Achieving realtime daylight factor computation for modular buildings in generative design

References

• Ahmad, Danny Asim, Anil Kumar, Om Prakash, and Ankish Aman. 2020. “Daylight availability assessment and the application of energy simulation software – A literature review.” Materials Science for Energy Technologies 3 (2020): 679–689. KeAi.
   Google Scholar
• Ayoub, M. 2020. “A review on machine learning algorithms to predict daylighting inside buildings.” Solar Energy 202: 249–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollinger, K., M. Grohmann, and O. Tessmann. 2010. “Structured becoming evolutionary processes in design engineering.” The New Structuralism: Design, Engineering and Architectural Technologies. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 80 (4): 34–39.
   Google Scholar
• Box, G., and D. Behnken. 1960. “Some new three level designs for the study of quantitative variables.” Technometrics 2: 455e75.
   Google Scholar
• Catalina, T., V. Iordache, and B. Caracaleanu. 2013. “Multiple regression model for fast prediction of the heating energy demand.” Energy & Building 2013 (57): 302e12.
   Google Scholar
• Catalina, T., J. Virgone, and E. Blanco. 2008. “Development and validation of regression models to predict monthly heating demand for residential buildings.” Energy and Buildings 2008 (40): 1825e43.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, H. D., and T. M. Chung. 2005. “Calculation of the vertical daylight factor on window facades in a dense urban environment.” Architect Sci Rev 48 (1): 81e92.
   Google Scholar
• CIE. “Natural daylight”. 1955. Official recommendation, Compte Rendu CIE 13, Session 2, Part 3.2.
   Google Scholar
• Crisp, V. H. C., and P. J. Littlefair. 1984. “Average daylight factor prediction.” Proceedings CIBS National Lighting Conference, University of Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Darmon, I. 2018. “Voxel computational morphogenesis in urban context: proposition and analysis of rules-based generative algorithms considering solar access”. MS Design by Data. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329738763.
   Google Scholar
• De Luca, F., M. Kiil, R. Simson, J. Kurnitski, and R. Murula. 2019. ““Evaluating Daylight Factor Standard through Climate Based Daylight Simulations and Overheating Regulations in Estonia”.” Proceedings of the 16th IBPSA Conference, Roma, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• DIALux software. https://www.DIALux.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Dogan, T., and Y. Park. 2017. “A New Framework for Residential Daylight Performance Evaluation”.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, S. 2017. “Classifications of shape grammars.” Design Computing and Cognition 16: 229–248.
   Google Scholar
• Goupy, J. 2017. Introduction aux plans d’expériences. 5ième édition. Paris: Dunod.
   Google Scholar
• Granadeiro, V., J. P. Duarte, J. R. Correia, et al. 2013. “Building envelope shape design in early stages of the design process: integrating architectural design systems and energy simulation.” Automation in Construction 32: 196–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guan, L. 2020. “An Investigation of Alternative Daylight Metrics”. PhD of the Institute for Environmental Design and Engineering University College London.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, T., Z. Wang, X. Luo, and W. Zhang. 2020. “State-of-the-art on research and applications of machine learning in the building life cycle.” Energy and Buildings 212: 1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Igawa, N., Y. Koga, T. Matsuzawa, and H. Nakamura. 2004. “Models of sky radiance distribution and sky luminance distribution.” Solar Energy 77: 137e57.
   Google Scholar
• Janjai, S., and P. Plaon. 2011. “Estimation of sky luminance in the tropics using artificial neural networks: modeling and performance comparison with the CIE model“.” Applied Energy 88: 840–847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, N. L., and C. F. Reinhart. 2014. “Irradiance caching for global illumination calculation on graphics hardware.” 2014 ASHRAE/IBPSA-USA, Building Simulation Conference, Atlanta, GA, September 10-12, pp. 111-120.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, N. L., and C. F. Reinhart. 2014. “Physically based global illumination calculation using graphics hardware.” Proceedings of eSim 2014: The Canadian Conference on Building Simulation, pp. 474-487.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, N. L., and C. F. Reinhart. 2015. “Fast daylight coefficient calculation using graphics hardware.” Proc. of BS2015: 14th Conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association, Hyderabad, India.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, N. L., and C. F. Reinhart. 2016. ““Real-Time Visual Comfort Feedback for architectural Design”.” PLEA 2016 Los Angeles – 32nd International Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture. Cities, Buildings, People: Towards Regenerative Environments.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, N. L., and C. F. Reinhart. 2017. ““Speedup Potential of Climate-Based Daylight Modelling on GPUs”.” Proceedings of the 15th IBPSA Conference, San Francisco, CA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Katsanou, Varvara N., Minas C. Alexiadis, and Dimitris P. Labridis. 2019. “An ANN-based model for the prediction of internal lighting conditions and user actions in non-residential buildings.” Journal of Building Performance Simulation 12 (5): 700–718. doi:10.1080/19401493.2019.1610067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazanasmaz, T., M. Gunaydin, and S. Binol. 2009. “Artificial Neural Networks to Predict Daylight Illuminance in Office Buildings.” Building and Environment 44 (8): 1751–1757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le-Thanh, L., H. Nguyen-Thi-Viet, J. Lee, and H. Nguyen-Xuan. 2022. “Nguyen-Xuan. “Machine learning-based real-time daylight analysis in buildings”.” Journal of Building Engineering 52: 42–61. doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104374.
   Google Scholar
• Li, D. H. W., N. T. C. Chau, and K. K. W. Wan. 2013. “Predicting daylight illuminance and solar irradiance on vertical surfaces based on classified standard skies.” Energy 53: 252e8.
   Google Scholar
• Li, D. H. W., C. C. S. Lau, and J. C. Lam. 2005. “Predicting daylight illuminance on inclined surfaces using sky luminance data.” Energy 30 (9): 1649e85.
   Google Scholar
• Li, D. H., S. Lou, A. Ghaffarianhoseini, K. A. Alshaibani, and J. C. Lam. 2017. “A review of calculating procedures on daylight factor based metrics under various CIE Standard Skies and obstructed environments.” Building and Environment 112: 29–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, C.-H., and Y.-S. Tsay. 2021. “A metamodel based on intermediary features for daylight performance prediction of façade design.” Building and Environment 206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108371.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenz, K. C.-L., M. Packianather, A. B. Spaeth, and C. Bleil De Souza. 2018. “Artificial neural network-based modelling for daylight evaluations.” Symposium on Simulation for Architecture & Urban Design.
   Google Scholar
• Loutfi, H., A. Bernatchou, Y. Raoui, and R. Tadili. 2017. “Learning Processes to Predict the Hourly Global, Direct, and Diffuse Solar Irradiance from Daily Global Radiation with Artificial Neural Networks.” International Journal of Photoenergy, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Marsault, X., and F. Torres. 2019. “An interactive and generative eco-design tool for architects in the sketch phase.” IOP’s Journal of Physics: Conference Series Vol. 1343, november 2019. https://iopscience.iop.org/issue/1742-6596/1343/1.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, A., and S. Stravoravdis. 2017. “Towards Dynamic Real-Time Daylight Simulation”. PLEA’17, Design to Thrive, Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Mavromatidis, L. E., X. Marsault, and H. Lequay. 2014. ““Daylight factor estimation at an early design stage to reduce buildings’ energy consumption due to artificial lighting: a numerical approach based on Doehlert and Box–Behnken designs.” Energy, ELSEVIER 65: 488–502. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2013.12.028.
   Google Scholar
• Mebarki, C., E. Djakab, A. M. Mokhtari, Y. Amrane, and L. Derradji. 2021. “Improvement of Daylight Factor Model for Window Size Optimization and Energy Efficient Building Envelope Design.” Journal of Daylighting 8: 204–221. doi:10.15627/jd.2021.17.
   Google Scholar
• The MOOVABAT project. 2017–2020. https://www.er2i.eu/fr/moovabat-le-batiment-technologique-intelligent/.
   Google Scholar
• Nabil, A., and J. Mardaljevic. 2006. “Useful daylight illuminances: a replacement for daylight factors.” Energy and Buildings 38: 905–913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naeem, M., and M. Wilson. 2007. “A study of the application of the BRE Average Daylight Factor formula to rooms with window areas below the working plane.” 2nd PALENC Conference and 28th AIVC Conference on Building Low Energy Cooling and Advanced Ventilation Technologies in the 21st Century, Crete island, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• Nault, E. 2016. Solar potential in early neighborhood design - A decision-support workflow based on predictive models. Lausanne: PhD N°7058, EPFL.
   Google Scholar
• Nourkojouri, H., N. S. Shafavi, M. Tahsildoost, and Z. S. Zomorodian. 2021. “Development of a Machine-Learning Framework for Overall Daylight and Visual Comfort Assessment in Early Design Stages.” Journal of Daylighting 8: 270–283. https://doi.org/10.15627/jd.2021.21.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, S., J. Bigler, A. Dietrich, H. Friedrich, J. Hoberock, D. Luebke, D. McAllister, et al. 2010. “OptiX: A general purpose ray tracing engine.” ACM Transactions on Graphics – Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 29 (4): 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Perez, R., R. Seals, and J. Michalsky. 1993. “All-weather model for sky luminance distribution preliminary configuration and validation.” Solar Energy 1993 (50): 235e45.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, T., J. Wolf, B. Peters, and T. Kesik. 2019. “Generative Design Approaches to Daylight in MURBs.” Proceedings of the 16th IBPSA Conference, Roma, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Radziszewski, K., and M. Waczynska. 2018. “Machine learning algorithm-based tool and digital framework for substituting daylight simulations in early-stage architectural design evaluation“. Symposium on Simulation for Architecture & Urban Design.
   Google Scholar
• Robert, Shannon. 1979. “Applied optics and optical engineering”. Elsevier editor, Vol. 7:p. 45.
   Google Scholar
• Safdie, M. 1961. “A three-dimensional modular building system”. Thesis, University of Montreal, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Si, W., X. Pan, H. Ogai, K. Hirai, N. Yamauchi, and T. Li. 2014. “Illumination Modeling Method for Office Lighting Control by Using RBFNN.” IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems E97.D (12): 3192–3200.
   Google Scholar
• SpaceMaker software. https://www.spacemakerai.com.
   Google Scholar
• Walger da Fonseca, R., and F. O. Ruttkay Pereira. 2021. “Metamodeling of the Energy Consumption of Buildings with Daylight Harvesting – Application of Artificial Neural Networks Sensitive to Orientation.” Journal of Daylighting 8: 255–269. doi:10.15627/jd.2021.20.
   Google Scholar
• Wienold, J. 2009. “Dynamic daylight glare evaluation.” Eleventh International IBPSA Conference: Building Simulation. pp 944–951.
   Google Scholar
• Woop, S., J. Schmittler, and P. Slusallek. 2005. “RPU: A programmable ray processing unit for realtime ray tracing.” ACM Transactions on Graphics - Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 24 (3): 434–444.
   Google Scholar
• Xiu, D., G. E. Karniadakis, and D. Xiu. 2002. “The Wiener-Askey polynomial chaos for stochastic differential equations.” Siam Journal. on Scientific Computing 24: 619–644. (electronic).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, S., and D. Liu. 2015. “Prediction of Daylighting and Energy Performance Using Artificial Neural Network and Support Vector Machine“.” Am. J. Civ. Eng. Archit 3 (3A): 1–8.
   Google Scholar