Deconstructing comparative sport policy analysis: assumptions, challenges, and new directions

References

• Andersen, S. and Ronglan, L., ed., 2012. Nordic elite sport: same ambitions - different tracks. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Baistow, K., 2000. Cross-national research: what can we learn from inter-country comparisons? Social Work in Europe, 7 (3), 8–13.
   Google Scholar
• Bergsgard, N., et al., 2007. Sport policy: A comparative analysis of stability and change. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Heritage, 2013. Sport participation 2010: research paper. Canadian Heritage. Available from: http://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2013/pc-ch/CH24-1-2012-eng.pdf [Accessed 16 July 17].
   Google Scholar
• De Bosscher, V., et al., 2006. A conceptual framework for analysing sports policy factors leading to international sporting success. European Sport Management Quarterly, 6 (2), 185–215. doi:10.1080/16184740600955087
   Google Scholar
• De Bosscher, V., et al., 2008. The global sporting arms race: an international comparative study on the sports policy factors leading to international sporting success. Oxford: Meyer & Meyer Sport (UK).
   Google Scholar
• De Bosscher, V., et al., 2009. Explaining international sporting success: an international comparison of elite sport systems and policies in six countries. Sport management review, 12, 113–136. doi: 10.1016/j.smr.2009.01.001
   Google Scholar
• De Bosscher, V., et al., 2015. Successful elite sport policies: an international comparison of the sports policy factors leading to international sporting success (SPLISS 2.0) in 15 nations. Maidenhead: Meyer & Meyer Sport (UK).
   Google Scholar
• De Bosscher, V., 2016. A mixed methods approach to compare elite sport policies of nations. A critical reflection on the use of composite indicators in the SPLISS study. Sport in Society, 21 (2), 331–355. doi:10.1080/17430437.2016.1179729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis, M. and Grix, J., 2012. Sport under communism: behind the east german miracle. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Digel, H., 2002. A comparison of competitive sport systems. New Studies in Athletics, 17 (1), 37–50.
   Google Scholar
• Digel, H., 2005. Comparison of successful sport systems. New Studies in Athletics, 20 (2), 7–18.
   Google Scholar
• Dogan, M. and Kazancigil, A., 1994. Comparing nations: concepts, strategies, substance. Oxford: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Dogan, M. and Pélassy, D., 1990. How to compare nations: strategies in comparative politics. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
   Google Scholar
• Dowling, M., et al., 2018. Living with imperfect comparisons: the challenges and limitations of comparative Paralympic sport policy research. Sport Management Review, 21, 101–113. doi:10.1016/j.smr.2017.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebbinghaus, B., 2005. When less is more: selection problems in large-N and small-N cross-national comparisons. International Sociology, 20 (2), 133–152. doi:10.1177/0268580905052366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K.M., 1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532–550. doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4308385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, M. and Houlihan, B., 2005. Elite sport development: policy learning and political priorities. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Green, M. and Oakley, B., 2001. Elite sport development systems and playing to win: uniformity and diversity in international approaches. Leisure Studies, 20, 247–267. doi:10.1080/02614360110103598
   Google Scholar
• Grix, J., 2010. The foundations of research. 2nd. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
   Google Scholar
• Grix, J., 2018. The foundations of research. 3rd. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
   Google Scholar
• Hantrais, L., 2009. International comparative research: theory, methods and practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
   Google Scholar
• Harkness, J., 1999. In pursuit of quality: issues for cross-national survey research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 2 (2), 125–140. doi:10.1080/136455799295096
   Google Scholar
• Henry, I., et al., 2005. A typology of approaches to comparative analysis of sports policy. Journal of Sport Management, 19, 480–496. doi:10.1123/jsm.19.4.480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houlihan, B. and Green, M., 2008. Comparative elite sport policy: systems, structures, and public policy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jowell, R., 1998. How comparative is comparative research? American Behavioral Scientist, 42 (2), 168–177. doi:10.1177/0002764298042002004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohn, M.L., 1987. Cross-national research as an analytical strategy. American Sociological Review, 52 (6), 713–731. doi:10.2307/2095831
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohn, M.L., 1989. Cross-national research in sociology. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Landman, T. and Carvalho, E., 2017. Issues and methods in comparative politics. 4th. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A., 1971. Comparative politics and the comparative method. American Political Science Review, 65 (3), 682–693. doi:10.2307/1955513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, M., van de Bunt, G., and de Bruijn, J., 2006. Comparative research: persistent problems and promising solutions. International Sociology, 21 (5), 619–631. doi:10.1177/0268580906067833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Øyen, E., 1990. Comparative methodology: theory and practice in international social research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Øyen, E., 2004. Living with imperfect comparisons. In: P. Kennet, Ed. A handbook of comparative social policy. Northampton, MA: Elgar Publishing, 276–293.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C., 2006. How to lure analytic social science out of the doldrums: some lessons from comparative research. International Sociology, 21 (5), 633–646. doi:10.1177/0268580906067834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragin, C., 2014. The comparative method: moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Oakland, CA: California University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sartori, G., 1970. Concept misinformation in comparative politics. American Political Science Review, 64 (4), 1033–1053. doi:10.2307/1958356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartori, G., 1994. Compare why and how: comparing, miscomparing and the comparative method. In: M. Dogan and A. Kazancigil, Eds. Comparing nations: concepts, strategies, Substance. Blackwell: Oxford, 14–34.
   Google Scholar
• Schuster, J.M., 2007. Participation studies and cross-national comparison: proliferation, prudence, and possibility. Cultural Trends, 16 (2), 99–196. doi:10.1080/09548960701299815
   Google Scholar
• Sport England, 2016. Active Lives Survey 2015–16: Year 1 Report. Sport England. Available from: http://www.sportengland.org/media/11498/active-lives-survey-yr-1-report.pdf [Accessed 15 June 17].
   Google Scholar
• Truyens, J., et al., 2014. A resource-based perspective on countries’ competitive advantage in elite athletics. International journal of sport policy and politics, 6, 459–489. doi: 10.1080/19406940.2013.839954
   Google Scholar