningen: Gällande regler 1 januari 2012. Jönköping: Swedish Forest Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Forest Agency. (2013a). Målbilder för god miljöhänsyn – en delleverans från dialog om miljöhänsyn. Jönköping: Swedish Forest Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Forest Agency. (2013b). Swedish statistical yearbook of forestry. Jönköping: Swedish Forest Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Forests Industries Federation. (2011). The Swedish Forests Industries Federation Facts and Figures 2010. Retrieved March 4, 2012, from http://www.forestindustries.se/documentation/facts_and_figures
   Google Scholar
• Swedish FSC Council. (2010). Swedish FSC standard for forest certification including SLIMF indicators. Uppsala: Swedish FSC Council.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Gov. Bill 1992/93: 226. En ny skogspolitik. [A new forest policy]. Stockholm: Ministry of Agriculture.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Gov. Bill 2007/08:108. En skogspolitik i takt med tiden. [A forest policy in line with the times]. Stockholm: Ministry of Agriculture.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Society for Nature Conservation and WWF Sweden. (2012). Sverige och nagoyamålen. Swedish Stockholm: Society for Nature Conservation and WWF Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Society for Nature Conservation. (2012). Naturskyddsföreningen hoppar av samarbete med Skogsstyrelsen. Retrieved May 2, 2013, from http://news.cision.com/se/naturskyddsforeningen/r/naturskyddsforeningen-hoppar-av-samarbete-med-skogsstyrelsen,c9227742
   Google Scholar
• Västerbotten County Administrative Board. (2012). Skogen – drygt halva Västerbotten. Retrieved February 3, 2012, from http://www.lansstyrelsen.se/vasterbotten/Sv/miljo-och-klimat/tillstandet-i-miljon/skog/Pages/default.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, S. A. (2011). Network governance as adaptive institutional response: The case of multifunctional forested landscapes. Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research, 3(3), 223–235. doi:10.1080/19390459.2011.591760
   Google Scholar
• WWF Sweden. (2012a). Angående Världsnaturfonden WWFs deltagande i “Dialog om miljöhänsyn”. Retrieved May 2, 2013, from http://www.wwf.se/nyhetsbrev/source.php/1502493/Brev%20WWF%20till%20SKS%20om%20dialogprocessen%20191012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• WWF Sweden. (2012b). Satsa på en ny skogspolitik inom naturens gränser (press release 28 May 2012). Retrieved March 18, 2012, from http://www.wwf.se/press/pressrum/pressmeddelanden/1478729-satsa-p-en-ny-skogspolitik-inom-naturens-grnser
   Google Scholar
• Zutshi, A., & Sohal, A. (2004). Adoption and maintenance of environmental management systems: Critical success factors. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 15(4), 399–419. doi:10.1108/14777830410540144
   Google Scholar