Targeting phonological recoding to support orthographic learning: effectiveness of WordDriver delivered via telehealth

References

• Apel, K., Thomas-Tate, S., Wilson-Fowler, E. B., & Brimo, D. (2012). Acquisition of initial mental graphemic representations by children at risk for literacy development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33(2), 365–391. doi:10.1017/s0142716411000403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin, C. R., Vaughn, S., & McClelland, A. M. (2017). Intensive Reading interventions for inadequate responders in grades K–3: A synthesis. Learning Disability Quarterly, 40(4), 191–210. doi:10.1177/0731948717714446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berninger, V. W., Vermeulen, K., Abbott, R. D., & McCutchen, D. (2003). Comparison of three approaches to supplementary reading instruction for low-achieving second-grade readers. Language, Speech & Hearing Services in Schools, 34(2), 101–116. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2003/009)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biname, F., Danzio, S., & Poncelet, M. (2015). Relative ease in creating detailed orthographic representations contrasted with severe difficulties to maintain them in long-term memory among dyslexic children. Dyslexia, 24(4), 361–370. doi:10.1002/dys.1506
   Google Scholar
• Binamé, F., & Poncelet, M. (2016). The development of the abilities to acquire novel detailed orthographic representations and maintain them in long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 143, 14–33. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2015.10.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen, C. (1996). The quick screener.
   Google Scholar
• Bowey, J. A., & Muller, D. (2005). Phonological recoding and rapid orthographic learning in third-graders’ silent reading: A critical test of the self-teaching hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 92(3), 203–219. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2005.06.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bus, A. G., & van Ijzendoorn, M. H. (1999). Phonological awareness and early reading: A meta-analysis of experimental training studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(3), 403–414. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.91.3.403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catts, H. W., Adlof, S. M., & Weismer, S. E. (2006). Language deficits in poor comprehenders: A case for the simple view of reading. Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research, 49(2), 278–293. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2006/023)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claessen, M., Leitao, S., & Barrett, N. (2010). Investigating children’s ability to reflect on stored phonological representations: The silent deletion of phonemes task. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 45(4), 411–423. doi:10.3109/13682820903111945
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M. (1981). The MRC psycholinguistic database. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A(4), 497–505. doi:10.1080/14640748108400805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M. (2006). Dual route and connectionist models of reading: An overview. London Review of Education, 4(1), 5–17. doi:10.1080/13603110600574322
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, A. E., Perry, K. E., Stanovich, K. E., & Share, D. L. (2002). Orthographic learning during reading: Examining the role of self-teaching. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 82(3), 185–199. doi:10.1016/S0022-0965(02)00008-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denton, C. A., Tolar, T. D., Fletcher, J. M., Barth, A. E., Vaughn, S., & Francis, D. J. (2013). Effects of tier 3 intervention for students with persistent reading difficulties and characteristics of inadequate responders. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 633–648. doi:10.1037/a0032581
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Education, S. A. T. (2005). Teaching reading: Report and recommendations. Melbourne: Australian Government.
   Google Scholar
• DIBELS. (2018). DIBELS®: Dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills. Retrieved from https://dibels.uoregon.edu/materials/dibels
   Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. C. (2005). Learning to read words: Theory, findings, and issues. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9(2), 167–188. doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr0902_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García, J. R., & Cain, K. (2014). Decoding and reading comprehension: A meta-analysis to identify which reader and assessment characteristics influence the strength of the relationship in English. Review of Educational Research, 84(1), 74–111. doi:10.3102/0034654313499616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillon, G. T. (2002). Follow-up study investigating the benefits of phonological awareness intervention for children with spoken language impairment. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 37(4), 381–400. doi:10.1080/1368282021000007776
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6–10. doi:10.1177/074193258600700104
   Google Scholar
• Hatcher, P. J., Hulme, C., Miles, J. N., Carroll, J. M., Hatcher, J., Gibbs, S., Snowling, M. J. & Snowling, M. J. (2006). Efficacy of small group reading intervention for beginning readers with reading-delay: A randomised controlled trial. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47(8), 820–827. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01559.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hempenstall, K. (2012). Response to intervention: Accountability in action. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 17(2), 101–131. doi:10.1080/19404158.2012.704879
   Google Scholar
• Herrmann, J. A., Matyas, T., & Pratt, C. (2006). Meta-analysis of the nonword reading deficit in specific reading disorder. Dyslexia, 12(3), 195–221. doi:10.1002/dys.324
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, R. F., Torgesen, J. K., Lane, H. B., & Turner, S. J. (2012). Relations among reading skills and sub-skills and text-level reading proficiency in developing readers. Reading and Writing, 25(2), 483–507. doi:10.1007/s11145-010-9283-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kratochwill, T. R. P., Hitchcock, J. H. P., Horner, R. H. P., Levin, J. R. P., Odom, S. L. P., Rindskopf, D. M. P., & Shadish, W. R. P. (2013). Single-Case Intervention Research Design Standards: RASE. Remedial and Special Education, 34(1), 26. doi:10.1177/0741932512452794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyte, C. S., & Johnson, C. J. (2006). The role of phonological recoding in orthographic learning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 93(2), 166–185. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2005.09.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, H. B., Pullen, P. C., Hudson, R. F., & Konold, T. R. (2009). Identifying essential instructional components of literacy tutoring for struggling beginning readers. Literacy Research and Instruction, 48(4), 277–297. doi:10.1080/19388070902875173
   Google Scholar
• Machin, S., McNally, S., & Viarengo, M. (2018). Changing How literacy is taught: evidence on synthetic phonics. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 10(2), 217–241. doi:10.1257/pol.20160514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin-Chang, S., Ouellette, G., & Bond, L. (2017). Differential effects of context and feedback on orthographic learning: How good is good enough? Scientific Studies of Reading, 21(1), 17–30. doi:10.1080/10888438.2016.1263993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCandliss, B., Beck, I. L., Sandak, R., & Perfetti, C. (2003). Focusing attention on decoding for children with poor reading skills: Design and preliminary tests of the word building intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7(1), 75–104. doi:10.1207/S1532799XSSR0701_05
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching Children to Read. An Evidence-Based Assessment of the Scientific Research Literature on Reading and Its Implications for Reading Instruction. Retrieved from Washington, D.C: https://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/pubs/nrp/smallbook
   Google Scholar
• Ouellette, G., & Beers, A. (2010). A not-so-simple view of reading: How oral vocabulary and visual-word recognition complicate the story. Reading and Writing, 23(2), 189–208. doi:10.1007/s11145-008-9159-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pullen, P. C., & Lane, H. B. (2014). Teacher-directed decoding practice with manipulative letters and word reading skill development of struggling first grade students. Exceptionality, 22(1), 1–16. doi:10.1080/09362835.2014.865952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastle, K., Harrington, J., & Coltheart, M. (2002). Nonwords: The ARC nonword database. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 358(4), 534. doi:10.1080/02724980244000099
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, C., & Salter, W. (2007). The phonological awareness test 2. East Moline, IL: LinguiSystems, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Seiler, A., Leitão, S., & Blosfelds, M. (2013). The effectiveness of a computer-supported intervention targeting orthographic processing and phonological recoding for children with impaired word identification. Journal of Clinical Practice in Speech-Language Pathology, 15(1), 13–18.
   Google Scholar
• Seiler, A., Leitão, S., & Blosfelds, M. (2018). WordDriver‐1: Evaluating the efficacy of an app‐supported decoding intervention for children with reading impairment. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 54(2), 155–305. doi:10.1111/1460-6984.12388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55(2), 151–218. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparks, R., Patton, J., & Murdoch, A. (2014). Early reading success and its relationship to reading achievement and reading volume: Replication of ‘10 years later’. Reading and Writing, 27(1), 189–211. doi:10.1007/s11145-013-9439-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torgerson, C. J., Brooks, G., & Hall, J. (2006). A systematic review of the research literature on the use of phonics in the teaching of reading and spelling (report no. 711). Nottingham: DfES Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Torgesen, J. K. (2001). Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: Immediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approaches. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34(1), 33–58. doi:10.1177/002221940103400104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (2012). Test of word reading efficiency (Second Edition ed.). Austin, TS: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., Rashotte, C. A., & Pearson, N. A. (2013). Comprehensive test of phonological processing (Second Edition ed.). Austin, Texas: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Wales, D., Skinner, L., & Hayman, M. (2017). The efficacy of telehealth-delivered speech and language intervention for primary school-age children: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Telerehabilitation, 9(1), 55–70. doi:10.5195/ijt.2017.6219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (2016). WIAT-III A&NZ. Sydney NSW: Pearson Clinical and Talent Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Wheldall, K., & Beaman, R. (1999). An evaluation of MULTILIT - Making up lost time in literacy. executive summary. Retrieved from Sydney, Australia: Macquarie University.
   Google Scholar