Schwartz’s response to Chapman and Tunmer’s analysis of reading recovery data: Whose ideology and whose politics?

References

• Belgrave, J. W. (2009). The characteristics of children who are referred on from Reading Recovery (Unpublished Master of Education thesis). University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Center, Y., Wheldall, K., Freeman, L., Outhred, L., & McNaught, M. (1995). An evaluation of reading recovery. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 240–263.10.2307/748034
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, J. W., Greaney, K. T., & Tunmer, W. E. (2015). Is reading recovery an effective early literacy intervention program for children who most need literacy supports? In W. E. Tunmer, & J. W. Chapman (Eds.), Excellence and equity in literacy education (pp. 41–70). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137415578
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, J. W., & Tunmer, W. E. (2015, July). The literacy performance of ex-reading recovery students between two and four years following participation in the program: Is this intervention effective for students with early reading difficulties? Invited address presented at the 39th Annual Conference of the International Academy for Research in Learning Disabilities (IARLD), Vancouver, Canada. Retrieved from http://www.iferi.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/RR-James-W.-Chapman-and-William-E.-Tunmer.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, J. W., & Tunmer, W. E. (2016). Is reading recovery an effective intervention for students with reading difficulties? A critique of the i3 scale-up study. Reading Psychology, 37, 1025–1042. doi:10.1080/02702711.2016.1157538
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, J. W., Tunmer, W. E., & Prochnow, J. E. (2000). Does success in the Reading Recovery program depend on developing proficiency in phonological-processing skills? Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 141–176.
   Google Scholar
• Clay, M. M. (1985). The early detection of reading difficulties (3rd ed.). Auckland: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Clay, M. M. (1987). Learning to be learning disabled. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 22, 155–173.
   Google Scholar
• Clay, M. M. (1993). Reading Recovery: A guidebook for teachers in training. Auckland: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Clay, M. M. (2005). Literacy lessons designed for individuals. Part one: Why? When? and How? Auckland: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. C. (2005). Development of sight word reading: Phases and findings. In M. J. Snowling, & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 135–154). Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470757642
   Google Scholar
• Elbaum, B., Vaughn, S., Hughes, M., & Moody, S. (2000). How effective are one-to-one tutoring programs in reading for elementary students at risk for reading failure? A meta-analysis of the intervention research. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 605–619.10.1037/0022-0663.92.4.605
   Google Scholar
• Gluckman, P. (2013). The role of evidence in policy formation and implementation: A report from the Prime Minister’s Chief Science Advisor. Wellington: Office of the Prime Minister’s Science Advisory Committee.
   Google Scholar
• Glynn, T., Crooks, T., Bethune, N., Ballard, K., & Smith, J. (1989). Reading Recovery in context. Wellington: Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Jesson, R., & Limbrick, L. (2014). Can gains from early literacy interventions be sustained? The case of Reading Recovery. Journal of Research in Reading, 37, 102–117.10.1111/jrir.v37.1
   Google Scholar
• Malcolm, W., & Tarling, N. (2007). Crisis of identity: The mission and management of universities in New Zealand. Wellington: Dunmore Press.
   Google Scholar
• May, H., Gray, A., Sirinides, P., Goldsworthy, H., Armijo, M., Sam, C., … Tognatta, N. (2015). Year one results from the multisite randomized evaluation of the i3 scale-up of Reading Recovery. American Educational Research Journal, 52, 547–581.10.3102/0002831214565788
   Google Scholar
• McDowall, S., Boyd, S., & Hodgen, E. (2005). Reading Recovery in New Zealand: Uptake, implementation, and outcomes, especially in relation to Māori and Pasifika students. Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• McLachlain, K. (2014). Further thoughts on Reading Recovery. Learning Disabilities Australia Bulletin, 46, 39.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. (1999a). Report of the literacy taskforce. Wellington: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. (1999b). Literacy experts group: Report to the Secretary for Education. Wellington: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Drucker, K. T. (2012). PIRLS 2011 international results in reading. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College. Retrieved from http://timss.bc.edu/pirls2011/international-results-pirls.html
   Google Scholar
• National Reading Recovery. (2016). Reading Recovery in New Zealand. Retrieved from https://www.readingrecovery.ac.nz and https://www.readingrecovery.ac.nz/reading_recovery/
   Google Scholar
• Nicholas, K., & Parkhill, F. (2013). Is Reading Recovery sustainable two to four years after discontinuation? Education 3–13: International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education, 42, 663–672. doi:10.1080/03004279.2012.759605.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson, T. (1989). A comment on Reading Recovery. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 24, 95–97.
   Google Scholar
• Pressley, M. (2006). Reading instruction that works: The case for balanced teaching. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prochnow, J. E., Tunmer, W. E., & Greaney, K. T. (2015). Findings from New Zealand’s participation in the Progress in International Reading Literacy Study in 2001, 2006, and 2011. In W. E. Tunmer, & J. W. Chapman (Eds.), Excellence and equity in literacy education (pp. 23–40). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137415578
   Google Scholar
• Reading Recovery Council of North America. (2009). Standards and guidelines of Reading Recovery in the United States (5th ed.). Columbus, OH: Author. Retrieved from http://www.readingrecovery.org/pdf/implementation/Standards_Guidelines-09_Full_Version.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, R. M. (2015). Ideology and early literacy evidence: A response to Chapman & Tunmer (2015). Columbus, OH: Reading Recovery Council of North America. Retrieved from https://readingrecovery.org/images/pdfs/Reading_Recovery/Research_and_Evaluation/chapman_tunmer_2015_response.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Serry, T., Ros e, M., & Liamputtong, P. (2014). Reading Recovery teachers discuss Reading Recovery: A qualitative investigation. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 19, 61–73.10.1080/19404158.2014.909862
   Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E., Lake, C., Davis, S., & Madden, N. A. (2011). Effective programs for struggling readers: A best evidence synthesis. Educational Research Review, 6, 1–26.10.1016/j.edurev.2010.07.002
   Google Scholar
• Soler, J., & Openshaw, R. (2006). Literacy crises and reading policies: Children still can’t read! London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tunmer, W. E., & Chapman, J. W. (Eds.). (2015). Excellence and equity in literacy education: The case of New Zealand. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Tunmer, W. E., Greaney, K. T., & Prochnow, J. E. (2015). Pedagogical constructivism in New Zealand literacy education: A flawed approach to teaching reading. In W. E. Tunmer, & J. W. Chapman (Eds.), Excellence and equity in literacy education (pp. 121–144). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137415578
   Google Scholar