Educational infrastructure, professional learning, and changes in teachers’ instructional practices and beliefs

References

• Ball, D.L., 1990. The mathematical understandings that prospective teachers bring to teacher education. The elementary school journal, 90 (4), 449–466.10.1086/461626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, D.L., 1993. With an eye on the mathematical horizon: dilemmas of teaching elementary school mathematics. The elementary school journal, 93 (4), 373–397.10.1086/461730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrera Pedemonte, F., 2016. Teacher professional development: a cross-national analysis of quality features associated with teaching practices and student achievement. Thesis (PhD). University College London, Institute of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Bryk, A.S., Camburn, E.M., and Louis, K.S., 1999. Professional community in chicago elementary schools: facilitating factors and organizational consequences. Educational administration quarterly, 35 (5), 751–781.10.1177/0013161X99355004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchmann, M., 1984. The priority of knowledge and understanding in teaching. Vol. 1. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Buchmann, M., 1987. Teaching knowledge: the lights that teachers live by. Oxford review of education, 13 (2), 151–164.10.1080/0305498870130203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchmann, M. and Schwille, J., 1983. Education: the overcoming of experience. American journal of education, 92 (1), 30–51.10.1086/443721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capraro, M.M., 2001. Construct validation and a more parsimonious mathematics beliefs scales. Little Rock, AR: Mid-South Educational Research Association (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 464 088).
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, T.P., et al., 1999. Children’s mathematics: cognitively guided instruction. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Choy, S.P., Chen, X., and Bugarin, R., 2006. Teacher professional development in 1999–2000: what teachers, principals, and district staff report. Washington, DC: US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, C.M. and Peterson, P.L., 1986. Teachers’ thought processes. In: M.C. Wittrock, ed. Handbook of research on teaching. 3rd ed. New York: Macmillan, 255–296.
   Google Scholar
• Coburn, C.E., et al., 2012. Supporting sustainability: teachers’ advice networks and ambitious instructional reform. American journal of education, 119 (1), 137–182.10.1086/667699
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, D.K. and Barnes, C.A., 1993. Pedagogy and policy. In: D.K. Cohen, M.W. McLaughlin, and J.E. Talbert, eds. Teaching for understanding: challenges for policy and practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, D.K. and Hill, H.C., 2001. Learning policy: when state education reform works. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.10.12987/yale/9780300089479.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, D.K. and Moffitt, S.L., 2009. The ordeal of equality: did federal regulation fix the schools? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.12698/cpre.2009.OrdealofEqualityBk
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, D.K., et al., 2014. Improvement by design: the promise of better schools. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, D.K. and Spillane, J.P., 1992. Policy and practice: the relations between governance and instruction. Review of research in education, 18 (3), 3–49.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., 2000. Teacher quality and student achievement: a review of state policy evidence. Education policy analysis archives, 8 (1), 1–44.
   Google Scholar
• Desimone, L.M., et al., 2002. Effects of professional development on teachers’ instruction: results from a three-year longitudinal study. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 24 (2), 81–112.10.3102/01623737024002081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fennema, E., et al., 1996. A longitudinal study of learning to use children's thinking in mathematics instruction. Journal for research in mathematics education, 27 (4), 403–434.10.2307/749875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fennema, E., et al., 1993. Using children’s mathematical knowledge in instruction. American educational research journal, 30 (3), 555–583.10.3102/00028312030003555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firestone, W.A., Fitz, J., and Broadfoot, P., 1999. Power, learning, and legitimation: assessment implementation across levels in the United States and United Kingdom. American educational research journal, 36 (4), 759–793.10.3102/00028312036004759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floden, R.E., 1985. The role of rhetoric in changing teachers’ beliefs. Teaching and teacher education, 1 (1), 19–32.10.1016/0742-051X(85)90027-7
   Google Scholar
• Franke, M.L., et al., 2001. Capturing teachers’ generative change: a follow-up study of professional development in mathematics. American educational research journal, 38 (3), 653–689.10.3102/00028312038003653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, K.A., Zhao, Y. and Borman, K., 2004. Social capital and the diffusion of innovations within organizations: the case of computer technology in schools. Sociology of education, 77 (2), 148–171.10.1177/003804070407700203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, K.A., et al., 2011. Focus, fiddle, and friends: experiences that transform knowledge for the implementations of innovations. Sociology of education, 84 (2), 137–156. doi:10.1177/0038040711401812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garet, M.S., et al., 2001. What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American educational research journal, 38 (4), 915–945.10.3102/00028312038004915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, P.L. and Stodolsky, S.S., 1995. Content as context: The role of school subjects in secondary school teaching. Educational researcher, 24 (8), 5–23.10.3102/0013189X024008005
   Google Scholar
• Hart, L.C., 2002. Preservice teachers' beliefs and practice after participating in an integrated content/methods course. School science and mathematics, 102 (1), 4–14.10.1111/ssm.2002.102.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Heck, D., et al., 2008. Studying the effects of professional development: the case of the NSF’s local systemic change through teacher enhancement initiative. Journal for research in mathematics education, 39 (2), 113–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, H.C., 2007. Learning in the teaching workforce. The future of children, 17 (1), 111–127.10.1353/foc.2007.0004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins, M., Ozimek, D., and Sweet, T.M., 2016. Mathematics coaching and instructional reform: individual and collective change. Journal of mathematical behavior, 46, 215–230.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins, M. and Spillane, J.P., 2015. Conceptualizing relations between instructional guidance infrastructure (IGI) and teachers’ beliefs about mathematics instruction: regulative, normative, and cultural-cognitive considerations. Journal of educational change, 16 (4), 421–450. doi:10.1007/s10833-015-9257-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins, M., et al., 2013. Infrastructure redesign and instructional reform in mathematics: formal structure and teacher leadership. Elementary school journal, 114 (2), 200–224.10.1086/671935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, W.M. and Dexter, S., 2014. How teachers learn: the roles of formal, informal and independent learning. Education technology and research development, 62 (3), 367–384.10.1007/s11423-014-9337-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampert, M., 1992. Practices and problems in teaching authentic mathematics. In: F. Oser, A. Dick, and J.L. Patry, eds. Effective and responsible teaching: the new synthesis San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 295–314.
   Google Scholar
• Little, J.W., 1993. Teachers’ professional development in a climate of educational reform. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 15 (2), 129–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lortie, D.C., 1975. Schoolteacher. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Louis, K.S., Marks, H.M., and Kruse, S.D., 1996. Teachers’ professional community in restructuring schools. American educational research journal, 33 (4), 757–798.10.3102/00028312033004757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, L., 2010. Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Macnab, D.S., 2000. Forces for change in mathematics education: the case of TIMSS. Education policy analysis archives, 8 (15), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Malcolm, J., Hodkinson, P., and Colley, H., 2003. The interrelationships between informal and formal learning. Journal of workplace learning, 15 (7/8), 313–318.10.1108/13665620310504783
   Google Scholar
• McCutchen, D., et al., 2002. Beginning literacy: links among teacher knowledge, teacher practice, and student learning. Journal of learning disabilities, 35 (1), 69–86.10.1177/002221940203500106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, M.W. and Talbert, J.E., 2001. Professional communities and the work of high school teaching. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mulhern, F. and Rae, G., 1998. Development of a shortened form of the Fennema-Sherman mathematics attitudes scales. Educational and psychological measurement, 58 (2), 295–306.10.1177/0013164498058002012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics, 2007. TIMSS 2007. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM), 2014. Principles to actions: ensuring mathematical success for all. Reston, VA: NCTM.
   Google Scholar
• OECD, 2014. TALIS 2013 results: an international perspective on teaching and learning. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Parise, L.M. and Spillane, J.P., 2010. Teacher learning and instructional change: how formal and on-the-job learning opportunities predict changes in elementary school teachers’ instructional practice. Elementary school journal, 110 (3), 323–346.10.1086/648981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penuel, W.R., et al., 2012. Using social network analysis to study how collegial interactions can augment teacher learning from external professional development. American journal of education, 119 (1), 103–136.10.1086/667756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penuel, W.R., et al., 2013. The organization as a filter of institutional diffusion. Teachers college record, 115 (1), 1–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, P.L., et al., 1989. Teachers’ pedagogical content beliefs in mathematics. Cognition and instruction, 6 (1), 1–40.10.1207/s1532690xci0601_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peurach, D., 2011. Seeing complexity in public education: problems, possibilities, and success for all. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199736539.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Philipp, R.A., 2007. Mathematics teachers’ beliefs and affect. In: F.K. Lester, ed. Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 257–315.
   Google Scholar
• Polly, D., et al., 2013. The association between teachers’ beliefs, enacted practices, and student learning in mathematics. Mathematics educator, 22 (2), 11–30.
   Google Scholar
• Romberg, T. A., 1984. School mathematics: options for the 1990s. Vol. 3. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R.T. and Borko, H., 2000. What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29 (1), 4–15.
   Google Scholar
• Saxe, G.B., Gearhart, M., and Nasir, N.I.S., 2001. Enhancing students’ understanding of mathematics: a study of three contrasting approaches to professional support. Journal of mathematics teacher education, 4 (1), 55–79.10.1023/A:1009935100676
   Google Scholar
• Schifter, D. and Fosnot, C.T., 1993. Reconstructing mathematics education: stories of teachers meeting the challenge of reform. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A.H., 1992. Learning to think mathematically: problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics. In: D. Grouws, ed. Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. New York: Macmillan, 850–873.
   Google Scholar
• Sherin, M.G. and Han, S.Y., 2004. Teacher learning in the context of a video club. Teaching and teacher education, 20, 163–183.10.1016/j.tate.2003.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spillane, J.P., 2002. Local theories of teacher change: the pedagogy of district policies and programs. Teachers college record, 104 (3), 377–420.10.1111/tcre.2002.104.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spillane, J.P., 2006. Distributed leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P., Hopkins, M., and Sweet, T., 2017. School district educational infrastructure and change at scale: teacher peer interactions and their beliefs about mathematics instruction. American educational research journal. Advance online publication.
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J.P., Shirrell, M., and Hopkins, M., 2016. Designing and deploying a professional learning community (PLC) organizational routine: bureaucratic and collegial arrangements in tandem. Les dossiers des sciences de l’éducation, 35, 97–122.10.4000/dse
   Google Scholar
• Stein, M.K. and Coburn, C.E., 2008. Architectures for learning: a comparative analysis of two urban school districts. American journal of education, 114 (4), 583–626.10.1086/589315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stipek, D.J., et al., 2001. Teachers’ beliefs and practices related to mathematics instruction. Teaching and teacher education, 17, 213–226.10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00052-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stigler, J.W. and Hiebert, J., 1999. The teaching gap. New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, M., Loeb, S., and Grissom, J., 2015. Building teacher teams: evidence of positive spillovers from more effective colleagues (CEPA Working Paper no. 15–20). Stanford center for policy analysis. Available from: http://cepa.stanford.edu/wp15-20
   Google Scholar
• Sun, M., et al., 2013. Shaping professional development to promote the diffusion of instructional expertise Among teachers. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 35 (3), 344–369.10.3102/0162373713482763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, M., et al., 2014. Exploring colleagues’ professional influence on mathematics teachers’ learning. Teachers college record, 116 (6), 1–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, A.G., 1992. Teachers’ beliefs and conceptions: a synthesis of the research. In: D. Grouws, ed. Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. New York: Macmillan, 127–146.
   Google Scholar
• van Es, E.A. and Sherin, M.G., 2008. Mathematics teachers’ learning to notice in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 244–276.10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, S.R. and Baxter, J.A., 1996. Dilemmas of discourse-oriented teaching in one middle school mathematics classroom. The elementary school journal, 97 (1), 21–38.10.1086/461847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, S.M., 1990. A conflict of interests: the case of Mark Black. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 12 (3), 309–326.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, M.S. and Cooney, T., 2002. Mathematics teacher change and development: the role of beliefs. In: G. Leder, E. Pehkonen, and G. Törner, eds. Beliefs: a hidden variable in mathematics education. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 127–148.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, S.M., et al., 1996. Learning by all. Phi delta kappan, 77 (7), 468–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiseman, A.W., 2013. Policy responses to PISA in comparative perspective. In: H. Meyer and A. Benavot, eds. PISA, power, and policy: the emergence of global educational governance. Oxford: Symposium Books, 303–322.
   Google Scholar