Supports and Pushes: Insight into the Problem of Retention of STEM Women Faculty

References

• Benbow, C. P., & Stanley, J. C. (1983). Gender and the science major: A study of mathematically precocious youth. In M. W. Steinkamp & M. L. Maehr (Eds.), Women in science (pp. 205–214). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, D. A. (2001). How can I deal with missing data in my study? Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 2(5), 464–469.
   Google Scholar
• Biglan, A. (1973). The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(3), 195–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackwell, L., Snyder, L., & Mavriplis, C. (2009). Diverse faculty in STEM fields: Attitudes, performance, and fair treatment. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 2(4), 195–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brainard, J. (2008, February). By the numbers: Report details good and bad news for American science. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/daily/2008/01/1245n.htm/
   Google Scholar
• Burke, R. J., & Mattis, M. C. (Eds.). (2007). Women and minorities in science, technology, engineering and mathematics: Upping the numbers. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Callister, R. R. (2006). The impact of gender department climate on job satisfaction and intentions to quit for faculty in science and engineering fields. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31, 367–375.
   Google Scholar
• Dewitt, J., Osborne, J., Archer, L., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2013). Young children’s aspirations in science: The unequivocal, the uncertain and the unthinkable. Journal of Science Education, 35(6), 1037–1063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrenberg, R. G., Kasper, H., & Rees, D. I. (1991). Faculty turnover at American colleges and universities: Analyses of AAUP data. Economics of Education Review, 10(2), 99–110.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrenberg, R. G., Rizzo, M. J., & Condie, S. S. (2003). Start­up costs in American research universities. Cornell University ILR School, Working Papers, Paper 38.
   Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, S. (2012). I couldn’t wait to leave the toxic environment: A mixed methods study of women faculty satisfaction and departure from one research institution. NASPA Journal about Women in Higher Education, 5(1), 71–95.
   Google Scholar
• Griffeth, R. W., Hom, P. W., & Gaertner, S. (2000). A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates of employee turnover: Update, moderator tests, and research implications for the millennium. Journal of Management, 26, 463–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Information Technology & Innovation Foundation. (2010). Refueling the U.S. innovation economy: Fresh approaches to STEM education. Retrieved from https://itif.org/publications/2010/12/07/refueling-us-innovation-economy-fresh-approaches-stem-education
   Google Scholar
• Johnsrud, L. K., & Rosser, V. (2002). Faculty members’ morale and their intention to leave. Journal of Higher Education, 73(4), 518–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, D., Wolf-Wendel, L., & Twombly, S (NCES). (2011). International faculty: Experiences of academic life and productivity in U.S. universities. The Journal of Higher Education, 82, 720–747.
   Google Scholar
• Kulis, S., Sicotte, D., & Collins, S. (2002). More than a pipeline problem: Labor supply constraints and gender stratification across academic science disciplines. Research in Higher Education, 43(6), 657–691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, X. F., & Bilimoria, D. (2007). The representation and experience of women faculty in STEM fields. In R. Burke & M. Mattis (Eds.), Women and minorities in science, technology, engineering and mathematics: Upping the numbers (pp. 317–333). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Matier, M. W. (1990). Retaining faculty: A tale of two campuses. Research in Higher Education, 31(1), 39–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mobley, W. H. (1982). Employee turnover: Causes, consequences, and control. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2012). Average Scores of 15-year-old students on PISA science literacy scale, by education system: 2012. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/pisa/pisa2012/pisa2012highlights_4a.asp
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2010). National Study of Postsecondary Faculty (NSOPF) overview. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/surveys/nsopf/
   Google Scholar
• National Science Foundation. (2010). SEH doctorate holders employed in academia, by type of position, sex, and degree field: 1973–2010. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind14/index.cfm/chapter-5/c5s3.htm
   Google Scholar
• National Science Foundation. (2012a). Science and engineering degrees awarded, by degree level and sex of recipient: 1966–2012. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2015/nsf15326/
   Google Scholar
• National Science Foundation. (2012b). Degrees awarded in fields other than science and engineering, by degree level and sex of recipient: 1966–2012. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2015/nsf15326/
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, D. J., & Rogers, D. (2005). A national analysis of diversity in science and engineering faculties at research universities. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma, Department of Chemistry. Retrieved from http://cheminfo.chem.ou.edu/~djn/diversity/briefings/Diversity%20Report%20Final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Orenstein, P. (1994). School girls. New York, NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Osborn, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–1079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pajares, F., & Miller, M. D. (1994). The role of self-efficacy and self-concept beliefs in mathematical problem-solving: A path analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 193–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, S. R. (2007). A closer look at faculty service: What affects participation on committees? The Journal of Higher Education, 78(5), 523–541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, J. L. (1977). The study of turnover. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2000). A first course in structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Rosser, V. J. (2004). Faculty members’ intentions to leave: A national study on their work life and satisfaction. Research in Higher Education, 45(3), 285–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sallee, M. W., & Blakewood Pascale, A. (2012). Multiple roles, multiple burdens: The experiences of female scientists with children. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 18(2), 135–152.
   Google Scholar
• Sax, L., Kanny, A., Riggers-Piehl, T., Whang, H., & Paulson, L. (2015). But I’m not good at math: The changing salience of mathematical self-concept in shaping women’s and men’s STEM aspirations. Research in Higher Education, 58(8), 813–842.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, P. (2007). International study finds U.S. 15-year-olds behind the curve in science. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/daily/2007/12/865n.htm
   Google Scholar
• Settles, I. H., Cortina, L. M., Malley, J., & Stewart, A. J. (2006). The climate for women in academic science: The good, the bad, and the changeable. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 47–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, C., & Sax, L. (2011). Major selection and persistence for women in STEM. New Directions for Institutional Research, 152, 5–18.
   Google Scholar
• Smart, J. C. (1990). A causal model of faculty turnover intentions. Research in Higher Education, 31(5), 405–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steers, R. M.. & Mowday, R. T. (1981). Employee turnover and post-decision accommodation processes. In L. L. Cummings & B, M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 3, 235–281. Greenwich, CT.: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). New York, NY: Pearsons.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, S. L., & Heck, R. H. (2001). Analysis of large-scale secondary data in higher education research: Potential perils associated with complex sampling designs. Research in Higher Education, 42(5), 517–540.
   Google Scholar
• Tomarken, A. J., & Waller, N. G. (2005). Structural equation modeling: Strengths, limitations, and misconceptions. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 31–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyson, W., Lee, R., Borman, K. M., & Hanson, M. A. (2007). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) pathways: High school science and math coursework and postsecondary degree attainment. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 12(3), 243–270.
   Google Scholar
• Vogt, W.P. (2007). Quantitative research methods for professionals in education and other fields. Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Y. J. (2008). Gender disparity in STEM disciplines: A study of faculty attrition and turnover intentions. Research in Higher Education, 49, 607–624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, Y., & Volkwein, J. F. (2004). Examining the influences on faculty department intentions: A comparison of tenured versus non-tenured faculty at research universities using NSOPF-99. Research in Higher Education, 45, 139–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar