Effective re-teaching

References

• Akyűz, G., & Berberoğlu, G. (2010). Teacher and classroom characteristics and their relations to mathematics achievement of the students in the TIMSS. New Horizons in Education, 58, 77–95.
   Google Scholar
• Alfieri, L., Brooks, P. J., & Aldrich, N. J., Tennenbaum, H. R. (2011). Does discovery-based instruction enhance learning? Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 1–18.10.1037/a0021017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arief, G., Liem, D., & Martin, A. J. (2013). Direct instruction. In J. Hattie & E. Anderman (Eds.), International guide to student achievement (pp. 366–368). Hoboken, NJ: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, R., Hall, B. J., Doyle, J., & Armstrong, E. (2011). Cochrane update: “Scoping the scope” of a cochrane review. Journal of Public Health, 33, 147–150. doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdr015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER). (2012). School improvement: What does research tell us about effective strategies? Research Conference Proceedings. Camberwell: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Bambrick-Santoyo, P. (2010). Driven by data: A practical guide to improve instruction. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80, 139–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block, C. C., & Mangieri, J. N. (2009). Exemplary literacy teachers: What schools can do to promote success for all students. New York, NY: The Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S. (1971). Mastery learning. In J. H. Block (Ed.), Mastery learning: Theory and practice (pp. 47–63). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Bourke, R., & Loveridge, J. (2013). A scientist–practitioner model for inclusive education: Supporting graduate students to conduct systematic reviews for evidence-based practice. New Zealand Journal of Teachers’ Work, 14, 4–24.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell Collaboration. (n.d.). What is a systematic review? Retrieved from http://www.campbellcollaboration.org/what_is_a_systematic_review/index.php
   Google Scholar
• Chappuis, J. (2015). Seven strategies of assessment for learning (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, R. E., Kirschner, P. A., & Sweller, J. (2012, March 23). Putting students on the path to learning: The case for fully guided instruction. American Educator. Retrieved from http://www.aft.org/pdfs/americaneducator/spring2012/Clark.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Craft, H., & Bland, P. D. (2004). Ensuring lessons teach the curriculum with a lesson plan resource. The Clearing House, 78, 88–94.10.3200/TCHS.78.2.88-94
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education and Training (DET). (2014a). Level of Adjustment provided to the student. Retrieved from http://www.schooldisabilitydatapl.edu.au/Content/Downloads/level-of-adjustment-provided-to-the-student.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education and Training (DET). (2014b). Supplementary adjustments. Retrieved from: http://www.schooldisabilitydatapl.edu.au/#supplementaryadjustments_3
   Google Scholar
• Diener, C., & Dweck, C. (1978). An analysis of learned helplessness Continuous changes in performance, strategy, and achievement cognitions following failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 451–462.10.1037/0022-3514.36.5.451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DuFour, R., DuFour, R., Eaker, R., & Karhanek, G. (2009). Whatever it takes: How professional learning communities respond when kids don’t learn. Moorabin: Hawker Brownlow.
   Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. Th., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363–406.10.1037/0033-295X.100.3.363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fawson, P., & Peterson, T. (2011). E-time for learning. Principal Leadership, 11, 48–52.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2008). Better learning through structured teaching: A framework for the gradual release of responsibility. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Frye, C. C. (2010). Motivating middle school students to monitor and assess their learning. Science Scope, 34, 61–65.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. (2008). The six secrets of change: What the best leaders do to help their organizations survive and thrive. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Gagné, R. (1985). The conditions of learning and the theory of instruction (4th ed.). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Gersten, R., Compton, D., Connor, C. M., Dimino, J., Santoro, L., Linan-Thompson, S., & Tilly, W. D. (2008). Assisting students struggling with reading: Response to intervention and multi-tier intervention for reading in the primary grades. A practice guide. ( NCEE 2009-4045). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Goertz, M. E., Nabors Oláh, L., & Riggan, M. (2009). From testing to teaching: The use of interim assessments in classroom instruction. Philadelphia, PA: The Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, L., & Berman, J. (2012). Self-regulation and learning difficulties. Special Education Perspectives, 21, 41–52.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, L., Berman, J., & Bellert, A. (2015). Sustainable learning: Inclusive practices for 21st century classrooms. Port Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Harris, K. R., Fink-Chorzempa, B., & MacArthur, C. (2003). Primary grade teachers’ instructional adaptations for struggling writers: A national survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 279–292.10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, L., & Wong, B. Y. L. (1993). Comparing two modes of teaching a question–answering strategy for enhancing reading comprehension: Didactic and self-instructional training. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 270–279.10.1177/002221949302600407
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R. (1987). Rethinking mastery learning reconsidered. Review of Educational Research, 57, 225–229.10.3102/00346543057002225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R. (1990). Cooperative mastery learning strategies. The Elementary School Journal, 91, 33–42.10.1086/esj.1990.91.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R. (2003). How classroom assessments improve learning. Educational Leadership, 60, 6–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R. (2008). The rest of the story. Educational Leadership, 65, 28–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R. (2010). Lessons of mastery learning. Educational Leadership, 68, 52–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R., & Gates, S. (1986). Synthesis of research on the effects of mastery learning in elementary and secondary classrooms. Educational Leadership, 43, 73–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R., Passaro, P. D., & Wheeler, W. (1995). Mastery learning in the regular classroom: Help for at-risk students with learning disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 27, 15–18.
   Google Scholar
• Hempenstall, K. (2014). What works? Evidence-based practice in education is complex. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 19, 113–127. doi:10.1080/19404158.2014.921631
   Google Scholar
• Hollingsworth, J., & Ybarra, S. (2009). Explicit direct instruction: The power of a well-crafted, well-taught lesson. Moorabbin: Hawker Brownlow.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, M. (1982). Mastery teaching. El Segundo, CA: TIP.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, B., & Sonnemann, J. (2014). Turning around schools: It can be done. Retrieved from http://grattan.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/805-turning-around-schools.pdf The Exceptional Child
   Google Scholar
• Kameenui, E. J., & Carnine, D. (1986). Preteaching versus concurrent teaching of component skills of a subtraction algorithm to skill-deficient second graders: A components analysis of direct instruction. The Exceptional Child, 33, 103–115.10.1080/0156655860330203
   Google Scholar
• Kutscher, M. C. (2008). The reteaching of mathematics skills to fifth grade students ( Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ETD collection for University of Nebraska–Lincoln. (AAI3315055).
   Google Scholar
• Lalley, J. P., & Miller, R. H. (2006). Effects of pre-teaching and re-teaching on math achievement and academic self-concept of students with low achievement in math. Education, 126, 747–755.
   Google Scholar
• Marzano, R. J. (2006). Classroom assessment & grading that work. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Marzano, R. J. (2010). Reviving reteaching. Educational Leadership, 68, 82–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (2002). Effective instruction for special education (3rd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• McLane, R. (2013). What’s in a grade? Why mastery, not speed, is key. Education Week, 32, 28–29.
   Google Scholar
• McMullen, F., & Madelaine, A. (2014). Why is there so much resistance to direct instruction? Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 19, 137–151. doi:10.1080/19404158.2014.962065
   Google Scholar
• Ogle, D. M. (1986). K-W-L: A teaching model that develops active reading of expository text. The Reading Teacher, 39, 564–570.10.1598/RT.39.6.11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palinscar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 2, 117–175.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, P. D., & Gallagher, M. C. (1983). The instruction of reading comprehension. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 317–344.10.1016/0361-476X(83)90019-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pegg, J. (2013). Building the realities of working memory and neural functioning into planning, instruction and teaching. Conference proceedings. In How the brain learns: What lessons are there for teaching? (pp. 81–87). Camberwell: ACER.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, A., & Hammond, N. (2002). Systematic reviews: The experiences of a PhD student. Psychology Learning and Teaching, 2, 32–35.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenshine, B. (2012). Principles of instruction: Research-based strategies that all teachers should know. American Educator, 36, 12–19.
   Google Scholar
• Ryder, J., Tunmer, W., & Greaney, K. (2008). Explicit instruction in phonemic awareness and phonemically based decoding skills as an intervention strategy for struggling readers in whole language classrooms. Reading and Writing, 21, 349–369.10.1007/s11145-007-9080-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saskatoon Public Schools. (2013). Reteaching. In Curriculum and instruction (para. 1). Retrieved from http://schools.spsd.sk.ca/curriculum/blog/2013/11/05/reteaching/
   Google Scholar
• Saskatoon Public Schools. (2014). Reteaching. In Curriculum and instruction Retrieved from http://schools.spsd.sk.ca/curriculum/blog/2014/01/07/reteaching-2/
   Google Scholar
• Stiggins, R., & DuFour, R. (2009). Maximizing the power of formative assessments. Phi Delta Kappan, 90, 640–644.10.1177/003172170909000907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson, H. L. (2000). What instruction works for students with learning disabilities? Summarizing the results from a meta-analysis of intervention studies. In R. M. Gersten, E. P. Schiller, & S. Vaughn (Eds.), Contemporary special education research: Syntheses of the knowledge base on critical instructional issues (pp. 1–30). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• van Kraayenoord, C. E. (2006). The Australian Association of Special Education 2005 National conference Des english memorial lecture. Special education, evidence-based practices and policies: Re-think? Re-butt? Re-make? Re-value? Respond. Australasian Journal of Special Education, 30, 4–20.10.1080/10300110609409362
   Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., & Fuchs, L. (2003). Redefining learning disabilities as inadequate response to instruction: The promise and potential problems. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 137–146.
   Google Scholar
• Walberg, H. J. (2007). Changing and monitoring instruction. In H. J. Walberg (Ed.), Handbook on restructuring and substantial school improvement (pp. 85–98). Lincoln, IL: Centre on Innovation and Improvement.
   Google Scholar
• Westwood, P. (1993). Striving for positive outcomes for students with learning difficulties. Special Education Perspectives, 2, 87–94.
   Google Scholar
• Westwood, P. (2003). Commonsense methods for children with special education needs (4th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, B. Y. L. (1996). The ABCs of learning disabilities. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar