Parents’ experiences of their children’s supplementary reading intervention: A qualitative exploration

References

• Baenen, N., Bernholc, A., Dulaney, C., & Banks, K. (1997). Reading recovery: Long-term progress after three cohorts. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 2, 161–181.10.1207/s15327671espr0202_6
   Google Scholar
• Beitchman, J. H., Wilson, B., Johnson, C. J., Atkinson, L., Young, A., Adlaf, E., … Douglas, L. (2001). Fourteen-year follow-up of speech/language-impaired and control children: Psychiatric outcome. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 40, 75–82.10.1097/00004583-200101000-00019
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, D. V. M. (2007). Curing dyslexia and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder by training motor co-ordination: Miracle or myth? Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 43, 653–655.10.1111/jpc.2007.43.issue-10
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S. (1984). The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13, 4–16.10.3102/0013189X013006004
   Google Scholar
• Bond, J., Coltheart, M., Connell, T., Firth, N., Hardy, M., Nayton, M., … Weeks, A. (2010). Helping people with dyslexia: A national action agenda: Report to the Hon Bill Shorten, Parliamentary Secretary For Disabilities And Children’s Services. Retrieved from http://www.dyslexiaaustralia.com.au/DYSWP.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, C., & Young, B. K. (2003). Does reading recovery work in Kansas? A retrospective longitudinal study of sustained effects. Journal of Reading Recovery, 3(1), 59–64.
   Google Scholar
• Buckingham, J., Wheldall, K., & Beaman, R. (2012). A randomised control trial of a Tier-2 small-group intervention (‘MiniLit’) for young struggling readers. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 17, 79–99. doi:10.1080/19404158.2012.717537
   Google Scholar
• Buckingham, J., Wheldall, K., & Beaman-Wheldall, R. (2013). Why Jaydon can’t read: The triumph of ideology over evidence in teaching reading. Policy, 29, 21–32. Retrieved from http://www.cis.org.au/images/stories/policy-magazine/2013-spring/29-3-13-jennifer-buckingham.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Catts, H. W., Sittner Bridges, M., Little, T. D., & Tomblin, J. B. (2008). Reading achievement growth in children with language impairments. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51, 1569–1579.10.1044/1092-4388(2008/07-0259)
   Google Scholar
• Center, Y., Wheldall, K., Freeman, L. B., Outhred, L., & McNaught, M. (1995). An evaluation of reading recovery. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 240–263.10.2307/748034
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, J. W., Tunmer, W. E., & Prochnow, J. E. (2001). Does success in the reading recovery program depend on developing proficiency in phonological-processing skills? A longitudinal study in a whole language instructional context. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 141–176.
   Google Scholar
• Clay, M. M. (1987). Implementing reading recovery: Systemic adaptions to an education innovation. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 22, 35–58.
   Google Scholar
• Clay, M. M. (1994). Implementing reading recovery: The wider implications of an education innovation. Literacy Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 121–141.
   Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M., & Prior, M. (2007). Learning to read in Australia: Occasional paper 1/2007. The Academy of the Social Sciences in Australia. Conducting Research. Retrieved from http://www.education.vic.gov.au/researchinnovation/research/default.htm
   Google Scholar
• D’ Agostino, J. V., & Murphy, J. A. (2004). A meta-analysis of reading recovery in United States schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26, 23–28.10.3102/01623737026001023
   Google Scholar
• DeWalt, D. A., Berkman, N. D., Sheridan, S., Lohr, K. N., & Pignone, M. P. (2004). Literacy and health outcomes. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 19(12), 1228–1239.10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.40153.x
   Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S., Stahl, S., & Willows, D. (2001). Systematic phonics instruction helps students learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading panel’s meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71, 393–447.10.3102/00346543071003393
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2001). Responsiveness to intervention: A blueprint for practitioners, policymakers, and parents. Teaching Exceptional Children, 38, 57–61.
   Google Scholar
• Gersten, R., Compton, D., Connor, C. M., Dimino, J., Santoro, L., Linan-Thompson, S., & Tilly, W. D. (2009). Assisting students struggling with reading: Response to Intervention and multi-tier interventions in the primary grades. A practice guide. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/practice_guides/rti_reading_pg_021809.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Glynn, T., Crooks, T., Bethune, N., Ballard, K., & Smith, J. (1992). Reading recovery in context: Implementation and outcome. Educational Psychology, 12, 249–261.10.1080/0144341920120308
   Google Scholar
• Hammill, D. D. (2004). What we know about correlates of reading. Exceptional Children, 70, 453–468.
   Google Scholar
• Hempenstall, K. (2008). Corrective reading: An evidence-based remedial reading intervention. Australasian Journal of Special Education, 32, 23–54.10.1080/10300110701839949
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 1277–1288.10.1177/1049732305276687
   Google Scholar
• Iversen, S., & Tunmer, W. E. (1993). Phonological processing skills and the reading recovery program. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 112–126.10.1037/0022-0663.85.1.112
   Google Scholar
• Learning Disabilities, Dyslexia, and Vision. (2009). Retrieved from http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/124/2/837.full
   Google Scholar
• Liamputtong, P. (Ed.). (2013). Qualitative research methods (4th ed.). Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lonigan, C. J., Purpura, D. J., Wilson, S. B., Walker, P. M., & Clancy-Menchetti, J. (2013). Evaluating the components of an emergent literacy intervention for preschool children at risk for reading difficulties. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 114, 111–130. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2012.08.010
   Google Scholar
• Moorman, G. B., Blanton, W. E., & McLaughlin, T. (1994). The rhetoric of whole language. Reading Research Quarterly, 29, 308–329.10.2307/747779
   Google Scholar
• NAPLAN. (2013). Achievement in reading, persuasive writing, language conventions and numeracy: National report for 2013. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu.au/verve/_resources/NAPLAN_2013_National_Report.PDF
   Google Scholar
• NAPLAN – General. (2013). Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu.au/information/faqs/naplan–general.html
   Google Scholar
• National Assessment Program Literacy and Numeracy. (2014). Achievement in reading, persuasive writing, language conventions and numeracy. National report for 2014. (2014). Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu.au/verve/_resources/National_Assessment_Program_Literacy_and_Numeracy_national_report_for_2014.pdf
   Google Scholar
• NVivo8 Feature List. (2008). Retrieved from http://education.pugh.co.uk/uploads/documents/qsr_nvivo_8_feature_list.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pauli, Y. (2007). The effects of chiropractic care on individuals suffering from learning disabilities and dyslexia: A review of the literature. Journal of Vertebral Subluxation Research, 15, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Pinnell, G. S. (1989). Reading recovery: Helping at risk children learn to read. The Elementary School Journal, 90, 160–183.
   Google Scholar
• Pinnell, G. S., Lyons, C. A., DeFord, D. E., Bryk, A. S., & Seltzer, M. (1994). Comparing instructional models for the literacy education of high-risk first graders. Reading Research Quarterly, 29, 8–39.10.2307/747736
   Google Scholar
• Reading Recovery. (2013, February 13). Retrieved from http://www.earlyyears.sa.edu.au/pages/Programs/7218/?reFlag=1
   Google Scholar
• Reading Recovery Guidelines for 2010 and Beyond. (2010). Retrieved from http://www.curriculumsupport.education.nsw.gov.au/earlyyears/reading_recovery/docs/rr_guidelin_15.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Reading Recovery in the Archdiocese of Melbourne. (2011). Retrieved from http://www.ceomelb.catholic.edu.au/uploadedFiles/Content/03_Learning_and_Teaching/Literacy/Literacy_Projects/Reading%20Recovery%20paper.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, M., & Wheldall, K. (2007). Reading recovery 20 years down the track: Looking forward, looking back. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 54, 199–223.10.1080/10349120701330503
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie, J., Spencer, L., & O’Connor, W. (2003). Carrying out qualitative analysis. In J. Ritchie & J. E. Lewis (Eds.), Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students (pp. 219–262). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, J. (2009). Identifying and teaching children and young people with dyslexia and literacy difficulties. An independent report from Sir Jim Rose to the Secretary of State for children, schools and families. Retrieved from https://www.education.gov.uk/publications/eOrderingDownload/00659-2009DOM-EN.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rupley, W. H., Blair, T. R., & Nichols, W. D. (2009). Effective reading instruction for struggling readers: The role of direct/explicit teaching. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 25, 125–138.
   Google Scholar
• Serry, T. (2010). Supplementary reading support for young low-progress readers at school: Integrating perspectives about experiences and practices from service providers and parents in an Australian context ( Unpublished PhD thesis). Melbourne: La Trobe University.
   Google Scholar
• Serry, T., & Liamputtong, P. (2013). The in-depth interviewing method in health. In P. Liamputtong (Ed.), Research methods in health: Foundations for evidence-based practice (2nd ed., pp. 39–53). Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Serry, T., Rose, M., & Liamputtong, P. (2014). Reading recovery teachers discuss reading recovery: A qualitative investigation. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 19, 61–73. doi:10.1080/19404158.2014.909862
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. A., & Osborn, M. (2008). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A Practical guide to research methods (2nd ed., pp. 53–80). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, P. C., & Powell, M. B. (2004). Developmental language disorders and adolescent risk: A public-health advocacy role for speech pathologists? Advances in Speech-Language Pathology, 6, 221–229.10.1080/14417040400010132
   Google Scholar
• Spira, E., Bracken, S., & Fischel, J. (2005). Predicting improvement after first-grade reading difficulties: The effects of oral language, emergent literacy, and behavior skills. Developmental Psychology., 41, 225–234.10.1037/0012-1649.41.1.225
   Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 86, 24–53.
   Google Scholar
• Stephenson, J., & Wheldall, K. (2008). Miracles take a little longer: Science, commercialisation, cures and the Dore program. Australasian Journal of Special Education, 32, 67–82.10.1080/10300110701845946
   Google Scholar
• Sweeney, J. (2014). NAPLAN the last straw. Behaviour Management for Teachers, 5.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, S., Hillman, K., Wernert, N., Schmid, M., Buckley, S., & Munene, A. (2011). Highlights from TIMSS & PIRLS 2011 from Australia’s perspective. Retrieved from http://www.acer.edu.au/documents/TIMSS-PIRLS_Australian-Highlights.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., Small, S., & Fanuele, D. P. (2006). Response to intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between children with and without reading disabilities: Evidence for the role of kindergarten and first-grade interventions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 157. Retrieved from http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=1004088531&sid=9&Fmt=2&clientId=56518&RQT=309&VName=PQD10.1177/00222194060390020401
   Google Scholar
• Vernon-Feagans, L., Kainz, K., Amendum, S., Ginsberg, M., Wood, T., & Bock, A. (2012). Targeted reading intervention: A coaching model to help classroom teachers with struggling readers. Learning Disability Quarterly, 35, 102–114. doi:10.1177/0731948711434048
   Google Scholar
• Wanzek, J., Wexler, J., Vaughn, S., & Ciullo, S. (2010). Reading interventions for struggling readers in the upper elementary grades: A synthesis of 20 years of research. Reading and Writing, 23, 889–912. doi:10.1007/s11145-009-9179-5
   Google Scholar