REFERENCES
- American Academy of Forensic Sciences. 2010. Membership. http://www.aafs.org/membership/NewMemberIndividualSectionRequirements (Accessed 30 October 2014).
- Anderson, A. 2011. The Supreme Court abolishes expert immunity. The Barrister, May 31st. www.barristermagazine.com/article-listing/current-issue/the-supremecourt.
- Australian and New Zealand Forensic Science Society. 2010. The Registered Forensic Practitioner Scheme. Brisbane, QLD: Australian and New Zealand Forensic Science Society. www.anzfss.org.au/rfp/rfpdetails.htm (accessed August 1, 2014).
- Australian and New Zealand Forensic Science Society. 2014. ANZFSS Code of Professional Practice. http:// anzfss.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/ANZFSS-Code-of-Professional-Practice-Final.pdf (accessed October 30, 2014).
- Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency. 2010. Registration. www.pharmacyboard.gov.au/Registration.aspx (accessed October 30, 2014).
- Australian Pharmacy Council. 2010. Accreditation. http://pharmacycouncil.org.au/accreditation_intro.html (accessed October 30, 2014).
- Brightman, R. 2005. Australian forensic science. Education and training for the future: A review of the current status of forensic science education and training in Australia and options for the future. Melbourne: ANZPAA/National Institute of Forensic Sciences.
- Chartered Society of Forensic Sciences. 2010. Professional Membership. www.forensic-science-society.org.uk/Membership (accessed October 30, 2014).
- Daubert v Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc, 509 US 579, 590 n.8. 1993.
- European Union. 2009. Council Framework. Decision 2009/905/JHA of 30 November 2009 on Accreditation of forensic service providers carrying out laboratory activities. Official J. Euro Union L322:14–16.
- Fielding, A. G., and D. Portwood. 1980. Professions and the State: Toward a typology of bureaucratic professions. Sociological Review 28:23–53.
- Home Office. 2010. Reports. Accessed 10 August 2010 at http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/police/forensic-science-regulator/reports-publications/.
- Kelty, S. F. 2012. Professionalism in crime scene examination: Recruitment strategies using the seven key attributes of top crime scene examiners. Forensic Science Policy and Management 2:198–204.
- Kelty, S. F., and R. D. Gordon. 2013 Professionalism in crime scene examination: Recruitment strategies, part 2: Using a psychometric profile of top crime scene examiners in selection decision-making. Forensic Science Policy and Management 3:189–199.
- Kelty, S. F., R. Julian, and J. Robertson. 2012 Professionalism in crime scene examination: The seven key attributes of top crime scene examiners. Forensic Science Policy and Management 2:175–186.
- Lyons, M. 2011. The professionalization of children's services in Australia. Journal of Sociology 48:115–131.
- Margot, P. 2011. Forensic science on trial—What is the law of the land? Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences 43:89–103.
- Mnookin, J. L., S. A. Cole, I. E. Dror, B.A.J. Fisher, M. M. Houck, K. Inman, D. H. Kaye, et al. 2011. The need for a research culture in the forensic sciences. UCLA Law Review 58:725–779.
- National Academy of Sciences. 2009. National Academy of Sciences. Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A path forward. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
- Pharmaceutical Society of Australia. 2010. About continuing professional development. Accessed 30 October 2014 at http://www.psa.org.au/education/about-cpd/pharmacy-board-requirements (accessed October 30, 2014).
- Roach Anleu, S., and K. Mack. 2008. The professionalization of Australian magistrates. Journal of Sociology 44:185–203.
- Robertson, J. 2011. Forensic Science – A true profession? Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences 43:105–22.
- Robertson, J. 2014. Push for Royal Commission into forensic procedures. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences 46:365–367.
- Robertson, J., K. Kent, and L. Wilson-Wilde. 2013. The development of a core forensic standards framework for Australia. Forensic Science Policy and Management 4:59–67.
- Robertson, J., H. Metz, M. Scudder, and V. Hodgson. 2010. A quality system review; Australian Federal Police Forensic and Data Centres. Forensic Science Policy and Management 1:209–213.
- Samarji, A. M. 2010. Mapping the complexity of forensic science: Implications for forensic science education. PhD Thesis, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia.
- Science Engineering Manufacturing Technologies Alliance (SEMTA). 2008. Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification (ANZSRC). Canberra, ACT: Australian Bureau of Statistics [updated 2008; cited 2011 25 June]; www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/[email protected]/Latestproducts/1297.0Main%20Features52008?opendocument&tabname=Summary&prodno=1297.0&issue=2008&num=&view=
- Semta. 2004. Forensic Science: implications for higher education Sector Skills Council. www.semta.org.uk.
- Sercombe, H. 2010. Youth Work Ethics. London: Sage.
- Silverman, B. 2011. Research and Development in Forensic Science: A Review. London, UK: Home Office. www.gov.uk/government/publications/research-and-development-in-forensic-science-review.
- Supreme Court of Victoria. 2014. Expert Evidence in Criminal Trials. Practice Note No. 2. www.supremecourt.vic.gov.au/home/ (accessed October 30, 2014).
- Technical Working Group for Education and Training in Forensic Science. 2004. Education and Training in Forensic Science: A guide for forensic science laboratories, educational institutions, and students. National Institute of Justice, editor. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.
- Thompson, W. B. 2011. What role should investigative facts play in the evaluation of scientific evidence? Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences 43:123–134.
- Tregar K. L., and G. Proni. 2010. A review of forensic science higher education programs in the United States: Bachelors’ and Masters’ degrees. Journal of Forensic Science 55:1488–1493.
- Velayutham, S., and H. Perera. 1995. The historical context of professional ideology and tension and strain in the accounting profession. Accounting Historians Journal 22:81–101.
- West, B. 1998. Exploring professional knowledge: The case of accounting. Journal of Sociology 34:1–22.
- National Institute of Justice. 2014. U.S. Departments of Justice and Commerce Name Experts to First-Ever National Commission on Forensic Science. www.nist.gov/forensics/forensic-science-commission-011014.cfm (accessed October 30, 2014).