Social leverage of sporting mega-events and co-production. The case study of Orlik facilities in Poland after EURO 2012

References

• Aberbach, J. and Rockman, B., 2002. Conducting and coding elite interviews. Political science & politics, 35 (4), 673–676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acheson, J., 2011. Ostrom for anthropologists. International Journal of the Commons, 5 (2), 319–339. doi:10.18352/ijc.245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee, B.S., 2014. A critical perspective on corporate social responsibility: towards a global governance framework. Critical perspectives on international business, 10 (1/2), 84–95.
   Google Scholar
• Bason, T. and Grix, J., 2018. Planning to fail? Leveraging the Olympic bid. Marketing intelligence & planning, 36 (1), 138–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bek, D., et al., 2018. Creating an enduring developmental legacy from FIFA2010: the Football Foundation of South Africa (FFSA). European sport management quarterly, 19 (4), 437–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevir, M., 2013. A theory of governance. Berkeley. Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bevir, M., Needham, C., and Waring, J., 2019. Inside co‐production: ruling, resistance, and practice. Social policy & administration, 53 (2), 197–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., 1984. Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brannagan, P.M. and Giulanotti, R., 2015. Soft power and soft disempowerment: qatar, global sport and football’s 2022 World Cup finals. Leisure Studies, 34 (6), 703–719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broomhill, R., 2007. Corporate social responsibility: key issues and debates. Dunstan Papers, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A., 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bulmer, M., 1979. Concepts in the analysis of qualitative data. Sociological review, 27 (4), 651–677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chabior, M., 2010. Koncepcja Polskiego Programu Odpowiedzialności Społecznej UEFA EURO 2012 (Framing of Polish Social Responsibility Programme for UEFA EURO 2012). Warsaw: PL.2012.
   Google Scholar
• Chalip, L., 2004. Beyond impact: a general model for sport event leverage. In: B.W. Ritchie and D. Adair, eds.. Sport tourism: interrelationships, impacts and issues. Clevedon, UK: Channel View Publications, 226–252.
   Google Scholar
• Chalip, L., 2006. Towards social leverage of sport events. Journal of sport & tourism, 11 (2), 109–127.
   Google Scholar
• Chalip, L., et al., 2017. Creating sport participation from sport events: making it happen. International journal of sport policy and politics, 9 (2), 257–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K., 2006. Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Decree of the Council of Ministers, 2008. Moje boisko - Orlik 2012. Available from: http://prawo.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WDU20080610376/O/D20080376.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dembek, A. (2009) Euro 2012 w Polsce i na Ukrainie – analiza treści dyskursu prasowego. Raport z badań. Warsaw University, Department of Sociology, unpublished.
   Google Scholar
• Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., and Stern, P.C., 2003. The struggle to govern the commons. Science, 302 (5652), 1907–1912.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, R.M., Fretz, R.E., and Shaw, L.L., 1995. Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fligstein, N., 2001. Social skill and the theory of fields. Sociological theory, 19 (2), 105–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frawley, S. and Adam Cush, A., 2011. Major sport events and participation legacy: the case of the 2003 Rugby World Cup. Managing Leisure, 16 (1), 65–76.
   Google Scholar
• Fryc, A. and Ponczek, M., 2009. The communist rule in polish sport history. The international journal of the history of sport, 26 (4), 501–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fundacja Rozwoju Kultury Fizycznej (FDAS), Raport Nasz Orlik 2015 (Our Orlik Report 2015), 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G. and Strauss, A. L., 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R., Suddaby, R., and Hinings, C.R., 2002. Theorizing change: the role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Academy of management journal, 45 (1), 58–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grix, J., 2013. Sport politics and the olympics. Political studies review, 11, 15–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grix, J., et al., 2017. ‘State strategies for leveraging sports mega-events: unpacking the concept of ‘legacy”. International journal of sport policy and politics, 9 (2), 203–218. doi:10.1080/19406940.2017.1316761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grix, J. and Carmichael, F., 2012. Why do governments invest in elite sport? A polemic. International journal of sport policy and politics, 4 (1), 73–90.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, W.S., 2011. Strategies for conducting elite interviews. Qualitative research, 11 (4), 431–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayday, E.J., Pappous, A.S., and Koutrou, N., 2017. Leveraging the sport participation legacy of the London 2012 olympics: senior managers’ perceptions. International journal of sport policy and politics, 9 (2), 349–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, G. and Karamichas, J., Eds., 2012. Olympic games, mega-events and civil societies: globalization, environment, resistance. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Holm, P., 1995. The dynamics of institutionalization: transformation processes in Norwegian fisheries. Administrative science quarterly, 40 (3), 398–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leopkey, B. and Parent, M.M., 2012. The (Neo) institutionalization of legacy and its sustainable governance within the olympic movement. European sport management quarterly, 12 (5), 437–455. doi:10.1080/16184742.2012.693116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGinnis, M., ed., 1999. Polycentric governance and development: readings from the workshop in political theory and policy analysis. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Minnaert, L., 2012. An olympic legacy for all? The non-infrastructural outcomes of the olympic games for socially excluded groups (Atlanta 1996–Beijing 2008). Tourism Management, 33 (2), 361–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrill, C., 1995. The executive way. Conflict management in corporations. London and Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, D., 2006. Event business leveraging the Sydney 2000 olympic games. Annals of Tourism Research, 33 (1), 240–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E., 1990. Governing the commons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E., 2002. Common-pool resources and institutions: toward a revised theory. In: B.L. Gardner and G.C. Rausser, eds.. Handbook of Agricultural Economics. Vol. 2. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1315–1339.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E., 2010. Beyond markets and states: polycentric governance of complex economic systems. The American economic review, 100 (3), 641–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E., Parks, R.B., and Whitaker, G.P., 1978. Patterns of metropolitan policing. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, V., Tiebout, C.M., and Warren, R., 1961. The organisation of gover metropolitan areas: a theoretical inquiry. American political science review, 55 (4), 831–842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poteete, A., Janssen, M.A., and Ostrom, E., 2010. Working together: collective action, the commons, and multiple methods in practice. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Preuss, H., 2007. The conceptualisation and measurement of mega sport event legacies. Journal of sport and tourism, 12 (3–4), 207–227.
   Google Scholar
• Reis, A.C., et al., 2017. ‘Sport participation legacy and the olympic games: the case of Sydney 2000, London 2012, and Rio 2016ʹ. Event management, 21 (2), 139–158.
   Google Scholar
• Respect Your Health (RYH) Guidebook. Available from: http://www.streetfootballworld.org/sites/default/files/Respect_your_Health_guide-Euroschools_2012.pdf [Last accessed 8 May 2017
   Google Scholar
• Rogerson, R., 2016. Re-defining temporal notions of event legacy: lessons from Glasgow’s commonwealth games. Annals of leisure research, 19 (4), 497–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, H. J. and Rubin, I. S., 2011. Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Thousand Oaks: Sage
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J.C., 1998. Seeing like a state: how certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sengupta, M., 2017. A window into India’s development story – the 2010 commonwealth games. International journal of sport policy and politics, 9 (2), 331–348. doi:10.1080/19406940.2017.1313298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SVG (Sport Volunteering Group 2012++), 2010. Volunteering for Sport. Sport for Volunteering. (Wolontariat w sporcie. Sport dla Wolontariatu.). Warsaw.
   Google Scholar
• Szelenyi, I. and Wilk, K., 2010. ‘Institutional transformation in European post-communist regimes’. In: G. Morgan, et al. eds.. The oxford handbook of comparative institutional analysis pp. 565–587.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taks, M., et al., 2018. Sport participation from sport events: why it doesn’t happen? Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 36 (2), 185–198. doi:10.1108/MIP-05-2017-0091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walford, G., 2005. Research ethical guidelines and anonymity. International journal of research and method in education, 28 (1), 83–93.
   Google Scholar
• Weed, M., et al., 2015. The olympic games and raising sport participation: a systematic review of evidence and an interrogation of policy for a demonstration effect. European sport management quarterly, 15 (2), 195–226. doi:10.1080/16184742.2014.998695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Włoch, R., 2013. ‘UEFA as a new agent of global governance: a case study of relations between UEFA and the polish government against the background of the UEFA EURO 2012ʹ. Journal of sport and social issues, 37 (3), 297–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar