Mentoring beginning teachers in primary schools: research review

References

• Achinstein, B. and Barrett, A., 2004. (Re)framing classroom contexts: how new teachers and mentors view diverse learns and challenges of practice. Teachers College Record, 106 (4), 716–746.10.1111/tcre.2004.106.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alliance for Excellent Education. 2004. Tapping the potential: Retaining and developing high-quality new teachers. Washington, DC: Strumbos.
   Google Scholar
• Aspfors, J. and Fransson, G., 2015. Research on mentor education for mentors of newly qualified teachers: A qualitative meta-synthesis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 48, 75–86.10.1016/j.tate.2015.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Athanases, S.Z. and Achinstein, B., 2003. Focusing new teachers on individual and low performing students: The centrality of assessment in the mentor’s repertoire of practice. Teachers College Record, 105 (8), 1486–1520.10.1111/tcre.2003.105.issue-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benade, L., 2015. Teachers’ critical reflective practice in the context of the twenty-first century learning. Open Review of Educational Research, 2 (1), 42–54. doi:10.1080/23265507.2014.998159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berliner, D.C., 2000. A personal response to those who bash teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 51 (5), 358–371.10.1177/0022487100051005004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carver, C.L. and Feiman-Nemser, S., 2009. Using policy to improve teacher induction. Critical elements and missing pieces.. Education policy, 23 (2), 295–328. doi:10.1177/0895904807310036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Certo, J.L., 2005. Support, challenge, and the two-way street: Perceptions of a beginning second grade teacher and her quality mentor. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 26 (1), 3–21. doi:10.1080/10901020590918960.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, H.M., 2001. Synthesizing research: A guide for literature review. 3rd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• B.Curran, and Goldrick, L., 2002. Mentoring and supporting new teachers. Issues Brief. Washington, DC: NGA Center for Best Practices.
   Google Scholar
• Daloz, L., 1999. Mentor. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Danielson, C., 1999. Mentoring for beginning teachers: The case for mentoring. Teaching and change, 6, 251–257.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., 1997. Doing what matters most: Investigating quality teaching. National commission on teaching and America’s future. Available from: http://www.nctaf.org
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., and Sykes, G., 2003. Wanted: A national teacher supply policy for education: The right way to meet the “highly qualified teacher” challenge. Education policy analysis archives, 11(33). Available from: http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v11n33/
   Google Scholar
• Davis, B. and Higdon, K., 2008. The effects of mentoring/induction support in beginning teachers’ practices in early elementary classrooms (K-3). Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 22 (3), 261–274. doi:10.1080/02568540809594626.
   Google Scholar
• Fideler, E.F. and Haselkorn, D., 1999. Learning the ropes: urban teacher induction programs and practices in the United States. Belmont, MA: Recruiting New Teachers.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, S.H. and Strong, M.A., 2009. Full-release and site-based mentoring of new elementary grade teachers: An analysis of changes in student achievement. The New Educator, 5, 329–341. doi:10.1080/1547688X.2009.10399583.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, S.H., Strong, M.A. and Villar, A., 2008. An investigation of the effects of variations in mentor-based induction on the performance of students in California. Teachers college record, 110 (10), 2271–2289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasford, L.A. and Salintri, L., 2007. Designing a successful new teacher induction program: an assessment of the Ontario experience 2003-2006. Canadian journal of educational administration and policy, 60, 1–34.
   Google Scholar
• Grudnoff, L., 2012. All’s well? New Zealand beginning teachers’ experience of induction provision in their first six months in school. Professional Development in Education, 38 (3), 471–485. doi:10.1080/19415257.2011.636894.
   Google Scholar
• Hallam, P.R., et al., 2012. Two contrasting models for mentoring as they affect retention of beginning teachers. NASSP Bulletin, 96 (3), 243–278. doi:10.1177/0192636512447132.
   Google Scholar
• Henke, R.R., et al., 2000. Progress through the teacher pipeline: 1992–93 college graduates and elementary/secondary school teaching as of 1997 (NCES 2000–152). Washington, DC: US Department of Education, National Centre for Educational Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Hobson, A.J., et al., 2009. Mentoring beginning teachers: What we know and what we don’t. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 207–216.10.1016/j.tate.2008.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, S., Beutel, D. and Hudson, P., 2009. Teacher induction in Australia: A sample of what’s really happening. Research in comparative and international education, 4 (1), 53–62. doi:10.2304/rcie.2009.4.1.53.
   Google Scholar
• Ingersoll, R., and Kralik, J.M., 2004. The impact of mentoring on teacher retention: what the research says. Available from: http://www.ecs.org/clearinghouse/50/36/5036.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Kearney, S., 2014. Understanding beginning teacher induction: A contextualised examination of best practice. Cogent education, 1, 2–15. doi:10.1080/233186X.2014.967477.
   Google Scholar
• Kemmis , S., et al., 2014. Mentoring of new teachers as a contested practice: Supervision, support and collaborative development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 43, 154–164. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2014.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Killeavy, M., 2006. Induction: A collective endeavour of learning, teaching and leading. Theory Into Practice, 45 (2), 168–176.10.1207/s15430421tip4502_9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, J.S., et al., 2012. Literature review on induction and mentoring related to early career teacher attrition and retention. Mentoring & tutoring: Partnership in learning, 20 (1), 7–26.
   Google Scholar
• Ministerial Council on Education, Employment and Training and Youth Affairs, 2008. Melbourne declaration on educational goals for young Australians. Available from: http://agppa.asn.au/images/papers/National_Declaration_on_the_Educational_Goals_for_Young_Australians%202008.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Moir, E., 2003, July. Launching the next generation of teachers through quality induction. Paper presented at the NCTAF State Partners Symposium, Santa Cruz, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Moon, B., 2007. Research analysis: Attracting, developing and retaining effective teachers – a global overview of current policies and practices. Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Moyles, J., Suschitsky, W. and Chapman, L., 1999. Mentoring in primary schools: Ethos, structures and workloads. Journal of In-Service Education, 25 (1), 161–172. doi:10.1080/13674589900200067.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, D.C., Barry, A.L. and Addison, A.B., 2006. A model of a new-teacher induction program and teacher perception of beneficial components. Action in teacher education, 28 (4), 14–24.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2005. Teachers matter: Attracting, developing, and retaining effective teachers. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Plunkett M., and Dyson M., 2011. Becoming a teacher and staying one: Examining the complex ecologies associated with educating and retraining new teachers in rural Australia. Australian journal of teacher education 36(1), 32–47.
   Google Scholar
• Riley, P., and Gallant, A., 2010. Leaving narratives: Teachers tell us why they leave the profession early. Paper presented at the AARE conference 2010: Making a difference – Celebrating 40 years of Educational Research, Melbourne, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Roehrig, A.D., et al., 2008. Mentoring beginning primary teachers for exemplary teaching practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 684–702. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2007.02.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, T.M., and Ingersoll, R.M., 2004. What are the effects of induction and mentoring on beginning teacher turnover? American Educational Research Journal, 41 (3), 681–714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanulis, R.N., Little, S. and Wibbens, E., 2012. Intensive mentoring that contributes to change in beginning elementary teachers’ learning to lead classroom discussions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 32–43. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2011.08.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The International Summit on the Teaching Profession. 2013. Teacher quality: the 2013 international summit on the teaching profession. Available from: http://asiasociety.org/files/teachingsummit2013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J. and Odell, S.J., 2002. Mentored learning to teaching according to standards-based reform: A critical review. Review of education research, 72, 481–546.10.3102/00346543072003481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, H., Britton, T. and Ganser, T., 2005. What the world can teach us about new teacher induction. Phi Delta Kappan, 86 (5), 379–384.10.1177/003172170508600509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yusko, B. and Feiman-Nemser, S., 2008. Embracing contraries: Combining assistance and assessment in new teacher induction. Teachers college record, 110 (5), 923–953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar