The inequitable influence that varying accountability contexts in the United States have on teacher professional development

References

• Abbott, S.E., 2014. High-stakes test. In: The glossary of educational reform [online]. 18 September. Available from: http://edglossary.org/high-stakes-testing/ [ Accessed 28 September 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Baird, J., et al., 2001. The policy effects of PISA. Oxford: Oxford University Centre for Educational Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Boardman, A.G. and Woodruff, A.L., 2004. Teacher change and “high-stakes” assessment: what happens to professional development? Teaching and teacher education, 20 (6), 545–557.10.1016/j.tate.2004.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronfenbrenner, U., 1979. The ecology of human development: experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, R.W., 2010. The journey back: a case study examining the re-enculturation of a hybrid educator. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American educational research association, Denver, CO, April.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, R.W., 2011. The transformative nature of the hybrid role. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American educational research association, New Orleans, LA, April.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J. and Strauss, A., 2008. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 3rd ed. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Crotty, M., 1998. The foundations of social research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., 2004. Standards, accountability, and school reform. Teachers college record, 106 (6), 1047–1085.10.1111/tcre.2004.106.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desimone, L.M., 2009. Improving impact studies of teachers' professional development: toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational researcher, 38 (3), 181–199.10.3102/0013189X08331140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desimone, L., et al., 2002. Effects of professional development on teachers' instruction: results from a three-year longitudinal study. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 24 (2), 81–112.10.3102/01623737024002081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond, J.B. and Spillane, J.P., 2004. High stakes accountability in urban elementary schools: challenging or reproducing inequality? Teachers college record, 106 (6), 145–1176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmore, R.F., 2002. Bridging the gap between standards and achievement. Washington, DC: Albert Shanker Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Florida Department of Education, 2013. Florida Statutes [online]. Section 1008, 22. Available from: http://www.fldoe.org/teaching/performance-evaluation/index.stml [Accessed 30 January 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M., 2006. Turnaround leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M., 2009. Positive pressure. In: A. Hargreaves, et al., eds. Second international handbook of educational change. Springer international handbooks of education vol. 23. Dordrecht: Springer, 119–130.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M.G. and Miles, M.B., 1992. Getting reform right: what works and what doesn’t. Phi delta kappan, 73 (10), 745–752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, J. and Cowan, P., 2005. The fallibility of high stakes ‘11-plus’ testing in Northern Ireland. Assessment in education: principles, policy & practice, 12 (2), 145–165.
   Google Scholar
• Gersten, R., et al., 2009. Assisting students struggling with mathematics: Response to Intervention (RtI) for elementary and middle schools (NCEE 2009-4060) [online]. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education. Avaliable from: http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/practiceguides/rti_math_pg_042109.pdf [Accessed 30 January 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Gu, Q. and Johansson, O., 2013. Sustaining school performance: school contexts matter. International journal of leadership in education: theory and practice, 16 (3), 301–326.10.1080/13603124.2012.732242
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, T.R. and Sparks, D., 2002. Linking professional development to improvements in student learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American educational research association, New Orleans, LA, April.
   Google Scholar
• Hillocks, G., 2002. The testing trap: how state writing assessments control learning. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsh, S., 2009. A new definition. Journal of staff development, 30 (4), 10–16.
   Google Scholar
• Huberman, A.M. and Miles, M.B., 1984. Innovation up close. New York, NY: Plenum.10.1007/978-1-4899-0390-7
   Google Scholar
• Kosmoski, G.J., 2006. Supervision: an American perspective. In: G.J. Kosmoski, ed. Supervision. 3rd ed. Mequon, WI: Stylex, 3–32.
   Google Scholar
• Little, J.W., 1993. Teachers’ professional development in a climate of education reform. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 15 (2), 129–151.10.3102/01623737015002129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louis, K.S. and Miles, M.B., 1990. Improving the urban high school: what works and why. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCaffrey, J.R., et al., 2003. Evaluating value added models for teacher accountability [online]. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. Available from: http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/2004/RAND_MG158.pdf [Accessed 30 January 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Miller, P., 2008. Examining the work of boundary spanner leaders in community contexts. International journal of leadership in education, 11 (4), 353–377.10.1080/13603120802317875
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, C. and Sackney, L., 2000. Profound improvement: building capacity for a learning community. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Educational Statistics, 2013. State educational reforms. Available from: http://nces.ed.gov/programs/statereform/Tab1_4.asp [ Accessed 28 September 2014].
   Google Scholar
• National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education, 2001. Standards for professional development schools. Washington, DC: Marsha Levine.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M.Q., 2002. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rinke, C. and Valli, L., 2010. Making adequate yearly progress: teacher learning in school-based accountability contexts. Teachers college record, 112 (3), 645–684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivkin, S.G., Hanushek, E.A., and Kain, J.F., 2000. Teachers, schools, and academic achievement (Working Paper W6691). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Rowan, B., Correnti, R., and Miller, R.J., 2002. What large-scale survey research tells us about teacher effects on student achievement: insights from the prospects study of elementary schools. Teachers college record, 104 (8), 1525–1567.10.1111/tcre.2002.104.issue-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutter, A., 2011. Purpose and vision in professional development schools. In: J. Neopolitan, ed. Yearbook for the national society of the study of education, 110 (2). New York, NY: Teachers College Press, Columbia University, 289–305.
   Google Scholar
• Saldana, J., 2009. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sergiovanni, T.J. and Starratt, R.J., 2007. Supervision: a redefinition. 8th ed. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Sparks, D., 2002. Designing powerful professional development for teachers and principals. Oxford, OH: National Staff Development Council.
   Google Scholar
• Stobart, G. and Eggen, T., 2012. High-stakes testing – value, fairness, and consequences. Assessment in education: principles, policy & practice, 19 (1), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Stoll, L., 2009. Capacity building for school improvement or creating capacity for learning? A changing landscape. Journal of educational change, 10 (2–3), 115–127.10.1007/s10833-009-9104-3
   Google Scholar
• Stoll, L. and Bolam, R., 2005. Developing leadership for learning communities. In: M. Coles and G. Southworth, eds. Developing leadership: creating the schools of tomorrow. Maidenhead: Open University Press, 50–64.
   Google Scholar
• The Holmes Group, 1986. Tomorrow’s teachers: a report of the Holmes Group. East Lansing, MI: The Holmes Group.
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Education, 2001. No Child Left Behind. Pub.L. 107-110, 107th Congress.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, S.P., Horn, S.P., and Sanders, W.L., 1997. Teachers and classroom context effects on student achievement: implications for teacher evaluation. Journal of personnel evaluation in education, 11 (1), 57–67.
   Google Scholar
• Yendol-Hoppey, D. and Dana, N.F., 2010. Powerful professional development: building expertise within the four walls of your school. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar