Does linguistic comprehension support the decoding skills of struggling readers?

References

• Aaron, P. G. (1997). The impending demise of the discrepancy formula. Review of Educational Research, 67, 461–502.10.3102/00346543067004461
   Google Scholar
• Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, I. L., & Juel, C. (1992). The role of decoding in learning to read. In S. J. Samuels, & A. E. Farstrup (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (pp. 101–123). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Catts, H. W., Adlof, S. M., & Weismer, S. E. (2006). Language deficits in poor comprehenders: A case for the simple view of reading. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 278–293.10.1044/1092-4388(2006/023)
   Google Scholar
• Chall, J. S. (1967). Learning to read: The great debate. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Chinn, C. A., Waggoner, M. A., Anderson, R. C., Schommer, M., & Wilkinson, I. A. (1993). Situated actions during reading lessons: A microanalysis of oral reading error episodes. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 361–392.10.3102/00028312030002361
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, P. J., Snowling, M. J., Truelove, E., & Hulme, C. (2010). Ameliorating children’s reading-comprehension difficulties. Psychological Science, 21, 1106–1116.10.1177/0956797610375449
   Google Scholar
• Clay, M. M. (1993). Reading recovery: A guidebook for teachers in training. Auckland: Heinemann Education.
   Google Scholar
• Connor, C. M., Morrison, F. J., & Katch, L. E. (2004). Beyond the reading wars: Exploring the effect of child-instruction interactions on growth in early reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 8, 305–336.10.1207/s1532799xssr0804_1
   Google Scholar
• de Jong, P. F., & van der Leij, A. (2002). Effects of phonological abilities and linguistic comprehension on the development of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 51–77.10.1207/S1532799XSSR0601_03
   Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. C. (1995). Phases of development in learning to read words by sight. Journal of Research in Reading, 18, 116–125.10.1111/jrir.1995.18.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. C., & McCormick, S. (2013). Phases of word learning: Implications for instruction with delayed and disabled readers. In N. Unrau, N. J. Unrau, & R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (pp. 339–361). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.10.1598/0710
   Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Willows, D. M., Schuster, B. V., Yaghoub-Zadeh, Z., & Shanahan, T. (2001). Phonemic awareness instruction helps children learn to read: Evidence from the national reading panel’s meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 250–287.10.1598/RRQ.36.3.2
   Google Scholar
• Elliot, J. G., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2014). The dyslexia debate. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139017824
   Google Scholar
• Frith, U., & Snowling, M. (1983). Reading for meaning and reading for sound in autistic and dyslexic children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 1, 329–342.10.1111/bjdp.1983.1.issue-4
   Google Scholar
• Gillam, R. B., & Carlile, R. M. (1997). Oral reading and story retelling of students with specific language impairment. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 28, 30–42.10.1044/0161-1461.2801.30
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, K. S. (1967). Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game. Literacy Research and Instruction, 6, 126–135.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, K. S. (1969). Analysis of reading miscues: Applied psycholinguistics. Reading Research Quarterly, 5, 9–30.10.2307/747158
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, K. S. (1973). Miscues: Windows on the reading process. In K. S. Goodman (Ed.), Miscue analysis: Applications to reading instruction (pp. 3–14). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, K. S. (1992). Whole language research: Foundations and development. In S. J. Samuels, & A. E. Farstrup (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (pp. 46–69). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, Y. M., & Burke, C. L. (1972). Reading miscue inventory: Manual and procedures for diagnosis and evaluation. New York, NY: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Goswami, U. (2008). Cognitive development: The learning brain. Hove: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, P. B. (1983). Context, form, and interaction. In K. Rayner (Ed.), Eye movements in reading (pp. 203–211). New York, NY: Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-12-583680-7.50017-5
   Google Scholar
• Gough, P. B. (1991). The complexity of reading. In R. R. Hoffman, & D. S. Palermo (Eds.), Cognition and the symbolic processes: Applied and ecological perspectives (pp. 141–149). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, P. B. (1993). The beginning of decoding. Reading and Writing, 5, 181–192.10.1007/BF01027483
   Google Scholar
• Gough, P. B. (1996). How children learn to read and why they fail. Annals of Dyslexia, 46, 1–20.10.1007/BF02648168
   Google Scholar
• Gough, P. B., Alford, J. A., & Holley-Wilcox, P. (1981). Words and contexts. In O. J. L. Tzeng, & H. Singer (Eds.), Perception of Print: Reading Research in Experimental Psychology (pp. 85–102). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, P. B., & Hillinger, M. L. (1980). Learning to read: An unnatural act. Bulletin of the Orton Society, 30, 179–196.10.1007/BF02653717
   Google Scholar
• Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6–10.
   Google Scholar
• Hagtvet, B. E. (2003). Listening comprehension and reading comprehension in poor decoders: Evidence for the importance of syntactic and semantic skills as well as phonological skills. Reading and Writing, 16, 505–539.10.1023/A:1025521722900
   Google Scholar
• Hartas, D., & Warner, B. J. (2000). A form of dyslexia? Pupils with language and reading difficulties. Educational Psychology in Practice, 15, 246–255.10.1080/0266736000150405
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hempenstall, K. (2002). The three-cueing system: Help or hindrance? Direct Instruction News, 2, 42–51.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. D., & Baumann, J. F. (1984). Word identification. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 1, pp. 583–608). White Plains, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Kamhi, A. G., & Catts, H. W. (2012). Language and reading: Convergences and divergences. In A. G. Kamhi, & H. W. Catts (Eds.), Language and Reading Disabilities (pp. 1–23). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Laing, S. P. (2002). Miscue analysis in school-age children. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 11, 407–416.10.1044/1058-0360(2002/044)
   Google Scholar
• Leu, D. J., Jr. (1982). Oral reading error analysis: A critical review of research and application. Reading Research Quarterly, 17, 420–437.10.2307/747528
   Google Scholar
• Lovett, M. W., & Steinbach, K. A. (1997). The effectiveness of remedial programs for reading disabled children of different ages: Does the benefit decrease for older children? Learning Disability Quarterly, 20, 189–210.10.2307/1511308
   Google Scholar
• McKay, A., Davis, C., Savage, G., & Castles, A. (2008). Semantic involvement in reading aloud: Evidence from a nonword training study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 1495–1517.
   Google Scholar
• Moats, L. C., & Foorman, B. R. (1997). Components of effective reading instruction. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1, 187–189.10.1207/s1532799xssr0103_1
   Google Scholar
• Nation, K. (2005). Children’s reading comprehension difficulties. In M. J. Snowling, & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 248–265). Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470757642
   Google Scholar
• Nation, K., & Snowling, M. J. (1998). Individual differences in contextual facilitation: Evidence from dyslexia and poor reading comprehension. Child Development, 69, 996–1011.10.1111/j.1467-8624.1998.tb06157.x
   Google Scholar
• Neale, M. D. (1999). Neale analysis of reading ability-third edition. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand Parliament Electorate Data. (2015). Electorate profiles North Shore: Ethnic group of school pupils. Retrieved from https://www.parliament.nz/en-nz/mpp/electorates/data/DBHOH_Lib_EP_North_Shore_People/north-shore-people
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson, T. (1986). Reading is not a guessing game – The great debate revisited. Reading Psychology, 7, 197–210.10.1080/0270271860070307
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson, T. (1991). Do children read words better in context or in lists? A classic study recisted. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 444–450.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson, T. (2000). Reading the writing on the wall: Debates, challenges and opportunities in the teaching of reading. Palmerston North: Dunmore Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson, T., Lillas, C., & Rzoska, M. A. (1988). Have we been misled by miscues? The Reading Teacher, 42, 6–10.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, R., Hasbrouck, J. E., & Tindal, G. (1992). Greater validity for oral reading fluency: Can miscues help? The Journal of Special Education, 25, 492–503.10.1177/002246699202500406
   Google Scholar
• Parkin, C., Parkin, C., & Pool, B. (2002). PROBE reading assessment. Lower Hutt: Triune Initiatives.
   Google Scholar
• Ramus, F., & Szenkovits, G. (2008). What phonological deficit? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 129–141.10.1080/17470210701508822
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., Foorman, B. R., Perfetti, C. A., Pesetsky, D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2001). How psychological science informs the teaching of reading. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2, 31–74.10.1111/1529-1006.00004
   Google Scholar
• Scarborough, H. S. (1991). Early syntactic development of dyslexic children. Annals of Dyslexia, 41, 207–220.10.1007/BF02648087
   Google Scholar
• Shankweiler, D., & Crain, S. (1986). Language mechanisms and reading disorder: A modular approach. Cognition, 24, 139–168.10.1016/0010-0277(86)90008-9
   Google Scholar
• Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151–218.10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, L. S. (1989). IQ is irrelevant to the definition of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 469–478.10.1177/002221948902200803
   Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E., Lake, C., Chambers, B., Cheung, A., & Davis, S. (2009). Effective reading programs for the elementary grades: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 79, 1391–1466.10.3102/0034654309341374
   Google Scholar
• Smith, F. (1975). The role of prediction in reading. Elementary English, 52, 305–311.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, F. (1976). Learning to read by reading. Language Arts, 53, 297–322.
   Google Scholar
• Snowling, M. J., Gallagher, A., & Frith, U. (2003). Family risk of dyslexia is continous: Individual differences in the presusors of reading skill. Child Development, 72, 358–373.
   Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual difference in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407.10.1598/RRQ.21.4.1
   Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. (1991). Discrepancy definitions of reading disability: Has intelligence led us astray? Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 7–29.10.2307/747729
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, M. (1978). A psycholinguistic analysis of reading errors made by dyslexics and normal readers. Journal of Research in Reading, 1, 7–20.10.1111/jrir.1978.1.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Torgesen, J K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1977). Prevention and remediation of severe reading disabilities: Keeping the end in mind. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1, 217–231.
   Google Scholar
• Tunmer, W. E., & Chapman, J. W. (1996). A developmental model of dyslexia: Can the construct be saved? Dyslexia, 2, 179–189.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0909
   Google Scholar
• Tunmer, W. E., & Chapman, J. W. (1999). Teaching strategies for word identification. In G. B. Thompson & T. Nicholoson (Eds.), Learning to Read: Beyond Phonics and Whole Language (pp. 74–102). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Tunmer, W. E., & Chapman, J. W. (2012). The simple view of readinf redux: Vocabulary knowledge and the independent components hypothesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 453–466.
   Google Scholar
• Tunmer, W. E., & Nicholson, T. (2011). The development and teaching of word recognition skill. In M. L. Kamil, P. D. Pearson, E. B. Moje, & P. Afflerbach (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 4, pp. 405–431). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vellutino, F. R. (1991). Introduction to three studies on reading acquisition: Convergent findings on theoretical foundations of code-oriented versus whole-language approaches to reading instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 437–443.10.1037/0022-0663.83.4.437
   Google Scholar
• Vellutino, F. R., Fletcher, J. M., Snowling, M. J., & Scanlon, D. M. (2004). Specific reading disability (dyslexia): What have we learned in the past four decades? Journal of Chid Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 2–40.
   Google Scholar
• Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., & Reid Lyon, G. (2000). Differentiating between difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 223–238.10.1177/002221940003300302
   Google Scholar
• Walpole, S., & McKenna, M. C. (2006). The role of informal reading inventories in assessing word recognition. The Reading Teacher, 59, 592–594.10.1598/RT.59.6.10
   Google Scholar
• Warde, B. A. (2005). Reading miscues of college students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 36, 21–36.10.1080/10790195.2005.10850178
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (2007). Wechsler individual achievement test 2nd edition (WIAT-II), Australian (standardised ed.). Sydney: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Wixson, K. L. (1979). Miscue analysis: A critical review. Journal of Literacy Research, 11, 163–175.
   Google Scholar