References
- Acikkar, M., and O. Sivrikaya. 2018. Prediction of gross calorific value of coal based on proximate analysis using multiple linear regression and artificial neural networks. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering & Computer Sciences 26:2541–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.3906/elk-1802-50.
- Akhtar, J., N. Sheikh, and S. Munir. 2017. Linear regression based correlations for estimation of high heating values of Pakistani lignite coals. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects 39 (10):1063–70. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2017.1289283.
- Akkaya, A. V. 2009. Proximate analysis based multiple regression models for higher heating value estimation of low rank coals. Fuel Process Technology 90:165–70.
- Akkaya, A. V. 2013. Predicting coal heating values using proximate analysis via a neural network approach. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects 35 (3):253–60. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2010.509090.
- Akkoyunlu, M. C., E. Pekel, M. T. Akkoyunlu, and S. Pusat. 2020. Using hybridized ANN-GA prediction method for DOE performed drying experiments. Drying Technology, 1–7. (in Press). doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2020.1750027.
- Akkoyunlu, M. T., E. Pekel, M. C. Akkoyunlu, S. Pusat, C. Ozkan, and S. Kara. 2019. Moisture content estimation during fixed bed drying process with design of experiment and ANFIS methods. International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Technology 22:332–45. doi:https://doi.org/10.1504/IJOGCT.2019.103066.
- Begum, N., D. Chakravarty, and B. S. Das. 2019. Estimation of gross calorific value of bituminous coal using various coal properties and reflectance spectra. International Journal of Coal Preparation and Utilization 1–7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19392699.2019.1621301.
- Bui, H. B., H. Nguyen, Y. Choi, X. N. Bui, T. Nguyen-Thoi, and Y. Zandi. 2019. A novel artificial intelligence technique to estimate the gross calorific value of coal based on meta-heuristic and support vector regression algorithms. Applied Science 9:4868. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/app9224868.
- Ceylan, Z. 2020. Assessment of agricultural energy consumption of Turkey by MLR and Bayesian optimized SVR and GPR models. Journal of Forecasting. Early View. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/for.2673.
- Channiwala, S. A., and P. P. Parikh. 2002. A unified correlation for estimating HHV of solid, liquid and gaseous fuels. Fuel 81 (8):1051–63. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-2361(01)00131-4.
- Chelgani, S. C., B. Hart, W. C. Grady, and J. C. Hower. 2011. Study relationship between inorganic and organic coal analysis with gross calorific value by multiple regression and ANFIS. International Journal of Coal Preparation and Utilization 31 (1):9–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19392699.2010.527876.
- Chelgani, S. C., S. Mesroghli, and J. C. Hower. 2010. Simultaneous prediction of coal rank parameters based on ultimate analysis using regression and artificial neural network. International Journal of Coal Geology 83:31–34. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2010.03.004.
- Erik, N. Y., and I. Yilmaz. 2011. On the use of conventional and soft computing models for prediction of gross calorific value (GCV) of coal. International Journal of Coal Preparation and Utilization 31:32–59. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19392699.2010.534683.
- Feng, Q., J. Zhang, X. Zhang, and S. Wen. 2015. Proximate analysis based prediction of gross calorific value of coals: A comparison of support vector machine, alternating conditional expectation and artificial neural network. Fuel Process Technology 129:120–29. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2014.09.001.
- Ghugare, S. B., and S. S. Tambe. 2017. Genetic programming based high performing correlations for prediction of higher heating value of coals of different ranks and from diverse geographies. Journal of the Energy Institute 90:476–84. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2016.03.002.
- Go, A. W., R. C. Agapay, Y. H. Ju, and A. T. Conag. 2019. Unified semi-Empirical models for predicting or estimating the heating value of coal and related properties – Theoretical basis and thermochemical implications. Combustion Science and Technology 1–26. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00102202.2019.1617705.
- Guenther, J., and O. Sawodny. 2019. Feature selection and Gaussian process regression for personalized thermal comfort prediction. Building and Environment 48:448–58. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.11.019.
- Hewing, L., J. Kabzan, and M. N. Zeilinger. 2019. Cautious model predictive Control using gaussian process regression. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 1–8. Early access. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TCST.2019.2949757.
- Kanwal, S., B. Khan, S. M. Ali, and C. A. Mehmood. 2018. Gaussian process regression based inertia emulation and reserve estimation for grid interfaced photovoltaic system. Renew Energy 126 (10):865–75. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.04.012.
- Kavšek, D., A. Bednárová, M. Biro, R. Kranvogl, D. Vončina, and E. Beinrohr. 2013. Characterization of Slovenian coal and estimation of coal heating value based on proximate analysis using regression and artificial neural networks. Central European Journal of Chemistry 11 (9):1481–91.
- Kong, D., Y. Chen, and N. Li. 2018. Gaussian process regression for tool wear prediction. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 104:556–74. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.11.021.
- Kumari, P., A. K. Singh, D. A. Wood, and B. Hazra. 2019. Predictions of gross calorific value of Indian coals from their moisture and ash content. Journal Geological Society of India 93:437–42. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-019-1198-5.
- Liu, Y., Y. Pan, D. Huang, and Q. Wang. 2017. Fault prognosis of filamentous sludge bulking using an enhanced multi-output Gaussian processes regression. Control Engineering Practice 62:46–54. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conengprac.2017.02.003.
- Lu, S. X., G. Lin, H. Que, M. J. J. Li, C. H. Wei, and J. K. Wang. 2019. Grey relational analysis using Gaussian process regression method for dissolved gas concentration prediction. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics 10:1313–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-018-0812-y.
- Lu, Z., J. Mo, S. Yao, J. Zhao, and J. Lu. 2017. Rapid determination of the gross calorific value of coal using laser- Induced breakdown spectroscopy coupled with artificial neural networks and genetic algorithm. Energy & Fuels : An American Chemical Society Journal 31:3849–55. doi:https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b00025.
- Majumder, A., R. Jain, P. Banerjee, and J. Barnwal. 2008. Development of a new proximate analysis based correlation to predict calorific value of coal. Fuel 87:3077–81. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2008.04.008.
- Mesroghli, S., E. Jorjani, and S. C. Chelgani. 2009. Estimation of gross calorific value based on coal analysis using regression and artificial neural networks. International Journal of Coal Geology 79:49–54. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2009.04.002.
- Onifadea, M., A. I. Lawal, A. E. Aladejare, S. Bada, and M. A. Idris. 2019. Prediction of gross calorific value of solid fuels from their proximate analysis using soft computing and regression analysis. International Journal of Coal Preparation and Utilization 1–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19392699.2019.1695605.
- Palmer C. A., C. L. Oman, A. J. Park, and J. A. Luppens. 2015. The US Geological Survey coal quality (COALQUAL) database version 3.0. US Geological Survey. http://ncrdspublic.er.usgs.gov/coalqual
- Parikh, J., S. A. Channiwala, and G. K. Ghosal. 2005. A correlation for calculating HHV from proximate analysis of solid fuels. Fuel 84:484–94. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2004.10.010.
- Patel, S. U., B. J. Kumar, Y. P. Badhe, B. Sharma, S. Saha, S. Biswas, A. Chaudhury, S. S. Tambe, and B. D. Kulkarni. 2007. Estimation of gross calorific value of coals using artificial neural networks. Fuel 86:334–44. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2006.07.036.
- Pekel, E., M. C. Akkoyunlu, M. T. Akkoyunlu, and S. Pusat. 2020. Decision tree regression model to predict low-rank coal moisture content during convective drying process. International Journal of Coal Preparation and Utilization, 1–8. (in Press). doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19392699.2020.1737527.
- Qi, M., H. Luo, P. Weib, and Z. Fu. 2019. Estimation of low calorific value of blended coals based on support vector regression and sensitivity analysis in coal-fired power plants. Fuel 236:1400–07. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.09.117.
- Seervi, K. 2015. Prediction of calorific value of Indian coals by artificial neural network. BSc Thesis, Department of mining engineering national institute of technology, Rourkela.
- Son, Y., S. Lee, S. Park, and L. Jaewook. 2018. Learning representative exemplars using one-class Gaussian process regression. Pattern Recognition 74:185–97. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2017.09.002.
- Tan, P., C. Zhang, J. Xia, Q.-Y. Fang, and G. Chen. 2015. Estimation of higher heating value of coal based on proximate analysis using support vector regression. Fuel Process Technology 138:298–304. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2015.06.013
- Tewalt S. J., H. E. Belkin, J. R. SanFilipo, M. D. Merrill, C. A. Palmer, P. D. Warwick, A. W. Karlsen, R. B. Finkelman, and A. J. Park. 2010. Chemical analyses in the world coal quality inventory. US Geological Survey. http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2010/1196
- Tuncalı, E., B. Ciftci, N. Yavuz, S. Toprak, A. Koker, Z. Gencer, H. Aycik, and N. Pahin. 2002. Chemical and technological properties of Turkish tertiary coals. Ankara: Turkish General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration. [in Turkish].
- Wang, Y., and B. Chaib-Draa. 2016. KNN-based Kalman filter: An efficient and non-stationary method for Gaussian process regression. Knowledge-Based Systems 114:148–55. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2016.10.002.
- Wen, X., S. Jian, and J. Wang. 2017. Prediction models of calorific value of coal based on wavelet neural networks. Fuel 199:512–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.03.012.
- Yoon, Y. R., and H. J. Moon. 2018. Energy consumption model with energy use factors of tenants in commercial buildings using gaussian process regression. Energy and Buildings 168 (7):215–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.03.042.
- Zhang, C., H. Wei, X. Zhao, T. Liu, K. Zhang. 2016. A Gaussian process regression based hybrid approach for short-term wind speed prediction. Energy Convers Manage 126:1084–92. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.08.086.
- Zhua, X., and R. Venderbosch. 2005. A correlation between stoichiometrical ratio of fuel and its higher heating value. Fuel 84:1007–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2004.12.002.