References
- Braun, V. and Clarke, V., 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3 (2), 77–101.10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
- Corcoran, T., Mosher, F.A., and Rogat, A., 2009. Learning progressions in science: an evidence-based approach to reform. Consortium for policy research in education research report #RR-63. New York: Center on Continuous Instructional Improvement, Teachers College-Columbia University.
- Frohbieter, G., et al., 2011. Knowing and doing: what teachers learn from formative assessment and how they use information. CRESST report 802. Los Angeles, CA: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, & Student Testing.
- Furtak, E.M., 2011. “Flying blind”: an exploration of beginning science teachers’ enactment of formative assessment practices. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American educational research association, April, New Orleans, LA.
- Heritage, M., et al., 2009. From evidence to action: a seamless process in formative assessment? Educational measurement: issues and practice, 28 (3), 24–31.10.1111/j.1745-3992.2009.00151.x
- Olah, L.N., Lawrence, N.R., and Riggan, M., 2010. Learning to learn from benchmark assessment data: how teachers analyze results. Peabody journal of education, 85 (2), 226–245.10.1080/01619561003688688
- Shepard, L.A., Davidson, K.L., and Bowman, R., 2011. How middle school mathematics teachers use interim and benchmark assessment data. CRESST report 807. Los Angeles, CA: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, & Student Testing.