Middle Grades Mathematics Teachers’ Mixed Perceptions of Content-Focused Professional Development

References

• Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators. (2017). Standards for preparing teachers of mathematics. Raleigh, NC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Avcu, R. (2019). Turkish pre-service middle level mathematics teachers’ knowledge for teaching fractions. Research in Middle Level Education Online, 42(9), 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, D. L., Hill, H. C., & Bass, H. (2005). Knowing mathematics for teaching: Who knows mathematics well enough to teach third grade, and how can we decide? American Educator, 29(1), 14–16, 20–22, 43–46.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, C. A., Wilson, S., Higgins, T., & McCoach, D. B. (2010). Measuring the effects of professional development on teacher knowledge: The case of developing mathematical ideas. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(5), 479–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(8), 947–967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copur-Gencturk, Y., Plowman, D., & Bai, H. (2019). Mathematics teachers’ learning: Identifying key learning opportunities linked to teachers’ knowledge growth. American Educational Research Journal, 56(5), 1590–1628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., & Hammerness, K. (2005). The design of teacher education programs. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 390–441). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desimone, L. M., Smith, T. M., & Ueno, K. (2006). Are teachers who need sustained, content-focused professional development getting it? An administrator’s dilemma. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(2), 179–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gumus, S. (2013). The effects of teacher- and school-level factors on teachers’ participation in professional development activities: The role of principal leadership. Journal of International Education Research, 9(4), 371–380.
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8(3/4), 381–391.
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R., & Yoon, K. S. (2009). What works in professional development? Phi Delta Kappan, 90(7), 495–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, H. C. (2009). Fixing teacher professional development. Phi Delta Kappan, 90(7), 470–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, H. C., & Ball, D. L. (2004). Learning mathematics for teaching: Results from California’s mathematics professional development institutes. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 35(5), 330–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, H. C., Ball, D. L., & Schilling, S. G. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 372–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgen, J. (2011). Knowing and identity: A situated theory of mathematics knowledge in teaching. In T. Rowland & K. Ruthven (Eds.), Mathematical knowledge in teaching (pp. 27–42). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jacob, R., Hill, H., & Corey, D. (2017). The impact of a professional development program on teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching, instruction, and student achievement. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 10(2), 379–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krille, C. (2020). Barriers to participation in professional development. Cham, Switzerland: SpringerBriefs in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Lindmeier, A., Seemann, S., Kuratli-Geeler, S., Wullschleger, A., Dunekacke, S., Leuchter, M., … Heinze, A. (2020). Modeling early childhood teachers’ mathematics-specific professional competence and its differential growth through professional development - an aspect of structural validity. Research in Mathematics Education, 22(2), 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Main, K., & Pendergast, D. (2015). Core features of effective continuing professional development for the middle years: A tool for reflection. Research in Middle Level Education, 38(10), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Main, K., & Pendergast, D. (2017). Evaluating the effectiveness of a large-scale professional development programme. Professional Development in Education, 43(5), 749–769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maloney, C., & Konza, D. (2011). A case study of teachers’ professional learning: Becoming a community of professional learning or not? Issues in Educational Research, 21(1), 75–87.
   Google Scholar
• National Association of Math Circles. (n.d.). What is a math circle? Retrieved from http://www.mathcircles.org/what-is-a-math-circle/
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. Reston, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Washington, DC: Authors.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2019). TALIS 2018 results (Volume 1): Teachers and school leaders as lifelong learners. Paris, France: TALIS, OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Park, M., & So, K. (2014). Opportunities and challenges for teacher professional development: A case of collaborative learning community in South Korea. International Education Studies, 7(7), 96–108.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, K. J., Desimone, L., & Smith, T. M. (2011). Teacher participation in content-focused professional development & the role of state policy. Teachers College Record, 113(11), 2586–2630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4–15.
   Google Scholar
• Renninger, K. A., Cai, M., Lewis, M. C., Adams, M. M., & Ernst, K. L. (2011). Motivation and learning in an online, unmoderated, mathematics workshop for teachers. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(2), 229–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, K., Miller, S., & Reinhardt, J. (2019). Professional development as an ongoing partnership: The sum is greater than its parts. School-University Partnerships Furthering the Education Profession: Partnerships in Action, 12(1), 45–50.
   Google Scholar
• Rotermund, S., DeRoche, J., & Ottem, R. (2017). Teachers professional development by selected teacher and school characteristics: 2011–2012. [Stats in brief]. NCES 2017–200. National Center for Educational Statistics. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2017/2017200.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Swackhamer, L. E., Koellner, K., Basile, C., & Kimbrough, D. (2009). Increasing the self-efficacy of inservice teachers through content knowledge. Teacher Education Quarterly, 36(2), 63–78.
   Google Scholar
• Wan, S. W. Y., & Lam, P. C. (2010, May). Factors affecting lecturers’ participation in continuing professional development (CPD): Hong Kong primary school lecturers’ perspectives. Paper presented at the 2010 American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Denver, CO.
   Google Scholar
• Wei, R. C., Darling-Hammond, L., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the U.S. & abroad–technical report. Stanford, CA: National Staff Development Council.
   Google Scholar