937
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

To Stay or Leave: Factors that Impact Undergraduate Women’s Persistence in Science Majors

&

References

  • Allan, E. J., & Madden, M. (2006). Chilly classrooms for female undergraduate students: A question of method? The Journal of Higher Education, 77(4), 684–711. doi:10.1353/jhe.2006.0028
  • Astin, H. S., & Sax, L. J. (1996). Developing scientific talent in undergraduate women. In C. Davis, A. B. Ginorio, C. S. Hollenshead, B. B. Lazarus, P. M. Rayman, & Associates (Eds.), The equity equation: Fostering the advancement of women in the sciences, mathematics, and engineering (pp. 96–121). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Barker, L. J., & Garvin-Doxas, K. (2004). Making visible the behaviors that influence learning environment: A qualitative exploration of computer science classrooms. Computer Science Education, 14(2), 119–145.
  • Berryman, S. E. (1983). Who will do science? New York, NY: Rockefeller Foundation.
  • Beyer, S., Rynes, K., & Haller, S. (2004). Deterrents to women taking computer science courses. Technology and Society Magazine, IEEE, 23(1), 21–28. doi:10.1109/MTAS.2004.1273468
  • Blickenstaff, J. C. (2005). Women and science careers: Leaky pipeline or gender filter? Gender and Education, 14(4), 369–386. doi:10.1080/09540250500145072
  • Brainard, S. G., & Carlin, L. (1998). A six-year longitudinal study of undergraduate women in engineering and science. Journal of Engineering Education, 87(4), 369–376. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.1998.tb00367.x
  • Butterfield, J., & Crews, T. (2012). Casting a wider net: A longitudinal study exploring gender differences, influences and attitudes impacting academic major selection in computing. Computer and Information Science, 2(5), 2–10.
  • Carter, L. (2006). Why students with an apparent aptitude for computer science don’t choose to major in computer science. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 38(1), 27–31. doi:10.1145/1124706
  • Chen, X., & Weko, T. (2009). Students who study science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) in postsecondary education. (NCES 2009 161). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
  • Cohoon, J. M. (2001). Toward improving female retention in the computer science major. Communications of the ACM, 44(5), 108–114. doi:10.1145/374308.374367
  • Fox, M. F., Sonnert, G., & Nikiforova, I. (2011). Programs for undergraduate women in science and engineering: Issues, problems, and solutions. Gender & Society, 25(5), 589–615. doi:10.1177/0891243211416809
  • Gasiewski, J. A., Eagan, M. K., Garcia, G. A., Hurtado, S., & Chang, M. J. (2012). From gatekeeping to engagement: A multicontextual, mixed method study of student academic engagement in introductory STEM courses. Research in Higher Education, 53, 229–261. doi:10.1007/s11162-011-9247-y
  • Gayles, J. G. (Ed.) (2011). Attracting and retaining women in STEM. New Directions for Institutional Research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. doi: 10.1002/ir.404
  • Gayles, J. G., & Ampaw, F. (2014). The impact of college experiences on degree completion in STEM fields at four-year institutions: Does gender matter? The Journal of Higher Education, 85(4), 439–468. doi:10.1353/jhe.2014.0022
  • Goan, S. K., Cunningham, A. F., & Carroll, C. D. (2006). Degree completions in areas of national need, 1996−97 and 2001−02 (NCES 2006-154). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/Pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2006154.
  • Griffith, A. L. (2010). Persistence of women and minorities in STEM field majors: Is it the school that matters? Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/workingpapers/122/
  • Huang, G., Taddese, N., & Walter, E. (2000). Entry and persistence of women and minorities in college science and engineering education. Education Statistics Quarterly, 2(3), 59–60.
  • Hyde, M. S., & Gess-Newsome, J. (2000). Factors that increase persistence of female undergraduate science students. In J. Bart (Ed.), Women succeeding in the sciences: Theories and practices across disciplines (pp. 115–137). West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
  • Inkelas, K. K. (2011). Living–learning programs for women in STEM. New Directions for Institutional Research, 152, 27–37. doi:10.1002/ir.406
  • Jagacinski, C. M., Lebold, W. K., & Salvendy, G. (1988). Gender differences in computer-related fields. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 4(2), 185–202. doi:10.2190/RLNQ-UD8H-UBBJ-22DP
  • Kinzie, J. (2007). Women’s path in science: A critical feminist analysis. New Directions for Institutional Research, 133, 81–93. doi:10.1002/ir.206
  • Maple, S. A., & Stage, F. K. (1991). Influences on the choice of math/science major by gender and ethnicity. American Educational Research Journal, 28(1), 37–60. doi:10.3102/00028312028001037
  • Margolis, J., Fisher, A., & Miller, F. (2000). The anatomy of interest: Women in undergraduate computer science. Women’s Studies Quarterly, 28(1–2), 104–127. doi:10.3102/00028312028001037
  • National Science Board. (2012). Science and engineering indicators 2012. Arlington, Virginia: National Science Foundation.
  • Nicholls, G. M., Wolfe, H., Besterfield-Sacre, M., Shuman, L. J., & Larpkiattaworn, S. (2007). A method for identifying variables for predicting STEM enrollment. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(1), 33–44. doi:10.1002/jee.2007.96.issue-1
  • Nora, A., Cabrera, A., Hagedorn, L. S., & Pascarella, E. T. (1996). Differential impacts of academic and social experiences on college-related behavioral outcomes versus different ethnic and gender groups at four-year institutions. Research in Higher Education, 37, 427–452. doi:10.1007/BF01730109
  • Piatek Jimenez, K. (2008). Images of mathematicians: A new perspective on the shortage of women in mathematical careers. The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40(4), 633–646.
  • Porter, S. R., & Umbach, P. D. (2006). College major choice: An analysis of person–environment fit. Research in Higher Education, 47(4), 429–449. doi:10.1007/s11162-005-9002-3
  • Rayman, P., & Brett, B. (1995). Women science majors: What makes a difference in persistence after graduation? The Journal of Higher Education, 66, 388–414. doi:10.2307/2943794
  • Rendon, L. I., Jalomo, R. E., & Nora, A. (2000). Theoretical consideration in the study of minority student retention in higher education. In J. M. Braxton (Ed.), Rethinking the departure puzzle: New theory and research on college student retention (pp. 127–156). Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
  • Rettenmayer, J., Berry, R., & Ellis, S. (2007). The image of the information system profession: An investigation of gender differences. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 22(5), 46–51.
  • Sax, L. J. (1994). Mathematical self-concept: How college reinforces the gender gap. Research in Higher Education, 35(2), 141–166. doi:10.1007/BF02496699
  • Sax, L. J. (2001). Undergraduate science majors: Gender differences in who goes to graduate school. The Review of Higher Education, 24(2), 153–172. doi:10.1353/rhe.2000.0030
  • Sax, L. J. (2008). The gender gap in college: Maximizing the developmental potential of women and men. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview.
  • Shapiro, C. A., & Sax, L. J. (2011). Major selection and persistence for women in STEM. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2011, 5–18. doi:10.1002/ir.404
  • Thomas, S., & Heck, R. (2001). Analysis of large-scale secondary data in higher education: Potential perils associated with complex sampling designs. Research in Higher Education, 42(5), 517–540. doi:10.1023/A:1011098109834
  • Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45(1), 89–125. doi:10.3102/00346543045001089
  • Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Wang, X. (2013). Modeling entrance into STEM fields of student among students beginning at community colleges and four-year institutions. Research in Higher Education, 54, 664–692. doi:10.1007/s11162-013-9291-x
  • Wyer, M. (2003). Intending to stay: Images of scientist attitudes toward women, and gender as influences on persistence among science and engineering majors. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 9, 1–16. doi:10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v9.i1.10
  • Xie, Y., & Shauman, K. A. (2003). Women in science: Career processes and outcomes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Zhao, C. M., Carini, R. M., & Kuh, G. D. (2005). Searching for the peach blossom Shangri-la: Student engagement of men and women SMET majors. The Review of Higher Education, 28(4), 503–525. doi:10.1353/rhe.2005.0054

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.