Coaching in education: a professional development process in formation

References

• Ball, S.J., 2003. The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of education policy, 18 (2), 215–228. doi:10.1080/0268093022000043065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A., 1997. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, G., et al., 2005. Blended coaching: skills and strategies to support principal development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. and van Nieuwerburgh, C., 2017. The leader’s guide to coaching in schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clutterbuck, D., 2001. Everyone needs a mentor. London: Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Donohoo, J., 2017. Collective efficacy: how educators’ beliefs impact student learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dudley, P., 2015. Lesson study: professional learning for our time. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Feasey, S. 2017. Community capacity building coaching, CollectivED, (1) 43–45, Carnegie School of Education, Leeds Beckett University
   Google Scholar
• Flanagan, J., Wigley, B., and Lofthouse, R., 2017. Developing the use of communication rich pedagogies in classrooms using video enhanced reflective practice informed methodologies as a vehicle for teacher and speech and language therapist continuing professional development. Attuned interactions (3). https://attunedinteractions.wordpress.com/2017/04/19/developing-theuse-of-communication-rich-pedagogies-in-classrooms-using-videoenhanced-reflective-practice-informed-methodologies-as-a-vehiclefor-teacher-and-speech-and-language-therapist-continuing/
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A. and O’Connor, M., 2018a. Collaborative professionalism: when teaching together means learning for all. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A. and O’Connor, M., 2018b. Solidarity with solidity: the case for collaborative professionalism. Phi Delta Kappan, 100 (1), 20–24. doi:10.1177/0031721718797116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joyce, B. and Showers, B., 1988. Student achievement through staff development. New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S., et al. (2014) Ecologies of Practices. In: Changing practices, changing education. Springer, Singapore
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, A., 2014. Understanding continuing professional development: the need for theory to impact on policy and practice. Professional development in education, 40 (5), 688–697. doi:10.1080/19415257.2014.955122
   Google Scholar
• Kline, N., 2009. More time to think. Burley-in-Wharfedale: Fisher King.
   Google Scholar
• Lofthouse, R., et al., 2017. Lesson study: an opportunity for collaborative teacher inquiry. In: Teachers and teacher educators learning through inquiry: international perspectives. Kielce, Poland: The Jan Kochanowski University.
   Google Scholar
• Lofthouse, R. 2018. Long live metacognition, lessons learned from a life in the field, CollectivED, (4) 70–76, Carnegie School of Education, Leeds Beckett University
   Google Scholar
• Lofthouse, R., Flanagan, J., and Wigley, B., 2018. Talking it through: using specialist coaching to enhance teachers’ knowledge from speech and language sciences. Impact: journal of the chartered college of teaching, 2, 85–88.
   Google Scholar
• Lofthouse, R. and Leat, D., 2013. An activity theory perspective on peer coaching. International journal of mentoring and coaching in education, 2 (1), 8–20. doi:10.1108/20466851311323050
   Google Scholar
• Lofthouse, R., Leat, D., and Towler, C., 2010. Improving teacher coaching in schools; a practical guide. CfBT Education Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Lofthouse, R. and Thomas, U., 2017. Concerning collaboration; teachers’ perspectives on working in partnerships to develop teaching practices. Professional development in education, 43 (1), 36–56. doi:10.1080/19415257.2015.1053570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, D.L., 2012. Focus groups and social interaction. In: J.F. Gubriem, et al., eds. The sage handbook of interview research: the complexity of the craft. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 161–176.
   Google Scholar
• Moyles, J., Adams, S., and Musgrove, A., 2002. Using reflective dialogues as a tool for engaging with challenges of defining effective pedagogy. Early child development and care, 172 (5), 463–478. doi:10.1080/03004430214551
   Google Scholar
• Mycroft, L. and Sidebottom, K. 2017. Using thinking environments for emancipatory coaching practice. CollectivED, (1) 19–21, Carnegie School of Education, Leeds Beckett University
   Google Scholar
• Nind, M. and Vinha, H., 2016. Creating interactions with data. Using visual and metaphorical devices in repeated focus groups. Qualitative research, 16 (1), 9–26. doi:10.1177/1468794114557993
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priestley, M., Biesta, G., and Robinson, S., 2015. Teacher agency; an ecological approach. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Simkin, T., et al., 2006. Coaching as an in-school leadership development strategy: experiences from leading from the middle. Journal of in-service education, 32 (3), 321–340. doi:10.1080/13674580600841901
   Google Scholar
• Tschannen-Moran, B. and Tschannen-Moran, M., 2010. Evocative coaching. 1st ed. San Francisco: Juliessey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Veenman, S. and Denessen, E., 2001. The coaching of teachers: results of five training studies. Educational research and evaluation, 7 (4), 385–417. doi:10.1076/edre.7.4.385.8936
   Google Scholar
• Whiteside, R. 2017. Is coaching for transformation possible in a culture of performativity? CollectivED, (1) 5–9, Carnegie School of Education, Leeds Beckett University
   Google Scholar
• Whitmore, J., 2002. Coaching for performance: growing people, performance and purpose. London: Nicholas Brealey.
   Google Scholar