Evaluating the impact of professional development: the need for a student-focused approach

References

• Barber, M. and Mourshed, M., 2007. How the world’s best-performing school systems come out on top. London: McKinsey and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Bubb, S., 2009a. Engaging teachers in action research. In: P. Earley and V. Porritt, eds. Effective practices in continuing professional development: lessons from schools. London: Institute of Education and TDA, Bedford Way series, 36–47.
   Google Scholar
• Bubb, S., 2009b. Coaching in a special school. In: P. Earley and V. Porritt, eds. Effective practices in continuing professional development: lessons from schools. London: Institute of Education and TDA, Bedford Way series, 80–90.
   Google Scholar
• Bubb, S., 2013. Developing from within: towards a new model of staff development. Professional development today, 15 (1), 13–19.
   Google Scholar
• Bubb, S. and Earley, P., 2007. Leading and managing continuing professional development. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bubb, S. and Earley, P., 2010. Helping staff develop in schools. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bubb, S., Earley, P. and Hempel-Jorgensen, A., 2009. Staff development outcomes study. London: Institute of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, D. and Hollingsworth, H., 2002. Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and teacher education, 18 (8), 947–967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coldwell, M. and Simkins, T., 2011. Level models of continuing professional development evaluation: a grounded review and critique. Professional development in education, 37 (1), 143–157.
   Google Scholar
• Cordingley, P., et al., 2004. What do teacher impact data tell us about collaborative CPD? [online]. London: EPPI (The Centre for Evidence-Informed Policy and Practice in Education) at the London University Institute of Education). Available from: http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/ [Accessed 30 May 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Cordingley, P., et al., 2005. How do specialist inputs in CPD affect teachers, their learning and their pupils’ learning?. London: Centre for Evidence-Informed Policy and Practice in Education (EPPI).
   Google Scholar
• Cordingley, P., et al., 2006a. How do collaborative and sustained CPD and sustained but not collaborative CPD affect teaching and learning?. London: EPPI.
   Google Scholar
• Cordingley, P., et al., 2006b. How does collaborative CPD for teachers of the 5–16 age range affect teaching and learning?. London: EPPI.
   Google Scholar
• DfE (Department for Education), 2010. The importance of teaching. Norwich: TSO.
   Google Scholar
• Earley, P., 2010. ‘State of the nation’: a discussion of some of the project’s key findings. The curriculum journal, 21 (4), 473–483.
   Google Scholar
• Earley, P. and Porritt, V., eds., 2009. Effective practices in continuing professional development: lessons from schools. London: Institute of Education and TDA, Bedford Way series.
   Google Scholar
• Eun, B., 2011. A Vygotskian theory-based professional development: implications for culturally diverse classrooms. Professional development in education, 37 (3), 319–333.
   Google Scholar
• Fielding, M., et al., 2005. Factors influencing the transfer of good practice (RR615). London: DfES Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Frost, D. and Durrant, J., 2003. Teacher-led development work. London: David Fulton.
   Google Scholar
• Goodall, J., et al. 2005. Evaluating the impact of continuing professional development [online]. Nottingham: DCSF. Available from: http://dcsf.gov.uk/rsgateway.
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, T., 2000. Evaluating professional development. New York: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, T., 2002. Does it make a difference? Evaluating professional development. Educational leadership, 59 (6), 45–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, D., 2012. A self-improving school system: towards maturity. Nottingham: NCSL.
   Google Scholar
• Hobby, R. 2012. If we know how to make CPD more effective, why isn’t it happening? [online]. Teacher Development Trust Blog, 23 July. Available from: http://www.teacherdevelopmenttrust.org/if-we-know-how-to-make-cpd-more-effective-why-isnt-it-happening/ [Accessed 10 August 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Illingworth, S., 2009. Developing coaching as an effective method of CPD. In: P. Earley and V. Porritt, eds. Effective practices in continuing professional development: lessons from schools. London: Institute of Education and TDA, Bedford Way series, 69–79.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick, D., 1959. The Kirkpatrick model for training evaluation. The journal of the American society of training directors, 3, August.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, S., 2009. DIY CPD – A system for professional learning for all staff. In: P. Earley and V. Porritt, eds. Effective practices in continuing professional development: lessons from schools. London: Institute of Education and TDA, Bedford Way series, 112–121.
   Google Scholar
• Mulholland, M., 2009. Motivating with maths. In: P. Earley and V. Porritt, eds. Effective practices in continuing professional development: lessons from schools. London: Institute of Education and TDA, Bedford Way series, 91–100.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, J., 2011. The potential of continuing professional development. In: C. Chapman, et al., eds. School effectiveness and improvement research: policy and practice. London: Routledge, 106–111.
   Google Scholar
• Ofsted, 2006. The logical chain. London: Ofsted.
   Google Scholar
• Ofsted,, 2010. Good professional development in schools. London: Ofsted.
   Google Scholar
• Ofsted, 2012. School inspection handbook. London: Ofsted.
   Google Scholar
• Opfer, D., et al., 2010. Benefits, status and effectiveness of CPD for teachers in England. Paper presented to BERA conference, University of Warwick, September.
   Google Scholar
• Pedder, D., et al., 2010. Planning and organization of CPD for teachers in England. Paper presented to BERA conference, University of Warwick, September.
   Google Scholar
• Porritt, V., 2005. London’s learning: developing the leadership of CPD. London: Department for Education and Skills.
   Google Scholar
• Porritt, V., 2009a. Evaluating the impact of professional development. Education journal, (116), 9–10.
   Google Scholar
• Porritt, V., 2009b. Using coaching to improve teaching and learning and to develop leadership capacity. In: P. Earley and V. Porritt, eds. Effective practices in continuing professional development: lessons from schools. London: Institute of Education and TDA, Bedford Way series, 60–68.
   Google Scholar
• Porritt, V., Episcopo, K. and Wybron, S., 2006. London’s learning: developing the leadership of CPD in London schools. Professional development today, 9 (1), 7–11.
   Google Scholar
• Stoll, L., Harris, A. and Handscomb, G., 2012. Great professional development which leads to great pedagogy: nine claims from research. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, M. and Wiliam, D., 2008. Tight but loose: a conceptual framework for scaling up school reforms. In: E. Wylie, ed. Tight but loose: scaling up teacher professional development in diverse contexts. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service, 1–44.
   Google Scholar
• Timperley, H., 2011. Realizing the power of professional learning. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Training and Development Agency for Schools, 2007. Impact evaluation of CPD [online]. Available from: http://www.tda.gov.uk/upload/resources/pdf/i/impact_evaluation.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Training and Development Agency for Schools, 2008. Continuing professional development guidance (CPD). London: TDA.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, H. and Klein, L., 2006. Pathways to workforce development to child outcomes. The evaluation exchange, XI (4), Winter, pp. 2–4. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Family Research Project, Harvard School of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D., 2007. Content then process: teacher learning communities in the service of formative assessment. In: D.B. Reeves, ed. Ahead of the curve: the power of assessment to transform teaching and learning. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree, 183–204.
   Google Scholar