Small states: sport and politics at the margin

References

• Andersen, S.S. and Ronglan, L.-T., 2012. Nordic elite sport: same ambitions different tracks. Oslo: Universitetsforlag.
   Google Scholar
• Aplin, N.G. and Jong, Q.J., 2002. Celestials in touch: sport and the Chinese in colonial Singapore. The international journal of the history of sport, 19 (2–3), 67–98. doi:10.1080/714001763.
   Google Scholar
• Arnaud, P. and Riordan, J., 1998. Sport and international politics: the impact of fascism and communism on sport. London: E & FN Spon.
   Google Scholar
• Atkins, J., Mazzi, S., and Easter, C., 2000. A commonwealth vulnerability index for developing countries: the position of small states. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.
   Google Scholar
• Bailes, A.J.K., 2009. Does a small state need a strategy? Occasional Paper, Centre for Small Sates Studies. Reykjavik: University of Iceland.
   Google Scholar
• Batora, J., 2005. Public diplomacy in small and medium-sized states: Norway and Canada. Discussion Papers in Diplomacy. Clingendael: Netherlands Institute of International Relations.
   Google Scholar
• Beckles, H. and Stoddart, B., 1995. Liberation cricket: West Indies cricket culture. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• BBC, 2012. London 2012: Judoka’s Kosovo Olympic bid turned down. BBC. Available from: http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/olympics/18205297 [Accessed 10 January 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Bially Mattern, J., 2007. Why soft power isn’t so soft: representational force and the sociolinguistic construction of attraction in world politics. In: F. Berenskoetter and M. Williams, eds. Power in international relations. London: Routledge, 98–119.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, M.L., 2012. The political economy of small states: enduring vulnerability? Review of international political economy, 19 (5), 942–960. doi:10.1080/09692290.2011.635118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braveboy-Wagner, J.A., 2010. Opportunities and limitations of the exercise of foreign policy power by a very small state: the case of Trinidad and Tobago. Cambridge review of international affairs, 23 (3), 407–427. doi:10.1080/09557571.2010.484049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briguglio, L., 1995. Small island developing states and their economic vulnerabilities. World development, 23 (9), 1615–1632. doi:10.1016/0305-750X(95)00065-K.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J., 1988. Singapore’s diplomacy – the way in which it survives. Southeast Asian studies, 30 (1), 63–72.
   Google Scholar
• Chong, A., 2010. Small state soft power strategies: virtual enlargement in the cases of the Vatican city state and Singapore. Cambridge review of international affairs, 23 (3), 383–405. doi:10.1080/09557571.2010.484048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christmas-Møller, W., 1983. Some thoughts on the scientific applicability of the small state concept: a research history and discussion. In: O. Höll, ed. Small states in Europe and dependence. Vienna: Braumüller, 35–53.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth Secretariat, 1997. A future for small states: overcoming vulnerabilities. Report. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.
   Google Scholar
• Cronin, M., 1999. Sport and nationalism in Ireland: Gaelic games, soccer and Irish identity since 1884. Dublin: Four Courts Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davenport, D., 2002. The new diplomacy. Policy review, 116, 17–30.
   Google Scholar
• De Búrca, M., 1980. The GAA: A history of the Gaelic athletic association. Dublin: Cuman Lúthchleas Gael.
   Google Scholar
• Duursma, J.C., 1996. Fragmentation and the international relations of micro-states: self-determination and statehood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, T.D., 1997. Between diversity and disorder. American university international law review, 12 (4), 629–686.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, G. and Bairner, A., 2013. One country, two systems, three flags: imagining Olympic nationalism in Hong Kong and Macao. International review for the sociology of sport, 48 (3), 349–365. doi:10.1177/1012690212441160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horne, J., et al., 2013. Understanding sport: a socio-cultural analysis. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Horton, P.A., 2002. Shackling the lion: sport and modern Singapore. The international journal of the history of sport, 19 (2–3), 243–274. doi:10.1080/714001758.
   Google Scholar
• Horton, P.A., 2013. Singapore: imperialism and post-imperialism, athleticism, sport, nationhood and nation-building. The international journal of the history of sport, 30 (11), 1221–1234. doi:10.1080/09523367.2013.794414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houlihan, B., 2006. Government objectives and sport. In: W. Andreff and S. Szymanski, eds. Handbook on the economics of sport. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 254–259.
   Google Scholar
• Houlihan, B., 2007. Politics and sport. In: G. Ritzer, ed. The Blackwell encyclopedia of sociology. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Houlihan, B. and Zheng, J., 2013. The Olympics and elite sport policy: where will it all end? International journal of the history of sport, 30 (4), 338–355. doi:10.1080/09523367.2013.765726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingebritsen, C., 2006. Norm entrepreneurs: Scandinavia’s role in world politics. In: C. Ingebritsen, et al., eds. Small states in international relations. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 273–285.
   Google Scholar
• Keech, M. and Houlihan, B., 1999. Sport and the end of apartheid. The round table, 88 (349), 109–121. doi:10.1080/003585399108306.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, D. and Smith, N.J., 2010. Small state discourses in the international political economy. Third world quarterly, 31 (7), 1091–1105. doi:10.1080/01436597.2010.518750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard, M. and Small, A., 2003. Norwegian public diplomacy. London: The Foreign Policy Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, V.A., 2009. Foreword: studying small states over the twentieth into the twenty-first centuries. In: A.F. Cooper and T.M. Shaw, eds. The diplomacies of small states: between vulnerability and resilience. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, vii–xv.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, L.K. and Horton, P.A., 2011. Sport in Syonan (Singapore) 1942–1945: centralisation and nipponisation. The international journal of the history of sport, 28 (6), 895–924. doi:10.1080/09523367.2011.557910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, L.K. and Horton, P.A., 2012. Sport in the British colony of Singapore (1819–1900s): formation, diffusion and development. The international journal of the history of sport, 29 (9), 1325–1343. doi:10.1080/09523367.2012.694248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, D., 2012. Predicament and transcendence: the deconstruction of Singapore’s ASEAN strategy in the perspective on small state crisis consciousness. Southeast Asian studies, 54 (4), 27–38.
   Google Scholar
• Maas, M., 2009. The elusive definition of the small state. International politics, 46 (1), 65–83. doi:10.1057/ip.2008.37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandle, W.F., 1977. The IRB and the beginnings of the Gaelic athletic association. Irish historical studies, XX, 80. September.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Community Development (MCD), 1993. Sports excellence 2000: winning for Singapore. Singapore: MCD and SSC Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Singapore (MFA), 2013. Overview: about Singapore [online]. Available from: http://www.mfa.gov.sg/content/mfa/overseasmission/newyork/about_singapore/overview.html [Accessed 24 August 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Morris, J., 2011. ‘How Great is Britain’, pp. 332–333.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, I.B. and Gstöhl, S., 2004 Lilliputians in Gulliver’s world? Small states in international relations. Working Paper 1-2004, Centre for Small State Studies, University of Iceland. Reykjavik: CSSS.
   Google Scholar
• Nye, J.S., 1990. Soft power. Foreign policy, 80, 153–171. doi:10.2307/1148580.
   Google Scholar
• Nye, J.S., 2004. Soft power. The means to success in world politics. New York, NY: Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Nye, J.S., 2008. Public diplomacy and soft power. The ANNALS of the American academy of political and social science, 616, 94–109. doi:10.1177/0002716207311699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortmann, S., 2009. Singapore: the politics of inventing national identity. Journal of current Southeast Asian affairs, 4, 23–46.
   Google Scholar
• Preuss, H., 2004. The economics of staging the Olympics. A comparison of the games 1972–2008. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Qie, Q., 2005. A small country’s diplomacy with powers: on Singapore’s establishment and evolution of the strategy of balance among the powers. Around Southeast Asia, 20 (1), 7–11.
   Google Scholar
• Sam, M.P., 2003. What’s the big idea? Reading the rhetoric of a national sport policy process. Sociology of sport journal, 20, 189–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherwood, H., 2012. Gaza’s lone runner will carry the flag for Palestinian pride at the London Olympics. The Guardian, 1 March.
   Google Scholar
• Singapore Sports Council (SSC), 2009. Annual report 2008/2009. Singapore: Singapore Sports Council.
   Google Scholar
• Singapore Sports Council (SSC), 2011. A year in the life of sporting Singapore: Annual report 2010/2011. Singapore: Singapore Sports Council.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D., 2012. Dreams of gold in kingdom in the sky. The Guardian, 14 July.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, P., 2011. The concept of small states in the international political economy. The round table: the commonwealth journal of international affairs, 100 (413), 141–153. doi:10.1080/00358533.2011.565625.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C., 1969. Statistical typology of micro-states and territories: towards a definition of a micro-state. In UN Institute for Training and Research, small states and territories: status and problems. New York, NY: Arno.
   Google Scholar
• Thorhallsson, B., 2000. The role of small states in the European union. London: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Vital, D., 1967. The inequality of states: a study of the small power in international relations. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, L. and Jiang, L., 2008. Balance of power and Singapore’s diplomacy. Legal system and society, 11, 242–243.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, M., 2009. The lion city and the fragrant harbor: the political economy of Singapore and Hong Kong compared. The antitrust bulletin, 54 (3), 517–577.
   Google Scholar