Effects of real-time simulation feedback on design for visual comfort

References

• Amundadottir, M. L., S. Rockcastle, M. S. Khanie, and M. Andersen. 2017. “A Human-centric Approach to Assess Daylight in Buildings for Non-visual Health Potential, Visual Interest and Gaze Behavior.” Building and Environment 113: 5–21. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.09.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, R. E., and H. C. Lucas, Jr. 1983. “System Response Time Operator Productivity, and Job Satisfaction.” Communications of the ACM 26 (11): 972–986. doi: 10.1145/182.358464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beigbeder, T., R. Coughlan, C. Lusher, J. Plunkett, E. Agu, and M. Claypool. 2004. “ The Effects of Loss and Latency on User Performance in Unreal Tournament 2003®.” Proceedings of 3rd ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Network and System Support for Games, 144–151.
   Google Scholar
• Bellia, L., A. Pedace, and F. Fragliasso. 2015. “The Impact of the Software’s Choice on Dynamic Daylight Simulations’ Results: A Comparison Between Daysim and 3DS Max Design®.” Solar Energy 122: 249–263. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2015.08.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, J. T. 1986. “A Theory of Productivity in the Creative Process.” IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications Magazine 6: 25–34. doi: 10.1109/MCG.1986.276789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brutlag, J. 2009. Speed Matters for Google Web Search. Mountain View: Google.
   Google Scholar
• CEN Technical Committee 169. 2016. prEN 17037:2016 – Daylight of Buildings. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• CIE Technical Committee 3–13. 1995. CIE 117–1995 Discomfort Glare in Interior Lighting. Vienna: Commission Internationale de L'Eclairage.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, R. L., T. Porter, and L. Carpenter. 1984. “Distributed Ray Tracing.” SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics 18 (3): 137–145. doi: 10.1145/964965.808590
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. 1996. Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. 1st ed.New York: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Doherty, W. J., and R. P. Kelisky. 1979. “Managing VM/CMS Systems for User Effectiveness.” IBM Systems Journal 18 (1): 143–163. doi: 10.1147/sj.181.0143
   Google Scholar
• Doherty, W. J., and A. J. Thadani. 1982. The Economic Value of Rapid Response Time. White Plains, NY: IBM.
   Google Scholar
• Du, J., and S. Sharples. 2011. “The Assessment of Vertical Daylight Factors Across the Walls of Atrium Buildings, Part 1: Square Atria.” Lighting Research and Technology 44 (2): 109–123. doi: 10.1177/1477153511412530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Einhorn, H. 1979. “Discomfort Glare: A Formula to Bridge Differences.” Lighting Research and Technology 11 (2): 90–94. doi: 10.1177/14771535790110020401
   Google Scholar
• Galasiu, A. D., and M. R. Atif. 2002. “Applicability of Daylighting Computer Modeling in Real Case Studies: Comparison Between Measured and Simulated Daylight Availability and Lighting Consumption.” Building and Environment 37 (4): 363–377. doi: 10.1016/S0360-1323(01)00042-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grynberg, A. 1989. Validation of Radiance. Berkeley, CA: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratories. Document ID 1575.
   Google Scholar
• Guynes, J. L. 1988. “Impact of System Response Time on State Anxiety.” Communications of the ACM 31 (3): 342–347. doi: 10.1145/42392.42402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrold, R. 2003. IESNA Lighting Ready Reference: A Compendium of Materials from the IESNA Lighting Handbook. 9th ed.New York: Illuminating Engineering Society of North America.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkinson, R. 1972. “Glare from Daylighting in Buildings.” Applied Ergonomics 3 (4): 206–215. doi: 10.1016/0003-6870(72)90102-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoxmeier, J. A., and C. DiCesare. 2000. “ System Response Time and User Satisfaction: An Experimental Study of Browser-based Applications.” AMCIS 2000 Proceedings, 140–145.
   Google Scholar
• IESNA Daylighting Metrics Committee. 2012. Lighting Measurement #83, Spatial Daylight Autonomy (sDA) and Annual Sunlight Exposure (ASE). New York: IESNA Lighting Measurement.
   Google Scholar
• International WELL Building Institute. 2016. The WELL Building Standard® v1. New York: Delos Living LLC.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 9241–303. 2008. Ergonomics of Human–system Interaction – Part 303: Requirements for Electronic Visual Displays. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 9241–3. 1992. Ergonomic Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminals (VDTs) – Part 3: Visual Display Requirements. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• Jakubiec, J. A., and C. F. Reinhart. 2011. “ DIVA 2.0: Integrating Daylight and Thermal Simulations Using Rhinoceros 3D and EnergyPlus.” Proceedings of Building Simulation 2011: 12th Conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association, Sydney, 14–16 November, 2202–2209.
   Google Scholar
• Jakubiec, J. A., and C. F. Reinhart. 2012. “The ‘Adaptive Zone’ – A Concept for Assessing Discomfort Glare Throughout Daylit Spaces.” Lighting Research and Technology 44 (2): 149–170. doi: 10.1177/1477153511420097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, N. L., and C. F. Reinhart. 2014. “ Physically Based Global Illumination Calculation Using Graphics Hardware.” Proceedings of eSim 2014: The Canadian Conference on Building Simulation, 474–487.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, N. L., and C. F. Reinhart. 2015. “ Validation of GPU Lighting Simulation in Naturally and Artificially Lit Spaces.” Proceedings of BS2015: 14th Conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association, Hyderabad, India, December 7–9, 1229–1236.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, N. L., and C. F. Reinhart. 2016. “ Real-time Visual Comfort Feedback for Architectural Design.” PLEA 2016 Los Angeles – 32nd International Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, N. L., and C. F. Reinhart. 2017a. “Experimental Validation of Ray Tracing as a Means of Image-based Visual Discomfort Prediction.” Building and Environment 113: 131–150. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.08.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, N. L., and C. F. Reinhart. 2017b. “ Speedup Potential of Climate-based Daylight Modelling on GPUs.” 15th Conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association, 1438–1447.
   Google Scholar
• Jonson, B. 2005. “Design Ideation: The Conceptual Sketch in the Digital Age.” Design Studies 26 (6): 613–624. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2005.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jota, R., A. Ng, P. Dietz, and D. Wigdor. 2013. “ How Fast Is Fast Enough? A Study of the Effects of Latency in Direct-touch Pointing Tasks.” Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2291–2300.
   Google Scholar
• Kleindienst, S., and M. Andersen. 2012. “Comprehensive Annual Daylight Design Through a Goal-based Approach.” Building Research & Information 40 (2): 154–173. doi: 10.1080/09613218.2012.641301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konis, K. 2017. “A Novel Circadian Daylight Metric for Building Design and Evaluation.” Building and Environment 113: 22–38. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.11.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lafortune, E. P., and Y. D. Willems. 1993. “Bi-directional Path Tracing.” Proceedings of CompuGraphics 93: 145–153.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, G. W., and R. Shakespeare. 1998. Rendering with Radiance: The Art and Science of Lighting Visualization. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Z., and J. Heer. 2014. “The Effects of Interactive Latency on Exploratory Visual Analysis.” IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 20 (12): 2122–2131. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2014.2346452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mardaljevic, J. 2015. “ Climate-based Daylight Modelling and Its Discontents.” CIBSE Technical Symposium, London, April 16–17.
   Google Scholar
• Nabil, A., and J. Mardaljevic. 2006. “Useful Daylight Illuminances: A Replacement for Daylight Factors.” Energy and Buildings 38 (7): 905–913. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.03.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazzal, A. A. 2001. “A New Daylight Glare Evaluation Method: Introduction of the Monitoring Protocol and Calculation Method.” Energy and Buildings 33 (3): 257–265. doi: 10.1016/S0378-7788(00)00090-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, A. 1994. Unified Theories of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ng, A., et al. 2012. “ Designing for Low-latency Direct-touch Input.” Proceedings of the 25th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, 453–464.
   Google Scholar
• Ng, E. Y.-Y., L. K. Poh, W. Wei, and T. Nagakura. 2001. “Advanced Lighting Simulation in Architectural Design in the Tropics.” Automation in Construction 10 (3): 365–379. doi: 10.1016/S0926-5805(00)00053-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Hara, K. P., and S. J. Payne. 1998. “The Effects of Operator Implementation Cost on Planfulness of Problem Solving and Learning.” Cognitive Psychology 35 (1): 34–70. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1997.0676
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Hara, K. P., and S. J. Payne. 1999. “Planning and the User Interface: The Effects of Lockout Time and Error Recovery Cost.” International Journal of Human–Computer Studies 50 (1): 41–59. doi: 10.1006/ijhc.1998.0234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxman, R. 2006. “Theory and Design in the First Digital Age.” Design Studies 27 (3): 229–265. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2005.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, S. G., et al. 2010. “ OptiX: A General Purpose Ray Tracing Engine.” ACM Transactions on Graphics – Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 29 (4).
   Google Scholar
• Reinhart, C. F., and M. Andersen. 2006. “Development and Validation of a Radiance Model for a Translucent Panel.” Energy and Buildings 38 (7): 890–904. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhart, C., and P.-F. Breton. 2009. “Experimental Validation of Autodesk® 3ds Max® Design 2009 and Daysim 3.0.” LEUKOS: The Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America 6 (1): 7–35.
   Google Scholar
• Reinhart, C. F., and S. Herkel. 2000. “The Simulation of Annual Daylight Illuminance Distributions – A State-of-the-art Comparison of Six RADIANCE-based Methods.” Energy and Buildings 32 (2): 167–187. doi: 10.1016/S0378-7788(00)00042-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhart, C. F., and O. Walkenhorst. 2001. “Validation of Dynamic RADIANCE-based Daylight Simulations for a Test Office with External Blinds.” Energy and Buildings 33 (7): 683–697. doi: 10.1016/S0378-7788(01)00058-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robert McNeel & Associates. 2016. Rhinoceros 5.
   Google Scholar
• Salman, H. S., R. Laing, and A. Conniff. 2014. “The Impact of Computer Aided Architectural Design Programs on Conceptual Design in an Educational Context.” Design Studies 35 (4): 412–439. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2014.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheldon, N., et al. 2003. “ The Effect of Latency on User Performance in Warcraft III®.” Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Network and System Support for Games, 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Ubbelohde, M. S., and C. Humann. 1998. “Comparative Evaluation of Four Daylighting Software Programs.” In 1998 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings, Pacific Grove, CA, 3, 325–3.340. Washington, DC: American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy.
   Google Scholar
• US Green Building Council (USGBC). 2013. LEED Reference Guide for Building Design and Construction, LEED V4. Washington, DC: USGBC.
   Google Scholar
• Whitted, T. 1980. “An Improved Illumination Model for Shaded Display.” Communications of the ACM 23 (6): 343–349. doi: 10.1145/358876.358882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wienold, J. 2009a. “ Daylight Glare in Offices.” PhD Thesis. University Karlsruhe.
   Google Scholar
• Wienold, J. 2009b. “ Dynamic Daylight Glare Evaluation.” Eleventh International IBPSA Conference, Glasgow, Scotland, 944–951.
   Google Scholar
• Wienold, J., and J. Christoffersen. 2006. “Evaluation Methods and Development of a New Glare Prediction Model for Daylight Environments with the Use of CCD Cameras.” Energy and Buildings 38 (7): 743–757. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.03.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, Y., J. W. Moon, and S. Kim. 2016. “Development of Annual Daylight Simulation Algorithms for Prediction of Indoor Daylight Illuminance.” Energy and Buildings 118: 1–17. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.02.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar