A longitudinal study of the efficacy of the Cellfield reading intervention in a South African context

References

• Bosse, M., Tainturier, M., & Valdois, S. (2007). Developmental dyslexia: The visual attention span deficit hypothesis. Cognition, 104(2), 198–230. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2006.05.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christodoulou, J., Tudo, S. D., Lymberis, J., Saxler, P., Ghosh, S. & Gabrielli, J. (2014). Brain bases for reading fluency in typical reading and impaired fluency in dyslexia. Public Library of Science ONE, 9(7), 1–14. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0100552
   Google Scholar
• de Jong, P., & van Bergen, E. (2017). Issues in Diagnosing Dyslexia. In E. Segers & P. Broek (Eds.), Developmental perspectives in written language and literacy (pp. 349–361). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:10.1075/z.206.21dej
   Google Scholar
• Fälth, L., Gustafson, S., Tjus, T., Heimann, M., & Svensson, I. (2013). Computer-assisted Interventions targeting reading skills of children with reading disabilities – a longitudinal study. Dyslexia, 19(1), 37–53. doi:10.1002/dys.1450
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feuerstein, R., Falik, L., & Feuerstein, R. (2013). The Cognitive Elements of Neural Plasticity. http://www.neuropsychotherapist.com/cognitive-elements-neural-plasticity.
   Google Scholar
• Frijters, J. C., Tsujimoto, K., Borda, R., Gottwald, S., Hill, D. & Gruen, J. (2017). Reading-related causal attributions for success and failure: Dynamic links with reading skill. Reading Research Quarterly, 53(1), 127–148. doi:10.1002/rrq.189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, R., & Cain, K. (2014). Decoding and reading comprehension: A meta-analysis to identify which reader and assessment characteristics influence the strength of the relationship in English. Review of Educational Research, 84(1), 74–111. doi:10.3102/0034654313499616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gough, P., & Tunmer, W. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6–10. doi:10.1177/074193258600700104
   Google Scholar
• Hester, E., & Hudson, B. (2004). The role of phonological representation in decoding skills of young readers. Child Language Teaching & Therapy, 20(2), 115–133. doi:10.1191/0265659004ct266oa
   Google Scholar
• Howie, S. J., Combrinck, C., Roux, K., Tshele, M., Mokoena, G. M., & McLeod-Palane, N. (2017). PIRLS literacy 2016: South African highlights report. Centre for Evaluation and Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Meeks, L., Madelaine, A., & Stephenson, J. (2020). New teachers talk about their preparation to teach early literacy. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 25(2), 161–181. doi:10.1080/19404158.2020.1792520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennington, B. (2006). From single to multiple deficit models of developmental disorders. Cognition, 101(2), 385–413. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2006.04.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennington, B., Santerre-Lemmon, L., Rosenberg, J., MacDonald, B., Boada, R. & Olson, R. (2012). Individual prediction of dyslexia by single vs. multiple deficit models. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121(1), 212–224. doi:10.1037/a0025823
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prideaux, A., Marsh, K., & Caplygin, D. (2005). Efficacy of the cellfield intervention for reading difficulties: An integrated computer-based approach targeting deficits associated with dyslexia. Australian Journal of Learning Disabilities, 10(2), 51–62. doi:10.1080/19404150509546789
   Google Scholar
• Protopapas, A. (2019). Evolving concepts of dyslexia and their implications for research and remediation. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1–9. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02873
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramus, F. (2014). Should there really be a ‘dyslexia debate’? Brain A Journal of Neurology, 137(12), 3371–3374. doi:10.1093/brain/awu295
   Google Scholar
• Ring, J., & Black, J. (2018). The multiple deficit model of dyslexia: What does it mean for identification and intervention? Annals of Dyslexia, 68(2), 104–125. doi:10.1007/s11881-018-0157-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sander, J. (2008). Evaluation of the Cellfield intervention for dyslexia: Behavioural and electrophysiological outcomes [ MA dissertation]. Hobart, Australia: University of Tasmania.
   Google Scholar
• Scarborough, H. S. (2001). Connecting early language and literacy to later reading (dis)abilities: Evidence, theory, and practice. In S. Neuman & D. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook for Research in Early Literacy (pp. 97–110). New York City, USA: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shaywitz, S. (2005). Overcoming dyslexia. New York City, USA: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Snowling, M., Hulme, C., & Nation, K. (2020). Defining and understanding dyslexia: Past, present and future. Oxford Review of Education, 46(4), 501–513. doi:10.1080/03054985.2020.1765756
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solis, M., Miciak, J., Vaughn, S., & Fletcher, J. (2014). Why intensive interventions matter: Longitudinal studies of adolescents with reading disabilities and poor reading comprehension. Learning Disability Quarterly, 12(4), 218–229. doi:10.1177/0731948714528806
   Google Scholar
• Spanoudis, G. C., Papadopoulos, T. C., & Spyrou, S. (2019). Specific language impairment and reading disability: Categorical distinction or continuum? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 52(1), 3–14. doi:10.1177/0022219418775111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spaull, N. (2016). Learning to read and reading to learn. Stellenboch, South Africa: Department of Economics, University of Stellenbosch.
   Google Scholar
• Spaull, N. (2023) 2023 background report for the 2030 reading panel. Cape Town
   Google Scholar
• Spaull, N., & Pretorius, E. (2019). Still falling at the first hurdle: examining early grade reading in South Africa. In N. Spaull & J. Jansen (Eds.), South African Schooling: The Enigma of Inequality (pp. 147–168). Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Strattman, K., & Hodson, B. (2005). Variables that influence decoding and spelling in beginning readers. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 21(2), 165–190. doi:10.1191/0265659005ct287oa
   Google Scholar
• Tschentscher, N., Ruisinger, A., Blank, H., Diaz, B., & Kriegstein, K. (2019). Reduced structural connectivity between left auditory thalamus and the motion-sensitive planum temporale in developmental dyslexia. The Journal of Neuroscience, 39(9), 1729–1732. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1435-18.2018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNESCO institute of statistics. (2015). 50th Anniversary of international literacy day: Literacy rates are on the rise but millions remain illiterate. United Nations: UNESCO institute of statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Van Bergen, E., van der Leij, A., & de Jong, P. (2014). The intergenerational multiple deficit model and the case of dyslexia. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8(Article 246), 1–13. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00346
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van den Boer, M., & de Jong, P. (2018). Stability of visual attention span performance and its relation with reading over time. Scientific Studies of Reading, 22(5), 434–441. doi:10.1080/10888438.2018.1472266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Berg, S. (2015). What the annual national assessments can tell us about learning deficits over the education system and the school career. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 5(2), 28–43. doi:10.4102/sajce.v5i2.381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Gorp, K., Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2016). Enhancing decoding efficiency in poor readers via a word identification game. Reading Research Quarterly, 52(1), 105–123. doi:10.1002/rrq.156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldie, K., Wilson, A., Roberts, R., & Moreau, D. (2017). Reading network in dyslexia: Similar, yet different. Brain and Language, 174, 29–41. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2017.07.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., Sabatini, J., O’Reilly, T., & Weeks, J. (2019). Decoding and reading comprehension: A test of the decoding threshold hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 11(3), 387–401. doi:10.1037/edu0000302
   Google Scholar
• Wiederholt, J. L., & Bryant, B. (2001). Gray oral reading test 4 examiner’s manual. Austin, Texas: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Wiederholt, J. L., & Bryant, B. (2012). Gray oral reading test 5 examiner’s manual. Austin, Texas: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, G. (2018). Developing reading automaticity and fluency: Revisiting what reading teachers know, putting confirmed research into Current practice. Creative Education, 9(6), 838–855. doi:10.4236/ce.2018.96062
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, M. (2008). Proust and the squid, the story and science of the reading brain. New York City: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, U. (2011). Effects of a randomised reading intervention study: An application of structural equation modelling. Dyslexia, 17(4), 295–311. doi:10.1002/dys.438
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodcock, R. (1998). Woodcock reading mastery test- revised: Examiner’s manual. Circle Pines, Minnesota: American Guidance Service Inc.
   Google Scholar
• The World Bank. 2016. World development indicators: Highlights featuring the sustainable development goals. Washington DC: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. Available at https://databankfiles.worldbank.org/public/ddpext_download/site-content/wdi-2016-highlights-featuring-sdgs-booklet.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Zoubrinetzky, R., Bielle, F., Valdois, S., & Kroesbergen, E. (2014). New insights on developmental dyslexia subtypes: Heterogeneity of mixed reading profiles. Public Library of Science ONE, 9(6), 1–15. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0099337
   Google Scholar