Do You Hear What I See? Assessing Accessibility of Digital Commons and CONTENTdm

REFERENCES

• Ahmed, F., Borodin, Y., Puzis, Y., & Ramakrishnan, I.V. (2012). Why read if you can skim: Towards enabling faster screen reading. Proceedings of the International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (pp. 39:139:10). New York, NY: ACM. doi: 10.1145/2207016.2207052
   Google Scholar
• ARIA Landmarks. ( n.d.). In Accessibility handbook. Raleigh, NC: NC State University. Retrieved from . http://accessibility.oit.ncsu.edu/training/accessibility-handbook/aria-landmarks.html
   Google Scholar
• Berkeley Electronic Press (bepress). (2011). Voluntary product accessibility template (VPAT). Digital Commons Reference Material and User Guides. Paper 21. Retrieved from . http://digitalcommons.bepress.com/reference/21
   Google Scholar
• Bigham, J.P., Cavender, A.C., Brudvik, J.T., Wobbrock, J.O., & Lander, R.E. (2007). WebinSitu: A comparative analysis of blind and sighted browsing behavior. Proceedings of the 9th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (pp. 51–58). New York, NY: ACM. doi: 10.1145/1296843.1296854
   Google Scholar
• Byerley, S.L., Chambers, M., & Thohira, M. (2007). Accessibility of web-based library databases: The vendors' perspectives in 2007. Library Hi Tech, 25(4), 509–527. doi: 10.1108/07378830710840473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervone, H.F. (2013). Selected practices and tools for better accessibility in digital library projects. OCLC Systems & Services: International Digital Library Perspectives, 29(3), 130–133. doi: 10.1108/OCLC-05-2013-0015
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, G. (1990). Cognitive load theory as an aid for instructional design. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 6(2), 108–113. Retrieved from http://ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet6/cooper.html
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, C. (2009). Providing online access to oral histories: A case study. OCLC Systems & Services. International Digital Library Perspectives, 25(3), 175–185. doi: 10.1108/10650750910982566
   Google Scholar
• Davies, J.E. (2009). An overview of international research into the library and information needs of visually impaired people. Library Trends, 55(4), 785–795. doi: 10.1353/lib.2007.0039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickson, M. (2008). CONTENTdm digital collection management software and end-user efficacy. Journal of Web Librarianship, 2(2–3), 339–379. doi: 10.1080/19322900802190852
   Google Scholar
• Disability Services for Students–University of Montana. ( n.d.).. http://www.umt.edu/dss/
   Google Scholar
• Fulton, C. (2011). Web accessibility, libraries, and the law. Information Technology & Libraries, 30(1), 34–43. doi: 10.6017/ital.v30i1.3043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, D.F., & Niska, M. (2013, June). Why digital accessibility matters to the legal profession—A conversation with a young blind attorney. Law Practice Today. Retrieved from http://www.americanbar.org/content/newsletter/publications/law_practice_today_home/lpt-archives/june13/why-digital-accessibility-matters-to-the-legal-profession.html
   Google Scholar
• Hill, H. (2013). Disability and accessibility in the library and information science literature: A content analysis. Library & Information Science Research, 35(2), 137–142. doi: 10.1016/j.lisr.2012.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahl, C.M., & Williams, S.C. (2006). Accessing digital libraries: A study of ARL members' digital projects. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 32(4), 364–369. doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2006.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer, E. F. (2005). IUPUI image collection: A usability survey. OCLC Systems & Services: International digital library perspectives, 21(4), 346–359. doi: 10.1108/10650750510631712
   Google Scholar
• Lazar, J., Allen, A., Kleinman, J., & Malarkey, C. (2007). What frustrates screen reader users on the web: A study of 100 blind users. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 22(3), 247–269. doi: 10.1080/10447310709336964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OCLC. (2011, September 15). Voluntary Product Accessibility Template (Version 6.1). Dublin, OH: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Providenti, M., & Zai, R. (2007). Web accessibility at academic libraries: Standards, legislation, and enforcement. Library Hi Tech, 25(4), 494–508. doi: 10.1108/07378830710840455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley, C. A. (2002). Libraries, aggregator databases, screen readers and clients with disabilities. Library Hi Tech, 20(2), 179–187. doi: 10.1108/07378830210432543
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, A. (2004). The Accessibility of Digital Image Collections ( unpublished master's thesis). University College London, London.
   Google Scholar
• Ryerson University. (2014). Creating an accessible Microsoft Excel spreadsheet. Accessibility Tools & Resources. Retrieved from http://www.ryerson.ca/accessibility/tools/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Schmetzke, A., & Comeaux, D. (2009). Accessibility trends among academic library and library school web sites in the USA and Canada. Journal of Access Services, 6(1–2), 137–152. doi: 10.1080/15367960802286286
   Google Scholar
• Someren, M.W. van, Barnard, Y.F., & Sandberg, J. (1994). The think aloud method: A practical guide to modelling cognitive processes. London; San Diego: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Southwell, K.L., & Slater, J. (2012). Accessibility of digital special collections using screen readers. Library Hi Tech, 30(3), 457–471. doi: 10.1108/07378831211266609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stasio, F., & Campbell, N. (2013, November 1). First deaf-blind student at Harvard law pursues dreams. The State of Things. Chapel Hill, NC: WUNC. Retrieved from http://wunc.org/post/first-deaf-blind-student-harvard-law-pursues-dreams
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, R., Schmetzke, A., & Narenda, V. (2005). Accessibility and usability of online library databases. Library Hi Tech, 23(2), 265–286. doi: 10.1108/07378830510605205
   Google Scholar
• Tatomir, J., & Durrance, J.C. (2010). Overcoming the information gap: Measuring the accessibility of library databases to adaptive technology users. Library Hi Tech, 28(4), 577–594. doi: 10.1108/07378831011096240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatomir, J., & Tatomir, J.C. (2012). Collection accessibility: A best practices guide for libraries and Librarians (Chap. 5). Library Technology Reports, 48(7), 36–42.
   Google Scholar
• Theofanos, M.F., & Redish, J. (2006). Guidelines for accessible—and usable—web sites: Observing users who work with screenreaders. Interactions, 10(6), 38–51. Expanded “Authors' version” retrieved from . www.redish.net/images/stories/PDF/InteractionsPaperAuthorsVer.pdf
   Google Scholar
• UM/OCR (2014). UM/OCR Resolution Agreement, OCR Reference No. 10122118. Retrieved from http://www.umt.edu/accessibility/implementation/default.php
   Google Scholar
• Valentino, M., & Shults, B. (2012). Creating a digital library of three-dimensional objects in CONTENTdm. OCLC Systems & Services: International Digital Library Perspectives, 28(4), 208–220. doi: 10.1108/10650751211279148
   Google Scholar
• Vigo, M., & Harper, S. (2013). Challenging information foraging theory: Screen reader users are not always driven by information scent. Proceedings of the 24th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media (pp. 60–68). New York, NY: ACM. doi: 10.1145/2481492.2481499
   Google Scholar
• World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). (2008). Web content accessibility guidelines (WCAG) 2.0. Retrieved from http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/#guidelines
   Google Scholar
• Xie, I., Babu, R., Jeong, W., Joo, S., & Fuller, P. (2014). Blind users searching digital libraries: Types of help-seeking situations at the cognitive level. iSchools. doi: 10.9776/14272
   Google Scholar