1,892
Views
30
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Coaching in context: the role of relationships in the work of three literacy coaches

, &
Pages 740-757 | Received 07 Jun 2013, Accepted 16 Sep 2013, Published online: 22 Nov 2013

References

  • Anderson, J.R., Reder, L.M. and Simon, H.A., 1996. Situated learning and education. Educational researcher, 25 (4), 5–11.
  • Ashworth, D., 1999. Effects of direct instruction and basal reading instruction programs on the reading achievement of second graders. Reading improvement, 36 (4), 150–156.
  • Atteberry, A. and Bryk, A.S., 2011. Analyzing teacher participation in literacy coaching activities. The elementary school journal, 112 (2), 356–382.
  • Bandura, A. and McClelland, D.C., 1977. Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Biancarosa, G., Bryk, A.S. and Dexter, E.R., 2010. Assessing the value-added effects of literacy collaborative professional development on student learning. The elementary school journal, 111 (1), 7–34.
  • Bredeson, P., 2003. Designs for learning: a new architecture for professional development in schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  • Camburn, E.M., Kimball, S.M. and Lowenhaupt, R., 2008. Going to scale with teacher leadership: lessons learned from a districtwide literacy coach initiative. In: M.M. Mangin and S.R. Stoelinga, eds. Effective teacher leadership: using research to inform and reform. New York, NY: Teachers College Press, 120–143.
  • Camburn, E., Rowan, B. and Taylor, J., 2003. Distributed leadership roles in schools: the case of elementary schools adopting comprehensive school reform models. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 25 (4), 347–373.
  • Coburn, C.E. and Woulfin, S.L., 2012. Reading coaches and the relationship between policy and practice. Reading research quarterly, 47 (1), 5–30.
  • Elish-Piper, L. and L’Allier, S.K., 2010. Exploring the relationship between literacy coaching and student reading achievement in grades K–1. Literacy research and instruction, 49 (2), 162–174.
  • Elish-Piper, L. and L’Allier, S.K., 2011. Examining the relationship between literacy coaching and student reading gains in grades K–3. The elementary school journal, 112 (1), 83–106.
  • Emerson, R.M., Fretz, R.I. and Shaw, L.L., 1995. Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Firestone, W.A., 1985. The study of loose coupling: problems, progress, and prospects. In: A. Kerckhoff, ed. Research in sociology of education and socialization. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 3–30.
  • Guskey, T., 1995. Professional development in education: in search of the optimal mix. In: T.R. Guskey and M. Huberman, eds. Professional development in education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press, 114–132.
  • Guskey, T.R., 2000. Evaluating professional development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  • Hall, B., 2004. Literacy coaches: an evolving role. Carnegie reporter, 3 (1). Available from http://www.carnegie.org/reporter/09/literacy/ [Accessed 4 May 2009].
  • Hargreaves, A., 1995. Development and desire: a postmodern perspective. In: T.R. Guskey and M. Huberman, eds. Professional development in education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press, 9–34.
  • Hill, H.C. and Grossman, P., 2013. Learning from teacher observations: challenges and opportunities posed by new teacher evaluation systems. Harvard educational review, 83 (2), 371–384.
  • Hopkins, M., et al., 2013. Infrastructure redesign and instructional reform in mathematics: formal structure and teacher leadership. The elementary school journal.
  • International Reading Association, 2004a. The role and qualifications of the reading coach in the United States. Newark, DE: Author.
  • International Reading Association, 2004b. Standards for reading professionals – revised 2003. Newark, DE: Author.
  • Kennedy, A., 2005. Models of continuing professional development: a framework for analysis. Journal of in-service education, 31 (2), 235–250.
  • Lynch, J. and Ferguson, K., 2010. Reflections of elementary school literacy coaches on practice: roles and perspectives. Canadian journal of education, 33 (1), 199–227.
  • Mangin, M.M., 2009. Literacy coach role implementation: how district context influences reform efforts. Educational administration quarterly, 45 (5), 759–792.
  • Maxwell, J.A., 1998. Designing a qualitative study. In: L. Bickman and D.J. Rog, eds. Handbook of applied social research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 69–100.
  • Mehta, J., 2013. How paradigms create politics: the transformation of American educational policy, 1980–2001. American educational research journal, 50 (2), 285–324.
  • Miles, M.B. and Huberman, A.M., 1994. Qualitative data analysis. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Neufeld, B., 2002. Using what we know: implications for scaling-up implementation of the CCL model [online]. Cambridge, MA: Education Matters. Available from: http://www.bpe.org/files/Using%20What%20we%20Know%20-%20Implications%20for%20Scaling%20Up%20CCL%201-31-02.pdf [Accessed 6 June 2013].
  • Neuman, S.B. and Cunningham, L., 2009. The impact of professional development and coaching on early language and literacy instructional practices. American educational research journal, 46 (2), 532–566.
  • Neumerski, C.M., 2012. Rethinking instructional leadership, a review: what do we know about principal, teacher, and coach instructional leadership, and where should we go from here? Educational administration quarterly, 49 (2), 310–347.
  • Oborn, E., Barrett, M. and Dawson, S., 2013. Distributed leadership in policy formulation: a sociomaterial perspective. Organization studies, 34 (2), 253–276.
  • Rainville, K.N. and Jones, S., 2008. Situated identities: power and positioning in the work of a literacy coach. The reading teacher, 61 (6), 440–448.
  • Richard, A., 2003. Making our own road: the emergence of school-based staff developers in America’s public schools [online]. New York: Edna McConnell Clark Foundation. Available from: http://www.ecs.org/html/Document.asp?chouseid=4741 [Accessed 24 April 2006].
  • Rueda, R. and Moll, L., 1994. A sociocultural perspective on motivation. In: H. O’Neil and M. Drillings, eds. Motivation: theory and research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 117–137.
  • Russo, A., 2004. School-based coaching: a revolution in professional development – or just the latest fad? [online]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Letter. Available from http://www.edletter.org/past/issues/2004-ja/coaching.shtml [Accessed 9 February 2006].
  • Scott, L.S., 1999. The Accelerated Reader program, reading achievement, and attitudes of students with learning disabilities. Thesis (MA). Georgia State University.
  • Scott, S.E., Cortina, K.S. and Carlisle, J.F., 2012. Understanding coach-based professional development in reading first: how do coaches spend their time and how do teachers perceive coaches’ work? Literacy research and instruction, 51 (1), 68–85.
  • Showers, B. and Joyce, B., 1996. The evolution of peer coaching. Educational leadership, 53 (6), 12–16.
  • Showers, B., Joyce, B. and Bennett, B., 1987. Synthesis of research on staff development: a framework for future study and a state-of-the-art analysis. Educational leadership, 45 (3), 77–87.
  • Smith, A. and Bothell, W.A., 2012. Middle grades literacy coaching from the coach’s perspective. Research in middle level education, 35 (5), 1–16.
  • Smylie, M., 1995. Teacher learning in the workplace: implications for school reform. In: T.R. Guskey and M. Huberman, eds. Professional development in education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press, 92–113.
  • Snow, C., Ippolito, J., and Schwartz, R., 2006. What we know and what we need to know about literacy coaches in middle and high schools: a research synthesis and proposal research agenda. In: International Reading Association, ed. Standards for middle and high school literacy coaches. Newark, DE: Author, 35–52.
  • Spillane, J., Halverson, R. and Diamond, J., 2001. Investigating school leadership practice; a distributed perspective. Educational researcher, 30 (3), 23–28.
  • Spillane, J.P., Parise, L.M. and Sherer, J.Z., 2011. Organizational routines as coupling mechanisms: policy, school administration, and the technical core. American educational research journal, 48 (3), 586–619.
  • Stephens, D., et al., 2011. The impact of literacy coaches on teachers’ beliefs and practices. Journal of literacy research: a publication of the Literacy Research Association, 43 (3), 215–249.
  • Swartz, S., 2003. The foundation for comprehensive early literacy learning [online]. Available from: http://www.cell-exll.com/foundationresearchreport1.htm [Accessed 26 April 2006].
  • Vanderburg, M. and Stephens, D., 2010. The impact of literacy coaches: what teachers value and how teachers change. The elementary school journal, 111 (1), 141–163.
  • Walpole, S. and Blamey, K.L., 2008. Elementary literacy coaches: the reality of dual roles. The reading teacher, 62 (3), 222–231.
  • Weick, K., 1976. Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative science quarterly, 21 (1), 1–19.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.