Young Adolescent Voices: Students’ Perceptions of Interdisciplinary Teaming

References

• Arhar, J. (1992). Interdisciplinary teaming and the social bonding of middle level students. In J. Irvin (Ed.), Transforming middle level education: Perspectives and possibilities (pp. 139-161). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Arhar, J., & Kromrey, J. (1995). Interdisciplinary teaming and the demographics of membership: A comparison of student belonging in high S.E.S. and low S.E.S. middle-level schools. Research in Middle Level Education, 18(2), 71-88.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, J., & Stevenson, C. (1998). Teachers’ teaming handbook: A middle level planning guide. Toronto: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Beane, J. (1997). Curriculum integration: Designing the core of democratic education. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bolman, L., & Deal, T. (1997). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice and leadership (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. (1998). Qualitative research in education: An introduction to theory and methods. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, T. H. (1920). The junior high school. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.
   Google Scholar
• Carnegie Corporation. (1989). Turning points: Preparing American youth for the 21st century. Waldorf, MD: Carnegie.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, S., & Clark, D. (1992). The pontoon transitional design: A missing link in the research on interdisciplinary teaming. Research in Middle Level Education, 15(2), 57-81.
   Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A. (2001). Authorizing students’ perspectives: Toward trust, dialogue, and change in education. Educational Researcher, 31(4), pp.3-14.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1944). Democracy and education. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dickinson, T., & Erb, T. (Eds.). (1997). We gain more than we give: Teaming in middle schools. Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.
   Google Scholar
• Eccles, J., & Wigfield, A. (1997). Young adolescent development. In J. L. Irvin (Ed.), What current research says to the middle level practitioner (pp. 15-29). Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.
   Google Scholar
• Felner, R., Jackson, A., Kasak, D., Mulhall, P., Brand, S., & Flowers, N. (1997). The impact of school reform for the middle years: A longitudinal study of a network engaged in Turning Points-based comprehensive school transformation. Phi Delta Kappan, 78(7), 528-550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flowers, N., Mertens, S., & Mulhall, P. (1999). The impact of teaming: Five research-based outcomes. Middle School Journal, 31(2), 57-60.
   Google Scholar
• Gall, M., Borg, W., & Gall, J. (1996). Educational research: An introduction (6th ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Gatewood, T., & Dilg, C. (1975). The middle school we need. Washington: Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Gatewood, T., Cline, G., Green, G., & Harris, S. (1992). Middle school interdisciplinary team organization and its relationship to teacher stress. Middle School Journal, 30(2), 27-41.
   Google Scholar
• George, P. (1984). Middle school instructional organization: An emerging consensus. In John H. Lounsbury (Ed.), Perspectives: Middle school education (pp. 52-67). Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.
   Google Scholar
• Glesne, C. (1997). That rare feeling: (Re)Presenting research through poetic transcription. Qualitative Inquiry 3(2): 202-221.
   Google Scholar
• Glesne, C. (1999). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction (2nd ed.). New York: Addison Wesley Longman Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, G. S. (1904). Adolescence: Its psychology and its relation to physiology, anthropology, sociology, sex, crime, religion & education. New York: D. Appleton & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Harper, D. (1998). On the authority of the image: Visual methods at the crossroads. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (pp. 130-149). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, W., & Davis, G. (2000). Turning points 2000: Educating adolescents in the 21st century. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• James, C. (1972). Young lives at stake: The education of adolescents. New York: Agathon.
   Google Scholar
• Katzenbach, J., & Smith, D. (1999). The wisdom of teams: Creating high performance organization. New York: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Knowles, T., & Brown, D. (2000). What every middle school teacher should know. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Kolanowski, K. (1993). Use of portfolios in assessment of literature learners. Albany, NY: Center for the Study of Literature.
   Google Scholar
• Lounsbury, J. H. (1992). Perspectives on the middle school movement. In J. Irvin (Ed.), Transforming middle level education: Perspectives and possibilities (pp. 3-15). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. A. (1996). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• McEwin, C. K. (1997). Trends in the utilization of interdisciplinary team organization in middle schools. In T.S. Dickinson and T.O. Erb (Eds.), We gain more than we give: Teaming in middle schools (pp. 313-324). Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.
   Google Scholar
• McEwin, C., Dickinson T., & Jenkins, D. (2003). America ’s middle schools in the new century: Status and progress. Westerville, OH: National Middle School Association.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, R., Powell, R., & Pollak, J. (1992). The influence of middle level interdisciplinary teaming on teacher isolation. Research in Middle Level Education, 15(2), 9-27.
   Google Scholar
• National Middle School Association. (1995). This we believe: Developmentally responsive middle schools. Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.
   Google Scholar
• Oldfather, P., & McLaughlin, H. J. (1993). Gaining and losing voice: A longitudinal study of students’ continuing impulse to learn across elementary and middle level contexts. Research in Middle Level Education, 17(1), 1-23.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, R. (1993). Seventh graders’ perspectives of their interdisciplinary team. Middle School Journal, 24(2), 49-57.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, R. (1997). Teams and the affirmation of middle level students’ voices: The case of Jimmie. In T. S. Dickinson & T. O. Erb (Eds.), We gain more than we give: Teaming in middle schools (pp. 271-297). Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, L. (1998). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (pp. 345-371). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Senge, P., Kleiner, A., Roberts, C., Ross, R., & Smith, B. (1994). The fifth discipline fieldbook: Strategies and tools for building a learning organization. New York: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, C. (2002). Teaching ten to fourteen year olds. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Strahan, D., Bowles, N., Richardson, V., & Hanawald, S. (1997). Research on teaming: Insight from selected studies. In T. S. Dickinson & T. O. Erb (Eds.), We gain more than we give: Teaming in middle schools (pp. 359-384) Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.
   Google Scholar
• Strubbe, M. (1990). Are interdisciplinary units worthwhile? Ask students! Middle School Journal, 21(3), 36-38.
   Google Scholar
• Wolcott, H. (1994). Transforming qualitative data: Description, analysis, and interpretation. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publication.
   Google Scholar