Exploring Performance Skills in the Occupation of Learning to Read

References

• American Occupational Therapy Association. (2020). Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain and process (4th ed.). The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 74(Suppl. 2), Article 7412410010. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2020.74S2001
   Google Scholar
• Apfelbaum, K. S., & McMurray, B. (2017). Learning during processing: Word learning doesn’t wait for word recognition to finish. Cognitive Science, 41, 706–747. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnaud, L. M., & Gutman, S. A. (2022). Supporting literacy participation for underserved children: A set of guidelines for occupational therapy practice. Journal of Occupational Therapy, Schools, & Early Intervention, 15(2), 111–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkeley, S., Scanlon, D., Bailey, T. R., Sutton, J. C., & Sacco, D. M. (2020). A snapshot of RTI implementation a decade later: New picture, same story. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 53(5), 332–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219420915867
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breaux, K. C., & Lichtenberger, E. O. (2016). Essentials of KTEA-3 and WIAT-III assessment. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Brem, S., Bach, S., Kucian, K., Guttorm, T. K., Brandeis, H., Martin, E., Lyytinen, D., & Richardson, U. (2010). Brain sensitivity to print emerges when children learn letter–speech sound correspondences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(17), 7939–7944. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0904402107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T., & Rodger, S. (2009). An evaluation of the validity of the test of visual perceptual skills - revised (TVPS-R) using the rasch measurement model. The British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 72(2), 65–78. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.858.7496&rep=rep1&type=pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. (2014). The foundation of literacy: The child’s acquisition of the alphabetic principle. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cassidy, J., Ortlieb, E., & Grote-Garcia, S. (2016). Beyond the common core: Examining 20 years of literacy priorities and their impact on struggling readers. Literacy Research and Instruction, 55(2), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2015.1136011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catts, H. W. (2018). The simple view of reading: Advancements and false impressions. Remedial and Special Education, 39(5), 317–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518767563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colarusso, R. P., & Hammill, D. D. (2015). Motor-Free Visual Perception Test-4 (MVPT-4). Academic Therapy Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Compton, D. L., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Bryant, J. D. (2006). Selecting at-risk readers in first grade for early intervention: A two-year longitudinal study of decision rules and procedures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(2), 394. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.2.394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connor, C. M., Alberto, P. A., Compton, D. L., & O’Connor, R. E. (2014). Improving reading outcomes for students with or at risk for reading disabilities: A synthesis of the contributions from the institute of education sciences research centers. NCSER 2014-3000. National Center for Special Education Research. https://doi.org/10.1037/e606972011-004
   Google Scholar
• Cortiella, C., & Horowitz, S. H. (2014). The state of learning disabilities: Facts, trends, and emerging issues. National Center for Learning Disabilities, 25. https://www.ncld.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/2014-State-of-LD.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. C. (2017). Reconceptualizing the development of sight word reading and its relationship to recoding. In Reading acquisition. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351236904-5
   Google Scholar
• Foorman, B., Breier, J., & Fletcher, J. (2003). Interventions aimed at improving reading success: An evidence-based approach. Developmental neuropsychology, 24, 613–639. https://doi.org/10.1080/87565641.2003.9651913
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gersten, R., & Dimino, J. A. (2006). RTI (response to intervention): Rethinking special education for students with reading difficulties (yet again). Reading Research Quarterly, 41(1), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.41.1.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gori, S., & Facoetti, A. (2014). Perceptual learning as a possible new approach for remediation and prevention of developmental dyslexia. Vision Research, 99, 78–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2013.11.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258600700104
   Google Scholar
• Hammill, D. D., Pearson, N. A., & Voress, J. K. (2014). Developmental test of visual perception (3rd ed.). Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Hoover, W. A., & Tunmer, W. E. (2018). The simple view of reading: Three assessments of its adequacy. Remedial and Special Education, 39(5), 304–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518773154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, H. C. (2013). Statistical methods for psychology (8th ed.). Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. (2023). A history of the individuals with disabilities education act. https://sites.ed.gov/idea/IDEA-History#2000s-10s
   Google Scholar
• Kamhi, A. G., & Catts, H. W. (2012). Language and Reading Disabilities (3rd ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (2017). Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement-3 (KTEA-3). NCS Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Kena, G., Musu-Gillette, L., Robinson, J., Wang, X., Rathbun, A., Zhang, J., Wilkinson-Flicker, S., Barmer, A., & Velez, E. D. V. (2015). The condition of education 2015. NCES 2015- 144. National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from: https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2015/2015144.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Landerl, K., Freudenthaler, H. H., Heene, M., De Jong, P. F., Desrochers, A., Manolitsis, G., Parrila, R., & Georgiou, G. K. (2019). Phonological awareness and rapid automatized naming as longitudinal predictors of reading in five alphabetic orthographies with varying degrees of consistency. Scientific Studies of Reading, 23(3), 220–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2018.1510936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonigan, C. J., & Shanahan, T. (2009). Developing early literacy: Report of the national early literacy panel. Executive summary. A scientific synthesis of early literacy development and implications for intervention. National Institute for Literacy. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED508381.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Martin, N. A. (2017). Test of Visual Perceptual Skills-4 (TVPS-4). Academic Therapy Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Melby-Lervåg, M., Lyster, S. H., & Hulme, C. (2012). Phonological skills and their role in learning to read: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 138(2), 322. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026744
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Assessment of Educaation Progress. (2023). https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/highlights/ltt/2023/
   Google Scholar
• National Assessment of Education Progress. (2022). https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/reading/#
   Google Scholar
• National Reading Panel (U.S.), & National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U.S.). (2000). Report of the national reading panel: Teaching children to read: And evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the sub-groups. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health. https://www.nichd.nih.gov/sites/default/files/publications/pubs/nrp/Documents/report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nitz, J., Brack, F., Hertel, S., Krull, J., Stephan, H., Hennemann, T., & Hanisch, C. (2023). Multi-tiered systems of support with focus on nitzbehavioral modification in elementary schools: A systematic review. Heliyon, 9(6), e17506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17506
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pattamadilok, C., Chanoine, V., Pallier, C., Anton, J., Nazarian, B., Belin, P., & Ziegler, J. C. (2017). Automaticity of phonological and semantic processing during visual word recognition. Neuroimage: Reports, 149, 244–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.02.003
   Google Scholar
• Perea, M., Panadero, V., Moret-Tatay, C., & Gómez, P. (2012). The effects of inter-letter spacing in visual-word recognition: Evidence with young normal readers and developmental dyslexics. Learning & Instruction, 22(6), 420–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie, S. J., & Bates, T. C. (2013). Enduring links from childhood mathematics and reading achievement to adult socioeconomic status. Psychological Science, 24(7), 1301–1308. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612466268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanford, A. K., & Horner, R. H. (2013). Effects of matching instruction difficulty to reading level for students with escape-maintained problem behavior. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 15(2), 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300712449868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarborough, H. S., Neuman, S., & Dickinson, D. (2009). Connecting early language and literacy to later reading (dis) abilities: Evidence, theory, and practice. Approaching Difficulties in Literacy Development: Assessment, Pedagogy, and Programmes, 23, 39. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118092668.ch2
   Google Scholar
• Schneck, M. (2018). A frame of reference for visual perception. In P. Kramer (Ed.), Frames of reference for pediatric occupational therapy (3rd ed. pp. 348–389). Lippincott Williams & Wlikins.
   Google Scholar
• Schneps, M. H., Thomson, J. M., Sonnert, G., Pomplun, M., Chen, C., & Heffner-Wong, A. (2013). Shorter lines facilitate reading in those who struggle. PLOS ONE, 8(8), e71161. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrank, F. A., Mather, N., & McGrew, K. S. (2014). Woodcock-Johnson IV tests of achievement. Riverside.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, C. E. (2018). Simple and not-so-simple views of reading. Remedial and Special Education, 39(5), 313–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518770288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snowling, M. J. (1995). Phonological processing and developmental dyslexia. Journal of Research in Reading, 18(2), 132–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.1995.tb00079.x
   Google Scholar
• Stoiber, K. C., & Gettinger, M. (2016). Multi-tiered systems of support and evidence-based practices. In S. R. Jimerson (Ed.), Handbook of response to intervention (pp. 121–141). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7568-3
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. Institute of Education Sciences, National center for education statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2022 reading Assessment. https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/reading/#
   Google Scholar
• Villarreal, V. (2015). Review of the woodcock-Johnson IV tests of achievement. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 33(4), 391–398. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282915569447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, Y., McBride Chang, C., & Wong, N. (2014). What is the role of visual skills in learning to read? Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 776–777. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00776
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar