References
- Chu, K., J. Chen, and A. Yu. 2016. Applicability of a coarse-grained CFD–DEM model on dense medium cyclone. Minerals Engineering 90:43–54. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2016.01.020.
- Cui, B. Y., C. E. Zhang, D. Z. Wei, S. S. Lu, and Y. Q. Feng. 2017. Effects of feed size distribution on separation performance of hydrocyclones with different vortex finder diameters. Powder Technology 322:114–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2017.09.010.
- Dong, W., W. Zhankui, W. Zhi, Q. Guoyu, and G. Xuzhong. 2021. Study on hydrocyclone separation enhancement of micro Si/SiC from silicon-sawing waste by selective comminution. Separation Science and Technology 56 (5):991–99. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01496395.2020.1744653.
- Fan, Y., J. G. Wang, Z. Y. Bai, J. Y. Wang, and H. L. Wang. 2015. Experimental investigation of various inlet section angles in mini-hydrocyclones using particle imaging velocimetry. Separation and Purification Technology 149:156–64. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2015.04.047.
- Ghodrat, M., Z. Qi, S. B. Kuang, L. Ji, and A. B. Yu. 2016. Computational investigation of the effect of particle density on the multiphase flows and performance of hydrocyclone. Minerals Engineering 90:55–69. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2016.03.017.
- Hsieh, K. T., and K. Rajamani. 1988. Phenomenological model of the hydrocyclone: Model development and verification for single-phase flow. International Journal of Mineral Processing 22 (1–4):223–37. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-7516(88)90065-8.
- Huang, L., S. S. Deng, M. Chen, and J. F. Guan. 2017. Numerical simulation and experimental study on a deoiling rotary hydrocyclone. Chemical Engineering and Science 172:107–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2017.06.030.
- Huang, Y., H.-L. Wang, J. Tian, J. Li, P. Fu, and F. He. 2020. Theoretical study on centrifugal coupling characteristics of self-rotation and revolution of particles in hydrocyclones. Separation and Purification Technology 244 (116552):116552. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.116552.
- Hwang, K. J., and S. P. Chou. 2017. Designing vortex finder structure for improving the particle separation efficiency of a hydrocyclone. Separation and Purification Technology 172:76–84. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2016.08.005.
- Ji, L., S. B. Kuang, and A. B. Yu. 2019. Numerical investigation of hydrocyclone feed inlet configurations for mitigating particle misplacement. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 58 (36):16823–33. doi:https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b01203.
- Jinyi, T., W. Hualin, L. Wenjie, H. Yuan, F. Pengbo, L. Jianping, and L. Yi. 2021. An efficient approach to temporarily separate foulants using hydrocyclone with reflux function for thermal energy recovery from sewage. Separation and Purification Technology 259:118130. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.118130.
- Kelsall, D. F. 1952. A study of the motion of solid particles in a hydraulic cyclone. Transactions of the Institution of Chemical Engineers 30:87–103.
- Liu, A. L., Y. H. Zhang, L. Ma, Y. M. Wang, and M. Y. He. 2018. Effect of inlet particle arrangement on separating property of a cyclone separator. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering 35:1380–87. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-018-0026-8.
- Nageswararao, K. 2016. Modelling of hydrocyclone classifiers: A critique of ‘bypass’ and corrected efficiency. Powder Technology 297:106–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2016.04.016.
- Ni, L., J. Y. Tian, T. Song, Y. S. Jong, and J. N. Zhao. 2019. Optimizing geometric parameters in hydrocyclones for enhanced separations: A review and perspective. Separation and Purification Reviews 48 (1):30–51. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15422119.2017.1421558.
- Perez, D., P. Cornejo, C. Rodriguez, and F. Concha. 2018. Transition from spray to roping in hydrocyclones. Minerals Engineering 123:71–84. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2018.04.008.
- Qiu, S., G. Wang, S. Zhou, Q. Liu, L. Zhong, and L. Wang. 2020. The downhole hydrocyclone separator for purifying natural gas hydrate: Structure design, optimization, and performance. Separation Science and Technology 55 (3):564–74. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01496395.2019.1577264.
- Razmi, H., A. S. Goharrizi, and A. Mohebbi. 2019. CFD simulation of an industrial hydrocyclone based on multiphase particle in cell (MPPIC) method. Separation and Purification Technology 209:851–62. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2018.06.073.
- Rocha, C. A. O., G. Ullmann, D. O. Silva, and L. G. M. Vieira. 2020. Effect of changes in the feed duct on hydrocyclone performance. Powder Technology 374:283–89.
- Salmanizade, F., A. G. Moghaddam, and A. Mohebbi. 2021. Improvement hydrocyclone separation of biodiesel impurities prepared from waste cooking oil using CFD simulation. Separation Science and Technology 56 (6):1152–67. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01496395.2020.1749081.
- Song, T., J. Tian, L. Ni, C. Shen, and Y. Yao. 2020. Experimental study on liquid flow fields in de-foulant hydrocyclones with reflux ejector using particle image velocimetry. Separation and Purification Technology 240:116555. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.116555.
- Song, T., Y. Yao, and L. Ni. 2020. Response surface method to study the effect of conical surface and vortex-finder lengths on de-foulant hydrocyclone with reflux ejector. Separation and Purification Technology 253:117511. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.117511.
- Tang, B., Y. X. Xu, X. F. Song, Z. Sun, and J. G. Yu. 2017. Effect of inlet configuration on hydrocyclone performance. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China 27:1645–55. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(17)60187-0.
- Tian, J., L. Ni, T. Song, C. Shen, Y. Yao, and J. Zhao. 2019. Numerical study of foulant-water separation using hydrocyclones enhanced by reflux device: Effect of underflow pipe diameter. Separation and Purification Technology 215:10–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2018.12.081.
- Vakamalla, T. R., and N. Mangadoddy. 2017. Numerical simulation of industrial hydrocyclones performance: Role of turbulence modelling. Separation and Purification Technology 176:23–39. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2016.11.049.
- Vieira, L. G. M., D. O. Silva, and M. A. S. Barrozo. 2016. Effect of inlet diameter on the performance of a filtering hydrocyclone separator. Chemical Engineering and Technology 39:1406–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.201500724.
- Wu, S. E., K. J. Hwang, T. W. Cheng, T. C. Hung, and K. L. Tung. 2017. Effectiveness of a hydrocyclone in separating particles suspended in power law fluids. Powder Technology 320:546–54. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2017.07.088.
- Xu, Y. X., X. F. Song, Z. Sun, B. Tang, P. Li, and J. G. Yu. 2013. Numerical investigation of the effect of the ratio of the vortex-finder diameter to the spigot diameter on the steady state of the air core in a hydrocyclone. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 52 (15):5470–78. doi:https://doi.org/10.1021/ie302081v.
- Yang, Q., W. J. Lv, L. Ma, and H. L. Wang. 2013. CFD study on separation enhancement of mini-hydrocyclone by particulate arrangement. Separation and Purification Technology 102:15–25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2012.09.018.
- Yang, X. H., M. J. H. Simmons, P. K. Liu, Y. K. Zhang, and L. Y. Jiang. 2019. Effect of feed body geometry on separation performance of hydrocyclone. Separation Science and Technology 54 (17):2959–70. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01496395.2018.1548486.
- Ye, J. X., Y. X. Xu, X. F. Song, and J. G. Yu. 2019. Numerical modelling and multi-objective optimization of the novel hydrocyclone for ultra-fine particles classification. Chemical Engineering Science 207:1072–84. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2019.07.031.
- Zhang, C., D. Z. Wei, B. Y. Cui, T. S. Li, and N. Luo. 2017a. Effects of curvature radius on separation behaviors of the hydrocyclone with a tangent-circle inlet. Powder Technology 305:156–65. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2016.10.002.
- Zhang, Y. M., P. Cai, F. H. Jiang, K. J. Dong, Y. C. Jiang, and B. Wang. 2017b. Understanding the separation of particles in a hydrocyclone by force analysis. Powder Technology 322:471–89. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2017.09.031.