Let the right ones in: Supporting patrons as content creators with LibGuides and LibGuides CMS

References

• Adebonojo, L. G. (2010). LibGuides: Customizing subject guides for individual courses. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 17(4), 398–412. doi:10.1080/10691316.2010.525426
   Google Scholar
• Adebonojo, L. G., & Campbell, K. (2017). LibGuides to the rescue: The cure for the same old boring papers. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 24(1), 51–64. doi:10.1080/10691316.2015.1070703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, R. L. (2014). Designing LibGuides as instructional tools for critical thinking and effective online learning. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 8(3/4), 107–117. doi:10.1080/1533290X.2014.944423
   Google Scholar
• Barton, M., & Cummings, R. E. (2008). Wiki writing: Collaborative learning in the college classroom. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. doi:10.3998/dcbooks.5871848.0001.001
   Google Scholar
• Becker, S. A., Brown, M., Dahlstrom, E., Davis, A., DePaul, K., Diaz, V., & Pomerantz, J. (2018). NMC Horizon Report: 2018 Higher Education EditionLouisville, CO. EDUCAUSE. Retrieved from https://library.educause.edu/resources/2018/8/2018-nmc-horizon-report
   Google Scholar
• Betts, K., & Wilson, A. (2012, January). Using high touch pedagogy, authentic assessment & student generated content to increase student engagement in online education. Paper presented at the SoTL Commons Conference, Savannah, GA. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/sotlcommons/SoTL/2012/21/
   Google Scholar
• Bielat, V., Befus, R., & Arnold, J. (2013). Integrating LibGuides into the teaching-learning process. In A. W. Dobbs, R. L. Sittler, & D. Cook (Eds.), Using LibGuides to enhance library services: A LITA guide (pp. 121–142). Chicago, IL: American Library Association.
   Google Scholar
• Carver, B. W., Davis, R., Kelley, R. T., Obar, J. A., & Davis, L. L. (2012). Assigning students to edit Wikipedia: Four case studies. E-Learning and Digital Media, 9(3), 273–283. doi:10.2304/elea.2012.9.3.273
   Google Scholar
• Caverly, D. C., Nicholson, S. A., Battle, J., & Atkins, C. E. (2008). Techtalk: Web 2.0, blogs, and developmental education. Journal of Developmental Education, 32(1), 34–35. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/42775654
   Google Scholar
• Crane, B. E. (2012). Using web 2.0 and social networking tools in the K-12 classroom. Chicago, IL: Neal-Schuman.
   Google Scholar
• Dale, C., & Povey, G. (2009). An evaluation of learner-generated content and podcasting. The Journal of Hospitality Leisure Sport and Tourism, 8(1), 117–123. doi:10.3794/johlste.81.214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowling, S. (2013). Using blogs to share learner-generated content. TESL-EJ, 17(2), 1–22. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1017787
   Google Scholar
• Framework for information literacy for higher education (2015). Chicago, IL: Association of College & Research Libraries. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/issues/infolit/Framework_ILHE.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Holton, G. (1978). The scientific imagination: Case studies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press:.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, X., Cheong, C., & Chu, S. (2018). Developing a multidimensional framework for analyzing student comments in wikis. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(4), 26–38. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/26511535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. L., Plattner, A. S., & Hundley, L. (2018). Designing a collaborative blog about student success. Honors in Practice, 14, 119–128. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nchchip/277/
   Google Scholar
• Kruus, H., Ellervee, R., Robal, T., Ruberg, P., & Kruus, M. (2013, May). Involving students in teaching process – Encouraging student-generated content in ICT studies. 2013 24th EAEEIE Annual Conference (EAEEIE 2013). Chania, Greece. doi:10.1109/EAEEIE.2013.6576506
   Google Scholar
• Ktoridou, D., & Doukanari, E. (2015, November). Student generated content in higher education technology-related blogs. 2015 International Conference on Interactive Mobile Communication Technologies and Learning (IMCL), Thessaloniki, Greece. doi:10.1109/IMCTL.2015.7359605
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. Y., & Lowe, M. S. (2018). Building positive learning experiences through pedagogical research guide design. Journal of Web Librarianship, 1–27. doi:10.1080/19322909.2018.1499453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewontin, M. (2016, February). Term papers? These science students write Wikipedia pages instead. Christian Science Monitor. Retrieved from https://www.csmonitor.com/Technology/2016/0216/Term-papers-These-science-students-write-Wikipedia-pages-instead
   Google Scholar
• Mallon, M. N. (2012). The new distance learners: Providing customized online research assistance to urban students on the go. Urban Library Journal, 18(1), 4. Retrieved from https://academicworks.cuny.edu/ulj/vol18/iss1/4 doi:10.31641/ulj180104
   Google Scholar
• Mathany, C., & Dodd, J. (2018). Student-Generated Interview Podcasts: An Assignment Template. Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching, 11, 65–75. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1182853 doi:10.22329/celt.v11i0.4971
   Google Scholar
• Mortimore, J. M., & Baker, R. L. (2018). Supporting student-led content creation in the distance learning environment with LibGuides CMS. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 1–16. doi:10.1080/1533290X.2018.1499239
   Google Scholar
• Murray, D., McGill, T., Thompson, N., & Toohey, D. (2017). Can learners become teachers? Evaluating the merits of student generated content and peer assessment. Issues in Informing Science & Information Technology, 14, 21–33. doi:10.28945/3698
   Google Scholar
• Narayan, V., Davis, C., & Gee, R. (2012). Augmented learning – Spreading your wings beyond the classroom. Research in Learning Technology, 4–15. doi:10.3402/rlt.v20i0.19200
   Google Scholar
• Orús, C., Barlés, M. J., Belanche, D., Casaló, L., Fraj, E., & Gurrea, R. (2016). The effects of learner-generated videos for YouTube on learning outcomes and satisfaction. Computers & Education, 95, 254–269. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, W. (2006). Blogs, wikis, podcasts, and other powerful web tools for classrooms. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scull, A. (2014). Fostering student engagement and collaboration with the library: Student creation of LibGuides as a research assignment. The Reference Librarian, 55(4), 318–327. doi:10.1080/02763877.2014.929076
   Google Scholar
• Scull, A. (2016). Where collections and metaliteracy meet: Incorporating library-owned platforms into open and collaborative library instruction. In T. E. Jacobson & T. P. Mackey (Eds.), Metaliteracy in Practice (pp. 73–89). Chicago, IL: American Library Association.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, S. M., Lowe, S. M., & Maxson, B. K. (2018). Does course guide design impact student learning? College & Undergraduate Libraries, 25(3), 280–296. doi:10.1080/10691316.2018.1482808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldron, J. (2013). User-generated content, YouTube and participatory culture on the Web: Music learning and teaching in two contrasting online communities. Music Education Research, 15(3), 257–274. doi:10.1080/14613808.2013.772131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallis, S., & Battista, A. (2016). The politics of information: Students as creators in a metaliteracy context. InT. E. Jacobson & T. P. Mackey (Eds.), Metaliteracy in Practice (pp. 23–45). Chicago, IL. American Library Association.
   Google Scholar
• Woodthorpe, J., Shaw, J., Hauck, M., & Beaven, T. (2009). What’s in it for me? The stick and the carrot as tools for developing academic communities. Journal of Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, 7(5), 22–24. Retrieved from http://www.iiisci.org/journal/CV$/sci/pdfs/XE605HV.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Yang, X., Guo, X., & Yu, S. (2016). Student‐generated content in college teaching: Content quality, behavioural pattern and learning performance. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(1), 1–15. doi:10.1111/jcal.12111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar