E ‘value’ ating Forensic Science

References

• Association of Chief Police Officers. 2002. ACPO Investigation of Volume Crime Manual. Association of Chief Police Officers of England, Wales and Northern Ireland, ACPO.
   Google Scholar
• Association of Chief Police Officers, and Forensic Science Service. 1996. Using Forensic Science Effectively. ACPO & FSS.
   Google Scholar
• van Asten, A. C. 2014. On the added value of forensic science and grand innovation challenges for the forensic community. Science and Justice 54(2): 170–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ausenda, G. 2003. On Effectiveness. Woodbridge: Boydell Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, J. W. 2007. Value of DNA evidence in detecting crime. Journal of Forensic Sciences 52(1): 128–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, J. W. 2009. The value of fingerprint evidence in detecting crime. International Journal of Police Science & Management 11: 77–84.
   Google Scholar
• Bradbury, S.-A. and A. Feist. 2005. The use of forensic science in volume crime investigations: a review of the research literature. Home Office Online Report 43.
   Google Scholar
• Briody, M. 2006. The effects of DNA evidence on property offences in court. Current Issues in Criminal Justice 17(3): 380–396.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, J. M. and J. Jarvis. 2009. The wrongful conviction of forensic science. Forensic Science Policy & Management: An International Journal 1(1): 17–31.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, A., A. Walters, S. Hales, and C. Futers. 2001. Meeting report - forensic science and the crime scene. Science & Justice 41(4): 279–286.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Doleac, J. L. 2016. The effects of DNA databases on crime. Available at http://jenniferdoleac.com/wp-content/uploads/…/Doleac_DNA_Databases.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Drucker, P. F. 2007. The Effective Executive: The Definitive Guide to Getting the Right Things Done. Oxford: Elsevier Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• ESRC Genomics Network. 2008. Response by the ESRC genomic network on the human genetics commission consultation on the forensic use of DNA and the national DNA d. Available at http://www.genomicsnetwork.ac.uk/forum/publications/20726.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, J. 2010. Forensic Science: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, J., and R. Williams. 2009. Handbook of Forensic Science. Cullompton: Willan.
   Google Scholar
• Frazer, M. 1994. Quality in higher education: an international perspective. In What is Quality in Higher Education, ed. D. Green. Buckingham: Open University Press and Society for Research into Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Hales, C. P. 1986. “What do managers do? A critical revew of the evidence.” Journal of Management Studies 23(1): 88–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary. 1998. What price policing? A Study of efficiency and value for money in the police service. Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary (HMIC). London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary. 2010. Valuing the police - policing in an age of austerity. Available at https://www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/hmic/media/valuing-the-police-policing-in-an-age-of-austerity-20100720.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Her Majesty's Inspectorate Constabulary. 2015. Value for money profiles. Available at https://www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/hmic/our-work/value-for-money-inspections/value-for-money-profiles/
   Google Scholar
• Himberg, K. 2002. Project QUADRUPOL: Development of a benchmarking model for forensic laboratories. Problems of Forensic Sciences 50: 186–188.
   Google Scholar
• Home Office. 2007. Summary Report of the Scientific Work Improvement (SWIM) Package. Home Office: SWIM.
   Google Scholar
• Home Office and Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary. 2006. HMIC Baseline Assessment Framework Specific Grading Criteria.
   Google Scholar
• Home Office. 2014. The Home Office's Oversight of Forensic Services. Briefing for the House of Commons Science and Technology Committee.
   Google Scholar
• Horvath, F. and R. Meesig. 1996. The criminal investigation process and the role of forensic evidence: a review of empirical findings. Journal of Forensic Sciences 41(6): 963–970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houck, M., R. A. Riley, P. J. Speaker, and T. S. Witt. 2009. FORESIGHT: a business approach to improving forensic science services. Forensic Science Policy & Management: An International Journal 6(1–2): 7–29.
   Google Scholar
• Houck, M., P. J. Speaker, A. S. Fleming, and R. A. Riley Jr. 2012. The balanced scorecard: Sustainable performance assessment for forensic laboratories. Science & Justice 52(4): 209–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• House of Commons Select Committee on Science & Technology. 2005. Forensic Science On Trial. London: HCSCST.
   Google Scholar
• Human Genetics Commission. 2009. Nothing to hide, nothing to fear? Balancing individual rights and the public interest in the governance and use of the National DNA Database.
   Google Scholar
• Innes, M. and A. Clarke. 2009. Policing the past: cold case studies, forensic evidence and retroactive social control. The British Journal of Sociology 60(3): 543–563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, P., and R. Williams. 2004. DNA and Crime Investigation: Scotland and the ‘UK National DNA Database’. Scottish Journal of Criminal Justice Studies 10: 9.
   Google Scholar
• Julian, R. D., S. F. Kelty, C. Roux, P. Woodman, J. Robertson, A. Davey, R. Hayes, P. Margot, A. Ross, H. Sibly, and R. White. 2011. What is the value of forensic science? An overview of the effectiveness of forensic science in the Australian criminal justice system project. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences 43(4): 217–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, W. and E. Maguire. 2009. Assessing performance of systems designed to process criminal forensic evidence. Forensic Science Policy & Management: An International Journal 1(3): 159–170.
   Google Scholar
• Kobus, H., M. M. Houck, P. J. Speaker, R. A. Riley, and T. S. Witt. 2011. Managing performance in the forensic sciences: expectations in light of limited budgets. Forensic Science Policy & Management: An International Journal 2(1): 36–43.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, E. G., N. L. Hogan, T. Nerbonne, S. M. Barton, P. L. Watson, J. Buss, and J. Lambert. 2007. Differences in forensic science views and needs of law enforcement: a survey of Michigan law enforcement agencies. Police Practice and Research 8(5): 415–430.
   Google Scholar
• Lawless, C. 2010. A Curious Reconstruction? The Shaping of ‘Marketized’ Forensic Science. London: Centre for Analysis of Risk and Regulation, London School of Economics and Political Science.
   Google Scholar
• Ludwig, A. and J. Fraser. 2014. Effective use of forensic science in volume crime investigations: identifying recurring themes in the literature. Science & Justice 54(1): 81–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maguire, C., M. M. Houck, R. Williams, and P. J. Speaker. 2012. Efficiency and the cost-effective delivery of forensic science services: insourcing, outsourcing, and privatization. Forensic Science Policy & Management: An International Journal 3(2): 62–69.
   Google Scholar
• McAndrew, W. P. 2012a. Are forensic science services club goods? An Analysis of the optimal forensic science service delivery model. Forensic Science Policy & Management: An International Journal 3(4): 151–158.
   Google Scholar
• McAndrew, W. P. 2012b. “Is privatization inevitable for forensic science laboratories?” Forensic Science Policy & Management: An International Journal 3(1): 42–52.
   Google Scholar
• McCartney, C. 2006. The DNA expansion programme and criminal investigation. British Journal of Criminology 46(2): 175–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCollister, K. E., M. T. French, and H. Fang. 2010. The cost of crime to society: New crime-specific estimates for policy and program evaluation. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 108: 98–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCulloch, H. 1996. Police use of forensic science. Police Research Group: Police Research Series. Paper 19.
   Google Scholar
• National Audit Office. 2010. Analytical framework for assessing value for money. Available from https://www.bond.org.uk/data/files/National_Audit_Office_Analytical_framework_for_assessing_Value_for_Money.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Audit Office. 2014. Briefing for the House of Commons Science and Technology Committee: The Home Office's oversight of forensic service. Available at https://www.nao.org.uk/report/home-offices-oversight-forensic-services/
   Google Scholar
• National Institute of Forensic Science Australia. 2001. The Advancement of Science for Justice. Melbourne: NIFSA.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, J., I. Sommers, D. Baskin, and D. Johnson. 2010. The Role and Impact of Forensic Evidence in the Criminal Justice Process. U.S. Department of Justice. Los Angeles: National Institute of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsay, M. 1987. The Effectiveness of the Forensic Science Service. London: Home Office. Research Study 92.
   Google Scholar
• Raymond, J. J. 2010. A Criminalistic Approach to Biological Evidence: Trace DNA and Volume Crime Offences, University of Technology, Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Rix, B. 2004. The Contribution of Shoemark Data to Police Intelligence, Crime Detection and Prosecution. Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, P. 2012. Renegotiating forensic cultures: between law, science and criminal justice. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44(1): 47–59.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roman, J. K., S. Reid, J. Reid, A. Chalfin, W. Adams, and C. Knight. 2008. The DNA Field Experiment: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Use of DNA in the Investigation of High-Volume Crimes. Urban Institute Justice Policy Centre: NIJ U.S. Department of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Saulsbury, W., M. Hibberd, and B. L. Irving. 1994. Using Physical Evidence: A Report of the Forensic Science Service and the Association of Chief Police Officers Joint Research Project. The Police Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Speaker, P. J. 2009a. The decomposition of return on investment for forensic laboratories. Forensic Science Policy & Management: An International Journal 1(2): 96–102.
   Google Scholar
• Speaker, P. J. 2009b. Key performance indicators and managerial analysis for forensic laboratories. Forensic Science Policy & Management: An International Journal 1(1): 32–42.
   Google Scholar
• Speaker, P. J. 2013. Forensic science service provider models: data-driven support for better delivery options. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences 45(4): 398–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speaker, P. J. 2015. Financial management of forensic science laboratories: lessons from Project FORESIGHT 2011–2012. Forensic Science Policy & Management: An International Journal 1(2): 85–95.
   Google Scholar
• Strom, K. J. and M. J. Hickman. 2010. Unanalyzed evidence in law-enforcement agencies. Criminology & Public Policy 9(2): 381–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilley, N. 1995. Thinking about crime prevention performance indicators. Police Research Group: Crime Detection & Prevention Series. Paper 57: 46.
   Google Scholar
• Tilley, N. and A. Ford. 1996. Forensic science and crime investigation. Police Research Group: Crime Detection & Prevention Series. Paper 73.
   Google Scholar
• Touche, R. 1987. Review of Scientific Support for the Police. London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, S. J., J. S. Buckleton, O. Ribaux, C. Roux, and T. Raymond. 2008. Comparing the growth and effectiveness of forensic DNA databases. Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series 1(1): 667–668.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, B., C. Smith, A. Brock, and M. Townsley. 2005. DNA fast tracking, in Crime Science: New Approaches to Detecting and Preventing Crime, eds., M. J. Smith, and N. Tilley, 197–190. London: Willan.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R. and J. Weetman. 2013. Enacting forensics in homicide investigations. Policing and Society 23(3): 376–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, D. B., D. McClure, and D. Weisburd. 2010. Does Forensic DNA help to solve crime? The benefit of sophisticated answers to naive questions. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 26(4): 458–469.
   Google Scholar