References
- Adams, M. J., Beck, I., Brady, S., Chapman, J., Chard, D., Connor, C. M., … Williams, J. (2013). Guessing: Why the reading wars won't end (Letter to Washington Post from 41 researchers concerning the NCTQ report on teacher training). Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/wp/2013/09/17/another-blast-in-the-reading-wars/.
- Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2010). ABS research and experimental development, all sector summary, Australia, 2008–09. Retrieved from http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/[email protected]/DetailsPage/8112.02008-09?OpenDocument.
- Australian National Audit Office. (2012). National partnership agreement on literacy and numeracy. Retrieved from http://www.anao.gov.au/Publications/Audit-Reports/2011-2012/National-Partnership-Agreement-on-Literacy-and-Numeracy/Audit-brochure.
- Baker, S., Berninger, V. W., Bruck, M., Chapman, J., Eden, G., Elbaum, B., … Wolf, M. (2002). Evidence-based research on Reading Recovery (Letter from 31 researchers). Retrieved from http://www.wrightslaw.com/info/read.rr.ltr.experts.htm.
- Bloom, H. S., Hill, C. J., Black, A. R., & Lipsey, M. W. (2008). Performance trajectories and performance gaps as achievement effect-size benchmarks for educational interventions. MDRC Working Papers on Research Methodology. Retrieved from http://mdrc.org/sites/default/files/full_473.pdf.
- Briggs, D. C. (2008). Synthesizing causal inferences. Educational Researcher, 37, 15–22.
- Carlson, C. D., & Francis, D. J. (2002). Increasing the reading achievement of at-risk children through direct instruction: Evaluation of the Rodeo Institute for Teacher Excellence (RITE). Journal of Education for Students Placed At Risk, 7, 141–166.
- Carnine, D. (1995). Trustworthiness, usability, and accessibility of educational research. Journal of Behavioral Education, 5, 251–258.
- Carter, M., & Wheldall, K. (2008). Why can't a teacher be more like a scientist? Science, pseudoscience and the art of teaching. Australasian Journal of Special Education, 32, 5–21.
- Center, Y., Freeman, L., & Robertson, G. (2001). The relative effect of a code-oriented and a meaning-oriented early literacy program on regular and low progress Australian students in year 1 classrooms which implement Reading Recovery. International Journal of Disability, Development, and Education, 48, 207–232.
- Chapman, J. W., Greaney, K. T., & Tunmer, W. E. (2007). How well is Reading Recovery really working in New Zealand?New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 42, 17–29.
- Chapman, J. E., & Tunmer, W. E. (2011). Reading Recovery: Does it work?Perspectives on Language and Literacy, 21, 21–24.
- Chapman, J. W., Tunmer, W. E., & Prochnow, J. E. (2001). Does success in the Reading Recovery program depend on developing proficiency in phonological skills? A longitudinal study in a meaning-based instructional context. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 141–176.
- Chard, D. J., Ketterlin-Geller, L. R., Baker, S. K., Doabler, C., & Apichatabutra, C. (2009). Repeated reading interventions for students with learning disabilities: Status of the evidence. Exception Children, 75, 263–281.
- Cooke, N. L., Gibbs, S. L., Campbell, M. L., & Shalvis, S. L. (2004). A comparison of Reading Mastery fast cycle and horizons fast track A-B on the reading achievement of students with mild disabilities. Journal of Direct Instruction, 4, 139–151.
- Cuttance, P. (2005, July 5). Education research ‘irrelevant’. The Age, p. 5.
- DEECD. (2012, June). New directions for school leadership and the teaching profession: Discussion paper. Department of Education and Early Childhood Development. Retrieved from http://www.eduweb.vic.gov.au/edulibrary/public/commrel/about/teachingprofession.pdf.
- Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations. (n.d.). Standards of evidence for submissions for the teach, learn, share: The national literacy and numeracy evidence base. Retrieved from http://www.teachlearnshare.gov.au/Static/StandardsOfEvidenceForPublicationFinal.pdf.
- Engelmann, S. (2008). Machinations of What Works Clearinghouse. Retrieved from http://zigsite.com/PDFs/MachinationsWWC(V4).pdf.
- Ferrari, J. (2012, December 12). Lack of reform slammed: A decade of lost action on literacy. WeekEnd Australian. Retrieved from http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/a-decade-of-lost-action-on-literacy/story-fn59niix-1226542150781#.
- Greene, J. P. (2010). What doesn't work clearinghouse. Education Next. Retrieved from http://educationnext.org/what-doesnt-work-clearinghouse/.
- Hattie, J. A. C. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.
- Hempenstall, K. (1996). The gulf between educational research and policy: The example of Direct Instruction and whole language. Behaviour Change, 13, 33–46.
- Hempenstall, K. (2006). What does evidence-based practice in education mean?Australian Journal of Learning Disabilities, 11, 83–92.
- Herrera, J. A., Logan, C. H., Cooker, P. G., Morris, D. P., & Lyman, D. E. (1997). Phonological awareness and phonetic-graphic conversion: A study of the effects of two intervention paradigms with learning disabled children. Learning disability or learning difference?Reading Improvement, 34, 71–89.
- Horner, R. H., Swaminathan, K., Sugai, G., & Smolkowski, K. (2012). Considerations for the systematic analysis and use of single-case research. Education and Treatment of Children, 35, 269–290.
- Iversen, S., & Tunmer, W. E. (1993). Phonological processing skills and the Reading Recovery program. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 112–126.
- Kratochwill, T. R., Hitchcock, J., Horner, R. H., Levin, J. R., Odom, S. L., Rindskoph, D. M., & Shadish, W. R. (2010). Single-case designs technical documentation. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/wwc_scd.pdf.
- Law, M. (2002). Evidence-based rehabilitation: A guide to practice. Thoroughfare, NJ: Slack.
- Lipsey, M. W., Puzio, K., Yun, C., Hebert, M. A., Steinka-Fry, K., Cole, M. W., Roberts, M., Anthony, K. S., & Busick, M. D. (2012). Translating the statistical representation of the effects of education interventions into more readily interpretable forms (NCSER 2013-3000). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncser/pubs/20133000/
- Lloyd, J. W. (2007, May 29). WWC report on Direct Instruction. Spedpro Forum. Retrieved from [email protected].
- Lomax, R. G. (2004). Whither the future of quantitative literacy research?Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 107–112.
- Marshall, J. (1993). Why Johnny can't teach. Reason, 25, 102–106.
- McArthur, G. (2008). Does What Works Clearinghouse work? A brief review of Fast ForWord®. Australasian Journal of Special Education, 32, 101–107.
- National Early Literacy Panel. (2008). Executive summary: Developing early literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel. Jessup, MD: National Institute for Literacy.
- National Inquiry into the Teaching of Literacy. (2005). Teaching reading: National inquiry into the teaching of literacy. Canberra: Department of Education, Science, and Training.
- National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read. Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
- O'Keeffe, B. V., Slocum, T. A., Burlingame, C., Snyder, K., & Bundock, K. (2012). Comparing results of systematic reviews: Parallel reviews of research on repeated reading. Education & Treatment of Children, 35, 333–366.
- Productivity Commission. (2012). Schools workforce (Research Report). Canberra. JEL code: I21, I28, J24. Retrieved from http://www.pc.gov.au/projects/study/education-workforce/schools/report.
- Reynolds, M., & Wheldall, K. (2007). Reading Recovery 20 years down the track: Looking forward, looking back. International Journal of Disability, 54, 199–223.
- Reynolds, M., Wheldall, K., & Madelaine, A. (2009). The devil is in the detail regarding the efficacy of Reading Recovery: A rejoinder to Schwartz, Hobsbaum, Briggs, and Scull. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 56, 17–35.
- Slavin, R. E. (2003). A reader's guide to scientifically based research. Educational Leadership, 60, 12–16. Retrieved from http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/feb03/vol60/num05/A-Reader%27s-Guide-to-Scientifically-Based-Research.aspx.
- Slavin, R. E. (2008). Evidence-based reform in education: Which evidence counts?Educational Researcher, 37, 47–50.
- Slavin, R. E. (2013a). Overcoming four barriers to evidence-based education. Education Week, 32, 1–2. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2013/05/01/30slavin.h32.html?tkn = YVYFwfchIRt5fS7cgOjTWRtaP54JDVCPeTtt&cmp = clp-edweek.
- Slavin, R. E. (2013b). How to do lots of high-quality educational evaluations for peanuts. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-e-slavin/how-to-do-lots-of-high-qu_b_3953209.html.
- Slavin, R. E., & Smith, D. (2009). The relationship between sample sizes and effect sizes in systematic reviews in education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31, 500–506. Retrieved from http://www.bestevidence.org/methods/eff_sample_size.htm.
- Slocum, T. A., Spencer, T. D., & Detrich, R. (2012). Best available evidence: Three complementary approaches. Education and Treatment of Children, 35, 153–181.
- Spencer, T. D., Detrich, R., & Slocum, T. A. (2012). Evidence-based practice: A framework for making effective decisions. Education & Treatment of Children, 35, 127–151.
- Stockard, J. (2008). The What Works Clearinghouse beginning reading reports and rating of Reading Mastery: An evaluation and comment (Technical Report 2008-04). National Institute for Direct Instruction. Retrieved from http://www.nifdi.org/research/reviews-of-di/what-works-clearinghouse.
- Stockard, J. (2010). An analysis of the fidelity implementation policies of the What Works Clearinghouse. Current Issues in Education, 13. Retrieved from http://cie.asu.edu/.
- Stockard, J., & Wood, T. W. (2012). Reading Mastery and learning disabled students: A comment on the What Works Clearinghouse review. National Institute for Direct Instruction. Retrieved from http://www.nifdi.org/documents-library/doc_download/245-response-to-wwc-rm-and-ld-july-2012.
- Stockard, J., & Wood, T. W. (2013a). The WWC review process: An analysis of errors in two recent reports (Technical Report 2013-4). Office of Research and Evaluation, National Institute for Direct Instruction. Retrieved from http://www.nifdi.org/documents-library/doc_download/283-technical-report-2013-4-wwc.
- Stockard, J., & Wood, T. W. (2013b, September 9). Does the What Works Clearinghouse work? Office of Research and Evaluation, National Institute for Direct Instruction. Retrieved from http://www.nifdi.org/what-works-clearinghouse.
- Stone, J. E. (1996, April 23). Developmentalism: An obscure but pervasive restriction on educational improvement. Education Policy Analysis Archives.
- Strauss, V. (2013, September 24). Education department suspends ‘doing what works’ website. The Washington Post. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/wp/2013/09/24/education-department-suspends-doing-what-works-website/.
- The 1999 Omnibus Appropriations Bill. (1998). The reading excellence act, pp. 956–1007. Retrieved from http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-105s1596is/html/BILLS-105s1596is.htm.
- Tunmer, W. E., Chapman, J. E., Greaney, K. T., Prochnow, J. E., & Arrow, A. W. (2013). Why the New Zealand national literacy strategy has failed and what can be done about it: Evidence from the Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS) 2011 and Reading Recovery Monitoring Reports. Massey University Institute of Education, Retrieved from http://www.massey.ac.nz/massey/about-massey/news/article.cfm?mnarticle_uuid = F287725F-9E6F-011D-BE0E-F34366B8376A.
- Victorian Auditor-General. (2012). Programs for students with special learning needs: Audit summary. Retrieved from http://www.audit.vic.gov.au/publications/20120829-Special-Learning-Need/20120829-Special-Learning-Need.rtf.
- Wolery, M. (2013). A commentary: Single-case design technical document of the What Works Clearinghouse. Remedial and Special Education, 34, 39–43.
- WWC (What Works Clearinghouse). (2013a). WWC procedures and standards handbook (Version 3.0). Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/documentsum.aspx?sid = 19.
- WWC. (2013b). Evidence for what works in education. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/.
- Zient, J. D. (2012). Use of evidence and evaluation in the 2014 budget: Memorandum to the heads of executive departments and agencies. Executive Office of the President, Office of Management and Budget. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/memoranda/2012/m-12-14.pdf.