The trust–mistrust dynamic in the public governance of sport: exploring the legitimacy of performance measurement systems through end-users’ perceptions

References

• Adams, A., 2011. Between modernization and mutual aid: the changing perceptions of voluntary sports clubs in England. International journal of sport policy and politics, 3 (1), 23–43. doi:10.1080/19406940.2010.544663
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, J., Brudney, J., and Yang, K., 2010. Introduction to the symposium: accountability and performance measurement: the evolving role of nonprofits in the Hollow State. Nonprofit and voluntary sector quarterly, 39 (4), 565–570. doi:10.1177/0899764010369662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonso, J.M., Clifton, J., and Díaz-Fuentes, D., 2015. Did new public management matter? An empirical analysis of the outsourcing and decentralization effects on public sector size. Public management review, 17 (5), 643–660. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.822532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, S., Houlihan, B., and Ronglan, L.T., 2015. Systems and the development of elite athletes. Managing elite sport systems: research and practice, 3, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Andon, P., Free, C., and Sivabalan, P., 2014. The legitimacy of new assurance providers: making the cap fit. Accounting, organizations and society, 39 (2), 75–96. doi:10.1016/j.aos.2014.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvidson, M. and Lyon, F., 2014. Social impact measurement and non-profit organisations: compliance, resistance, and promotion. VOLUNTAS: International journal of voluntary and nonprofit organizations, 25 (4), 869–886. doi:10.1007/s11266-013-9373-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bairner, A., 2010. What’s Scandinavian about Scandinavian sport? Sport in society, 13 (4), 734–743. doi:10.1080/17430431003616555
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, P.E.E.A., et al., 2015. Leaders? experiences and perceptions implementing activity-based funding and pay-for-performance hospital funding models: a systematic review. Health policy, 119 (8), 1096–1110. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.05.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevir, M., 2013. Legitimacy and the administrative state: ontology, history, and democracy. Public administration quarterly, 37 (4), 535–549.
   Google Scholar
• Boon, J. and Verhoest, K., 2014. On a diet: explaining differences in overhead among public agencies in the era of austerity. Public performance & management review, 38 (2), 234–260. doi:10.1080/15309576.2015.983828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breuer, C., Hoekman, R., Nagel, S., and van der Werff, H., eds., 2016. Sport clubs in europe: a cross-national comparative perspective (vol. 12). Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A., 2015. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Centrum för idrottsforskning, 2015. Statens stöd till idrotten – uppföljning 2014 [Government support to sport – follow up 2014]. Stockholm: Centrum för idrottsforskning.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., Lægreid, P., and Stigen, I.M., 2006. Performance management and public sector reform: the Norwegian hospital reform. International public management journal, 9 (2), 113–139. doi:10.1080/10967490600766987
   Google Scholar
• Coalter, F. 2007. A wider social role for sport: who's keeping the score?. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Coalter, F., 2009. Sport-in-development: accountability or development? In: R. Levermore and A. Beacom, eds. Sport and international development. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 55–75.
   Google Scholar
• Cuganesan, S., Guthrie, J., and Vranic, V., 2014. The riskiness of public sector performance measurement: a review and research agenda. Financial accountability & management, 30 (3), 279–302. doi:10.1111/faam.2014.30.issue-3
   Google Scholar
• DaCosta, L. and Miragaya, A., eds., 2002. Worldwide experiences and trends in sport for all. Oxford: Meyer & Meyer Sport.
   Google Scholar
• De Bosscher, V., et al., 2006. A conceptual framework for analysing sports policy factors leading to international sporting success. European sport management quarterly, 6 (2), 185–215. doi:10.1080/16184740600955087
   Google Scholar
• De Bosscher, V., et al. 2015. Successful elite sport policies: an international comparison of the sports policy factors leading to international sporting success (SPLISS 2.0) in 15 nations. Maidenhead: Meyer & Meyer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Enjolras, B. and Waldahl, R.H., 2010. Democratic governance and oligarchy in voluntary sport organizations: the case of the Norwegian Olympic Committee and Confederation of Sports. European sport management quarterly, 10 (2), 215–239. doi:10.1080/16184740903559909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahlén, J., 2015a. Sport clubs in Sweden. In: H. Van der Werff, C. Breuer, S. Nagel,et al., eds. Sport clubs in Europe – a cross-national perspective. New York, NY: Springer, 396–429.
   Google Scholar
• Fahlén, J., 2015b. The corporal dimension of sports-based interventions: understanding the role of embedded expectations and embodied knowledge in sport policy implementation. International review for the sociology of sport. doi:10.1177/1012690215607083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahlén, J., Eliasson, I., and Wickman, K., 2015. Resisting self-regulation: an analysis of sport policy programme making and implementation in Sweden. International journal of sport policy and politics, 7 (3), 391–406. doi:10.1080/19406940.2014.925954
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahlén, J. and Skille, E.Å., 2016. State sport policy for indigenous sport: inclusive ambitions and exclusive coalitions. International journal of sport policy and politics. doi:10.1080/19406940.2016.1232297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahlén, J., and Stenling, C., 2016. Sport policy in sweden. International journal of sport policy and politics, 8 (3), 515-531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franco-Santos, M., Lucianetti, L., and Bourne, M., 2012. Contemporary performance measurement systems: a review of their consequences and a framework for research. Management accounting research, 23 (2), 79–119. doi:10.1016/j.mar.2012.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galily, Y., Yuval, F., and Bar-Eli, M., 2012. Municipal subsidiary policy toward professional sports teams: a democratic deficit in the local government. International journal of sociology and social policy, 32 (7/8), 431–447. doi:10.1108/01443331211249066
   Google Scholar
• Gilmore, S. and Sillince, J., 2014. Institutional theory and change: the deinstitutionalisation of sports science at Club X. Journal of organizational change management, 27 (2), 314–330. doi:10.1108/JOCM-02-2013-0022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, B.G. and Strauss, A.L., 2009. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. and Grix, J., 2011. Bringing structures back in: the ‘governance narrative’, the ‘decentred approach’ and ‘asymmetrical network governance’ in the education and sport policy communities. Public administration, 89 (2), 537–556. doi:10.1111/padm.2011.89.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, M., 2006. From ‘sport for all’ to not about ‘sport’ at all?: interrogating sport policy interventions in the United Kingdom. European sport management quarterly, 6 (3), 217–238. doi:10.1080/16184740601094936
   Google Scholar
• Green, M., 2007a. Olympic glory or grassroots development?: sport policy priorities in Australia, Canada and the United Kingdom, 1960–2006. The international journal of the history of sport, 24 (7), 921–953. doi:10.1080/09523360701311810
   Google Scholar
• Green, M., 2007b. Governing under advanced liberalism: sport policy and the social investment state. Policy sciences, 40 (1), 55–71. doi:10.1007/s11077-007-9034-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, M. and Houlihan, B., 2006. Governmentality, modernization, and the “disciplining” of national sporting organizations: athletics in Australia and the United Kingdom. Sociology of sport journal, 23 (1), 47–71. doi:10.1123/ssj.23.1.47
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, D., 2013. Drawing a veil over managerialism: leadership and the discursive disguise of the new public management. Journal of educational administration and history, 45 (3), 267–282. doi:10.1080/00220620.2013.771154
   Google Scholar
• Halligan, J., 2015. Coordination of welfare through a large integrated organization: the Australian department of human services. Public management review, 17 (7), 1002–1020. doi:10.1080/14719037.2015.1029346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harlock, J. and Metcalf, L., 2016. Measuring impact: prospects and challenges for third sector organisations. Voluntary sector review, 7 (1), 101–108. doi:10.1332/204080516X14534734765005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatry, H.P., 2006. Performance measurement: getting results. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Havaris, E.P. and Danylchuk, K.E., 2007. An assessment of sport Canada’s sport funding and accountability framework, 1995–2004. European sport management quarterly, 7 (1), 31–53. doi:10.1080/16184740701270329
   Google Scholar
• Henry, I.P. and Matthews, N., 1998. Sport, policy and European Union: the post-Maastricht agenda. Managing leisure, 3 (1), 1–17. doi:10.1080/13606719808559321
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C., 2012. Public management by numbers as a performance-enhancing drug: two hypotheses. Public administration review, 72 (1), 85–92. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02634.x
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. and Peters, G., 2004. The middle aging of new public management: into the age of paradox? Journal of public administration research and theory, 14 (3), 267–282. doi:10.1093/jopart/muh019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houlihan, B., 1997. Sport, policy and politics: a comparative analysis. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Houlihan, B., 2001. Citizenship, civil society and the sport and recreation professions. Managing leisure, 6 (1), 1–14. doi:10.1080/13606710010026331
   Google Scholar
• Howard, C., 2015. Rethinking post-NPM governance: the bureaucratic struggle to implement one-stop shopping for government services in Alberta. Public organization review, 15 (2), 237–254. doi:10.1007/s11115-014-0272-0
   Google Scholar
• Koufteros, X., Verghese, A.J., and Lucianetti, L., 2014. The effect of performance measurement systems on firm performance: a cross-sectional and a longitudinal study. Journal of operations management, 32 (6), 313–336. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2014.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindgren, J., Fahlén, J., and Ferry, M., 2016. Aktivitetskort på nätet: En studie av förändrade rutiner för verksamhetsrapportering och dess konsekvenser för kommunal styrning av föreningsverksamhet [Activity-cards online: A study changed routines for activity reports and their consequences for local governance of club activities]. Umeå: Umeå university.
   Google Scholar
• Macris, L.I. and Sam, M.P., 2014. Belief, doubt, and legitimacy in a performance system: national sport organization perspectives. Journal of sport management, 28 (5), 529–550. doi:10.1123/jsm.2012-0290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marin-Burgos, V., Clancy, J.S., and Lovett, J.C., 2015. Contesting legitimacy of voluntary sustainability certification schemes: valuation languages and power asymmetries in the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil in Colombia. Ecological economics, 117, 303–313. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.04.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, T., Harris, S., and Collins, M., 2012. Implementing community sport policy: understanding the variety of voluntary club types and their attitudes to policy. International journal of sport policy and politics, 5 (3), 397–419. doi:10.1080/19406940.2012.735688
   Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D.P., et al., 2011. Performance regimes amidst governance complexity. Journal of public administration research and theory, 21 (Suppl 1), i141–i155. doi:10.1093/jopart/muq059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newcomer, K., Baradei, L.E., and Garcia, S., 2013. Expectations and capacity of performance measurement in NGOs in the development context. Public administration and development, 33 (1), 62–79. doi:10.1002/pad.v33.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newcomer, K. and Caudle, S., 2011. Public performance management systems: embedding practices for improved success. Public performance & management review, 35 (1), 108–132. doi:10.2753/PMR1530-9576350106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols, G., et al., 2012. The relationship between types of sports club and English government policy to grow participation. International journal of sport policy and politics, 4 (2), 187–200. doi:10.1080/19406940.2012.662693
   Google Scholar
• Nichols, G., et al., 2016. How sport governance impacted on Olympic legacy: a study of unintended consequences and the ‘Sport Makers’ volunteering programme. Managing sport and leisure, 21 (2), 61–74. doi:10.1080/23750472.2016.1181984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norberg, J.R., 1997. A mutual dependency: Nordic sports organizations and the state. The international journal of the history of sport, 14 (3), 115–135. doi:10.1080/09523369708714003
   Google Scholar
• Norman, R., and Gregory, R., 2003. Paradoxes and pendulum swings: performance management in new zealand's public sector. Australian journal of public administration, 62 (4), 35-49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Boyle, I., 2015. Developing a performance management framework for a national sport organisation. Sport management review, 18 (2), 308–316. doi:10.1016/j.smr.2014.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson, L.-E., 2007. Frivilligt arbete inom idrotten [Volunteer work in sport]. Stockholm: Riksidrottsförbundet.
   Google Scholar
• Österlind, M., 2016. Sport policy evaluation and governing participation in sport: governmental problematics of democracy and health. International journal of sport policy and politics, 8 (3), 347-362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owczarzak, J., Broaddus, M., and Pinkerton, S., 2016. Audit culture: unintended consequences of accountability practices in evidence-based programs. American journal of evaluation, 37 (3), 326-343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M.Q., 2002. Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Perck, J., et al., 2016. Organisational change in local sport clubs: the case of Flemish gymnastics clubs. Sport, business and management: an international journal, 6 (2), 158–181. doi:10.1108/SBM-01-2014-0002
   Google Scholar
• Phillpots, L., Grix, J., and Quarmby, T., 2011. Centralized grassroots sport policy and ‘new governance’: a case study of county sports partnerships in the UK –unpacking the paradox. International review for the sociology of sport, 46 (3), 265–281. doi:10.1177/1012690210378461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., 2007. New labour’s re-disorganization: hyper-modernism and the costs of reform–a cautionary tale. Public management review, 9 (4), 529–543. doi:10.1080/14719030701726663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. and Dan, S., 2013. Searching for impacts in performance-oriented management reform: a review of the European literature. Public performance & management review, 37 (1), 7–32. doi:10.2753/PMR1530-9576370101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, M. 1999. The audit society: rituals of verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prop. 2016/17:1. Budgetpropositionen för 2017 [The budget proposition for 2017]. Stockholm: Finansdepartementet.
   Google Scholar
• Riksidrottsförbundet. 2005. Idrottens föreningar—En studie om idrottsföreningarnas situation [Sport clubs—a study of sport clubs’ situation]. Stockholm: Riksidrottsförbundet.
   Google Scholar
• Riksidrottsförbundet, 2010. Idrotts-Sverige: En presentation av Riksidrottsförbundet [Sports Sweden: a presentation of the Swedish Sports Confederation]. Stockholm: Riksidrottsförbundet.
   Google Scholar
• Riksidrottsförbundet, 2011. Idrotten i siffror [Sport in numbers]. Stockholm: Riksidrottsförbundet.
   Google Scholar
• Sam, M.P. and Macris, L.I., 2014. Performance regimes in sport policy: exploring consequences, vulnerabilities and politics. International journal of sport policy and politics, 6 (3), 513–532. doi:10.1080/19406940.2013.851103
   Google Scholar
• Schein, E., 2004. Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Shore, C. and Wright, S., 2015. Governing by numbers: audit culture, rankings and the new world order. Social anthropology, 23 (1), 22–28. doi:10.1111/1469-8676.12098
   Google Scholar
• Sjöblom, P. and Fahlén, J., 2010. The survival of the fittest: intensification, totalization and homogenization in Swedish competitive sport. Sport in society, 13 (4), 704–717. doi:10.1080/17430431003616514
   Google Scholar
• Skille, E. Å., 2008. Understanding sport clubs as sport policy implementers: a theoretical framework for the analysis of the implementation of central sport policy through local and voluntary sport organizations. International review for the sociology of sport, 43 (2), 181-200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skille, E.Å., 2011. Sport for all in Scandinavia: sport policy and participation in Norway, Sweden and Denmark. International journal of sport policy and politics, 3 (3), 327–339. doi:10.1080/19406940.2011.596153
   Google Scholar
• SOU 2008:59. Föreningsfostran och tävlingsfostran – En utvärdering av statens stöd till idrotten [Democratic fostering and competition fostering. An evaluation of the government support to sport]. Stockholm: Fritzes.
   Google Scholar
• Stenling, C., 2015. The drive for change: putting the means and ends of sport at stake in the organizing of Swedish voluntary sport (Doctoral dissertation, Umeå University)
   Google Scholar
• Stenling, C. and Fahlén, J., 2016. Same same, but different? Exploring the organizational identities of Swedish voluntary sports: possible implications of sports clubs’ self-identification for their role as implementers of policy objectives. International review for the sociology of sport, 51 (7), 867–883. doi:10.1177/1012690214557103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Striteska, M. and Spickova, M., 2012. Review and comparison of performance measurement systems. The journal of organizational management studies, 1–13. doi:10.5171/2012.114900
   Google Scholar
• Sveriges kommuner och landsting, 2013. Elitidrottens anläggningar – finaniering, kostnader och dialog med idrotten [Elite sport facilities- funding, costs and dialogue with sport]. Stockholm: Sveriges kommuner och landsting.
   Google Scholar
• Torsteinsen, H., 2012. Why does post-bureaucracy lead to more formalisation? Local government studies, 38 (3), 321–344. doi:10.1080/03003930.2011.629194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T.R., Fagan, J., and Geller, A., 2014. Street stops and police legitimacy: teachable moments in young urban men’s legal socialization. Journal of empirical legal studies, 11 (4), 751–785. doi:10.1111/jels.12055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vedung, E., 1998. Policy instruments: typologies and theories. carrots, sticks, and sermons. Policy instruments and their evaluation, 5, 21-58.
   Google Scholar
• Vinni, R., 2007. Total quality management and paradigms of public administration. International public management review, 8 (1), 103–131.
   Google Scholar