Retraining surrogate models in increasingly restricted design spaces: a novel building energy model calibration method

References

• ASHRAE. 1975. Standard 90-1975: Energy Conservation in New Building Design. Atlanta, GA, USA: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-conditioning Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• ASHRAE. 2014. Guideline 14-2014, Measurement of Energy and Demand Savings. Atlanta, GA, USA: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-conditioning Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Azar, Elie, and Carol C. Menassa. 2012. “A Comprehensive Analysis of the Impact of Occupancy Parameters in Energy Simulation of Office Buildings.” Energy and Buildings, Cool Roofs, Cool Pavements, Cool Cities, and Cool World 55 (December): 841–853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.10.002.
   Google Scholar
• Beal, Logan DR, Daniel C. Hill, R. Abraham Martin, and John D. Hedengren. 2018. “Gekko Optimization Suite.” Processes 6 (8): 106. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr6080106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellman, Richard E. 1957. Dynamic Programming. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cant, Kevin, and Ralph Evins. 2022. “Improved Calibration of Building Models Using Approximate Bayesian Calibration and Neural Networks.” Journal of Building Performance Simulation 16 (0): 291–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/19401493.2022.2137236.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Jianli, Xinghua Gao, Yuqing Hu, Zhaoyun Zeng, and Yanan Liu. 2019. “A Meta-Model-Based Optimization Approach for Fast and Reliable Calibration of Building Energy Models.” Energy 188 (December): 116046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.116046.
   Google Scholar
• Chong, Adrian, Yaonan Gu, and Hongyuan Jia. 2021. “Calibrating Building Energy Simulation Models: A Review of the Basics to Guide Future Work.” Energy and Buildings 253 (December): 111533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111533.
   Google Scholar
• Coakley, Daniel, Paul Raftery, and Marcus Keane. 2014. “A Review of Methods to Match Building Energy Simulation Models to Measured Data.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 37 (September): 123–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.05.007.
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, John. 2002. International Performance Measurement and Verification Protocol: Concepts and Options for Determining Energy and Water Savings - Vol I. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrara, Maria, Ciro Lisciandrello, Alessio Messina, Mauro Berta, Yufeng Zhang, and Enrico Fabrizio. 2020. “Optimizing the Transition Between Design and Operation of ZEBs: Lessons Learnt from the Solar Decathlon China 2018 SCUTxPoliTo Prototype.” Energy and Buildings 213: 109824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.109824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilks, Walter R., Sylvia Richardson, and David Spiegelhalter. 1996. Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice. London: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Herbinger, Florent, Colin Vandenhof, and Michaël Kummert. 2023. “Building Energy Model Calibration Using a Surrogate Neural Network.” Energy and Buildings 289 (June): 113057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113057.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Wancheng, Zhe Tian, Yakai Lu, and Fawei Fu. 2018. “Stepwise Calibration for Residential Building Thermal Performance Model Using Hourly Heat Consumption Data.” Energy and Buildings 181 (December): 10–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.10.001.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Guangchen, Wei Tian, Hu Zhang, and Xing Fu. 2023. “A Novel Method of Creating Machine Learning-Based Time Series Meta-Models for Building Energy Analysis.” Energy and Buildings 281 (February): 112752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112752.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, C. Devon, and Boxin Tang. 2015. “Latin Hypercubes and Space-Filling Designs.” In Handbook of Design and Analysis of Experiments, edited by Angela Dean, Max Morris, John Stufken, and Derek Bingham. New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Monetti, Valentina, Elisabeth Davin, Enrico Fabrizio, Philippe André, and Marco Filippi. 2015. “Calibration of Building Energy Simulation Models Based on Optimization: A Case Study.” Energy Procedia 78 (November): 2971–2976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.693.
   Google Scholar
• Nagpal, Shreshth, Caitlin Mueller, Arfa Aijazi, and Christoph F. Reinhart. 2019. “A Methodology for Auto-Calibrating Urban Building Energy Models Using Surrogate Modeling Techniques.” Journal of Building Performance Simulation 12 (1): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/19401493.2018.1457722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Østergård, Torben, Rasmus Lund Jensen, and Steffen Enersen Maagaard. 2018. “A Comparison of Six Metamodeling Techniques Applied to Building Performance Simulations.” Applied Energy 211 (February): 89–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.10.102.
   Google Scholar
• Reddy, T. A., I. Maor, S. Jian, and C. Panjapornporn. 2006. “Procedures for Reconciling Computer-Calculated Results with Measured Energy Data.” Technical Report. Atlanta, GA, USA: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, Boxin. 1993. “Orthogonal Array-Based Latin Hypercubes.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 88 (424): 1392–1397. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1993.10476423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Energy. 2015. M&V Guidelines: Measurement and Verification for Performance-Based Contracts Version 4.0.”.
   Google Scholar
• Westermann, Paul, and Ralph Evins. 2019. “Surrogate Modelling for Sustainable Building Design – A Review.” Energy and Buildings 198 (September): 170–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.05.057.
   Google Scholar
• Wilde, Pieter de. 2014. “The Gap between Predicted and Measured Energy Performance of Buildings: A Framework for Investigation.” Automation in Construction 41 (May): 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2014.02.009.
   Google Scholar
• Wortmann, Thomas. 2019. “Genetic Evolution vs. Function Approximation: Benchmarking Algorithms for Architectural Design Optimization.” Journal of Computational Design and Engineering 6 (3): 414–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcde.2018.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Tao, Yiqun Pan, Jiachen Mao, Yonglong Wang, and Zhizhong Huang. 2016. “An Automated Optimization Method for Calibrating Building Energy Simulation Models with Measured Data: Orientation and a Case Study.” Applied Energy 179 (October): 1220–1231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.07.084.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan, Jun, Victor Nian, Bin Su, and Qun Meng. 2017. “A Simultaneous Calibration and Parameter Ranking Method for Building Energy Models.” Applied Energy 206 (November): 657–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.08.220.
   Google Scholar