Gendered Student Ideals in STEM in Higher Education

REFERENCES

• Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4(2), 139–158. doi:10.1177/089124390004002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acker, J. (2000). Gendered contradictions in organizational equity projects. Organization, 7(4), 625–632. doi:10.1177/135050840074007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acker, J. (2012). Gendered organizations and intersectionality: Problems and possibilities. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 31(3), 214–224. doi:10.1108/02610151211209072
   Google Scholar
• Allan, E. J. (2003). Constructing women's status: Policy discourses of university women's commission reports. Harvard Educational Review, 73(1).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, J., Chandler, J., & Berg, E. (2007). Women’s movements and new public management: Higher education in Sweden and England. Public Administration, 81(1), 103–122.
   Google Scholar
• Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., & Tarule, J. M. (1997). Women’s ways of knowing. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bird, S. R. (2011). Unsettling universities’ incongruous, gendered bureaucratic structures: A case-study approach. Gender, Work, and Organization, 18(2), 202–230. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0432.2009.00510.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britton, D. M. (2000). The epistemology of the gendered organization. Gender & Society, 14(3), 418–434. doi:10.1177/089124300014003004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britton, D. M., & Logan, L. (2008). Gendered organizations: Progress and prospects. Sociology Compass, 2(1), 107–121. doi:10.1111/j1751-9020.2007.00071.x
   Google Scholar
• Brown, C., Garavalia, L. S., Fritts, M. L. H., & Olson, E. A. (2006). Computer science majors: Sex role orientation, academic achievement, and social cognitive factors. The Career Development Quarterly, 54, 331–345. doi:10.1002/j.2161-0045.2006.tb00198.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrnes, J. P., Miller, D. C., & Schafer, W. D. (1999). Gender differences in risk-taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125(3), 367–383. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.3.367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, M., & Gregor, F. (2004). Mapping social relations: A primer in doing institutional ethnography. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cantu, N. (2012). Getting there cuando no hay camino (when there is no path): Paths to discovery testimonios by Chicanas in STEM. Equity & Excellence in Education, 45(3), 472–487. doi:10.1080/10665684.2012.698936
   Google Scholar
• Carrell, S. E., Page, M. E., & West, J. E. (2010). Sex and science: How professor gender perpetuates the gender gap. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(3), 1101–1144. doi:10.1162/qjec.2010.125.3.1101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrigan, C., Quinn, K., & Riskin, E. A. (2011). The gendered division of labor among STEM faculty and the effects of critical mass. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 4(3), 131–146. doi:10.1037/a0021831
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carspecken, F. P. (1996). Critical ethnography in educational research: A theoretical and practical guide [Kindle reader version]. New York, NY: Routledge. Retrieved from http://www.amazon.com/Critical-Ethnography-Educational-Research-Theoretical-ebook/dp/B00FDR4P74/ref=tmm_kin_title_0?_encoding=UTF8&sr=8-1&qid=1419264649
   Google Scholar
• Charleston, L. J., George, P. L., Jackson, J. L., Berhanu, J., & Amechi, M. H. (2014). Navigating underrepresented STEM spaces: Experiences of Black women in U.S. computing science higher education programs who actualize success. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 7(3), 166–176. doi:10.1037/a0036632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• DuPre, C. (2010). Does being a good girl lead to being a good student? Teaching English in the Two-Year College, 38(1), 68–77.
   Google Scholar
• Gayles, J. G., & Ampaw, F. (2014). The impact of college experiences on degree completion in STEM fields at four-year institutions: Does gender matter? Journal of Higher Education, 85(4), 439–468. doi:10.1080/00221546.2014.11777336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldin, C., Katz, L. F., & Kuziemko, I. (2006). The homecoming of American college women: The reversal of the college gender gap. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(4), 133–156. doi:10.1257/jep.20.4.133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorman, S. T., Durmowicz, M. C., Roskes, E. M., & Slattery, S. P. (2010). Women in the academy: Female leadership in STEM education and the evolution of a mentoring web. Forum on Public Policy Online, 2010(2), 1–21
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S. (1987). Feminism and methodology. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S. (2004). A socially relevant philosophy of science? Resources from standpoint theory’s controversiality. Hypatia, 19(1), 25–47. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2004.tb01267.x
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S. (2009). Standpoint theories: Productively controversial. Hypatia, 24(4), 192–200. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2009.01067.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartsock, N. (1987). The feminist standpoint: Developing the ground for a specifically feminist historical materialism. In S. Harding (Ed), Feminism and methodology (pp. 157–180). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herzig, A. H. (2010). Women belonging in the social worlds of graduate mathematics. Montana Mathematics Enthusiast, 7(2/3), 177–208.
   Google Scholar
• Hesse-Biber, & Nagy, S. J. (2014). Feminist research practice: A primer. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kimmel, M. S. (2008). The gendered society. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kreutzer, K., & Boudreaux, A. (2012). Preliminary investigation of instructor effects on gender gap in introductory physics. Physical Review Special Topics—Physics Education Research, 8(1). doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010120
   Google Scholar
• Linley, J. L., & George-Jackson, C. E. (2013). Addressing underrepresentation in STEM fields through undergraduate interventions. New Directions for Student Services, 2013(144), 97–102. doi:10.1002/ss.20073
   Google Scholar
• London, B., Rosenthal, L., Levy, S. R., & Lobel, M. (2011). The influences of perceived identity compatibility and social support on women in nontraditional fields during the college transition. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 33, 304–321. doi:10.1080/01973533.2011.614166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Monroe, K., Ozyurt, S., Wrigley, T., & Alexander, A. (2008). Gender equality in academia: Bad news from the trenches, and some possible solutions. Perspectives on Politics, 6(2), 215–233. doi:10.1017/S1537592708080572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morganson, V. J., Jones, M. P., & Major, D. A. (2010). Understanding women’s underrepresentation in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: The role of social coping. Career Development Quarterly, 59(2), 169–179. doi:10.1002/j.2161-0045.2010.tb00060.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morimoto, S. A., Zajicek, A. M., Hunt, V. H., & Lisnic, R. (2013). Beyond binders full of women: NSF ADVANCE and initiatives for institutional transformation. Sociological Spectrum, 33, 397–415. doi:10.1080/02732173.2013.818505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Girls Collaborative Project. (2015) State of girls and women in STEM. Ngcproject.org. Retrieved from https://ngcproject.org/statistics
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2007). Validity and qualitative research: An oxymoron? Quality & Quantity, 41, 233–249. doi:10.1007/s11135-006-9000-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Research Center. (2015). Science and engineering degree attainment: 2004-2014. National Student Clearinghouse Research Center. Retrieved from http://nscresearchcenter.org/snapshotreport-degreeattainment15/
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, L., London, B., Levy, S., & Lobel, M. (2011). The roles of perceived identity compatibility and social support for women in a single-sex STEM program at a co-educational university. Sex Roles, 65(9/10), 725–736. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-9945-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossman, G. B., & Ralis, S. F. (2003). Learning in the field: An introduction to qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Saldana, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Sander, L. (2012). Colleges confront a gender gap in student engagement. Chronicle of Higher Education, 59(10), B14–B17.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, S. (2015). Promoting risk taking in mathematics classrooms: The importance of creating a safe learning environment. Mathematics Enthusiast, 12(1–3), 290–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Šidlauskienė, V., & Butašova, K. (2013). Designing gender equality as institutional transformation at a higher education institution. Gender Studies & Research, 11, 50–69.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. E. (2005). Institutional ethnography: A sociology for people. Lanham, MD: Altamira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. E. (2006). Institutional ethnography as practice. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Tatum, H. E., Schwartz, B. M., Schimmoeller, P. A., & Perry, N. (2013). Classroom participation and student-faculty interactions: Does gender matter? Journal of Higher Education, 84(6), 745–768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, N., Bystydzienski, J., & Desai, A. (2014). Changing institutional culture through peer mentoring of women STEM faculty. Innovative Higher Education, 40(2), 143–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villalobos, A. (2009). The importance of breaking set: Socialized cognitive strategies and the gender discrepancy in mathematics. Theory and Research in Education, 7(1), 27–45.
   Google Scholar
• Vogt, C. M., Hocevar, D.& Hagedorn, L. (2007). A social cognitive construct validation: Determining women’s and men’s success in engineering programs Journal of Higher Education, 78(3), 337–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, R. S., Seifert, T. A., Padgett, R. D., Park, S., & Umbach, P. D. (2011). Why do more women than men want to earn a four-year degree? Journal of Higher Education, 82(1), 1–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Women’s status in higher education: Background and significance. (2011). ASHE Higher Education Report, 37(1), 1–14. doi:10.1002/aehe.3701
   Google Scholar
• Yakaboski, T. (2011). “Quietly stripping the pastels:” The undergraduate gender gap. Review of Higher Education, 34(4), 555–580. doi:10.1353/rhe.2011.0020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar