References
- Baert, P. and Booth, J., 2012. Tensions within the public intellectual: political interventions from dreyfus to the new social media. International journal of politics, culture, and society, 25, 111–126. doi:10.1007/s10767-012-9123-6
- Baert, P. and Morgan, M., 2017. A performative framework for the study of intellectuals. European journal for social theory, 21 (3), 322–339. doi:10.1177/1368431017690737
- Bartlett, T., 2018. What’s so dangerous about Jordan Peterson? The Chronicle of Higher Education, January. Available from: https://www.chronicle.com/article/What-s-So-Dangerous-About/242256
- Beckner, S., 2018. Thought crimes: Jordan Peterson and the meaning of the meaning of life. Skeptic, March. Available from: https://www.skeptic.com/reading_room/thought-crimes-jordan-peterson-meaning-of-life/
- Bialik, K. and Matsa, K.E., 2017. Key trends in social and digital news media. Pew research center, 4–10. Available from: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/10/04/key-trends-in-social-and-digital-news-media/
- Brooks, D., 2018. The Jordan Peterson moment. The New York Times, January. Available from: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/25/opinion/jordan-peterson-moment.html
- Burston, D., 2018. It’s hip to be square! The myths of Jordan Peterson. Psychotherapy and politics journal, 17 (1), n.p.
- Cave, T. and Wilson, D., 2018. Reading beyond the code. Literature and relevance theory. Oxford: Oxford UP.
- Connell, R.W., 2005. Masculinities. 2nd ed. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
- Covington, P., Adams, J., and Sargin, E., 2016. Deep neural networks for YouTube recommendations. RecSys. Available from: https://static.googleusercontent.com/media/research.google.com/nl//pubs/archive/45530.pdf
- Crociani-Windland, L. and Yates, C., 2020. Masculinity, affect and the search for certainty in an age of precarity. Free associations: psychoanalysis and culture, media, groups, politics, 78, 2047–2622.
- Derksen, J., 2019. De twaalf geboden van klinisch psycholoog Jordan Peterson. GZ - Psychologie, 11 (1), 35–36. doi:10.1007/s41480-019-0010-x
- Derrida, J., 1999. Adieu to Emmanuel Levinas. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
- Derrida, J., 2002. Acts of religion. New York: Routledge.
- Derrida, J., 2003. Rogues: two essays of reason. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
- Derrida, J., 2005. Paper machine. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
- Diggit Magazine, 2018. Professor Odile Heynders on public intellectuals and the public sphere [video file]. October 18. Available from: https://www.diggitmagazine.com/videos/professor-odile-heynders-public-intellectuals-and-public-sphere
- Driessens, O., 2014. Celebrity capital: redefining celebrity using field theory. Theory and Society, 42 (5), 543–560. doi:10.1007/s11186-013-9202-3
- Gallup and Knight, 2018. American views: trust, media and democracy. Knight foundation report. Available from: https://knightfoundation.org/reports/american-views-trust-media-and-democracy-90489
- Genetically Modified Skeptic, 2018. Jordan Peterson misrepresents science [video file]. July 28. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KaDAuiLaT2Q
- Ging, D., 2017. Alphas, betas, and incels: theorizing the masculinities of the manosphere. Men & masculinities, 20 (10), 1–20.
- Gonçalves, L., 2018. Psychologist Jordan Peterson says lobsters help to explain why human hierarchies exist – do they? The Conversation. Available from: https://theconversation.com/psychologist-jordan-peterson-says-lobsters-help-to-explain-why-human-hierarchies-exist-do-they
- Grice, P., 1989. Studies in the way of words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Habermas, J., 2009. Europe, the faltering project. Cambridge: Polity.
- Heynders, O., 2016. Writers as public intellectuals: literature, celebrity, democracy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Hicks, S., 2004. Explaining postmodernism: skepticism and socialism from rousseau to foucault. Roscoe: Ockham’s Razor.
- Jung, C.G., et al., 1966. Two essays on analytical psychology. 2nd ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP.
- Klein, D.B., 2018. On Jordan Peterson, postmodernism, and PoMo-bashing. Society, 55 (6), 477–481. doi:10.1007/s12115-018-0295-1
- Lilley, S. 2011. Noam Chomsky: Anarchism, Council Capitalism, and Life After Capitalism. In: Lilley, S., ed., Capital and Its Discontents: Conversations with Radical Thinkers in a Time of Tumult, 237–245. Oakland, CA: PM Press.
- Maly, I., 2018. Populism as a mediatized communicative relation: the birth of algorithmic populism. Tilburg papers in culture studies, 213, 1–21.
- Marshall, D.P., 2016. Introduction: the plurality of publics. Contemporary Publics: Shifting Boundaries in New Media, Technology and Culture. In:D’Cruz, G., Lee, K., McDonald, S. and Marshall, D., eds, 1–13. London: Palgrave.
- Marshall, D.P. and Barbour, K., 2015. Making intellectual room for persona studies: a new consciousness and a shifted perspective. Persona studies, 1 (1), 1–12. doi:10.21153/ps2015vol1no1art464
- Marshall, D.P., Moore, C., and Barbour, K., 2015. Persona as method: exploring celebrity and the public self through persona studies. Celebrity studies, 6 (3), 288–305. doi:10.1080/19392397.2015.1062649
- Mathijsen, M., 2013. Historiezucht: de obsessie met het verleden in de negentiende eeuw. Nijmegen: Vantilt.
- McCallum, K.M. and Scott-Phillips, T., 2020. The art experience. Review of philosophy and psychology, 11 (37), 21–35. doi:10.1007/s13164-019-00443-y
- Meizoz, J., 2007. Postures littéraires: mises en scène modernes de l’auteur. Genève: Slatkine.
- Nickerson, R.S., 1998. Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of general psychology, 2 (2), 175–220. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175
- Niskanen, K., Bosch, M., and Wils, K., 2018. Scientific personas in theory and practice—ways of creating scientific, scholarly, and artistic identities. Persona studies, 4 (1), 1–5. doi:10.21153/ps2018vol4no1art748
- Papacharissi, Z., 2002. The virtual sphere: the internet as a public sphere. new media & society, 4 (1), 9–27. doi:10.1177/14614440222226244
- Papacharissi, Z., 2014. Affective publics: sentiment, technology, and politics. Oxford, UK: Oxford UP.
- Paul, H., 2016. Sources of the self. Scholarly personae as repertoires of scholarly selfhood. BMGN – low countries historical review, 131 (4), 135–154.
- Peterson, J.B., 1999. Maps of meaning: the architecture of belief. New York: Routledge.
- Peterson, J.B., 2017. Modern Times: Camille Paglia & Jordan B Peterson [video file]. October 2. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v-hIVnmUdX
- Peterson, J.B., 2018. 12 rules for life: an antidote to chaos. New York: Penguin Random House.
- Poell, T. and van Dijck, J., 2014. Social media and journalistic independence. In: J. Bennett and N. Strange, eds. Media independence: working with freedom or working for free? Routledge research in cultural and media studies, 69. New York: Routledge, 182–201.
- Read, M., 2018. Talking Basement-Dwellers with Jordan Peterson, Reddit’s new favorite philosopher. New York Magazine, February 4. https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2018/02/jordan-peterson-reddits-new-favorite-philosopher.html
- Robinson, N.J., 2018. The intellectual we deserve. Current Affairs, March. Available from: https://www.currentaffairs.org/2018/03/the-intellectual-we-deserve
- Sjw Triggered, 2020. SJW TRIGGERED- Jordan Peterson on Black Lives Matter. [Video file]. Oct 17. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=85caIvIylxA.
- Shields, J.A. and Dunne, J.M., 2016. Passing on the right. Conservative professors in the progressive university. Oxford: Oxford UP.
- Sperber, D. and Wilson, D., 1990. Rhetoric and relevance. In: J. Bender and D. Wellbery, eds. The ends of rhetoric: history, theory, practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 140–156.
- Sperber, D. and Wilson, D., 2004. Relevance theory. In: L.R. Horn and G. Ward, eds. The handbook of pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell, 607–632.
- Sperber, D., 2010. The guru effect. Review of philosophical psychology, 1 (4), 583–592. doi:10.1007/s13164-010-0025-0
- Sperber, D. and Wilson, D., 1986. Relevance: communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
- TheArchangel911, 2018. “Down the rabbit hole you meet the archetypes,” Jordan Peterson [video file]. September 5. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0_3iShwZxP0
- Tufekci, Z., 2015. Algorithmic harms beyond Facebook and Google: emergent challenges of computational agency. Journal on telecommunications and high technology law, 13, 203–218.
- van de Ven, I., 2018. From mythomaniac to martyr. The many public faces of A.H.J. Dautzenberg. Werkwinkel, journal of low countries and South African studies, 12 (2), 65–80.
- van de Ven, I., 2019. Big books in times of big data. Series Media/Arts/Politics. Leiden: Leiden UP.
- Weber, M., 2012 [1947]. Theory of social and economic organization. Trans. A. R. Anderson and T. Parsons. Eastford: Martino.
- Wilson, D., 2012. Relevance and the interpretation of literary works. Paper presented at EPICS V, Sevilla, March 2012.
- Yang, W., 2018. The passion of Jordan Peterson. Esquire, May. Available from: https://classic.esquire.com/article/2018/5/1/the-passion-of-jordan-peterson
- Žižek, S., 2018. A reply to my critics concerning an engagement with Jordan Peterson. The Philosophical Salon, February. Available from: https://thephilosophicalsalon.com/a-reply-to-my-critics-concerning-an-engagement-with-jordan-peterson/