1,964
Views
40
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

A resource-based perspective on countries’ competitive advantage in elite athletics

, , &

References

  • Abbott, A. and Collins, D., 2004. Eliminating the dichotomy between theory and practice in talent identification and development: considering the role of psychology. Journal of sports sciences, 22 (5), 395–408.
  • Abraham, A., Collins, D., and Martindale, R., 2006. The coaching schematic: validation through expert coach consensus. Journal of sports sciences, 24 (6), 549–564.
  • Aman, M.S., Mawarni, M., and Omar-Fauzee, M.S., 2009. Sport for all and elite sport: underlining values and aims for government involvement via leisure policy. European journal of social sciences, 9 (4), 659–668.
  • Amit, R. and Schoemaker, P.J.H., 1993. Strategic assets and organizational rents. Strategic management journal, 14, 33–46.
  • Andersen, S.S. and Ronglan, L.T., 2012. Nordic elite sport. Same ambitions, different tracks. Oslo: Universiteitsforlaget.
  • Augestad, P., Bergsgard, N.A., and Hansen, A.Ø., 2006. The institutionalisation of an elite sport organisation in Norway – the case of ‘Olympiatoppen’. Sociology of sport journal, 23 (3), 293–313.
  • Australian Sport Commission, 2001. Preliminary investigation into the effectiveness of the national coach accreditation scheme. Armidale: Australian Sport Commission.
  • Babiak, K.M., 2009. Criteria of effectiveness in multiple cross-sectional interorganizational relationships. Evaluation and program planning, 32, 1–12.
  • Bar-Eli, M., Galily, Y., and Israeli, A., 2008. Gaining and sustaining competitive advantage: on the strategic similarities between Maccabi Tel Aviv BC and FC Bayern München. European journal for sport and society, 5 (1), 75–96.
  • Barney, J.B., 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17, 99–120.
  • Barney, J.B., 2001. Is the resource-based “view” a useful perspective for strategic management research? Yes. Academy of management review, 6 (1), 41–56.
  • Bayle, E. and Madella, A., 2002. Development of a taxonomy of performance for national sport organizations. European journal of sport science, 2, 1–21.
  • Bayle, E. and Robinson, L., 2007. A framework for understanding the performance of national governing bodies in sport. European sport management quarterly, 7 (3), 249–268.
  • Bergsgard, N.A., et al., 2007. Sport policy. A comparative analysis of stability and change. London: Elsevier.
  • Berret, T. and Slack, T., 2003. A framework for the analysis of strategic approaches employed by non-profit sport organisations in seeking corporate sponsorship. Sport management review, 4, 21–45.
  • Besanko, D., et al., 2006. Economics of strategy. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Binns, J.T., 2009. The use of performance based funding in a sport organization: a case study of the United States Olympic Committee. Unpublished doctoral thesis. University of Northern Colorado.
  • Böhlke, N., 2007. New insights in the nature of best practices in elite sport system management – exemplified with the organization of coach education. New studies in athletics, 22 (1), 49–59.
  • Böhlke, N. and Robinson, L., 2009. Benchmarking of élite sport systems. Management decision, 47 (1), 67–84.
  • Clumpner, R.A., 1994. 21st century success in international competition. In: R. Wilcox, ed. Sport in the global village. Morgantown, WV: FIT, 298–303.
  • De Bosscher, V., et al., 2006. A conceptual framework for analysing sports policy factors leading to international sporting success. European sport management quarterly, 6 (2), 185–215.
  • De Bosscher, V., 2007. Sports policy factors leading to international sporting success. Published doctoral thesis. VUBPRESS, Brussel.
  • De Bosscher, V., et al., 2008. The global sporting arms race. An international comparative study on sports policy factors leading to international sporting success. Aachen: Meyer & Meyer.
  • De Bosscher, V., et al., 2009. Explaining international sporting success. An International comparison of elite sport systems and policies in six nations. Sport management review, 12, 113–136.
  • De Bosscher, V., et al., 2010. Developing a method for comparing the elite sport systems and policies of nations: a mixed research methods approach. Journal of sport management, 24, 567–600.
  • De Vos, B., 2009. Talentidentificatie: een greep uit het huidige sportlandschap en een aanzet tot discussie [online]. Available from: http://www.bloso.be/VlaamseTrainersschool/Documents/090602_UG2_Talentidentificatie.pdf [Accessed 15 October 2009].
  • Digel, H., 2002. A comparison of successful sport systems. New studies in athletics, 17 (1), 37–50.
  • Digel, H., 2005. Comparison of successful sport systems. New studies in athletics, 20 (2), 7–18.
  • Digel, H., Burk, V., and Fahrner, M., 2006. High performance sport: an international comparison. Edition Sports international (Vol. 9). Weilham/Teck: Braüer.
  • Digel, H. and Thiel, A., 2009. Berufsveld Trainer. Tübingen: Universität Tübingen, Institut für Sportwissenschaft.
  • Duffy, P., et al., 2001. Factors promoting and inhibiting the success of high performance players and athletes in Ireland [online]. Available from: http://www.nctc.ul.ie/press/pubs/Succes%20Factors%20Study.doc [Accessed 25 September 2008].
  • Eisenhardt, K.M. and Martin, J.A., 2000. Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic management journal, 21, 1105–1121.
  • Erickson, K., Côte, J., and Fraser-Thomas, J., 2007. Sport experience, milestones, and educational activities associated with high-performance coaches’ development. The sport psychologist, 21, 302–316.
  • Fletcher, D. and Anton, S., 2003. Sources of organizational stress in elite sports performers. The sport psychologist, 17, 175–195.
  • Fletcher, D. and Wagstaff, C.R.D., 2009. Organizational psychology in elite sport: its emergency, application and future. Psychology of sport and exercise, 10, 427–434.
  • Frisby, W., 1986. The organizational structure and effectiveness of voluntary organizations: the case of Canadian national sport governing bodies. Journal of park and recreation administration, 4, 61–74.
  • Fusetti, C., 2008. The dilemma of multi-stakeholder sport associations: organizational design and its constraints. Remarks on Sport Governance in Three French Sport Federations [online]. Available from: http://www.egpa-thirdsector.eu/resources/papers2008/fusetti.pdf [Accessed 26 February 2010].
  • Gerrard, B., 2003. What does the resource-based view “bring to the table” in sport management research? European sport management quarterly, 3, 139–144.
  • Gerrard, B., 2005. A resource-utilization model of organizational efficiency in professional sports teams. Journal of sport management, 19, 143–169.
  • Gibbons, T., et al., 2003. Reflections on success: US Olympians describe the success factors and obstacles that most influences their Olympic development. Report phase II. United States Olympic Committee (USOC).
  • Gilbert, W. and Trudel, P., 1999. An evaluation strategy for coach education programs. Journal of sport behavior, 22 (2), 234–250.
  • Glad, B., 2002. What is success in athletics? New studies in athletics, 17 (1), 11–17.
  • Glad, B. and Egilsson, J., 2008. Athletics in Iceland: can the ‘third surge’ last? New studies in athletics, 23 (1), 41–63.
  • Grant, R.M., 1996. Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: organisational capability as knowledge integration. Organisation science, 7 (4), 375–387.
  • Grant, R.M., 2010. Contemporary strategy analysis. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
  • Green, B.C., 2005. Building sport programs to optimize athlete recruitment, retention, and transition: toward a normative theory of sport development. Journal of sport management, 19, 233–253.
  • Green, M., 2007. Olympic Glory or grassroots development? Sport policy priorities in Australia, Canada and the United Kingdom, 1960–2006. International journal for the history of sport, 24 (7), 92–953.
  • Green, M. and Collins, S., 2008. Policy, politics and path dependency: sport development in Australia and Finland. Sport management review, 11, 225–251.
  • Green, M. and Houlihan, B., 2005. Elite sport development. Policy learning and political priorities. New York: Routledge.
  • Green, M. and Houlihan, B., 2006. Governmentality, modernization, and the “disciplining” of national sporting organizations: athletics in Australia and the United Kingdom. Sociology of sport, 23 (1), 47–71.
  • Greenleaf, C., Gold, D., and Dieffenbach, K., 2001. Factors influencing Olympic performance: interviews with Atlanta and Nagano US Olympians. Journal of applied sport psychology, 13, 154–184.
  • Grix, J., 2009. The impact of UK sport policy on the governance of athletics. International journal of sport policy, 1 (1), 31–49.
  • Grossocordón, J.G., 2003. The Royal Spanish Athletics Federation programme of talent identification, development and assistance for young athletes. New studies in athletics, 18 (1), 35–45.
  • Henrikson, K., Stambulova, N., and Roessler, K.K., 2009. Holistic approach to athletic talent development environments: a successful sailing milieu. Psychology of sport & exercise, 11, 212–222.
  • Houlihan, B., 2009. Mechanisms of international influence on domestic elite sport policy. International journal of sport policy, 1 (1), 51–69.
  • Houlihan, B. and Green, M., 2008. Comparative elite sport development: systems, structures and public policy. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
  • Irwin, G., Hanton, S., and Kerwin, D.G., 2005. The conceptual process of skill progression development in artistic gymnastics. Journal of sports sciences, 23 (10), 1089–1099.
  • Johnson, K.N. and Ali, A., 2002. A tale of two seasons: participation and medal counts at the summer and winter Olympic Games. Wellesley, MA: Wellesley College. Available from: http://www.wellesley.edu/economics/wkpapers/wellwp_0010.pdf [Accessed 15 February 2003].
  • Kihl, L.A., Kikulis, L.M., and Thibault, L., 2007. A deliberative democratic approach to athlete centres sport: the dynamics of administrative and communicative power. European sport management quarterly, 7 (1), 1–30.
  • Kihl, L.A., Leberman, S., and Schull, V., 2010. Stakeholder constructions of leadership in intercollegiate athletics. European sport management quarterly, 10, 241–275.
  • Kikulis, L.M., et al., 1989. A structural taxonomy of amateur sport organizations. Journal of sport management, 3 (2), 129–150.
  • Kirk, D., Brettschneider, W.F., and Auld, C., 2007. Junior sport models representing best practice nationally and internationally. In: S.L. Hooper, C. MacDonald and M. Phillips, eds. Junior sport matters: briefing papers for Australian junior sport. Belconnen, NSW: Australian Sports Commission, 83–99.
  • Larose, K. and Haggerty, T.R., 1996. Factors associated with national Olympic success: an exploratory study. Unpublished master’s thesis. University Brunswick, Canada.
  • Lidor, R., Côté, J., and Hackfort, D., 2009. ISSP position stand: to test or not to test? The use of physical skill tests in talent detection and early phased of sport development. International journal of sport and exercise psychology, 7, 131–146.
  • Lynch, M. and Mallet, C., 2006. Becoming a successful high performance track and field coach. Modern athlete & coach, 4 (1), 15–20.
  • Madella, A., Bayle, E., and Tome, J., 2005. The organisational performance of National Swimming Federations in Mediterranean Countries: a comparative approach. European journal of sport science, 5 (4), 207–220.
  • Mahoney, J.T., 1995. The management of resource and the resource of management. Journal of business research, 33, 91–101.
  • Martindale, R.J.J., Collins, D., and Abraham, A., 2007. Effective talent development: the elite coach perspective in UK sport. Journal of applied sport psychology, 19 (2), 187–206.
  • Muckenhaupt, M., 2009. Informationsversorging von Trainerinnen und Trainern. Tübingen: Institut für Medienwissenschaft, Universität Tübingen.
  • Newland, B. and Kellett, P., 2012. Exploring new models of elite sport delivery: the case of triathlon in the USA and Australia. Managing leisure, 17, 170–181.
  • Oakley, B. and Green, M., 2001. Still playing the game at arm’s length? The selective reinvestment in British sport, 1995–2000. Managing leisure, 6, 74–94.
  • Oliver, C., 1997. Sustainable competitive advantage: combining institutional and resource-based views. Strategic management journal, 18 (9), 697–713.
  • Orders, A. and Chelladurai, P., 1994. The effectiveness of sport Canada’s Athlete Assistance Program from 1980 to 1989. Journal of sport management, 8, 140–152.
  • Papadimitriou, D., 1998. The impact of institutionalized resources, rules and practices on the performance of non-profit sport organizations. Managing leisure, 3, 169–180.
  • Papadimitriou, D., 2007. Conceptualizing effectiveness in a non-profit organizational environment. An exploratory study. International journal of public sector management, 20 (7), 571–587.
  • Papadimitriou, D. and Taylor, P., 2000. Organisational effectiveness of Hellenic National Sports Organisations: a multiple constituency approach. Sport Management Review, 2000 (3), 23–46.
  • Patton, M.Q., 2002. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Porter, M.E., 1980. Competitive strategy. New York: Free Press.
  • Porter, M.E., 1990. The competitive advantage of nations. London: The Macmillan Press.
  • Priem, R.L. and Butler, J.E., 2001. Is the resource-based “view” a useful perspective for strategic management research? Academy of management review, 26 (1), 22–40.
  • Reade, I., Rodgers, W., and Spriggs, K., 2008. New ideas for high performance coaches: a case study of knowledge transfer in sport science. International journal of sports science & coaching, 3 (3), 335–354.
  • Riewald, S.T., 2003. Strategies to prevent dropout from youth athletics. New studies in athletics, 18 (3), 21–26.
  • Robinson, L. and Minikin, B., 2012. Understanding the competitive advantage of National Olympic Committees. Managing leisure, 17 (2–3), 139–154.
  • Robson, C., 2003. Real world research: a resource for social scientists and practitioner-researchers. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Rocha, C. and Turner, B., 2008. Organizational effectiveness of athletic departments and coaches’ extra-role behaviors. Journal of issues in intercollegiate athletics, 1, 124–144.
  • Sam, M.P. and Jackson, S.J., 2004. Sport policy development in New Zealand: paradoxes of an integrative Paradigm. International review for the sociology of sport, 39 (2), 205–229.
  • Sanderson, L., 2003. Factors in the design and implementation of programmes that will attract, recruit, retain and develop youth athletes. New studies in athletics, 18 (3), 27–34.
  • Seippel, Ø., 2002. Volunteers and professionals in Norwegian Sport Organizations. Voluntas: International journal of voluntary and nonprofit organisations, 13 (1), 253–270.
  • Shilbury, D., 2012. Competition: the heart and soul of sport management. Journal of sport management, 26, 1–10.
  • Sirmon, D.G., Hitt, M.A., and Ireland, R.D., 2007. Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: looking inside the black box. Academy of management review, 23 (1), 273–292.
  • Skille, E.A., 2002. Understanding sport clubs and sport policy implementers: a theoretical framework for the analysis and implementation of central sport policy through local and voluntary sport organisations. International review for the sociology of sport, 43 (2), 181–200.
  • Slack, T. and Hinings, B., 1992. Understanding change in national sport organizations: an integration of theoretical perspectives. Journal of sport management, 6, 114–132.
  • Smart, D.L. and Wolfe, R.A., 2000. Examining sustainable competitive advantage in intercollegiate athletics: a resource-based view. Journal of sport management, 14, 133–153.
  • Sotiriadou, K. and Shilbury, D., 2009. Australian elite athlete development: an organisational perspective. Sport management review, 12 (3), 137–148.
  • Spanos, Y.E. and Lioukas, S., 2001. An examination into the causal logic of rent generation: contrasting porter’s competitive strategy framework and the resource-based perspective. Strategic management journal, 22, 907–934.
  • Sport Industry Research Centre, 2002. European sporting success. A study of the development of medal winning elites in five European countries. Final Report. Sheffield: Sport Industry Research Centre.
  • Steward, B., 2006. Sport funding and finance. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • Strauss, A. and Corbin, J., 1990. Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. London: Sage.
  • Tan, T.C. and Green, M., 2008. Analysing China’s drive for Olympic success in 2008. International journal of the history of sport, 25 (3), 314–338.
  • Taylor, M. and O’Sullivan, N., 2009. How should national governing bodies of sport be governed in the UK? An exploratory. Corporate governance: an international review, 17 (6), 681–693.
  • Thiel, A. and Mayer, J., 2009. Characteristics of voluntary sports clubs management: a sociological perspective. European sport management quarterly, 9 (1), 81–98.
  • van Bottenburg, M., 2003. Sport for all and elite sport: do they benefit one another? In: NOC*NSF, ed. Proceedings of the 9th World Sport for All Congress. ‘Sport for All and Elite Sport: Rivals or partners?’. Arnhem: NOC*NSF, 25.
  • Wang, C.L. and Ahmed, P.K., 2007. Dynamic capabilities: a review and research agenda. International journal of management reviews, 9 (1), 31–51.
  • Wernerfelt, B., 1984. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic management journal, 5, 171–180.
  • Wicker, P. and Breuer, C., 2011. Scarcity of resources in German non-profit sport clubs. Sport management review, 14, 188–201.
  • Williams, S.J. and Kendall, L., 2007. Perceptions of elite coaches and sports scientists of the research needs for elite coaching practice. Journal of sport sciences, 25 (14), 1577–1586.
  • Winand, M. et al., 2009. Organizational performance of Olympic sport governing bodies. Dealing with measurement and priorities. In: Paper presented at the 9th European Academy of Management Conference, 11–12 May 2009, Liverpool.
  • Winter, S.G., 2001. Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic management journal, 14, 991–995.
  • Wolstencroft, E., 2002. Talent identification and development: an academic review. Edinburgh: The University of Edinburgh & Sportscotland.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.