Sport policy evaluation: what do we know and how might we move forward?

References

• Alkin, M.C. Ed., 2004. Evaluation roots: tracing theorists’ views and influences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Armour, K., Sandford, R., and Duncombe, R., 2013. Positive youth development and physical activity/sport interventions: mechanisms leading to sustained impact. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 18 (3), 256–281. doi:10.1080/17408989.2012.666791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, R., Sport Pedagogy Special Interest, G et al., 2009. The educational benefits claimed for physical education and school sport: an academic review. Research Papers in Education, 24 (1). 1–27. doi:10.1080/02671520701809817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bamberger, M., Rugh, J., and Mabry, L., 2012. RealWorld evaluation: working under budget, time, data, and political constraints. 2nd. California: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, B., 2004. An evaluation of the impacts of the Champion Coaching scheme on youth sport and coaching. (Doctoral). Loughborough: Loughborough University.
   Google Scholar
• Buisseret, T.J., Cameron, H.M., and Georghiou, L., 1995. What difference does it make? Additionality in the public support of R & D in large firms. International Journal of Technology Management, 10, 587–600. doi:10.1504/IJTM.1995.025644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabinet Office, 1999. Modernizing government, Cm.4310. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D.T. and Stanley, J.C., 1963. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Chicago: Rand McNally and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D.T. and Stanley, J.C., 1966. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Skokie, IL: Rand McNally.
   Google Scholar
• Cartwright, N., 2007. Are RCTs the gold standard? BioSocieties, 2 (1), 11–20. doi:10.1017/S1745855207005029
   Google Scholar
• Chelimsky, E., 2006. The purposes of evaluation in a democratic society. In: I. Shaw, J. Greene, and M. Mark, Eds. The SAGE Handbook of Evaluation. London: SAGE, 33–55.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, H.T., 1990. Theory-driven evaluations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, H.T., 2015. Practical programe evaluation: theory-driven evaluation and the integrated evaluation perspective. 2nd. Los Angeles: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, H.T., Donaldson, S.I., and Mark, M. Eds., 2011. Advancing validity in outcome evaluation: theory and practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, H.T., et al., 2008. A process evaluation of the implementation of a computer-based, health provider-delivered HIV-prevention intervention for HIV-positive men who have sex with men in the primary care setting. AIDS Care, 20 (1), 51–60. doi:10.1080/09540120701449104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, H.T. and Rossi, P.H., 1980. The multi-goal, theory-driven approach to evaluation: A model linking basic and applied social science. Social Forces, 59 (1), 106–122. doi:10.2307/2577835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, H.T. and Rossi, P.H., 1983. Evaluating with sense- The theory driven approach. Evaluation Review, 7 (3), 283–302. doi:10.1177/0193841X8300700301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, H.T. and Rossi, P.H., 1987. The theory-driven approach to validity. Evaluation and Program Planning, 10, 95–103. doi:10.1016/0149-7189(87)90025-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S. and Henry, I., 2016. Evaluating the London 2012 Games’ impact on sport participation in a non-hosting region: a practical application of realist evaluation. Leisure Studies, 35 (5), 685–707. doi:10.1080/02614367.2015.1040827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S. and Henry, I., 2017. Schools’ engagement with the get set London 2012 Olympic education programme. European Physical Education Review, Online First, 1356336 × 17721437. doi:10.1177/1356336X17721437
   Google Scholar
• Chen, S., Henry, I., and Ko, L.-M., 2013. Meta-evaluation, analytic logic models and the assessment of impacts of sport policies. In: I. Henry and L.-M. Ko, Eds. Routledge handbook of sport policy. London: Routledge, 33–47.
   Google Scholar
• Coalter, F., 2007. Sports clubs, social capital and social regeneration: ‘ill-defined interventions with hard to follow outcomes’? Sport in Society, 10 (4), 537–559. doi:10.1080/17430430701388723
   Google Scholar
• Coalter, F., 2010. The politics of sport-for-development: limited focus programmes and broad gauge problems? International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 45 (3), 295–314. doi:10.1177/1012690210366791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coalter, F., 2011. Sports development’s contribution to social policy objectives: the difficult relationship between politics and evidence. In: B. Houlihan and M. Green, Eds.. Routledge handbook of sports development. London: Routledge, 561–578.
   Google Scholar
• Coalter, F., 2013. ‘There is loads of relationships here’: developing a programme theory for sport-for-change programmes. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 48 (5), 594–612. doi:10.1177/1012690212446143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coalter, F., 2017. Sport and social inclusion: evidence-based policy and practice. Social Inclusion, 5 (2), 141–149. doi:10.17645/si.v5i2.852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colebatch, H.K., 1998. Policy. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, M.I., Henry, I., and Houlihan, B., 1999. Sport and social inclusion. Loughborough: Loughborough University.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, T.D., 1995. Lessons learned in evaluation over the past 25 years. In: E. Chelimsky and W.R. Shadish, Eds. Evaluation for the 21st century. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 30–52.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, T.D. and Campbell, D.T., 1979. Quasi-experimentation: design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
   Google Scholar
• Cousins, J.B. and Earl, L.M., 1992. The case for participatory evaluation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14 (4), 397–418. doi:10.3102/01623737014004397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L.J., 1963. Course improvement through evaluation. Teachers College Record, 64, 672–683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L.J., 1982. Designing evaluations of educational and social programs. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J., & Associates, 1980. Toward reform of program evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Daugbjerg, S.B., et al., 2009. Promotion of physical activity in the European region: content analysis of 27 national policy documents. Journal of Physics Activity Health, 6 (6), 805–817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, H.T.O. and Nutley, S.M., 2000. Healthcare: evidence to the fore. In: H.T.O. Davies, S.M. Nutley, and P.C. Smith, Eds. What works? Evidence-based policy and practice in public services. Bristol: Policy Press, 43–68.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, H.T.O., Nutley, S.M., and Smith, P.C., 2000. Learning from the past, prospects for the future. In: H.T.O. Davies, S.M. Nutley, and P.C. Smith, Eds. What works? Evidence-based policy and practice in public services. Bristol: Policy Press, 351–366.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, P., 1999. What is Evidence-based Education? British Journal of Educational Studies, 47 (2), 108–121. doi:10.1111/1467-8527.00106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DCMS, 2002. Game plan. London.
   Google Scholar
• De Bosscher, V., et al., 2011. Effectiveness of national elite sport policies: A multidimensional approach applied to the case of Flanders. European Sport Management Quarterly, 11 (2), 115–141. doi:10.1080/16184742.2011.559133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudley, D.A., et al., 2010. Engaging adolescent girls from linguistically diverse and low income backgrounds in school sport: a pilot randomised controlled trial. J Sci Med Sport, 13 (2), 217–224. doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2009.04.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easton, D., 1953. The political system. New York: Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, M., 2011. The impact of School Sport Partnerships on primary schools: an in-depth evaluation. (Doctoral). Durham: Durham University.
   Google Scholar
• EEA, 2016. Environment and climate policy evaluation. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• England, S., 2016. Towards an active nation: strategy 2016-2021. London: Sport England. Available from: https://www.sportengland.org/media/10629/sport-england-towards-an-active-nation.pdf
   Google Scholar
• English Partnerships. (2008). Additionality guide - A standard approach to assessing the additional impact of interventions London. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/191511/Additionality_Guide_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Erik, A., 1995. Between knowledge and power: utilization of social science in public policy making. Policy Sciences, 28 (1), 79–100. doi:10.1007/BF01000821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission Communication. (2011). Developing the European dimension in sport. Brussels. Available from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2011:0012:FIN:en:PDF
   Google Scholar
• Foley, P., 1992. Local economic policy and job creation: A review of evaluation studies. Urban Studies, 29 (3–4), 557–598. doi:10.1080/00420989220080571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furubo, J.E., Rist, R.C., and Sandahl, R., 2002. International atlas of evaluation. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Gabriel, K.K.P., et al., 2011. Girls on the run: A quasi-experimental evaluation of a developmentally focused youth sport program. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 8 (s2), S285–S294. doi:10.1123/jpah.8.s2.s285
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gerston, L., 1997. Public policy making: process and principles. Armonk, NY: M.E.Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, M. and Turbin, V., 1999. Evaluating ‘realistic evaluation’. Evidence from a study of CCTV. Crime Prevention Studies, 10, 179–199.
   Google Scholar
• Girginov, V., 2016. Has the London 2012 Olympic Inspire programme inspired a generation? A realist view. European Physical Education Review, 22 (4), 490–505. doi:10.1177/1356336X15623169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girginov, V. and Hills, L., 2009. The political process of constructing a sustainable London Olympics Sports development legacy. International Journal of Sport Policy, 1 (2), 161–181. doi:10.1080/19406940902950713
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, R., 1963. Instructional technology and the measurement of learning outcomes: some questions. American psychologist, 18, 519–521. doi:10.1037/h0049294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gortmaker, S.L., et al., 1999. Impact of a school-based interdisciplinary intervention on diet and physical activity among urban primary school children: eat well and keep moving. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, 153 (9), 975–983.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Granger, R.C., 1998. Establishing causality in evaluations of comprehensive community initiatives. In: K. Fulbright-Anderson, A.C. Kubisch, and J.P. Connell, Eds. New approaches to evaluating community initiatives (volume 2): theory, measurement and analysis. Washington DC: Aspen Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Grant Thornton, Ecorys, & Centre for Olympic Studies and Research Loughborough University. (2011a). Meta-evaluation of the impacts and legacy of the London 2012 Olympic Games and Paralympic Games - Report 1: Scope, research questions and data strategy London: DCMS
   Google Scholar
• Grant Thornton, Ecorys, & Centre for Olympic Studies and Research Loughborough University. (2011b). Meta-evaluation of the impacts and legacy of the London 2012 Olympic Games and Paralympic Games - Report 2: Methods. London. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/report-2-meta-evaluation-of-the-impacts-and-legacy-of-the-london-2012-olympic-games-and-paralympic-games-april-2011
   Google Scholar
• Grant Thornton, Ecorys, & Centre for Olympic Studies and Research Loughborough University. (2012). Meta-evaluation of the impacts and legacy of the London 2012 Olympic Games and Paralympic Games - Report 3: Baseline and counterfactual. London: DCMS
   Google Scholar
• Grant Thornton, Ecorys, Centre for Olympic Studies & Research Loughborough University, & Economics, Oxford. (2013). Meta-evaluation of the impacts and legacy of the London 2012 Olympic Games and Paralympic Games - Report 5: Post Games evaluation. London: DCMS
   Google Scholar
• Gray, A. and Jenkins, B., 1995. Policy evaluation in a time of fiscal stress: some reflections from British experience. In: R.C. Rist, Ed. Policy Evaluation: linking Theory to Practice. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J., 2009. Evidence as ‘proof’ and evidence as ‘inkling’. In: S.I. Donaldson, C.A. Christie, and M.M. Mark, Eds. What counts as credible evidence in applied research and evaluation practice? Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 153–167.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, T., et al., 2009. How do you modernize a health service? A realist evaluation of whole-scale transformation in London. Milbank Quarterly, 87 (2), 391–416. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2009.00562.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guba, E.G., 1969. The failure of educational evaluation. Educational Technology, 9 (5), 29–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guba, E.G. and Lincoln, Y.S., 1989. Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hadorn, D.C., et al., 1996. Rating the quality of evidence for clinical practice guidelines. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 49 (7), 749–754. doi:10.1016/0895-4356(96)00019-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HallAitken. (2009). Community sport initiative evaluation: 3rd annual report. London. Available from: https://www.biglotteryfund.org.uk/-/media/Files/../er_eval_community_sport_yr3.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Harris, K., 2018. Building sport for development practitioners’ capacity for undertaking monitoring and evaluation – reflections on a training programme building capacity in realist evaluation. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 1–20. doi:10.1080/19406940.2018.1442870
   Google Scholar
• Henkel, M., 1991. Government, evaluation and change. London: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, I., 2016. The meta-evaluation of the sports participation impact and legacy of the London 2012 Games: methodological implications. Journal of Global Sport Management, 1 (1–2), 19–33. doi:10.1080/24704067.2016.1177356
   Google Scholar
• Hill, M., 2005. The public policy process. 4th. Harlow: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Hogwood, B.W. and Gunn, L.A., 1984. Policy analysis for the real world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C., Dixon, R., and Wilson, D. (2009). ‘Managing by numbers’: the way to make public services better. Available from:http://www.publicservices.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/policy-briefing-nov2009.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Houlihan, B., 2011. Assessing the impact of sports development: introduction - the problems of policy evaluation. In: B. Houlihan and M. Green, Eds. Routledge handbook of sports development. London: Routledge, 557–560.
   Google Scholar
• House of Sport. (2013). Research matters: sport Northern Ireland’s research strategy 2013-2017. Belfast. Available from: http://www.sportni.net/sportni/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/ResearchStrategyfinal.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, K., 2013. Sport mega-events and a legacy of increased sport participation: an Olympic promise or an Olympic dream? (Doctoral). Leeds: Leeds Metropolitan University.
   Google Scholar
• Jacob, S., Speer, S., and Furubo, J.-E., 2015. The institutionalization of evaluation matters: updating the International Atlas of Evaluation 10 years later. Evaluation, 21 (1), 6–31. doi:10.1177/1356389014564248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, G.J., et al., 2017. An integrative review of sport-based youth development literature. Sport in Society, 20 (1), 161–179. doi:10.1080/17430437.2015.1124569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay, T., 2009. Developing through sport: evidencing sport impacts on young people. Sport in Society, 12 (9), 1177–1191. doi:10.1080/17430430903137837
   Google Scholar
• Keen, J. and Packwood, T., 1995. Qualitative Research: case study evaluation. BMJ, 311 (7002), 444–446. doi:10.1136/bmj.311.7002.444
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leigh, A., 2009. What Evidence should Social Policymakers Use? Australian Treasury Economic Roundup, 1, 27–43. Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1415462.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y.S. and Guba, E.E., 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park: CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsey, I. and Bacon, D., 2016. In pursuit of evidence-based policy and practice: a realist synthesis-inspired examination of youth sport and physical activity initiatives in England (2002–2010). International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 8 (1), 67–90. doi:10.1080/19406940.2015.1063528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loughborough Partnership. (2009). School Sport Partnership Impact study Loughborough. Available from: http://www.lboro.ac.uk/departments/ssehs/research/centres-institutes/youth-sport/research/young-people-school-based/school-sport-partnership-2008.html
   Google Scholar
• Mansfield, L., et al., 2015. The Health and Sport Engagement (HASE) intervention and evaluation project: protocol for the design, outcome, process and economic evaluation of a complex community sport intervention to increase levels of physical activity. BMJ open, 5 (10). doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchal, B., et al., 2012. Is realist evaluation keeping its promise? A review of published empirical studies in the field of health systems research. Evaluation, 18 (2), 192–212. doi:10.1177/1356389012442444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastenbroek, E., Van Voorst, S., and Meuwese, A., 2016. Closing the regulatory cycle? A meta evaluation of ex-post legislative evaluations by the European Commission. Journal of European Public Policy, 23 (9), 1329–1348. doi:10.1080/13501763.2015.1076874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEldowney, J., 1997. Policy evaluation and the concepts of deadweight and additionality: a commentary. Evaluation, 3 (2), 175–188. doi:10.1177/135638909700300204
   Google Scholar
• Merton, R., 1968. Social theory and social structure. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nickerson, R.S., 1998. Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of general psychology, 2 (2), 175. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175
   Google Scholar
• Nutley, S.M., Walter, I., and Davies, H.T.O., 2007. Using Evidence: how research can inform public services. Bristol. Bristol: The Policy Press, University of Bristol.
   Google Scholar
• Nutley, S.M. and Webb, J., 2000. Evidence and the policy process. In: H.T.O. Davies, S.M. Nutley, and P.C. Smith, Eds. What works? - evidence-based policy and practice in public services. Bristol: The Policy Press, 13–42.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, D., 2013. Drowning the deadweight in the rhetoric of economism: what sport policy, Free Swimming, and EMA tell us about public services after the crash. Public Administration, 91 (1), 69–82. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.02019.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Österlind, M., 2016. Sport policy evaluation and governing participation in sport: governmental problematics of democracy and health. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 8 (3), 347–362. doi:10.1080/19406940.2015.1123755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, W., 1995. Public policy: an introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M., 1984. An alternative evaluation approach for the problem-solving training program: A utilization-focused evaluation process. Evaluation and Program Planning, 7, 189–192. doi:10.1016/0149-7189(84)90045-4
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M., 1997. Utilization-focused evaluation-the new century text. 3rd. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M., 2008. Utilization-focused evaluation. 4thedition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R., 2000. Middle range realism. Archives Europeennes De Sociologie, 41 (2), 283–325. doi:10.1017/S0003975600007050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawson, R., 2013. The science of evaluation: A realist manifesto. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R. and Tilley, N., 1994. What works in evaluation research. British Journal of Criminology, 34 (3), 291–306. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a048424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawson, R. and Tilley, N., 1997. Realistic evaluation. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R. and Tilley, N., 2004. Realist evaluation. Evaluation, 48, 1–36.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C., 1931. Collected Papers. Vol. 5, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
   Google Scholar
• PricewaterhouseCoopers. (2010). Evaluation of the impact of Free Swimming_year 1 report. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/77391/FSPyear1_main_report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ramirez, R. and Brodhead, D. (2013). Utilization-focused evaluation: A primer for evaluators Penang, Malaysia. Available from: https://evaluationinpractice.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/ufeenglishprimer.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rist, R.C. Ed., 1995. Policy Evaluation: linking Theory to Practice. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, P.H., Lipsey, M.W., and Freeman, H.E., 2004. Evaluation: A systematic approach. 7th. Thousand Oaks, CA.: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, N. (2005). The value of sport. Paper presented at the Raising the stakes. The Fourth All Island Sports Development Conference, Naas Co Kildare, Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Sanderson, I., 2000. Evaluation in complex policy systems. Evaluation, 6 (4), 433–454. doi:10.1177/13563890022209415
   Google Scholar
• Sanderson, I., 2002. Evaluation, policy learning and evidence-based policy making. Public Administration, 80 (1), 1–22. doi:10.1111/1467-9299.00292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid, G., 1996. Process evaluation: policy formation and implementation. In: K.S.G. Schmid, Ed. International handbook of labour market policy and evaluation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenefeld, J. and Jordan, A., 2017. Governing policy evaluation? Towards a new typology. Evaluation, 23 (3), 274–293. doi:10.1177/1356389017715366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scriven, M., 1967. The methodology of evaluation. In: R.W. Tyler, R.M. Gagne, and M. Scriven, Eds. Perspectives of Curriculum Evaluation. Chicago: Rand McNally, 39–83.
   Google Scholar
• Scriven, M., 1969. An introduction to meta-evaluation. Educational Products Report, 2 (5), 36–38.
   Google Scholar
• Scriven, M., 1991. Evaluation thesaurus. 4th. Newbury Park: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Scriven, M., 2008. A summative evaluation of RCT methodology and an alternative approach to causal research. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 5 (9), 11–24.
   Google Scholar
• Shadish, W.R., Cook, T.D., and Campbell, D.T., 2002. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. and Leech, R., 2010. ‘evidence. what evidence?’: evidence-based policy making and school sport partnerships in North West England. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 2 (3), 327–345. doi:10.1080/19406940.2010.519341
   Google Scholar
• Storey, D.J., 1990. Evaluation of policies and measures to create local employment. Urban Studies, 27 (5), 669–684. doi:10.1080/00420989020080651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stufflebeam, D.L., 1966. A depth study of the evaluation requirement. Theory into Practice, 5, 121–133. doi:10.1080/00405846609542011
   Google Scholar
• Stufflebeam, D.L., 1967. The use and abuse of evaluation in Title III. Theory into Practice, 6, 126–133. doi:10.1080/00405846709542071
   Google Scholar
• Stufflebeam, D.L., 1978. Metaevaluation: an overview. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 1 (2), 146–163. doi:10.1177/016327877800100102
   Google Scholar
• Stufflebeam, D.L. and Coryn, C.L.S., 2014. Evaluation theory, models, and applications. 2 edition. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, A Wiley Brand.
   Google Scholar
• Stufflebeam, D.L., Madaus, G.F., and Kellaghan, T. Eds., 2000. Evaluation models: viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation. 2nd ed. ed. Norwell, MA: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Suomi, K., 2004. Multiple constituency evaluation in sport policy. European Journal for Sport and Society, 1 (2), 135–144. doi:10.1080/16138171.2004.11687754
   Google Scholar
• The LSE GV314 Group., 2014. Evaluation under contract: government pressure and the production of policy research. Public Administration, 92 (1), 224–239. doi:10.1111/padm.12055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilley, N., 2000. Doing realistic evaluation of criminal justice. In: V. Jupp, P. Davies, and P. Francis, Eds. Doing criminological research. London: Sage, 97–113.
   Google Scholar
• Treasury, H.M., 2003. The Green Book: appraisal and evaluation in central government treasury guidance. London: HM Treasury. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/220541/green_book_complete.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, R.W., 1942. General statement on evaluation. The Journal of Educational Research, 35 (7), 492–501. doi:10.1080/00220671.1942.10881106
   Google Scholar
• Vedung, E., 1997. Public policy and program evaluation. New Bruswick: NJ: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Weed, M., 2010. How will we know if the London 2012 Olympics and Paralympics benefit health? British Medical Journal, 340. doi:10.1136/bmj.c2202
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weed, M., 2014. Is tourism a legitimate legacy from the Olympic and Paralympic games? An analysis of London 2012 legacy strategy using programme theory. Journal of Sport & Tourism, 19 (2), 101–126. doi:10.1080/14775085.2015.1053968
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, C., 1972. Evaluation. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, C., 1993. Where politics and evaluation research meet. Evaluation Practice, 14 (1), 93–106. doi:10.1177/109821409301400119
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, C., 1997. How can theory-based evaluation make greater headway? Evaluation Review, 21 (4), 501–524. doi:10.1177/0193841x9702100405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, C. and Bucuvalas, M.J., 1980. Truth tests and utility tests: decision-makers’ frames of reference for social science research. American Sociological Review, 45 (2), 302–313. doi:10.2307/2095127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, M.S. and Arthur-Banning, S.G., 2008. The logic of youth development: constructing a logic model of youth development through sport. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 26 (2), Available from: http://js.sagamorepub.com/jpra/article/view/1330.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yin, R.K., 1992. The case study method as a tool for doing evaluation. Current Sociology, 40 (1), 121–137. doi:10.1177/001139292040001009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar