187
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Repertoire networks among national board-certified physical education teachers

&
Pages 436-451 | Received 31 Oct 2013, Accepted 02 May 2014, Published online: 20 Jun 2014

References

  • Allinder, R.M., 1994. The relationship between efficacy and the instructional practices of special education teachers and consultants. Teacher education and special education, 17 (2), 86–95.10.1177/088840649401700203
  • Andrus, C., 2005. The wiki and the blog: toward a complex adaptive intelligence community. Studies in intelligence, 49 (3), 63–70.
  • Block, B.A. and Estes, S., 2011. Supercomplexity in higher education kinesiology. Quest, 63 (2), 179–196.10.1080/00336297.2011.10483675
  • Cantrell, S., et al., 2008. National board certification and teacher effectiveness: evidence from a random assignment experiment [online]. Technical Report: National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. Available from: http://www.nber.org/papers/w14608 [Accessed 10 June 2014].10.3386/w14608
  • Carnegie Task Force on Teaching as a Profession, 1986. A nation prepared: teachers for the 21st century. New York: Carnegie Foundation.
  • Chow, J., et al., 2007. The role of nonlinear pedagogy in physical education. Review of educational research., 77 (3), 251–278.10.3102/003465430305615
  • Coskie, T.L. and Place, N.A., 2008. The national board certification process as professional development: the potential for changed literacy practice. Teaching and teacher education, 24 (7), 1893–1906.10.1016/j.tate.2008.02.005
  • Davis, B. and Simmt, E., 2003. Understanding learning systems: mathematics education and complexity science. Journal for research in mathematics education, 34 (2), 137–167.10.2307/30034903
  • Freund, M., Russell, V.K., and Kavulic, C., 2005. A study of the role of mentoring in achieving certification by the national board for professional teaching standards. Arlington, VA: NBPTS.
  • Hakel, M.D., Koenig, J., and Elliott, S.W., 2008. Assessing accomplished teaching: advanced-level certification programs. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
  • Hayek, F., 1964. The theory of complex phenomena. In: M. Bunge, ed. The critical approach to science and philosophy. London: Collier Macmillan, 332–349.
  • Hayek, F., 1989. The pretense of knowledge. The American economic review, 79 (6), 3–7.
  • Henderson, M. and Bradley, S., 2008. Shaping online teaching practices: the influence of professional and academic identities. Campus-wide information systems, 25 (2), 85–92.10.1108/10650740810866585
  • Juarrero, A., 1999. Dynamics in action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Kelso, J.A., 1984. Phase transitions and critical behavior in human bimanual coordination. American journal of physiology – regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology, 246 (6), 1000–1004.
  • Lave, J. and Wenger, E., 1991. Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511815355
  • Lincoln, Y.S. and Guba, E.G., 1985. Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Mason, M., 2008. What is complexity theory and what are its implications for educational change? Educational philosophy and theory, 40 (1), 35–49.10.1111/j.1469-5812.2007.00413.x
  • McMurtry, A., 2008. Complexity theory 101 for educators: a fictional account of a graduate seminar. McGill journal of education, 43 (3), 265–281.10.7202/029699ar
  • Mehta, J., 2013. The penetration of technocratic logic into the educational field: rationalizing schooling from the progressives to the present. The college record, 115 (5), 1–36.
  • Midgley, C., Feldlaufer, H., and Eccles, J.S., 1989. Student/teacher relations and attitudes toward mathematics before and after the transition to junior high school. Child development, 60 (4), 981–992.10.2307/1131038
  • Morrison, K., 2008. Educational philosophy and the challenge of complexity theory. Education philosophy and theory, 40 (1), 19–34.10.1111/j.1469-5812.2007.00394.x
  • National Board for Professional Teaching Standards, 2008. National board certification process [online]. Available from: http://www.nbpts.org/for_candidates [Accessed 2 January 2008].
  • National Commission on Excellence in Education, 1983. A nation at risk: the imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.
  • Newell, K.M., Liu, Y.T., and Mayer-Kress, G., 2003. A dynamical systems interpretation of epigenetic landscapes for infant motor development. Infant behavior and development, 26 (4), 449–472.10.1016/j.infbeh.2003.08.003
  • Ovens, A., Hopper, T., and Butler, J., eds., 2013. Complexity thinking in physical education: reframing curriculum, pedagogy, and research. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Palincsar, A.S., et al., 1998. Designing a community of practice: principles and practices of the GIsML community. Teaching and teacher education, 14 (1), 5–19.10.1016/S0742-051X(97)00057-7
  • Patton, M., 2002. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • People Pulse, 2012. Organizational communications survey [online]. Available from: http://www.peoplepulse.com.au/Organisational-Communication-Survey.pdf [Accessed 27 June 2012].
  • Renshaw, I., et al., 2010. A constraints-led perspective to understanding skill acquisition and game play: a basis for integration of motor learning theory and physical education praxis. Physical education and sport pedagogy, 15 (2), 117–137.
  • Rhoades, J.L. and Woods, A.M., 2013. Self-organized communities of practice in physical education. Quest, 65 (1), 44–56.
  • Rogers, J., 2000. Communities of practice: a framework for fostering coherence in virtual learning communities. Educational technology & society, 3 (3), 384–392.
  • Ross, J.A., 1992. Teacher efficacy and the effects of coaching on student achievement. Canadian journal of education/revue canadienne de l’education, 17, 51–65.10.2307/1495395
  • Stewart, M., 2001. The coevolving organization [online]. Rutland, UK: Decomplexity Associates. Available from: http://www.decomplexity.com/Coevolving%20Organization%20US.pdf [Accessed 10 June 2014].
  • Wenger, E., 1998. Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511803932
  • Wenger, E., 2010. Communities of practice and social learning systems: the career of a concept. In: C. Blackmore, ed. Social learning systems and communities of practice. London: Springer, 179–198.
  • Wenger, E., 2012. Communities of practice [online]. Available from: http://www.ewenger.com/theory/index.htm [Accessed 2 January 2012].
  • Woods, A.M. and Rhoades, J.L. 2010. National board certified physical educators: background characteristics, subjective warrants, and motivations. Journal of teaching in physical education, 29 (3), 312–331.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.